[George M. Middius[_4_]]

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 3, 7:54*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

Waterboarding is a form of torture that consists of immobilizing the
victim on his or her back with the head inclined downwards, and then
pouring water over the face and into the breathing passages. By forced
suffocation and inhalation of water, the subject experiences the
sensation of drowning and is caused to believe they are about to die.
[1] It is considered a form of torture by legal experts,[2][3]
politicians, war veterans,[4][5] medical experts in the treatment of
torture victims,[6][7] intelligence officials,[8] military judges,[9]
and human rights organizations.[10][11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding

Clyde just has a 'differing POV'. I'm sure it's an equally valid one
and ****.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

Waterboarding is a form of torture that consists of immobilizing the
victim on his or her back with the head inclined downwards, and then
pouring water over the face and into the breathing passages. By forced
suffocation and inhalation of water, the subject experiences the
sensation of drowning and is caused to believe they are about to die.
[1] It is considered a form of torture by legal experts,[2][3]
politicians, war veterans,[4][5] medical experts in the treatment of
torture victims,[6][7] intelligence officials,[8] military judges,[9]
and human rights organizations.[10][11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding

Clyde just has a 'differing POV'. I'm sure it's an equally valid one
and ****.

OK, follow-up question: Which one of the RAO dunces (Sacky or Scottie) is
the Black Knight in "Holy Grail", and which is Elmer Fudd?

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 3, 8:24*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
Shhhh! said:





In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

Waterboarding is a form of torture that consists of immobilizing the
victim on his or her back with the head inclined downwards, and then
pouring water over the face and into the breathing passages. By forced
suffocation and inhalation of water, the subject experiences the
sensation of drowning and is caused to believe they are about to die.
[1] It is considered a form of torture by legal experts,[2][3]
politicians, war veterans,[4][5] medical experts in the treatment of
torture victims,[6][7] intelligence officials,[8] military judges,[9]
and human rights organizations.[10][11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterboarding

Clyde just has a 'differing POV'. I'm sure it's an equally valid one
and ****.

OK, follow-up question: Which one of the RAO dunces (Sacky or Scottie) is
the Black Knight in "Holy Grail", and which is Elmer Fudd?

Is this a trick question?

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

Clyde just has a 'differing POV'. I'm sure it's an equally valid one
and ****.

OK, follow-up question: Which one of the RAO dunces (Sacky or Scottie) is
the Black Knight in "Holy Grail", and which is Elmer Fudd?

Is this a trick question?

Nope.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 3, 9:28*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
Shhhh! said:

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?
Clyde just has a 'differing POV'. I'm sure it's an equally valid one
and ****.
OK, follow-up question: Which one of the RAO dunces (Sacky or Scottie) is
the Black Knight in "Holy Grail", and which is Elmer Fudd?
Is this a trick question?

Nope.

Well, 2pid seems to 'think' "it's just a flesh wound" when heis
argument's been gored, which would leave...

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 3, 8:54*pm, George M. Middius wrote:
In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

If it isn't, it comes closer than AC/DC 24/7
if it is, its not nearly in the same category as pulling out
fingernails.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

What's that rattling sound?

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?

If it isn't, it comes closer than AC/DC 24/7
if it is, its not nearly in the same category as pulling out
fingernails.

From now on, we can eschew the "if" from all queries about your character
and intelligence. The appraisal of nil on both counts is manifest and
obvious.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 3, 11:57*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
What's that rattling sound?

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?
If it isn't, it comes closer than AC/DC 24/7
if it is, its not nearly in the same category as pulling out
fingernails.

From now on, we can eschew the "if" from all queries about your character
and intelligence. The appraisal of nil on both counts is manifest and
obvious.

"if" you say so.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Clyde Slick said:

What's that rattling sound?

In all seriousness, do you actually believe that waterboarding is not
torture?
If it isn't, it comes closer than AC/DC 24/7
if it is, its not nearly in the same category as pulling out
fingernails.

From now on, we can eschew the "if" from all queries about your character
and intelligence. The appraisal of nil on both counts is manifest and
obvious.

"if" you say so.

If you're not too drunk, see if you can recall Obama's asseveration that
his nominee for the Supreme Court should have empathy. What does that
mean to you?

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 4, 1:30*am, George M. Middius wrote:


If you're not too drunk, see if you can recall Obama's asseveration that
his nominee for the Supreme Court should have empathy. What does that
mean to you?

that we should stop appointing lawyers and start appointing social
workers

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 4, 12:33*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:30*am, George M. Middius wrote:

If you're not too drunk, see if you can recall Obama's asseveration that
his nominee for the Supreme Court should have empathy. What does that
mean to you?

that we should stop appointing lawyers and start appointing social
workers

And there you have it.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Shhhh! said:

If you're not too drunk, see if you can recall Obama's asseveration that
his nominee for the Supreme Court should have empathy. What does that
mean to you?

that we should stop appointing lawyers and start appointing social
workers

And there you have it.

No, I don't. But neither does Sacky.

[MiNe 109]

In article
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote:

On Jul 4, 12:33*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 4, 1:30*am, George M. Middius wrote:

If you're not too drunk, see if you can recall Obama's asseveration that
his nominee for the Supreme Court should have empathy. What does that
mean to you?

that we should stop appointing lawyers and start appointing social
workers

And there you have it.

And to think Sotomayor was criticized for following the law in the Ricci
case instead of having enough empathy for those unfortunate white
firefighters.

Stephen