Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
George M. Middius George M. Middius is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,173
Default Debating Trade 207 (1.5 credits): The non-responsive evasion



Jenn said:

You are free to answer the questions that will shed light on the topic:
Did you accuse John and/or Art of sending you kiddie porn? If so, where
is the evidence that they did so?


Asked and answered.™

In case you missed it, Mr. **** admitted (that's the human-language
equivalent of the Krooglish "debatified") that he had no proof the
alleged porn was not sent to him by those he accused.

Guilty until proven innocent gibes very nicely with Krooger's
persecution complex.



Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Debating Trade 203 (1.5 credits) George M. Middius Audio Opinions 0 February 25th 08 05:29 PM
Scottie's "debating trade" logic ;-) George M. Middius Audio Opinions 15 July 2nd 07 04:48 PM
"Debating trade technique" was Gain equations : ref frequency response Andre Jute Audio Opinions 20 December 21st 05 02:56 AM
Spare us the "debating trade" JBorg Audio Opinions 1 February 17th 05 10:13 AM
Krooger does some "debating trade" illogic Arny Krueger Audio Opinions 13 December 11th 04 12:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"