Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
A while back someone was lamenting that the MCA SP-1 microphone had
increased in price from $40 to $50. (A steal at that price, even so.) So I thought I would mention that PSSL has a special on them right now for $39.99. Here's a link: http://www.pssl.com/!IMlL8eSbcH!A87C...05578x57098911 No, I don't work for PSSL, but I thought I'd pass this tip on to folks that might be interested. As for me, I already have four of the SP-1's, so I probably won't be taking advantage of this special. Dean |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm
intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. Thanks, JJ "drichard" wrote in message ... A while back someone was lamenting that the MCA SP-1 microphone had increased in price from $40 to $50. (A steal at that price, even so.) So I thought I would mention that PSSL has a special on them right now for $39.99. Here's a link: http://www.pssl.com/!IMlL8eSbcH!A87C...05578x57098911 No, I don't work for PSSL, but I thought I'd pass this tip on to folks that might be interested. As for me, I already have four of the SP-1's, so I probably won't be taking advantage of this special. Dean |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
John Jacobson wrote:
So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. Thanks, JJ You'd need something with a mic preamp that offered phantom power, preferably real 48 vdc phantom. I'm not familiar with your soundcard. "drichard" wrote in message ... A while back someone was lamenting that the MCA SP-1 microphone had increased in price from $40 to $50. (A steal at that price, even so.) So I thought I would mention that PSSL has a special on them right now for $39.99. Here's a link: http://www.pssl.com/!IMlL8eSbcH!A87Csvro6cg!/SP-1?fc_c= 1400370x3205578x57098911 aka http://tinyurl.com/ycreyu7 No, I don't work for PSSL, but I thought I'd pass this tip on to folks that might be interested. As for me, I already have four of the SP-1's, so I probably won't be taking advantage of this special. Dean -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://www.armadillomusicproductions...arryMeHome.htm http://hankalrich.com/ |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
John Jacobson wrote:
So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. That's a really open ended question, but for starters, you'll need a mic preamp that provides phantom power, and the appropriate cables or adapters to connect it to your Minidisk or Audiophile card. Note that mic preamps that provide phantom power and are battery powered are few and far between, so using it outdoors with your Minidisk recorder may not be that simple unless you have a long extension cord. |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
"John Jacobson" wrote in message
So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. I have a MCA SP-1 that I've used for some spoken word recording work at home. It seems to be a very reasonable general-purpose side-address cardioid mic. For the price, it is very hard to criticize. For twice the price it would still be effectively faultless. Starting around three times the price it might actually have some tough competition. Depending on how you use it, you might want to put it into shock mount. If you use it for close-miced vocals, a pop/breath filter might be in order. I've destroyed at least one mic of this general kind by using it for close vocals. Over a period of years of repeated use, it built up residue on the diaphragm and was permanently damaged, even after careful cleaning. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? A mic preamp with phantom power. I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. The AP2496 has line-level inputs on RCA jacks. I have one of them, as well. Options for inexpensive mic preamps include the Rolls MP13 which I also own, and is just fine for the purpose. Another approach is to use an inexpensive mixing console such as those from Behringer. Just make sure you don't pick one of their very smallest ones that lack phantom power. Ironically, you can buy a mixing console with 2 mic inputs for about the same price as the MP13. If memory serves, I last used my MP13 with one of the somewhat larger Behringer mixing consoles. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Arny Krueger wrote:
Depending on how you use it, you might want to put it into shock mount. If you use it for close-miced vocals, a pop/breath filter might be in order. I have seen a vocalist spit 3 meters during a concert, always use a spit screen or a windscreen, even if just a light one, on mics that are used for vox. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
John Jacobson wrote:
So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. It is a great mic for most voices, but it should not be the first pair of mics in the household, A MXL 603 stereo set is is a better starter package, the small condensers are GP mics, the large ones are - very generally speaking - specialists because they are less likely to have a smooth off axis response. JJ Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:19:02 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote
(in article ): John Jacobson wrote: So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. It is a great mic for most voices, but it should not be the first pair of mics in the household, A MXL 603 stereo set is is a better starter package, the small condensers are GP mics, the large ones are - very generally speaking - specialists because they are less likely to have a smooth off axis response. Kind regards Peter Larsen I think those (603) are the ones Harvey sent me, Peter. I didn't like 'em in my preamps. YMMV. Regards, Ty --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Ty Ford wrote:
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:19:02 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote (in article ): John Jacobson wrote: So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. It is a great mic for most voices, but it should not be the first pair of mics in the household, A MXL 603 stereo set is is a better starter package, the small condensers are GP mics, the large ones are - very generally speaking - specialists because they are less likely to have a smooth off axis response. I think those (603) are the ones Harvey sent me, Peter. I didn't like 'em in my preamps. YMMV. Interesting, thank you. I should have added that a certain willingness to take risks is an advantage with mail order mics .... from what people have said about them here I expect them to be a bit too bright, almost spitty, but also to be quite usable as choir mics, and I want to be free to allocate my KSM 141's to soloists. Note that is my impression based on what people have said, not based on listening to a pair. I will gladly replace my recommendation with a suggestion of using KM184's instead, I'd love to have a pair of those. But there is this here budget thing ... As for why I suggested them in this context of first mic pair rather than the MCA SP1, reportedly it should be the same capsule, is that their dimension related properties make them a more probable pair for learning to record stereo, something that is not done via a pan-potted setup but via proper stereo miking. Proper use of stereo pairs, also when multimiking, is in my opinion the route to proper perspective and spatiality. Ty Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Hi Peter,
I can tell you that I owned a pair of MXL 603s mics a few years ago, and sold them. There was something about them I didn't like - seemed a little harsh to me. Some time later I bought an MCA SP-1, and liked it. At the time I had not heard that it has the same capsule as the 603s, as people have been saying. (Though I'm still trying to figure out how a capsule that big fits into the 603's SD body. Are people SURE they are the same capsule?) Maybe my tastes changed, maybe the internal circuitry is different, maybe MXL started making better diaphragms, or maybe the body has some effect. But the SP-1 doesn't bother me the same way. Since I no longer have the 603's to compare them side by side, it could be any of those things. Anyway, that's my very unscientific experience with the two. Dean On Nov 28, 3:08*pm, "Peter Larsen" wrote: Ty Ford wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:19:02 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote (in article ): John Jacobson wrote: So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. *What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? *I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. It is a great mic for most voices, but it should not be the first pair of mics in the household, A MXL 603 stereo set is is a better starter package, the small condensers are GP mics, the large ones are - very generally speaking - specialists because they are less likely to have a smooth off axis response. I think those (603) are the ones Harvey sent me, Peter. I didn't like 'em in my preamps. YMMV. Interesting, thank you. I should have added that a certain willingness to take risks is an advantage with mail order mics .... from what people have said about them here I expect them to be a bit too bright, almost spitty, but also to be quite usable as choir mics, and I want to be free to allocate my KSM 141's to soloists. Note that is my impression based on what people have said, not based on listening to a pair. I will gladly replace my recommendation with a suggestion of using KM184's instead, I'd love to have a pair of those. But there is this here budget thing ... As for why I suggested them in this context of first mic pair rather than the MCA SP1, reportedly it should be the same capsule, is that their dimension related properties make them a more probable pair for learning to record stereo, something that is not done via a pan-potted setup but via proper stereo miking. Proper use of stereo pairs, also when multimiking, is in my opinion the route to proper perspective and spatiality. Ty * *Kind regards * *Peter Larsen |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
drichard wrote:
I can tell you that I owned a pair of MXL 603s mics a few years ago, and sold them. There was something about them I didn't like - seemed a little harsh to me. Some time later I bought an MCA SP-1, and liked it. At the time I had not heard that it has the same capsule as the 603s, as people have been saying. (Though I'm still trying to figure out how a capsule that big fits into the 603's SD body. Are people SURE they are the same capsule?) It is mounted in a brass ring in the MCA SP1, that moves the druckstau related peak downwards. Maybe my tastes changed, maybe the internal circuitry is different, maybe MXL started making better diaphragms, or maybe the body has some effect. But the SP-1 doesn't bother me the same way. Since I no longer have the 603's to compare them side by side, it could be any of those things. Thanks you. Anyway, that's my very unscientific experience with the two. I'm glad you told about it. Dean Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:08:47 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote
(in article ): Ty Ford wrote: On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:19:02 -0500, Peter Larsen wrote (in article ): John Jacobson wrote: So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. It is a great mic for most voices, but it should not be the first pair of mics in the household, A MXL 603 stereo set is is a better starter package, the small condensers are GP mics, the large ones are - very generally speaking - specialists because they are less likely to have a smooth off axis response. I think those (603) are the ones Harvey sent me, Peter. I didn't like 'em in my preamps. YMMV. Interesting, thank you. I should have added that a certain willingness to take risks is an advantage with mail order mics .... from what people have said about them here I expect them to be a bit too bright, almost spitty, but also to be quite usable as choir mics, and I want to be free to allocate my KSM 141's to soloists. Note that is my impression based on what people have said, not based on listening to a pair. I will gladly replace my recommendation with a suggestion of using KM184's instead, I'd love to have a pair of those. But there is this here budget thing ... As for why I suggested them in this context of first mic pair rather than the MCA SP1, reportedly it should be the same capsule, is that their dimension related properties make them a more probable pair for learning to record stereo, something that is not done via a pan-potted setup but via proper stereo miking. Proper use of stereo pairs, also when multimiking, is in my opinion the route to proper perspective and spatiality. Ty Kind regards Peter Larsen Peter, The I would steer you to the Audix SCX-1 HC SD mics, but they are $500 a piece. I have had heard three good MCA SP-1's quite impressive for the $. I find the km 184 pretty bright. The km 84 were a bit more natural. If you're micing at a distance, brightness isn't as much of an issue. Regards, Ty --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Ty Ford wrote:
[choir mics] The I would steer you to the Audix SCX-1 HC SD mics, but they are $500 a piece. I have had heard three good MCA SP-1's quite impressive for the $. I find the km 184 pretty bright. The km 84 were a bit more natural. I made a recording with a pair of KM84's way many years ago, mezzo and organ, just right. Neumann has no intention of reintrocing them, I have asked them about this. If you're micing at a distance, brightness isn't as much of an issue. At the Audix budget I'll go for a pair of KM184s, but first I'll have to be patient, thanks Ty! Ty Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your response. I've never heard the term "druckstau", and I'm not sure what it means when you say that the brass ring moves "the druckstau related peak" downwards. Do you mind elaborating? After looking at the SP-1 more carefully I can see the brass ring you referred to. And now I can see that the diaphragm part of the assembly is the same size as the barrel of the 603s mic. It's not obvious at first. Do you (or anyone else reading this) know if the rest of the 603s circuit is the same as the SP-1? I've read that the SP-1 circuit is patterned after a Schoeps. Again, thanks for the info. Dean On Nov 28, 9:24*pm, "Peter Larsen" wrote: drichard wrote: I can tell you that I owned a pair of MXL 603s mics a few years ago, and sold them. There was something about them I didn't like - seemed a little harsh to me. Some time later I bought an MCA SP-1, and liked it. At the time I had not heard that it has the same capsule as the 603s, as people have been saying. (Though I'm still trying to figure out how a capsule that big fits into the 603's SD body. Are people SURE they are the same capsule?) It is mounted in a brass ring in the MCA SP1, that moves the druckstau related peak downwards. Maybe my tastes changed, maybe the internal circuitry is different, maybe MXL started making better diaphragms, or maybe the body has some effect. But the SP-1 doesn't bother me the same way. Since I no longer have the 603's to compare them side by side, it could be any of those things. Thanks you. Anyway, that's my very unscientific experience with the two. I'm glad you told about it. Dean * Kind regards * Peter Larsen |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
drichard wrote:
Thanks for your response. I've never heard the term "druckstau", and I'm not sure what it means when you say that the brass ring moves "the druckstau related peak" downwards. Do you mind elaborating? If possible do put this one through google translate: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/MikrofoneImSchallfeld.pdf Druckstau literally translates as pressure build up, the result for an omni type microphone is - as I remember this - a 6 dB peak centered at the frequency where the wavelenght = 2 x the membrane diameter. Perhaps Scott Dorsey or Don Pearce can point you to english language literature. The DPA nosecone is a ploy to avoid this effect by making the microphone diameter ""zero"", the price is a cavity resonance in the required cavity in front of the microphone membrane, so the result is an unlinear response that is identical in all directions, ie. easy to compensate electronically. After looking at the SP-1 more carefully I can see the brass ring you referred to. And now I can see that the diaphragm part of the assembly is the same size as the barrel of the 603s mic. It's not obvious at first. It is a good ploy, the AT4033 also uses it, the virtue of the small actual membrane remains that its internal resonances and break-up modes are in a much higher frequency range. Microphone membranes by necessity have all the size related problems that loudspeaker membranes have .... Do you (or anyone else reading this) know if the rest of the 603s circuit is the same as the SP-1? I've read that the SP-1 circuit is patterned after a Schoeps. The SP1 is reportedly using a Schoeps inspired circuit board, googling this forum will lead you to Jim Stewarts mods for it, the most important one probably to replace a ceramic capacitor with whateveritwaselse, the result being a smoother treble. Dean Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
drichard wrote:
I can tell you that I owned a pair of MXL 603s mics a few years ago, and sold them. There was something about them I didn't like - seemed a little harsh to me. Some time later I bought an MCA SP-1, and liked it. At the time I had not heard that it has the same capsule as the 603s, as people have been saying. The MXL 991 is like the 603, and the 990 is a 991 capsule in a different case. The MCA SP-1, at least from the pictures, looks like an earlier series, maybe the 2001. The 990/991/603 use a 1/2" diaphragm. The 2001 has a 1-1/4" diaphragam which would clearly not fit in a 603 case. |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Yes, the SP-1 is a side address Small Diaphram Condenser. It is a
favorite for modification over the 603 mainly because there's more room to make the modifications. Michael Jolly of Oktavamod now features modification and upgrades to the MCA and other similar circuit mics from Nady and others. Mine was modified by Jim Williams of Audio Upgrades: http://www.vocalimpactmedia.com/Soun...ml#MCASP1stock |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Peter Larsen wrote:
drichard wrote: Thanks for your response. I've never heard the term "druckstau", and I'm not sure what it means when you say that the brass ring moves "the druckstau related peak" downwards. Do you mind elaborating? If possible do put this one through google translate: http://www.sengpielaudio.com/MikrofoneImSchallfeld.pdf Druckstau literally translates as pressure build up, the result for an omni type microphone is - as I remember this - a 6 dB peak centered at the frequency where the wavelenght = 2 x the membrane diameter. Perhaps Scott Dorsey or Don Pearce can point you to english language literature. The DPA nosecone is a ploy to avoid this effect by making the microphone diameter ""zero"", the price is a cavity resonance in the required cavity in front of the microphone membrane, so the result is an unlinear response that is identical in all directions, ie. easy to compensate electronically. After looking at the SP-1 more carefully I can see the brass ring you referred to. And now I can see that the diaphragm part of the assembly is the same size as the barrel of the 603s mic. It's not obvious at first. It is a good ploy, the AT4033 also uses it, the virtue of the small actual membrane remains that its internal resonances and break-up modes are in a much higher frequency range. Microphone membranes by necessity have all the size related problems that loudspeaker membranes have .... Do you (or anyone else reading this) know if the rest of the 603s circuit is the same as the SP-1? I've read that the SP-1 circuit is patterned after a Schoeps. The SP1 is reportedly using a Schoeps inspired circuit board, googling this forum will lead you to Jim Stewarts mods for it, Methinks you meant Jim Williams, of Audio Upgrades. the most important one probably to replace a ceramic capacitor with whateveritwaselse, the result being a smoother treble. Dean Kind regards Peter Larsen -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://www.armadillomusicproductions...arryMeHome.htm http://hankalrich.com/ |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
jowillie wrote:
Yes, the SP-1 is a side address Small Diaphram Condenser. It is a favorite for modification over the 603 mainly because there's more room to make the modifications. 20 mm. diapghram puts it sort of in between SDC and LDC. Michael Jolly of Oktavamod now features modification and upgrades to the MCA and other similar circuit mics from Nady and others. Mine was modified by Jim Williams of Audio Upgrades: http://www.vocalimpactmedia.com/Soun...ml#MCASP1stock -- ha shut up and play your guitar http://www.armadillomusicproductions...arryMeHome.htm http://hankalrich.com/ |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
hank alrich wrote:
The SP1 is reportedly using a Schoeps inspired circuit board, googling this forum will lead you to Jim Stewarts mods for it, Methinks you meant Jim Williams, of Audio Upgrades. You're a great psychic Hank, thank you! Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
drichard wrote:
I can tell you that I owned a pair of MXL 603s mics a few years ago, and sold them. There was something about them I didn't like - seemed a little harsh to me. Some time later I bought an MCA SP-1, and liked it. At the time I had not heard that it has the same capsule as the 603s, as people have been saying. (Though I'm still trying to figure out how a capsule that big fits into the 603's SD body. Are people SURE they are the same capsule?) They do not have the same capsule. They have capsules of similar design; they are both rather small capsules roughly based on the KM84 design. Very roughly, though. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Peter Larsen wrote:
John Jacobson wrote: So, the reviews indicate this mike being extraordinary for the price and I'm intrigued. What would I need besides the mike for a working recording system? I use Minidisc for outdoor stuff and it has 1/8" input; the sound card in the PC is the Audiophile 2496. It is a great mic for most voices, but it should not be the first pair of mics in the household, A MXL 603 stereo set is is a better starter package, the small condensers are GP mics, the large ones are - very generally speaking - specialists because they are less likely to have a smooth off axis response. JJ Kind regards Peter Larsen I expect there are better options now than the 603. They're rather harsh. -- Les Cargill |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
On Nov 29, 9:35*am, jowillie wrote:
Yes, the SP-1 is a side address Small Diaphram Condenser. It is a favorite for modification over the 603 mainly because there's more room to make the modifications. Michael Jolly of Oktavamod now features modification and upgrades to the MCA and other similar circuit mics from Nady and others. Mine was modified by Jim Williams of Audio Upgrades:http://www.vocalimpactmedia.com/Soun...ml#MCASP1stock Here's a link to the upgrades that OktavaMod offers - http://www.oktavamodshop.com/product...roducts_id=114 -Neb |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
"hank alrich" wrote in message ... jowillie wrote: Yes, the SP-1 is a side address Small Diaphram Condenser. It is a favorite for modification over the 603 mainly because there's more room to make the modifications. 20 mm. diapghram puts it sort of in between SDC and LDC. http://recordinghacks.com/microphones/MCA/SP1 puts the diaphragm at more like 16 mm. 20 mm is the capsule diameter. |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
MCA SP-1 sale
Thanks Arny.
But that author also says the SP-1 uses the same capsule as the 603s, a claim disputed by Scott Dorsey, whose opinion I trust. Isn't it supposed to be modeled after the KM84? How big is that capsule? Dean On Nov 30, 7:17*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "hank alrich" wrote in message ... jowillie wrote: Yes, the SP-1 is a side address Small Diaphram Condenser. It is a favorite for modification over the 603 mainly because there's more room to make the modifications. 20 mm. diapghram puts it sort of in between SDC and LDC. http://recordinghacks.com/microphones/MCA/SP1 puts the diaphragm at more like 16 mm. 20 mm is the capsule diameter. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
advertisement: SM57,58,91 and SKB Mic case for sale on ebay, plus a whole list of other stuff for sale | Pro Audio | |||
Our 10TH ANNIVERSARY AUDIO SALE! The Best High-End Audio Sale of the Year! | Marketplace | |||
sale | Marketplace | |||
Updated High End Sale List 11/07/05 - Markdown for Year End Sale! | Marketplace | |||
Updated High End Sale List 11/05/05 - New markdown for Holiday Sale! | Marketplace |