Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(( They aren't Hispanics. Hispanic means "of, or pertaining to, Spain".
They are a group that's 10% Spanish and the pure Spanish don't emigrate. They're dark Southwest Indians that couldn't compete with the Plains tribes. Nor, until someone proves Caesar was an Aztec, are they "Latinos". They're indios and mestizos. They are not us. We are a small minority on a hostile planet, THE REST OF WHOSE INHABITANTS HATE US. Bret.)) Obama Leads McCain 62%-29% Among Hispanics [Steve Sailer] @ 9:34 am "The Karl Rove strategy of Republicans winning the pivotal Hispanic vote by pushing for illegal immigrant amnesty, whose truest true believers are George W. Bush and John McCain (Ted Kennedys partner in pushing amnesty), continues to work as well as ever. From the LA Times: Obama leads in battle for Latino vote The latest polls show he has a surprising advantage over McCain and is favored by up to 62% of voters. By Peter Wallsten, June 6, 2008 A new Gallup Poll summary of surveys taken in May shows Obama winning 62% of Latino registered voters nationwide, compared with just 29% for McCain. Others have found a wide gap as well. The pro-Democratic group Democracy Corps compiled surveys from March through May that showed Obama with a 19-point lead among Latinos. And a Times poll published last month showed Obama leading McCain among California Latinos by 14 points. Republicans say McCains numbers among Latinos at the moment are disappointing far below the goals set by a campaign that has long believed McCain could challenge the traditional Democratic dominance of the Latino electorate. The numbers suggest that McCains image has suffered after a competitive GOP primary in which he renounced some of the moderate views on immigration popular among many Latinos. For example, McCain, who was a chief sponsor of legislation creating a path to citizenship for most of the nations estimated 12 million illegal immigrants, now says he believes the government must focus first on securing the U.S.-Mexico border before dealing with illegal workers. The new position helped mollify some conservatives who viewed McCain as soft on illegal immigration. But it now leaves the senator forced to come from behind in an area that was supposed to be a strength. And McCain must weigh two competing needs: attracting Latinos in the Southwest and Florida turned off by the GOPs hard-line opposition to his legislation and mobilizing conservative whites who could prove crucial in Ohio and other battlegrounds. The competitive GOP primary was basically over on February 5, four months ago. Since then, McCain has been paddling back toward amnesty. Look, the simplest explanation for why Hispanics prefer the Democrat over the Republican is because hes the Democrat. Theyve voted for every Democratic Presidential candidate since JFK. They like the tax-and-spend Democratic Party more than the [whatever the hell Republicans are these days] GOP because, on average, Hispanics pay less in taxes and get more in government spending. Thats because, on the whole, they are poorer. (For an explanation of why poorer people would vote to have the government take money away from richer people and give it to them, see the recent insights of that cutting edge political analyst, Aristotle.) One reason that the media is constantly surprised by the facts about Latinos is because the facts tend to be dull. As I wrote in Is Brown the New Black? in the March 10, 2008 American Conservative: Although the media constantly tries to drum up interest in Hispanics by extolling them as swing voters living in vibrant neighborhoods and so forth, the tedious reality is that the word that best sums up Latino America is inertia. Things just sort of keep on keeping on in the general direction that they were already moving. The LA Times article rolls on with this insightful quote: If the McCain people dont realize they need to beef up that operation, then clearly hes not going to be president, said Robert de Posada, a Republican consultant on Latino politics. Because it always comes as a complete surprise when a man who makes his living as a consultant on Latino politics says we need more Latinos in America. Perhaps the McCain people could beef up that operation by hiring another Republican consultant on Latino politics, such as, to pick a random example, Robert de Posada. Meanwhile, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who was raised in Mexico City, is helping Obama rally the Hispanic troops: With Latinos, you stress that Obamas a minority like us, Richardson said. Well, thats reassuring." http://blog.vdare.com/archives/2008/...ong-hispanics/ -- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 6, 5:11*pm, "BretLudwig" wrote:
We are a small minority on a hostile planet, THE REST OF WHOSE INHABITANTS HATE US. Bret Ah, I suppose some people just get envious of our "natural superiority". LOL! What a piece of ****. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:11:42 -0500, "BretLudwig"
wrote: (( They aren't Hispanics. Hispanic means "of, or pertaining to, Spain". They are a group that's 10% Spanish and the pure Spanish don't emigrate. They're dark Southwest Indians that couldn't compete with the Plains tribes. Nor, until someone proves Caesar was an Aztec, are they "Latinos". They're indios and mestizos. They are not us. We are a small minority on a hostile planet, THE REST OF WHOSE INHABITANTS HATE US. Bret.)) Well said. -- http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/ |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
((I can't wholly take credit for it: the "rest of whose inhabitants" is
from the great Dr. Revilo P. Oliver. This is really good stuff.. Bret. )) A Warning For America From South Africa by Gemma Meyer People used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa (but so did pornography and the gay rights movement). Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveal trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country. Americas structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character. Writing letters to the press, manning stands at county fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing your Congressman that is what you know, and what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods youve created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability. But woe to you if or more likely, when the rules change. White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life. That is exactly what happened in South Africa. I know, because I was there and I saw it happen. Faced with revolution in the streets, strikes, civil unrest and the sheer terror and murder practiced by Nelson Mandelas African National Congress (ANC), the white government simply capitulated in order to achieve peace. Westerners need peace. They need order and stability. They are builders and planners. But what we got was the peace of the grave for our society. The Third World is different different peoples with different pasts and different cultures. Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples. Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe once the thriving, stable Rhodesia is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country. Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion. Those in the West who forced South Africa to surrender to the ANC and its leaders did not consider Africa to be the dangerous, corrupt, and savage place it is now in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Those Western politicians now have a similar problem looming on their own doorsteps: the demand for power and treasure from the non-Western peoples inside the realm. It is already too late for South Africa, but not for America if enough people strengthen their spine and take on the race terrorists, the armies of the politically correct and, most dangerous of all, the craven politicians who believe compassionate conservatism will buy them a few more votes, a few more days of peace. White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you. We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of oppression and racism, and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the equality of man, and his love your neighbor philosophy none of which are part of the Third Worlds history. The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Todays tyrants were yesterdays mission-school proteges. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the brotherhood of man. Other tyrants, like the infamous Idi Amin, were trained and schooled by the whites themselves, at Oxford, Cambridge, and Harvard. After receiving the best from the West, they unleashed a resentful bloodlust against their benefactors. From what I have seen and read thus far, I fear Americans will capitulate just as we did. Americans are, generally, a soft lot. They dont want to quarrel or obstruct the claims of those who believe they were wronged. They like peace and quiet, and they want to compromise and be nice. A television program that aired in South Africa showed a town meeting somewhere in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrunk back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didnt want to quarrel. In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of societys laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings as in Zimbabwe. What will happen when the new majority says the judges are racists, and that they refuse to acknowledge white mans justice? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned. What will you do when the future non-white majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white racists and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language? Dont laugh. When the majority took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols. In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing invasions of private land by the have-nots; the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair; the banishment of your history from the education of the young; the revolutionization of your justice system. In South Africa today, only 9 percent of murderers end up in jail. Court dockets are regularly purchased and simply disappear. Magistrates can be bribed as can the prison authorities, making escapes commonplace. Vehicle and airplane licenses are regularly purchased, and forged school and university certificates are routine. What would you think of the ritual slaughter of animals in your neighbors backyard? How do you clean up the blood and entrails that litter your suburban streets? How do you feel about the practice of witchcraft, in which the parts of young girls and boys are needed for medicinal purposes? How do you react to the burning of witches? Dont laugh. All that is quite common in South Africa today. Dont imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses like the need to overcome generations of white racism will be found to exonerate the guilty. In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesnt exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the Westerners pressuring him to surrender. When Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe murders his political opponents, ignores unfavorable court decisions, terrorizes the population and siphons off millions from the state treasury for himself and his friends, South Africas new President Thabo Mbeki holds his hand and declares his support. That just happened a few weeks ago. [Note: This article is a few years old. -IA] Your tax dollars will go to those who dont earn and dont pay. In South Africa, organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans services, are simply abandoned. What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within, used to suit the goals of the new rulers. And they will reign either through terror, as in Zimbabwe today, or exert other corrupt pressures to obtain, or buy votes. Once power is in the hands of aliens, dont expect loyalty or devotion to principle from those whose jobs are at stake. One of the most surprising and tragic components of the disaster in South Africa is how many previously anti-ANC whites simply moved to the other side. Once you lose social, cultural, and political dominance, there is no getting it back again. Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meetings. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weaknesses and hacks off the arms and legs of his political opponents. To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, dont put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail. Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Thomas Jefferson and George Washington, and your Constitution. What they want are your possessions, your power, and your status. And they already know that their allies among you, the human rights activists, the skillful lawyers and the left-wing politicians will fight for them, and not for you. They will exploit your compassion and your Christian charity, and your good will. They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well. They know what to do. Do you?" Gemma Meyer is the pseudonym of a South African journalist. She and her husband, a former conservative member of parliament, still reside in South Africa. http://igoralexander.wordpress.com/2...-south-africa/ -- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
McCain as Paris Hilton, Obama as Daniel Day-Lewis | Audio Opinions | |||
More French Duplicity (Surprise, Surprise) | Audio Opinions |