[Jenn[_2_]]

ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 4, 12:32 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,





ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 3, 11:59 pm, Jenn wrote:
In article
,

ScottW2 wrote:
On Mar 3, 4:20 pm, Jenn
wrote:
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:

On Mar 3, 6:10 pm, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:
"Jenn" wrote in message


et..
.

In article

,
ScottW2 wrote:

On Mar 2, 6:37 pm, Jenn
wrote:
In article
.
com
,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

On Mar 2, 7:03 pm, MiNe 109

wrote:
In article

ups.
com,
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:

On Mar 2, 2:21 pm, "Arny Krueger"

wrote:
"MiNe 109"
wrote in
message

...

Some time back, I heard a conversation
about organ
building
and
the
difficulties of designing a mechanical
action. An
engineer
type
helpfully pointed out that you could
substitute a
pneumatic
or
electric
system and solve all the problems.

Apparently the whole lot of you had no clue
about the
fact that
both
alternative methods have been implemented
for over 100
years.
FWIW,
the
Moeller at church uses an electric system.

LOL! Right on schedule.

Um, GOIA, I think this proves your
insanity...again. ;-)

Lord. Despite the inadvertent troll, I still
advocate
shunning, but
he
does make such a large target sometimes.

Shoot at the very large drone with the "JACKASS"
markings on
either
side.

shaking my head at yet another innocent thread
hijacked

Hijacked? Arny comments and shhtard hands him the
keys
with glee at the joyride coming.

ScottW

Yes, I would call Arny's "comments" hijacking.

snip GOIA's insane ramblings

Let him rant. It probably makes him feel like a big man to
troll.

Still can't just ignore him. How childish.
I'll talk about you but I won't talk to you. LoL.
Grow up and face reality.

ScottW

Yep, it's really hard to ignore him, just as it is hard for you
to
ignore Shhhh and George.

Nothing hard about that. I do it whenever I feel like it.

lol For how long have you ignored them when you're actually here?

I ignore more than 50% of ssshtards and Middiots posts.

How many do you ignore where you are the target? About the same as I do
in Arny's case, it seems to me.

Are you suggesting even a higher percentage are not worthy of
a response? You may be right.

I'm suggesting that you should follow your own advice if you wish to
have any credibility.



I have this "thing" about someone calling me a
"bigot".

Nothing like advertising your buttons if you want to
get them pushed.

What normal person doesn't have an aversion to being called a bigot?

Exactly. So you're not "special".

Who said that I am?

Why take it so personal and act like it means anything to anyone?

Again, check the mirror.





But in fact, I made a comment about yet another on-topic
thread being hijacked. I didn't mention Arny until YOU did.

I'm not compelled to act according to your weakness.
I've no problem ignoring Arny when necessary.
Reality is...Arny's little snipes would be trivial if it wasn't
the
voluminous replies by the ridiculers. You've implied this
yourself
when you say he is best ignored. You just fail to practice what
you
preach.

lol That's fine, Scott. Clearly you see yourself as the cop here.


I'm not sure you see anything clearly, especially your own hypocrisy.

Of course you're not.


Enjoy your role. Meanwhile, yes, as I clearly admitted, it's hard
to
ignore someone who makes it his business to annoy and lie about you.

Join the club.

So you see my point.


Shhtard, Middiot, Atkinson, Stephen and even you
occasionally have intentionally distorted my position.

I don't recall ever doing that. Perhap you could provide an example.



The best I can do right now is not post to him here.

But you just have to talk about him. I see little difference except
volume.
You're still making it about Arny which in reality should be the last
thing you want to do.

ScottW

I have a difficult time letting him lie about me, true.