[George M. Middius[_4_]]

I'm referring to the horrific, family-destroying hijinks of South
Carolina's Gov. Sanford (a Republican). He lied to his family, he lied to
the press, and he lied to the electorate of his state. He tried to close
the door on his sexual shenanigans the same way the monstrous atheist
Elliott Spitzer did in New York. By slinking off on the sly to a faraway
tryst, Sanford showed exactly how much esteem he holds for the
"institution of marriage". The web of lies he wove to conceal his
immorality shocks the conscience.

Of course, every "conservative" knows this kind of sexual escapade is a
minor peccadillo compared to the cataclysmic destruction of holy matrimony
wrought by the satanic Pres. Clinton. He forced a naive young women to
fellate him. By this act the heinous Clinton degraded all women and set
back their march to equality by at least 3 years. (Maybe even longer than
3 years; scientists are still studying the long-term effects of the Oval
Office BJ.) That is why Clinton needed to be impeached, but Sanford just
needs some moral rehabilitation.

I'm sure Clydemeister Sacky will be able to explain to Witless's
satisfaction why Sanford's betrayal of his family is not "immoral" even
though Barney Frank's association with a pimp was "immoral". Our
"conservative" contingent is quite resourceful when it comes to the
pliability of common words.




--
"There are words and there are definitions.
Sometimes the definition of a word changes with context"
-- Scottie Witlessmongrel, RAO, June 24, 2009

[Clyde Slick]

On Jun 24, 4:16*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:


I'm sure Clydemeister Sacky will be able to explain to Witless's
satisfaction why Sanford's betrayal of his family is not "immoral" even
though Barney Frank's association with a pimp was "immoral".

IN both cases, what is immoral is the breach of trust with their
constituents. Both examples raise security concerns, by at some point
exposing
the politicians to extortion (at least until the behavior became
public).
Both were a breach of the public trust. Who wants a governor who
disappears
unnanounced for six days, his staff doesn't know where he is and when
he will be back, and
not even the LT Gov was in the loop. ANd you would think the FBI'
knew all about it, I mean, they would investigate the unannounced
absence as a potential crime, and check airline records.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Frogs are dumb. A bug flies by, and out goes the tongue.

I'm sure Clydemeister Sacky will be able to explain to Witless's
satisfaction why Sanford's betrayal of his family is not "immoral" even
though Barney Frank's association with a pimp was "immoral".

IN both cases, what is immoral is the breach of trust with their

Sorry, I thought you'd realize my challenge was rhetorical. Your
cockamamie rationalizations are not needed because. By virtue of your
demented ranting about Rep. Frank, you permanently disqualified yourself
from talking about morality. Or at least being taken seriously.

[vinyl anachronist]

What's most alarming is the sheer stupidity factor. I don't mind that
the guy is having an affair (after all, every Argentinian woman I've
ever met embodied most of the qualities that heterosexual men find
highly distracting), it's the fact that he didn't think a governor
would cause a ****storm by disappearing for a few days.

These are clearly not leadership qualities. And this was one of the
guys the Republicans were grooming for 2012? Between this and Palin's
woes, this Republicans probably won't have a viable candidate for the
next three general elections.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Frogs are dumb. A bug flies by, and out goes the tongue.

I'm sure Clydemeister Sacky will be able to explain to Witless's
satisfaction why Sanford's betrayal of his family is not "immoral" even
though Barney Frank's association with a pimp was "immoral".

IN both cases, what is immoral is the breach of trust with their

Sorry, I thought you'd realize my challenge was rhetorical. Your
cockamamie rationalizations are not needed. By virtue of your demented
ranting about Rep. Frank, you permanently disqualified yourself from
talking about morality. Or at least being taken seriously.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

Between this and Palin's woes, this Republicans probably won't have
a viable candidate for the next three general elections.

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste. Scottie sez
you're a traitorous traitor.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jun 24, 3:12�pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
vinyl anachronist said:

Between this and Palin's woes, this Republicans probably won't have
a viable candidate for the next three general elections.

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste. Scottie sez
you're a traitorous traitor.

Using his rationale, every person who has ever held up a protest sign
should be sentenced to death for sedition. What a distinctly un-
American viewpoint he possesses.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jun 24, 3:12�pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
vinyl anachronist said:

Between this and Palin's woes, this Republicans probably won't have
a viable candidate for the next three general elections.

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste.

Oh, and I'm also disappointed that Letterman didn't flip Palin the
bird on network TV. Her star is falling fast. She probably won't even
be re-elected as governor at this point.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

Between this and Palin's woes, this Republicans probably won't have
a viable candidate for the next three general elections.

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste. Scottie sez
you're a traitorous traitor.

Using his rationale, every person who has ever held up a protest sign
should be sentenced to death for sedition. What a distinctly un-
American viewpoint he possesses.

Scottie would vote for an ayatollah if we had any.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste.

Oh, and I'm also disappointed that Letterman didn't flip Palin the
bird on network TV. Her star is falling fast. She probably won't even
be re-elected as governor at this point.

He did invite her to his show. I'm hoping he's ready with an ambush like
the one he sprung on Paris Hilton.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jun 24, 3:24�pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
vinyl anachronist said:

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste.

Oh, and I'm also disappointed that Letterman didn't flip Palin the
bird on network TV. Her star is falling fast. She probably won't even
be re-elected as governor at this point.

He did invite her to his show. I'm hoping he's ready with an ambush like
the one he sprung on Paris Hilton.

The Queen of Alaska said no and tried to paint Dave as a pedophile
during her scripted refusal. And some people thought she was a serious
candidate.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste.

Oh, and I'm also disappointed that Letterman didn't flip Palin the
bird on network TV. Her star is falling fast. She probably won't even
be re-elected as governor at this point.

He did invite her to his show. I'm hoping he's ready with an ambush like
the one he sprung on Paris Hilton.

The Queen of Alaska said no and tried to paint Dave as a pedophile
during her scripted refusal. And some people thought she was a serious
candidate.

Palin definitely learned to "stay on message", even to the point of
"living the dream" anytime she's in front of a camera.

[vinyl anachronist]

On Jun 24, 5:15�pm, George M. Middius
wrote:
vinyl anachronist said:

So you admit you thought Letterman's "joke" was in good taste.

Oh, and I'm also disappointed that Letterman didn't flip Palin the
bird on network TV. Her star is falling fast. She probably won't even
be re-elected as governor at this point.

He did invite her to his show. I'm hoping he's ready with an ambush like
the one he sprung on Paris Hilton.

The Queen of Alaska said no and tried to paint Dave as a pedophile
during her scripted refusal. And some people thought she was a serious
candidate.

Palin definitely learned to "stay on message", even to the point of
"living the dream" anytime she's in front of a camera.

Staying on message? That certainly doesn't sound mavericky to me.

[George M. Middius[_4_]]

vinyl anachronist said:

He did invite her to his show. I'm hoping he's ready with an ambush like
the one he sprung on Paris Hilton.

The Queen of Alaska said no and tried to paint Dave as a pedophile
during her scripted refusal. And some people thought she was a serious
candidate.

Palin definitely learned to "stay on message", even to the point of
"living the dream" anytime she's in front of a camera.

Staying on message? That certainly doesn't sound mavericky to me.

Dang! Another bubble is burst.