Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tube preamp low freq loss
I recently built a tube overdrive circuit for my guitar rig. It functions
well in almost all respects except one issue that I've not found an answer for yet. The circuit description is an opamp input stage which drives the first half of a 12ax7, this is followed by the second half of the 12ax7 which then goes to an opamp output gain stage. If you've seen the Paia tube mic pre circuit it's essentially the same changed to single ended input and the gain of most stages have been changed to push the tubes to distortion levels. If I bypass the tube section the circuit is clean and fat. But when I start to add the tube section for a mix of overdriven tube, it starts to sound thin! I've checked the obvious, series caps and values which are fine (Pspice simulations show -3db frequency response down to less than 10Hz). I've checked the actual circuit caps as well and they are good. I can rule out the opamp circuits since signal passes through both opamps in bypass mode. As I increase distortion it gets thinner. I haven't done a frequency response measurement on the bench yet to identify the actual point of low freq. rolloff but my guess is it's around the 300-500Hz range.(?) I did add a 100uf cap to across the cathode resistor of the first tube stage to increase the gain and there are only 3 other caps which are coupling caps for input, between stages and output. By the way, the tubes are fed with a low plate voltage of 48v, plate resisters are 270k, cathode resistors are 2700 (2nd stage) & 1200 bypassed with a 100uf (1st stage). Could this simply be a result the low bias current and the "starved" plate design? Any recommendations would be appreciated! Thanks, Jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tube preamp low freq loss
Jeffrey Landgraf wrote:
I recently built a tube overdrive circuit for my guitar rig. It functions well in almost all respects except one issue that I've not found an answer for yet. The circuit description is an opamp input stage which drives the first half of a 12ax7, this is followed by the second half of the 12ax7 which then goes to an opamp output gain stage. If you've seen the Paia tube mic pre circuit it's essentially the same changed to single ended input and the gain of most stages have been changed to push the tubes to distortion levels. If I bypass the tube section the circuit is clean and fat. But when I start to add the tube section for a mix of overdriven tube, it starts to sound thin! I've checked the obvious, series caps and values which are fine (Pspice simulations show -3db frequency response down to less than 10Hz). I've checked the actual circuit caps as well and they are good. I can rule out the opamp circuits since signal passes through both opamps in bypass mode. As I increase distortion it gets thinner. I haven't done a frequency response measurement on the bench yet to identify the actual point of low freq. rolloff but my guess is it's around the 300-500Hz range.(?) I did add a 100uf cap to across the cathode resistor of the first tube stage to increase the gain and there are only 3 other caps which are coupling caps for input, between stages and output. By the way, the tubes are fed with a low plate voltage of 48v, plate resisters are 270k, cathode resistors are 2700 (2nd stage) & 1200 bypassed with a 100uf (1st stage). Could this simply be a result the low bias current and the "starved" plate design? Any recommendations would be appreciated! Skip the cathode bypass cap. That's always a bad idea. THEN measure the actual response. Are you really seeing a low frequency loss, or are you seeing a huge high frequency buildup due to the distortion effect? If it's the former, try larger value coupling caps and check to see what your source and load impedances on the stage really are. If it is the latter, try adding some RLC equalization networks until it sounds right. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Tube preamp low freq loss
"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message ... Jeffrey Landgraf wrote: I recently built a tube overdrive circuit for my guitar rig. It functions well in almost all respects except one issue that I've not found an answer for yet. The circuit description is an opamp input stage which drives the first half of a 12ax7, this is followed by the second half of the 12ax7 which then goes to an opamp output gain stage. If you've seen the Paia tube mic pre circuit it's essentially the same changed to single ended input and the gain of most stages have been changed to push the tubes to distortion levels. If I bypass the tube section the circuit is clean and fat. But when I start to add the tube section for a mix of overdriven tube, it starts to sound thin! I've checked the obvious, series caps and values which are fine (Pspice simulations show -3db frequency response down to less than 10Hz). I've checked the actual circuit caps as well and they are good. I can rule out the opamp circuits since signal passes through both opamps in bypass mode. As I increase distortion it gets thinner. I haven't done a frequency response measurement on the bench yet to identify the actual point of low freq. rolloff but my guess is it's around the 300-500Hz range.(?) I did add a 100uf cap to across the cathode resistor of the first tube stage to increase the gain and there are only 3 other caps which are coupling caps for input, between stages and output. By the way, the tubes are fed with a low plate voltage of 48v, plate resisters are 270k, cathode resistors are 2700 (2nd stage) & 1200 bypassed with a 100uf (1st stage). Could this simply be a result the low bias current and the "starved" plate design? Any recommendations would be appreciated! Skip the cathode bypass cap. That's always a bad idea. THEN measure the actual response. Are you really seeing a low frequency loss, or are you seeing a huge high frequency buildup due to the distortion effect? If it's the former, try larger value coupling caps and check to see what your source and load impedances on the stage really are. If it is the latter, try adding some RLC equalization networks until it sounds right. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." Skip the cathode bypass cap. That's always a bad idea. Scott, Yes, I agree I need to measure the actual response which is my next step in debug. This should point to the RC pole where I'm getting rolloff if that's the problem. Why is it a bad idea to add a cathode bypass cap? This is straight out of many tube handbooks including the Audio Cyclopedia as well as other reference books. I haven't seen any mention as to any "bad" effects of doing this. Also, you mention high frequency buildup as the waveform moves toward a square wave. I've looked at the output waveform on the bench using a sine wave input and don't see a sloped, scooped or otherwise strange square wave. I would assume this would lean toward coupling cap (I have not tried the complex signal from a guitar signal). Would this buildup (and loss of low freq) have anything to do with the loss of even order harmonics? Thanks for the advice, Jeff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Tube preamp low freq loss
Jeffrey Landgraf wrote:
Yes, I agree I need to measure the actual response which is my next step in debug. This should point to the RC pole where I'm getting rolloff if that's the problem. Why is it a bad idea to add a cathode bypass cap? This is straight out of many tube handbooks including the Audio Cyclopedia as well as other reference books. I haven't seen any mention as to any "bad" effects of doing this. Cathode bypass will give you an additional low frequency corner, it means an additional capacitor in circuit (and therefore additional nonlinearity due the cap), and it gives slightly poorer linearity of the tube itself. It's common on a lot of circuits out there to increase gain at the expense of linearity. But you want it out because you don't need much gain anyway and it makes your circuit harder to model. Also, you mention high frequency buildup as the waveform moves toward a square wave. I've looked at the output waveform on the bench using a sine wave input and don't see a sloped, scooped or otherwise strange square wave. I would assume this would lean toward coupling cap (I have not tried the complex signal from a guitar signal). Would this buildup (and loss of low freq) have anything to do with the loss of even order harmonics? No, it has something to do with the additional of odd order harmonics. When you distort something, you're making a square wave with a bunch of high frequency trash. When you do it with a cheesy starvation-mode circuit, you'll tend to get more higher order stuff than you would if you had the tube working at normal levels, and also the distortion is asymmetric so you're getting some even order stuff too. But the whole notion of distorting a signal IS to add harmonics... and the more you add, the more topheavy the signal will sound. EQ can help you with this. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When did home theater take over? | Audio Opinions | |||
Is a tube preamp suitable for trumpet? | Pro Audio | |||
art tube mp mic preamp | Pro Audio | |||
hearing loss info | Car Audio | |||
Tube Preamp Voltage | Pro Audio |