Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro, rec.audio.opinion, rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been reading about some of the myriad complexities involved in
creating LP's, and it seems a lot of the difficulties stem from the fact that the speed of the surface changes - i.e. slows - constantly. Strictly from a standpoint of reproduction, wouldn't a cylinder configuration have been more advantageous for high quality reproduction than the platter? Or no? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro, rec.audio.opinion, rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 18, 8:54�pm, Doc wrote:
I've been reading about some of the myriad complexities involved in creating LP's, and it seems a lot of the difficulties stem from the fact that the speed of the surface changes - i.e. slows - constantly. Strictly from a standpoint of reproduction, wouldn't a cylinder configuration have been more advantageous for high quality reproduction than the platter? Or no? Only if the vertical modulation was not used. Cylinders were made by the Edison company, and they consisted of a series of peaks and valleys. That doesn't work well for high frequencies because the stylus doesn't have time to fall back into the valley before the next peak comes along. The lateral modulation of the LP works much better for that. Edison firmly believed in vertical modulation. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doc" wrote in message
... I've been reading about some of the myriad complexities involved in creating LP's, and it seems a lot of the difficulties stem from the fact that the speed of the surface changes - i.e. slows - constantly. Strictly from a standpoint of reproduction, wouldn't a cylinder configuration have been more advantageous for high quality reproduction than the platter? Or no? It was certainly much harder to reproduce cylinders than platters, which is why they fell out of use when mass production of recordings started. Sean |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Soundhaspriority" wrote in message ... "videochas www.locoworks.com" wrote in message ... On Jan 18, 8:54?pm, Doc wrote: I've been reading about some of the myriad complexities involved in creating LP's, and it seems a lot of the difficulties stem from the fact that the speed of the surface changes - i.e. slows - constantly. Strictly from a standpoint of reproduction, wouldn't a cylinder configuration have been more advantageous for high quality reproduction than the platter? Or no? Only if the vertical modulation was not used. Cylinders were made by the Edison company, and they consisted of a series of peaks and valleys. That doesn't work well for high frequencies because the stylus doesn't have time to fall back into the valley before the next peak comes along. The lateral modulation of the LP works much better for that. Edison firmly believed in vertical modulation. --------------------------------------------------------- As far as the cylinders, I seem to recall that the abandonment in favor of discs was purely for cost. The cylinders were extremely expensive to make -- is that correct? That's right. You can't press a cylinder. You have to cut each one individually. I'm sure in time, someone might have figured out a way to expand the master or shrink the copy, but I think pressing discs is just easier. Plus, they're easier to store. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "videochas www.locoworks.com" wrote in message ... On Jan 18, 8:54?pm, Doc wrote: I've been reading about some of the myriad complexities involved in creating LP's, and it seems a lot of the difficulties stem from the fact that the speed of the surface changes - i.e. slows - constantly. Strictly from a standpoint of reproduction, wouldn't a cylinder configuration have been more advantageous for high quality reproduction than the platter? Or no? Only if the vertical modulation was not used. Cylinders were made by the Edison company, and they consisted of a series of peaks and valleys. That doesn't work well for high frequencies because the stylus doesn't have time to fall back into the valley before the next peak comes along. The lateral modulation of the LP works much better for that. Edison firmly believed in vertical modulation. I'm not sure vertical modulation is intrinsically better than lateral modulation at high frequencies. Stereo recordings have a fair amount of vertical modulation with out-of-phase conditions, which can occur randomly in a true stereo recording. The stylus handles it quite well. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
videochas wrote:
***** Only if the vertical modulation was not used. Cylinders were made by the Edison company, and they consisted of a series of peaks and valleys. That doesn't work well for high frequencies because the stylus doesn't have time to fall back into the valley before the next peak comes along. ***** Why not? Ratio of sprung to unsprung weight must be high for both lateral and vertical tracking. There should be no difference in terms of max acceleration, surely? But maybe gravity contributes to even harmonics at low frequency? Ian HTML is inconvenient. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
...Ratio of sprung to unsprung weight...
Er, mass. Not wishing to add to the confusion. Ian |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bret Ludwig wrote:
[...] But cylinders had the downside of needing to be individually cut. Reproduction by stamping was impossible. Stamping was not an appropriate process, but moulding was. Commercial cylinders were reproduced by various moulding processes from a master. They were only individually-cut in the very earliest days before the moulding process was perfected. -- ~ Adrian Tuddenham ~ (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply) www.poppyrecords.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question about acrylic vs. glass turntable platters | Audio Opinions | |||
Newbie Q little black cylinders | Car Audio | |||
Transfer of Edison Cylinders? | Pro Audio | |||
Recording on wax cylinders? | Pro Audio | |||
Edison cylinders: any value? | Pro Audio |