Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... http://seanolive.blogspot.com/ "The performance scores of the untrained groups are scaled relative to the mean scores of the trained listener in order to facilitate comparisons between trained and untrained listeners. The trained listeners clearly performed better than any of the untrained groups, by quite a large margin. The relative performance of the untrained groups, from best to worst, were the audio retailers (35%), the audio reviewers (20%), the audio marketing-sales group (10%), and the college students (4%). " IOW, compared to trained listeners @ 100%, reviewers scored 20% and audio sales people scored 10%. **This is just the sort of stuff I've been saying for years, after Stereo Review published those nonsensical comparisons all those years ago. Pulling people off the street is just dumb. The ONLY people who should be involved in listening comparisons (blind or otherwise) are those who have carefully trained hearing abilities. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
science ...science...science...astronomy... | Pro Audio | |||
science vs vs pseudo science | High End Audio | |||
DBT and science | High End Audio | |||
science vs. pseudo-science | High End Audio |