Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Trevor Wilson[_2_] Trevor Wilson[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 724
Default Now for a little science..




"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...
http://seanolive.blogspot.com/

"The performance scores of the untrained groups are scaled relative to the
mean scores of the trained listener in order to facilitate comparisons
between trained and untrained listeners. The trained listeners clearly
performed better than any of the untrained groups, by quite a large
margin. The relative performance of the untrained groups, from best to
worst, were the audio retailers (35%), the audio reviewers (20%), the
audio marketing-sales group (10%), and the college students (4%). "

IOW, compared to trained listeners @ 100%, reviewers scored 20% and audio
sales people scored 10%.


**This is just the sort of stuff I've been saying for years, after Stereo
Review published those nonsensical comparisons all those years ago. Pulling
people off the street is just dumb. The ONLY people who should be involved
in listening comparisons (blind or otherwise) are those who have carefully
trained hearing abilities.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au


 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
science ...science...science...astronomy... online money Pro Audio 0 March 5th 08 11:23 AM
science vs vs pseudo science Johnd1001 High End Audio 21 October 29th 03 01:30 AM
DBT and science Michael Scarpitti High End Audio 35 October 13th 03 12:29 AM
science vs. pseudo-science ludovic mirabel High End Audio 91 October 3rd 03 09:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"