Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Arny Krueger Arny Krueger is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17,262
Default Atkinson Falls Into The Bad Statistics Trap, Again.

In

http://stereophile.com/asweseeit/907awsi/

Atkinson gives his approval to this AES conference paper by quoting it:

"I will end this month's essay by quoting, from a paper given at the
conference, the results of experiments on the audibility of high sampling
rates: "To achieve a higher degree of fidelity to the live analog reference,
we need to convert audio using a high sampling rate even when we do not use
microphones and loudspeakers having bandwidth extended far beyond 20kHz.
Listeners judge high sampling conversion as sounding more like the analog
reference when listening to standard audio bandwidth." (footnote 2)
"So that's that, then

So says John, by now more than a little desperate to find support for his
ragazine's manifold exceptional claims about the audible benefits of high
sample rates.

Well, the paper John mentioned finally made it out into the public domain by
being posted on the web at

http://www.hitech-projects.com/hera/...s/aar07pu4.pdf

In fact the paper's stated conclusion is in the opinion of many a crock, a
travesty of science. It rests its conclusions on two listening tests where
the listeners affirmed the experiment's hypothesis about 50% of the time, or
even less. IOW the experimental results did not significantly differ from
random guessing.

This brings to mind some earlier blind amplifier tests that John once tried
for foist off on the audiophile world. Unfortunately the highly-regarded
statistician that gave John his comeuppance that time has since passed.






  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,415
Default Atkinson Falls Into The Bad Statistics Trap, Again.

On Dec 14, 3:10 pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:

You remind me of Flyin' Bwian, GOIA. LoT"S!

LOL!
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Clyde Slick Clyde Slick is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,545
Default Atkinson Falls Into The Bad Statistics Trap, Again.

On 15 Dec, 01:28, Bret Ludwig wrote:
This brings to mind some earlier blind amplifier tests that John once tried
for foist off on the audiophile world. Unfortunately the highly-regarded
statistician that gave John his comeuppance that time has since passed.


Maybe Stereophile should hire Steve Sailer.


reviewing a perfect 5.1, where all the sound comes only out of the
right rear.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
trap their bulb in addition the pot Karl I. Slanina, MPSE Car Audio 0 November 8th 07 07:13 PM
a wall as bass trap apa Pro Audio 7 December 29th 06 07:20 PM
Electronic Bass Trap Ricky W. Hunt Pro Audio 15 November 25th 04 06:03 AM
Electronic Bass Trap Ricky W. Hunt Pro Audio 0 November 23rd 04 03:03 AM
A TRAP FOR TURNER Patrick Turner Vacuum Tubes 3 December 10th 03 11:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:27 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"