Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben Steins Documentary €śExpelled€ť
Posted by Matt Nuenke on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 10:12 PM in Free Speech "This weekend my wife and I saw the documentary movie €śExpelled.€ť It stars Ben Stein, trying to show the heavy hand of scientific Darwinists in suppressing any scientists that do not agree with the modern synthesis. That is, suppressing any alternative to Darwinisms rejection of intelligent design (creationism). How intolerant is science to intelligent design? From watching the movie not much€”Stein only covers a couple of examples, spending most of the movie showing him walking from one campus or office to another. The primary premise in the movie is that the simplest organisms that first evolved on earth are far too complex and statistically could not have been created from the primordial soup without a designer. The purpose of Steins movie seems to be not so much against science, as to show that there is a god because life needed a designer to even begin the process of evolution. And why is such an intelligent person like Stein taking on this issue? I can only speculate, but it seems to be part of the Neocons strategy to maintain the guiding hand of the prophets (primarily the Jews), the administrators like Bush and other government officials, and the masses who need religion in place of open intellectualism. That is, the masses do not need the truth, but need a sustaining dogma to follow blindly where the Neocons lead them. He talks with Richard Dawkins about his belief in God. At one point Dawkins points out that the intelligent designers could be very intelligent aliens from another planet that €śseeded€ť life on earth. It seems an easy way out for educators, who may be forced to teach intelligent design, to assume that it means that aliens and not some deity was the intelligent designer, as a matter of scientific parsimony. The absurdity of this movie however is that Stein focuses on a very narrow area of academic intolerance when there are far more egregious examples of political correctness and outright oppression using state sponsored dogma. In every Western country, anyone who questions the details of the Holocaust is harassed, censored or imprisoned for research that does not conform to the Holocaust dogma. Likewise, scientists who study behavioral and cognitive differences between various races or ethnic groups, and dare to reveal academic research that shows real and innate differences between races is subject to censorship and dismissal in far greater numbers than the handful of academics who advocate intelligent design. Stein never ventures into these other areas of academic censorship, leading me to assert that academic freedom is not what stein is objecting to. He simply wants to make the little people believe that intelligent design is a viable hypothesis because he wants to make sure that the masses maintain their religious faith. " http://majorityrights.com/index.php/...tary_expelled/ -- Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Apr, 19:41, "BretLudwig" wrote:
Ben Stein’s Documentary “Expelled” Posted by Matt Nuenke on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 10:12 PM in Free Speech "This weekend my wife and I saw the documentary movie “Expelled.” It stars Ben Stein, trying to show the heavy hand of scientific Darwinists in suppressing any scientists that do not agree with the modern synthesis. That is, suppressing any alternative to Darwinism’s rejection of intelligent design (creationism). How intolerant is science to intelligent design? From watching the movie not much—Stein only covers a couple of examples, spending most of the movie showing him walking from one campus or office to another. The primary premise in the movie is that the simplest organisms that first evolved on earth are far too complex and statistically could not have been created from the primordial soup without a designer. The purpose of Stein’s movie seems to be not so much against science, as to show that there is a god because life needed a designer to even begin the process of evolution. And why is such an intelligent person like Stein taking on this issue? I can only speculate, but it seems to be part of the Neocon’s strategy to maintain the guiding hand of the prophets (primarily the Jews), the administrators like Bush and other government officials, and the masses who need religion in place of open intellectualism. That is, the masses do not need the truth, but need a sustaining dogma to follow blindly where the Neocons lead them. He talks with Richard Dawkins about his belief in God. At one point Dawkins points out that the intelligent designers could be very intelligent aliens from another planet that “seeded” life on earth. It seems an easy way out for educators, who may be forced to teach intelligent design, to assume that it means that aliens and not some deity was the intelligent designer, as a matter of scientific parsimony. The absurdity of this movie however is that Stein focuses on a very narrow area of academic intolerance when there are far more egregious examples of political correctness and outright oppression using state sponsored dogma. In every Western country, anyone who questions the details of the Holocaust is harassed, censored or imprisoned for research that does not conform to the Holocaust dogma. Likewise, scientists who study behavioral and cognitive differences between various races or ethnic groups, and dare to reveal academic research that shows real and innate differences between races is subject to censorship and dismissal in far greater numbers than the handful of academics who advocate intelligent design. Stein never ventures into these other areas of academic censorship, leading me to assert that academic freedom is not what stein is objecting to. He simply wants to make the little people believe that intelligent design is a viable hypothesis because he wants to make sure that the masses maintain their religious faith. " http://majorityrights.com/index.php/..._steins_docume... -- Message posted usinghttp://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.opinion/ More information athttp://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html BTW, have you got any fake watches to sell? |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ben Stein’s Documentary “Expelled” Posted by Matt Nuenke on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 10:12 PM in Free Speech "This weekend my wife and I saw the documentary movie “Expelled.” It (snipped for brevity as one should usually do when replying to Bret's or anyone's pasted post) http://majorityrights.com/index.php/..._steins_docume... On Apr 22, 7:07 pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On 22 Apr, 19:41, "BretLudwig" wrote: BTW, have you got any fake watches to sell? Why buy the fake when the real deal is affordable? http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/clo...rman/index.htm |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26 Apr, 17:49, RapidRonnie wrote:
Ben Stein’s Documentary “Expelled” Posted by Matt Nuenke on Tuesday, April 22, 2008 at 10:12 PM in Free Speech "This weekend my wife and I saw the documentary movie “Expelled.” It (snipped for brevity as one should usually do when replying to Bret's or anyone's pasted post) http://majorityrights.com/index.php/..._steins_docume.... On Apr 22, 7:07 pm, Clyde Slick wrote: On 22 Apr, 19:41, "BretLudwig" wrote: BTW, have you got any fake watches to sell? Why buy the fake when the real deal is affordable? http://wwp.greenwichmeantime.com/clo.../watches/glyci... but they don't carry Swatzi's |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Documentary field recording - mics | Pro Audio | |||
best setup for movie documentary | Pro Audio | |||
Tom Dowd documentary | Pro Audio | |||
IFC RAP Documentary | Pro Audio |