Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I bring this post over from elsewhere to a more learned forum. . It seems that Mr Krueger, despite his claim to be a "professional recording engineer" has no formal education in either recording or music, neither does he own, or have access to, the training manuals with which recording personnel are familiar. It seems that Wiki and "Goggle" (sic) are the sources of the technical foundation on which his sound recording expertise is based:-) Hmmm:-) Please read on...... "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Iain Churches" wrote in message i.fi "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Iain Churches" wrote in message i.fi "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... Differentiate foldback and monitor? In your dreams, Iain: Iain snipped a Wikipedia article that shows him up for the ignorant bozo that he is Any fool can write on Wiki. There are frequently blatant errors. A proper set or BBC or EBU training manuals is a much more reliable source of accurate and complete information. Study the EBU training manuals. Which of the several thousand EBU documents do you mean? You know, they do have unique names. LOL! Find them. There is a complete set dedicated to broadcast procedures and terminology. At the same time, look up "recordist" and "condenser" :-))) IOW Iain, you were just throwing the good name of the EBU about. You have no clue. I have most of their relevant material, including sound for television. My work illustrates my level of competence, and what I have leaned (been taught) from the material covered in those and other manuals,and from the challenges presented by each and every session. But then of course, so does yours :-) LOL I also have some of the incomparable BBC manuals, given to me by a very good friend who was a lecturer there for many years. My library also includes reams of handwritten lecture notes, from Decca, and also material from RCA, Westrex, Neumann (disc cutting and mic info) Studer, Neve, SSL. And of course JAES publications and a large shelf of well-thumbed orchestral scores. Iani, it is obvious that you have far more lip service to school learning about live sound than practical smarts. A formal training in music recording includes much theory, a great deal of studio practice with ensembles ranging from jazz trios to symphony orchestras, plus vocal soloists and ensembles. There is also a great deal of music to be studied, ad even familiarity with the standard reportoire is only thje tip of the ice-berg. So your infamous "been there, done that" is meaningless in real life. Any real professional can run rings round you in either as has been clearly shown. Oh really? Yes really. Your reluctance to post any material for general appraisal is confirmation of this. Just think, if you could post something to surpass what I, John, Jenn, Bob, Mike Peters, Mike G, Kevin, or many others, could offer. What a feather in your cap that would be!! Of course, you dare not take the risk:-) You flout your so-called expertise, but dare not let anyone else here audition one of your recordings. That tells most what they need to know. Iain, if I thought that my recordings would get a fair appraisal from someone who mattered, things would be different. Perhaps I am biased against you, but that is due to your nauseous religious hypocricy, not your (lack of) recording skills. But I am sure that the rest of the people I mention above, plus TT, Ruff etc etc would give you a fair hearing. But still, you dare not take the chance. Actually, no comment would probably be required. Just a linear comnparison, 16 bars cut or cross faded into 16 bars. That would suffice nicely. But, to paraphrase Marshal Joseph Joffre, when he began to comprehend the situation at the First Battle of the Marne in WW1: ... "Vous etes dans un pot de chambre, et vous y serez emmerdes" Many of us still remember, and smile about the way you tried to "correct the audiophool misconceptions" of two very erudite gentlemen from the BBC:-) You have no evidence of that to show, either. You have no doubt, cleaned up the archive, but I correspond with about half a dozen people, including the two gentlemen concerned, who remember it well and laugh about it often. Arny. You turn every thread in which you participate into a shambles. That happens Iain when you see me coming and start wetting and soiling yourself in public. What a coarse, sordid born-again Christian you a-( Iain |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Feb, 05:34, "Iain Churches" wrote:
But, to paraphrase Marshal Joseph Joffre, when he began to comprehend *the situation at the First Battle of the Marne in WW1: ... "Vous etes dans un pot de chambre, et vous y serez emmerdes" Arny, When in a ******** of your own making, just take a ****. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:38:30 -0800 (PST), Clyde Slick
wrote: On 5 Feb, 05:34, "Iain Churches" wrote: But, to paraphrase Marshal Joseph Joffre, when he began to comprehend *the situation at the First Battle of the Marne in WW1: ... "Vous etes dans un pot de chambre, et vous y serez emmerdes" Arny, When in a ******** of your own making, just take a ****. Excellent, cultural translation, Clyde. Herbert |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Arny's on a roll... | Audio Opinions | |||
Arny's blathering | Audio Opinions | |||
Arny's Bad Week on RAO | Audio Opinions |