[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Mr. ****'s new anti-psychotic meds have backfired.

There are any number of reasons why I'm stonewalling Iain.

Is that what you believe you're doing? It's always a surprise when we who
inhabit reality receive a report from inside a lunatic's bubble of insanity.
In reality, what you're doing is lying your ass off, then compounding those
lies with more lies, then encasing all THOSE lies with a nasty armor of
****-encrusted super-lies. But you go on and cling to your delusions, Turdy.
One is that its great fun trolling him since he is truly obsessed with me.

To put that klaim in perspective, you also had "fun" when you accused a
dozen or so people of emailing kiddie porn to you. Then you had more "fun"
when you lied about showing the non-existent kiddie porn to a non-existent
"undercover" cop. Then you had still more "fun" when you recently admitted
(hahaha) that you made up the whole story from the get-go. In other words,
you have the time of your life when you're lying your ass off. Fun, fun,
fun! Till the wifey takes your Villager away!

Deflating stuffed shirts like him and [my supreme master's] Posse[sic] is hard for me to turn away from.

And let's not forget about the "fun" you have while "winning" your "debates"
against Normals. In the past ten years, according to your personalized
history, you've "deflated" nearly every Real Audio Guy who dared to intrude
on the Sakred Usenet Hunting Ground. You've sustained ringing "victories"
over Bamborough, Atkinson, Johnston, Goudreau, Zelniker, and others. Never
mind that in reality, where Krooborgs are not allowed entrance, those people
are widely known and respected for their knowledge and achievements. On
Usenet, where fantasizing is the coin of the realm, the Krooborg (that's
you, of course) gets to be "master of the debating trade".

BTW, Turdy, I'll give you three guesses as to what "master of the debating
trade" connotes to human beings. Go on, give it a go.

Another is that I have nothing that meets my standards

Still another surprising admission, but at least now we understand why
you're ashamed to reveal your work.

Your admission does beg the question of why you believe you're qualified to
criticize others' recording work even though your own attempts are
substandard. Got an answer for that one, "master of the debating trade"?