Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Caruso was a mono sound source without all doubt. Therefore seems
sufficient the transfer of the assigned pure audio information in a single mono channel. The spatial sound field becomes created in the Milan Scala only by the fact that a large number of spatial dispersed mirror sound sources occur. According her room positions arise signal delays regarding the listener and the reflection factors by the surfaces influencing the frequency response and level of these mirror sound sources. Though the signal itself always is Caruso's mono source. The conventional methods are now seeking to reduce the spatial distribution of those sound sources upon few audio channels by psychoacoustic principles. This always caused a loss of spatial information. Much more effective seems the synthesis by the rendition side, by which in principle all sound sources in their correct position can be mapped. This " Wave Field Synthesis" approach is known since two decades, depicted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_field_synthesis. Letīs discus the advantages and disandvantages of this approach. Regards Helmut www.syntheticwave.de |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
don't even try to time a approach | Car Audio | |||
A new approach to the SET | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Suggestion to approach | Pro Audio | |||
Full wave bridge with half wave rectifiers | Vacuum Tubes | |||
recording multitrack audio on the field (i mean "on the field" !) who did that ? | Pro Audio |