Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andre Jute" wrote:
It's amazing that the Kutztown organizers rent space to a man with the reputation of Peter Wieck of Wyncote, PA. He is a notorious hoarder and profiteer, and a netflamer and netstalker of anyone who exposes him. His immorality, his stealing, his stalking and his lying has earned him the contemptuous nickname "Worthless Wiecky" on the Usenet. Don't the Kutztown organizers know this? Fiultra The difficulty with the Kutzdown Radio Meet is finding out who is in charge. The reputable and respectable Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) denies that it has any influence over who can be rented space. According to Mike Koste, "The DVHRC has no financial interest or control of facility, including the renting and assignment of vendor spaces. The club merely acts as hosts." The Radio Meet is held at Renninger's Antique and Farmer's Market in Kutztown, PA. Renninger's are in the business of renting stalls to fill their facility. They have neither the ability nor the desire to weed out bad apples. As long as the stallholder doesn't defecate on the floor, Renninger's don't care what sort of thief and scum he is. Renninger's will rent even Peter Wieck a stall, regardless. So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter Wieck. Regards, Gray Glasser |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 18, 12:28 pm, wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote: It's amazing that the Kutztown organizers rent space to a man with the reputation of Peter Wieck of Wyncote, PA. He is a notorious hoarder and profiteer, and a netflamer and netstalker of anyone who exposes him. His immorality, his stealing, his stalking and his lying has earned him the contemptuous nickname "Worthless Wiecky" on the Usenet. Don't the Kutztown organizers know this? Fiultra The difficulty with the Kutzdown Radio Meet is finding out who is in charge. The reputable and respectable Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) denies that it has any influence over who can be rented space. According to Mike Koste, "The DVHRC has no financial interest or control of facility, including the renting and assignment of vendor spaces. The club merely acts as hosts." The Radio Meet is held at Renninger's Antique and Farmer's Market in Kutztown, PA. Renninger's are in the business of renting stalls to fill their facility. They have neither the ability nor the desire to weed out bad apples. As long as the stallholder doesn't defecate on the floor, Renninger's don't care what sort of thief and scum he is. Renninger's will rent even Peter Wieck a stall, regardless. So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter Wieck. Regards, Gray Glasser Well, now. And Andre has never been "caught in a lie"... how about the lie that Gray Glasser is a separate entity rather than merely yet another schizoid manifestation of a diseased mind? Andre, I use your "first" name (Christian, manifestly, it is not) as a simple indication - to you - that you are a childish git whining over being challenged in what you perceive is your private sandbox. And when so-challenged choose to crap all over every other sandbox in sight. So, you do not deserve even the respect one would use addressing a child. To others I generally refer to you as Mr. Jute, so they better understand the actual lack of respect. Now, it was you that once wrote "want another go at it?" The short answer is not really. But you do tend to fulminate and blather at great and extreme length when prodded... clearly you haven't the character to do anything but that. Get a life, or your meds will fail. At this point I expect your stress level to be well in the red-zone... given that you are over 60, overweight and undertall, that is not a good combination for the long term. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Sep, 19:28, wrote:
.. As long as the stallholder doesn't defecate on the floor, Renninger's don't care what sort of thief and scum he is. Renninger's will rent even Peter Wieck a stall, regardless. "At least" they won't rent to Krueger |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Sep, 21:06, Peter Wieck wrote:
e... given that you are over 60, overweight and undertall, that is not a good combination for the long term. that was sooooooo underfunny. |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Clyde Slick said: that was sooooooo underfunny. Now that you've put down stakes in Transylvania, have you learned to eat pork and shellfish? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Wieck wrote:
On Sep 18, 12:28 pm, wrote: "Andre Jute" wrote: It's amazing that the Kutztown organizers rent space to a man with the reputation of Peter Wieck of Wyncote, PA. He is a notorious hoarder and profiteer, and a netflamer and netstalker of anyone who exposes him. His immorality, his stealing, his stalking and his lying has earned him the contemptuous nickname "Worthless Wiecky" on the Usenet. Don't the Kutztown organizers know this? Fiultra The difficulty with the Kutzdown Radio Meet is finding out who is in charge. The reputable and respectable Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) denies that it has any influence over who can be rented space. According to Mike Koste, "The DVHRC has no financial interest or control of facility, including the renting and assignment of vendor spaces. The club merely acts as hosts." The Radio Meet is held at Renninger's Antique and Farmer's Market in Kutztown, PA. Renninger's are in the business of renting stalls to fill their facility. They have neither the ability nor the desire to weed out bad apples. As long as the stallholder doesn't defecate on the floor, Renninger's don't care what sort of thief and scum he is. Renninger's will rent even Peter Wieck a stall, regardless. So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter Wieck. Regards, Gray Glasser Well, now. And Andre has never been "caught in a lie"... how about the lie that Gray Glasser is a separate entity rather than merely yet another schizoid manifestation of a diseased mind? If you believe it, you should prove it, Worthless. You've tried before and failed. Andre, I use your "first" name (Christian, manifestly, it is not) No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum. The Boss has several times publiclty described you as scum, Worthless, so why do you persist in your foul manners? as a simple indication - to you - that you are a childish git whining over being challenged The notion that a semiliterate janitor like you can challenge The Boss is laughable. In any event, all you've done for a couple of years is attempted character assassination which Mr Jute contemptuously ignored. in your own sandbox. You came to RAT with the single intention of stalking The Boss, for the sole and entirely discreditable reason that, in your own words, it amuses you. You started abusing Mr Jute, without any provocation whatsoever, even as he welcomed you to RAT. And when so-challenged choose to crap all over every other sandbox in sight. You defecated on the carpet in the house where The Boss practices his hobby. So what's your beef when The Boss produces one of his internet puppet shows with you as the star exhibit? Why should there be one rule for scum like you and another for Mr Jute? So, you do not deserve even the respect one would use addressing a child. To others I generally refer to you as Mr. Jute, so they better understand the actual lack of respect. If you believe The Boss cares what you think, you're delusional as well as very, very stupid. I heard him say once, in a lecture on morality, something like, "Respect is only of value between free peers. When it is offered or withheld as a form of blackmail, it is worthless. The blackmailer does not have, cannot get, and will never be given any respect." You're clearly a blackmailer, Worthless. You abused Mr Jute without provocation for years, then offered to cease if he would "stop prosetylizing". That is clearly an attempt by blackmail to control what he says and how. I imagine The Boss regards that, besides blackmail, as an assault on free speech. Now, it was you that once wrote "want another go at it?" The short answer is not really. The Boss is a fair man. If you want to run, he'll let you run. He let you run before, when he crisply and quickly made a public fool of you by turning you into a golem of decayed pig offal stuffed into a cow's bladder, and kicked you around like a football. He generously did not pursue you after you ran. You stupidly returned to abuse him further. But you do tend to fulminate and blather at great and extreme length when prodded... clearly you haven't the character to do anything but that. You should find out who Andre Jute is, Worthless, and before much longer, for the sake of your family. It is only you who think you're messing with some limp intellectual with glasses. Get a life, or your meds will fail. At this point I expect your stress level to be well in the red-zone... We note your lipsmacking relish over the prospect of doing someone else harm. It is quite clear that you wish Mr Jute dead because he is so patently superior to you in every respect. given that you are over 60, overweight and undertall, The stalker always thinks he knows more about his victim than the victim does. that is not a good combination for the long term. Once more you wish The Boss dead. For what? For pointing out, and proving, that you're a stalker, a thief and a liar? For being charismatic and talented when you're dull and, well, dull? You're over the top, Worthless. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA With sincere contempt for a reckless fool, Gray Glasser |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 6:14 am, wrote:
Peter Wieck wrote: wrote: So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter Wieck. Regards, Gray Glasser Well, now. And Andre has never been "caught in a lie"... how about the lie that Gray Glasser is a separate entity rather than merely yet another schizoid manifestation of a diseased mind? If you believe it, you should prove it, Worthless. You've tried before and failed. Andre, I use your "first" name (Christian, manifestly, it is not) No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum. The Boss has several times publiclty described you as scum, Worthless, so why do you persist in your foul manners? Peter Wieck is scum. I've asked him politely, many times, not to address me at all, and certainly not familiarly. But Worthless Wiecky's foul manners no longer surprise us. as a simple indication - to you - that you are a childish git whining over being challenged The notion that a semiliterate janitor like you can challenge The Boss is laughable. In any event, all you've done for a couple of years is attempted character assassination which Mr Jute contemptuously ignored. Hundreds of message of denigration. I haven't read them all, though I'm having an analysis made. But a few I read recently were McCarthyite smears. When I challenged the little scumball Wieck to prove his claims, he weaseled, failed, and became offensive to those who pointed out that he was the liar, not I. in your own sandbox. You came to RAT with the single intention of stalking The Boss, for the sole and entirely discreditable reason that, in your own words, it amuses you. You started abusing Mr Jute, without any provocation whatsoever, even as he welcomed you to RAT. I was amazed to have the glad hand I extended to the newbie spat in by Worthless Peter Wieck. And when so-challenged choose to crap all over every other sandbox in sight. You defecated on the carpet in the house where The Boss practices his hobby. So what's your beef when The Boss produces one of his internet puppet shows with you as the star exhibit? Why should there be one rule for scum like you and another for Mr Jute? The hypocrisy of Worthless Wiecky's supporters is breathtaking. They're mostly garage vermin. They''ll crunch satisfactorily underfoot; a few smart ones will change sides before they go down with Worthless Wiecky. So, you do not deserve even the respect one would use addressing a child. To others I generally refer to you as Mr. Jute, so they better understand the actual lack of respect. If you believe The Boss cares what you think, you're delusional as well as very, very stupid. This worthless little man Wieck really is a mule's arse. Hey, Worthless, rap the side of your head with your knuckles, let's find out if it's empty. Boing, boing. I heard him say once, in a lecture on morality, something like, "Respect is only of value between free peers. When it is offered or withheld as a form of blackmail, it is worthless. The blackmailer does not have, cannot get, and will never be given any respect." That's probably better said than I put it back then. You're clearly a blackmailer, Worthless. Of course he is. He abused me constantly on some kind of a plan known only to him, then several times offered to cease abusing me if I would make some concession to him. That is by definition blackmail. You abused Mr Jute without provocation for years, then offered to cease if he would "stop prosetylizing". That is clearly an attempt by blackmail to control what he says and how. I imagine The Boss regards that, besides blackmail, as an assault on free speech. Ah, I see you were following it. I didn't actually, myself, but one of the students categorizing Worthless Wiecky's posts pointed out the repeated attempts by Worthless to blackmail me as a pattern. And of course I see Wieck's blackmail as an assault on freedom of speech, our main liberty. Now, it was you that once wrote "want another go at it?" The short answer is not really. The Boss is a fair man. If you want to run, he'll let you run. He let you run before, when he crisply and quickly made a public fool of you by turning you into a golem of decayed pig offal stuffed into a cow's bladder, and kicked you around like a football. He generously did not pursue you after you ran. You stupidly returned to abuse him further. Not football, Gray, rugby. How many times do I have to tell you that people who speak real English play "football" with a *round* ball. The game played with an eliptical ball with pointed ends is rugby. But you do tend to fulminate and blather at great and extreme length when prodded... clearly you haven't the character to do anything but that. You should find out who Andre Jute is, Worthless, and before much longer, for the sake of your family. It is only you who think you're messing with some limp intellectual with glasses. Caveat emptor. If Worthless was half as energetic a stalker as he is a blackmailer and character assassin, he would know without needing to be told. But, all the same, for the appearance of giving him a fair chance, I'll make him the same offer I made the Magnequest Scum and others: **** out of my face, Wiecky, and tomorrow I won't remember your name. Get a life, or your meds will fail. At this point I expect your stress level to be well in the red-zone... We note your lipsmacking relish over the prospect of doing someone else harm. It is quite clear that you wish Mr Jute dead because he is so patently superior to you in every respect. After Kutztown I shall publish a little essay on fascism and he generations. But, for now, it is probably enough to note that it is the fear my talents inspire in the Worthless-Wiecky mentalities, rather than only or mainly his envy, which causes fascists to wish people dead, and to kill them. given that you are over 60, overweight and undertall, The stalker always thinks he knows more about his victim than the victim does. Holy ****! "Undertall"? The poor little man is fraying at the edges already. Lord, send us, just once, a slimeball with decent English rather than these crass clowns like Worthless Wiecky. Is that too much to ask? that is not a good combination for the long term. Once more you wish The Boss dead. For what? For pointing out, and proving, that you're a stalker, a thief and a liar? For being charismatic and talented when you're dull and, well, dull? You're over the top, Worthless. My poker school is made up of psych pros. They are all betting on what I can make Worthless say and do, and for how long; they are all of the opinion that he is an obsessive ("a hard-on for Andre that won't go away") who will do himself harm sooner or later. None of them believes Wieck has the sense to choose softer ankles than mine to shatter himself against. I've given up finding medical excuses for the enemies of society: one transgression against free speech, and I deal with them. Worthless Wiecky had several chances to commit further crimes because I wasn't paying attention. That's an oversight I'm correcting right now. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA With sincere contempt for a reckless fool, Gray Glasser That's an outstanding analysis for a part-timer, Gray. Andre Jute Sauvitor in modo, fortiter in res |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andre Jute said: Gray Glasser Peter Wieck is scum. I've asked him politely, many times, not to address me at all, and certainly not familiarly. But Worthless Wiecky's foul manners no longer surprise us. Worthless is undoubtedly a deserving beast-in-arms for the filthful Arnii Krooborg. On the audio newsgroups, no insult is worse than "Kroopologist", and Worthless Wiecky is a putrid Kroopologist. Would you care to state unequivocally that when you and "Gray Glasser" reply to each "other's" posts, you're not talking to yourself? |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 9:42 am, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast .
net wrote: Andre Jute said: Gray Glasser Peter Wieck is scum. I've asked him politely, many times, not to address me at all, and certainly not familiarly. But Worthless Wiecky's foul manners no longer surprise us. Worthless is undoubtedly a deserving beast-in-arms for the filthful Arnii Krooborg. On the audio newsgroups, no insult is worse than "Kroopologist", and Worthless Wiecky is a putrid Kroopologist. Putrid is right. Would you care to state unequivocally that when you and "Gray Glasser" reply to each "other's" posts, you're not talking to yourself? You must seek Gray's answer from Gray; I certainly always read his posts because you can trust him to have informed himself fully and to have reached a balanced judgement. As for myself, I am happy to state unequivocally that whenever I reply to Gray's posts, or yours, George, or anyone else's, I am most certainly talking to myself, otherwise there would be no post. D'y'see, I reserve my hands on the keyboard for important work like, well, my work, my ears for the soundtrack of the movie I'm watching or the CD I'm playing, and I dictate posts the newsgroups into a dictation programme which transcribes them into text that I can copy and paste into my mailer. It's called multi-tasking and it is another reason for the talentless Wieck to resent me. HTH. Andre Jute Prontoprecipitevolismovolmente -- Italian for "quickly" AND THIS IS WHERE THE COMMANDER GOT THE QUOTATION FROM: On Sep 19, 6:14 am, wrote: Peter Wieck wrote: wrote: So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter Wieck. Regards, Gray Glasser Well, now. And Andre has never been "caught in a lie"... how about the lie that Gray Glasser is a separate entity rather than merely yet another schizoid manifestation of a diseased mind? If you believe it, you should prove it, Worthless. You've tried before and failed. Andre, I use your "first" name (Christian, manifestly, it is not) No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum. The Boss has several times publiclty described you as scum, Worthless, so why do you persist in your foul manners? Peter Wieck is scum. I've asked him politely, many times, not to address me at all, and certainly not familiarly. But Worthless Wiecky's foul manners no longer surprise us. as a simple indication - to you - that you are a childish git whining over being challenged The notion that a semiliterate janitor like you can challenge The Boss is laughable. In any event, all you've done for a couple of years is attempted character assassination which Mr Jute contemptuously ignored. Hundreds of message of denigration. I haven't read them all, though I'm having an analysis made. But a few I read recently were McCarthyite smears. When I challenged the little scumball Wieck to prove his claims, he weaseled, failed, and became offensive to those who pointed out that he was the liar, not I. in your own sandbox. You came to RAT with the single intention of stalking The Boss, for the sole and entirely discreditable reason that, in your own words, it amuses you. You started abusing Mr Jute, without any provocation whatsoever, even as he welcomed you to RAT. I was amazed to have the glad hand I extended to the newbie spat in by Worthless Peter Wieck. And when so-challenged choose to crap all over every other sandbox in sight. You defecated on the carpet in the house where The Boss practices his hobby. So what's your beef when The Boss produces one of his internet puppet shows with you as the star exhibit? Why should there be one rule for scum like you and another for Mr Jute? The hypocrisy of Worthless Wiecky's supporters is breathtaking. They're mostly garage vermin. They''ll crunch satisfactorily underfoot; a few smart ones will change sides before they go down with Worthless Wiecky. So, you do not deserve even the respect one would use addressing a child. To others I generally refer to you as Mr. Jute, so they better understand the actual lack of respect. If you believe The Boss cares what you think, you're delusional as well as very, very stupid. This worthless little man Wieck really is a mule's arse. Hey, Worthless, rap the side of your head with your knuckles, let's find out if it's empty. Boing, boing. I heard him say once, in a lecture on morality, something like, "Respect is only of value between free peers. When it is offered or withheld as a form of blackmail, it is worthless. The blackmailer does not have, cannot get, and will never be given any respect." That's probably better said than I put it back then. You're clearly a blackmailer, Worthless. Of course he is. He abused me constantly on some kind of a plan known only to him, then several times offered to cease abusing me if I would make some concession to him. That is by definition blackmail. You abused Mr Jute without provocation for years, then offered to cease if he would "stop prosetylizing". That is clearly an attempt by blackmail to control what he says and how. I imagine The Boss regards that, besides blackmail, as an assault on free speech. Ah, I see you were following it. I didn't actually, myself, but one of the students categorizing Worthless Wiecky's posts pointed out the repeated attempts by Worthless to blackmail me as a pattern. And of course I see Wieck's blackmail as an assault on freedom of speech, our main liberty. Now, it was you that once wrote "want another go at it?" The short answer is not really. The Boss is a fair man. If you want to run, he'll let you run. He let you run before, when he crisply and quickly made a public fool of you by turning you into a golem of decayed pig offal stuffed into a cow's bladder, and kicked you around like a football. He generously did not pursue you after you ran. You stupidly returned to abuse him further. Not football, Gray, rugby. How many times do I have to tell you that people who speak real English play "football" with a *round* ball. The game played with an eliptical ball with pointed ends is rugby. But you do tend to fulminate and blather at great and extreme length when prodded... clearly you haven't the character to do anything but that. You should find out who Andre Jute is, Worthless, and before much longer, for the sake of your family. It is only you who think you're messing with some limp intellectual with glasses. Caveat emptor. If Worthless was half as energetic a stalker as he is a blackmailer and character assassin, he would know without needing to be told. But, all the same, for the appearance of giving him a fair chance, I'll make him the same offer I made the Magnequest Scum and others: **** out of my face, Wiecky, and tomorrow I won't remember your name. Get a life, or your meds will fail. At this point I expect your stress level to be well in the red-zone... We note your lipsmacking relish over the prospect of doing someone else harm. It is quite clear that you wish Mr Jute dead because he is so patently superior to you in every respect. After Kutztown I shall publish a little essay on fascism and he generations. But, for now, it is probably enough to note that it is the fear my talents inspire in the Worthless-Wiecky mentalities, rather than only or mainly his envy, which causes fascists to wish people dead, and to kill them. given that you are over 60, overweight and undertall, The stalker always thinks he knows more about his victim than the victim does. Holy ****! "Undertall"? The poor little man is fraying at the edges already. Lord, send us, just once, a slimeball with decent English rather than these crass clowns like Worthless Wiecky. Is that too much to ask? that is not a good combination for the long term. Once more you wish The Boss dead. For what? For pointing out, and proving, that you're a stalker, a thief and a liar? For being charismatic and talented when you're dull and, well, dull? You're over the top, Worthless. My poker school is made up of psych pros. They are all betting on what I can make Worthless say and do, and for how long; they are all of the opinion that he is an obsessive ("a hard-on for Andre that won't go away") who will do himself harm sooner or later. None of them believes Wieck has the sense to choose softer ankles than mine to shatter himself against. I've given up finding medical excuses for the enemies of society: one transgression against free speech, and I deal with them. Worthless Wiecky had several chances to commit further crimes because I wasn't paying attention. That's an oversight I'm correcting right now. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA With sincere contempt for a reckless fool, Gray Glasser That's an outstanding analysis for a part-timer, Gray. Andre Jute Sauvitor in modo, fortiter in res |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 19, 8:14 am, (a whole-cloth creation of
Andre Jute) wrote: No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum. And In this country, there are generally two common definitions of a "Gentleman": One being the sort who rests his weight on his elbows whilst screwing someone, and the other being a 'remittance man' sort who need not work for a living. I would be neither, and would never claim to it. Despite our present government, most Americans are pretty direct, pretty tolerant, but and at the same time pretty much enjoy deflating windbags, especially those capable of only a bad smell at their best moments. But, what we have here is you, fulminating and spinning just like an Iranian centrifuge with one (1) sock-puppet and one (1) "commander" of questionable antecedents (who, BTW, also questions the reality of "Gray Glasser" as a separate entity) carrying your water. Pathetic. And you are obsessing pretty much 24/7. Pathetic. Assassins.... Pathetic. You will note that when you actually discussed tube-craft, I made no comment whatsoever, despite the pretty obvious cribbing in your posts... It was on-topic and on point. But shall we take a poll and rename this NG rec.audio.inner-tubes? You are a pathetic, whining, lying, bit of pretentious never-was, and no quantity of sock-puppets and no amount of amateurish vituperation will change that in the slightest. There is a very sound legal principle: Res ipsit loquitor. You ask that I prove you are as I have described you above. You have provided all the proof needed on several occasions, this latest breakdown of yours only being the most recent. Res ipsit loquitor: The thing speaks for itself. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:37:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote:
In this country, there are generally two common definitions of a "Gentleman": One being the sort who rests his weight on his elbows whilst screwing someone, and the other being a 'remittance man' sort who need not work for a living. I would be neither, and would never claim to it. You DON'T take the weight on your elbows? Ah well, if you don't actually wipe your cock on the curtains you may still qualify. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing
Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors. It is supposed to explain why the victim is responsible for Worthless Wiecky over a period of two years sending hundreds of messages hounding the victim's every post. It ignores the fact that the victim simply ignored Worthless Wiecky, mostly making no response. Worthless Wiecky's abusive reply doesn't answer any of Mr Glasser's questions. Worthless Wiecky provides no defence for Mr Glasser's accusations. What it comes down to is that Worthless Wiecky did it because he wanted to, for his own amusement, because he thought that denigrating a more talented person would make his tiny dick bigger. Below I give Mr Glasser's post in full, and Worthless Wiecky's worthless reply in full. Worthless Wiecky, of course, cut away every relevant part of Mr Glasser's post. Worthless Peter Wieck's reply contains the following additonal lies: Peter Wieck wrote [FULL POST BELOW]: You will note that when you actually discussed tube-craft, I made no comment whatsoever, This is another lie by Worthless Peter Wieck. He persecuted my every post, including technical ones. despite the pretty obvious cribbing in your posts... This is another lie. It is also a professional libel on me. It should be noted that I accused Worthless Peter Wieck of plagiarism and proved it by his own words. Prove these lies, scumbag, or I shall return to call you a liar. The rest of your post, Worthless Wiecky, is one big lie inspired by the envy of a little-nothing-janitor for someone with actual achievements. Andre Jute No mercy for a slimy stalker ******* FIRST, GRAY GLASSER'S LIST OF WORTHLESS PETER WIECK'S CRIMES: wrote: Peter Wieck wrote: On Sep 18, 12:28 pm, wrote: "Andre Jute" wrote: It's amazing that the Kutztown organizers rent space to a man with the reputation of Peter Wieck of Wyncote, PA. He is a notorious hoarder and profiteer, and a netflamer and netstalker of anyone who exposes him. His immorality, his stealing, his stalking and his lying has earned him the contemptuous nickname "Worthless Wiecky" on the Usenet. Don't the Kutztown organizers know this? Fiultra The difficulty with the Kutzdown Radio Meet is finding out who is in charge. The reputable and respectable Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club (DVHRC) denies that it has any influence over who can be rented space. According to Mike Koste, "The DVHRC has no financial interest or control of facility, including the renting and assignment of vendor spaces. The club merely acts as hosts." The Radio Meet is held at Renninger's Antique and Farmer's Market in Kutztown, PA. Renninger's are in the business of renting stalls to fill their facility. They have neither the ability nor the desire to weed out bad apples. As long as the stallholder doesn't defecate on the floor, Renninger's don't care what sort of thief and scum he is. Renninger's will rent even Peter Wieck a stall, regardless. So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter Wieck. Regards, Gray Glasser Well, now. And Andre has never been "caught in a lie"... how about the lie that Gray Glasser is a separate entity rather than merely yet another schizoid manifestation of a diseased mind? If you believe it, you should prove it, Worthless. You've tried before and failed. Andre, I use your "first" name (Christian, manifestly, it is not) No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum. The Boss has several times publiclty described you as scum, Worthless, so why do you persist in your foul manners? as a simple indication - to you - that you are a childish git whining over being challenged The notion that a semiliterate janitor like you can challenge The Boss is laughable. In any event, all you've done for a couple of years is attempted character assassination which Mr Jute contemptuously ignored. in your own sandbox. You came to RAT with the single intention of stalking The Boss, for the sole and entirely discreditable reason that, in your own words, it amuses you. You started abusing Mr Jute, without any provocation whatsoever, even as he welcomed you to RAT. And when so-challenged choose to crap all over every other sandbox in sight. You defecated on the carpet in the house where The Boss practices his hobby. So what's your beef when The Boss produces one of his internet puppet shows with you as the star exhibit? Why should there be one rule for scum like you and another for Mr Jute? So, you do not deserve even the respect one would use addressing a child. To others I generally refer to you as Mr. Jute, so they better understand the actual lack of respect. If you believe The Boss cares what you think, you're delusional as well as very, very stupid. I heard him say once, in a lecture on morality, something like, "Respect is only of value between free peers. When it is offered or withheld as a form of blackmail, it is worthless. The blackmailer does not have, cannot get, and will never be given any respect." You're clearly a blackmailer, Worthless. You abused Mr Jute without provocation for years, then offered to cease if he would "stop prosetylizing". That is clearly an attempt by blackmail to control what he says and how. I imagine The Boss regards that, besides blackmail, as an assault on free speech. Now, it was you that once wrote "want another go at it?" The short answer is not really. The Boss is a fair man. If you want to run, he'll let you run. He let you run before, when he crisply and quickly made a public fool of you by turning you into a golem of decayed pig offal stuffed into a cow's bladder, and kicked you around like a football. He generously did not pursue you after you ran. You stupidly returned to abuse him further. But you do tend to fulminate and blather at great and extreme length when prodded... clearly you haven't the character to do anything but that. You should find out who Andre Jute is, Worthless, and before much longer, for the sake of your family. It is only you who think you're messing with some limp intellectual with glasses. Get a life, or your meds will fail. At this point I expect your stress level to be well in the red-zone... We note your lipsmacking relish over the prospect of doing someone else harm. It is quite clear that you wish Mr Jute dead because he is so patently superior to you in every respect. given that you are over 60, overweight and undertall, The stalker always thinks he knows more about his victim than the victim does. that is not a good combination for the long term. Once more you wish The Boss dead. For what? For pointing out, and proving, that you're a stalker, a thief and a liar? For being charismatic and talented when you're dull and, well, dull? You're over the top, Worthless. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA With sincere contempt for a reckless fool, Gray Glasser ******* AND HERE IS WORTHLESS PETER WIECK'S ABUSIVE REPLY: Peter Wieck wrote: On Sep 19, 8:14 am, (a whole-cloth creation of Andre Jute) wrote: No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum. And In this country, there are generally two common definitions of a "Gentleman": One being the sort who rests his weight on his elbows whilst screwing someone, and the other being a 'remittance man' sort who need not work for a living. I would be neither, and would never claim to it. Despite our present government, most Americans are pretty direct, pretty tolerant, but and at the same time pretty much enjoy deflating windbags, especially those capable of only a bad smell at their best moments. But, what we have here is you, fulminating and spinning just like an Iranian centrifuge with one (1) sock-puppet and one (1) "commander" of questionable antecedents (who, BTW, also questions the reality of "Gray Glasser" as a separate entity) carrying your water. Pathetic. And you are obsessing pretty much 24/7. Pathetic. Assassins.... Pathetic. You will note that when you actually discussed tube-craft, I made no comment whatsoever, despite the pretty obvious cribbing in your posts... It was on-topic and on point. But shall we take a poll and rename this NG rec.audio.inner-tubes? You are a pathetic, whining, lying, bit of pretentious never-was, and no quantity of sock-puppets and no amount of amateurish vituperation will change that in the slightest. There is a very sound legal principle: Res ipsit loquitor. You ask that I prove you are as I have described you above. You have provided all the proof needed on several occasions, this latest breakdown of yours only being the most recent. Res ipsit loquitor: The thing speaks for itself. Peter Wieck Wyncote, PA |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 20, 2:07 am, Laurence Payne NOSPAMlpayne1ATdsl.pipex.com
wrote: On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:37:20 -0700, Peter Wieck wrote: In this country, there are generally two common definitions of a "Gentleman": One being the sort who rests his weight on his elbows whilst screwing someone, and the other being a 'remittance man' sort who need not work for a living. I would be neither, and would never claim to it. You DON'T take the weight on your elbows? Ah well, if you don't actually wipe your cock on the curtains you may still qualify. I don't imagine someone as humourless as Worthless Wiecky gets laid all that often, or, considering his age and girth, at all. One of the paradoxes of human nature is that men with a sense of humour do better with women. There is the example of Karl Marx, who was very ugly, but who had a good sense of humour, and thus a lot of success with women. Worthless Wiecky has been ****ting on the carpet in RAT, RAO and UKRA for two years now. Surely, Laurence, this isn't the first time you've noticed that the thieving little scumbag isn't a gentleman? Andre Jute Pavement pooper scooper enforcer |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andre Jute wrote:
Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors. {stipulated, snipped for good taste} You know, Andre, for someone with the notable acclaim you seem to rest on, for the worldwide respect you claim to command, your rather heated pursuit of Mr Wieck in these fora should be beneath you. He is an individual with a hobbycraft interest, who posts you USENet for his activities. You, on the other hand, would appear, by your website, to play at a much higher level. With considerable worldwide recognition and support. By your pursuit of Mr Wieck, you have given him far more recognition and credibility than he would have otherwise have assumed, but more importantly, you raise questions about your own stature and intent. After all, to quote the prophet Lujack: Eagles don't hunt flies. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andre Jute" wrote in message
ups.com I'm thinking that Jute the uncouth has alienated so many people that Peter should advertise at Kutztown that he's AKA "Worthless Wiecky" Nousiane and I often wear nametags with our Middiot-borne borg-names at local audio club meetings. Gets a lot of laughs! Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors. snip equally repulsive weirdness |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Arny Krueger wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message ups.com I'm thinking that Jute the uncouth has alienated so many people that Peter should advertise at Kutztown that he's AKA "Worthless Wiecky" Although you and I have had our differences, Arny, I have to agree here. Peter couldn't BUY this kind of promotional buzz. |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"D Peter Maus" wrote in
message Arny Krueger wrote: "Andre Jute" wrote in message ups.com I'm thinking that Jute the uncouth has alienated so many people that Peter should advertise at Kutztown that he's AKA "Worthless Wiecky" Although you and I have had our differences, Arny, I have to agree here. Peter couldn't BUY this kind of promotional buzz. It was a good thing that my coffee cup was long-emptied when I read Jute's most recent diatribe. Jute has taken his already legendary lack of self-awareness to new depths! |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 20, 7:56 am, D Peter Maus wrote:
Andre Jute wrote: Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors. {stipulated, snipped for good taste} All right, you agree Wieck is slime and the accusations are proven against him; you so stipulate. A pity I toocannot draw a curtain over the distasteful slime of Peter Wieck's crime. You know, Andre, for someone with the notable acclaim you seem to rest on, for the worldwide respect you claim to command, I never rest on my laurels, D Peter, and I make no claims. You can read whatever I put on my netsite and draw your own conclusion. your rather heated pursuit of Mr Wieck in these fora should be beneath you. Why should putting down a bully who assaults free speech and tries to blackmail his victim into silence be beneath any intellectual? Surely an attack on free speech is the first order of business for any intellectual. The blackmail: Worthless Wiecky, without any provocation from me, hounds my posts for two years with hundreds of messages and then offers to desist if I will say what he wants me to say in the manner he wants me to say it. Do I need to explain how that is a fascist assault on free speech? He is an individual with a hobbycraft interest, who posts you USENet for his activities. You, on the other hand, would appear, by your website, to play at a much higher level. With considerable worldwide recognition and support. Sure, that's what's problem here. Worthless Wiecky is a stalker. The talentless little man thinks that by denigrating me, by "controlling" me, his talentless, worthless person will appear to be greater than my achievements. It's the dreams of stalkers everywhe to live in the skin of the beloved, and when the beloved finds them boring, to assassinate him. In short, Wieck's assaults on free speech are driven by a diseased envy. By your pursuit of Mr Wieck, you have given him far more recognition and credibility than he would have otherwise have assumed, Raise your eyes, D Peter, to the horison and beyond. Search engines will find Worthless Wiecky for a long time and undercut his dignity, which is important to him because it all he has. People in the communities where he was once appreciated (among other reasons for his large-scale bribery, literally buying loyalty with weekly presents), will first close around him, and then start wondering about the fire indicated by the smoke. A couple of smart traders have already written to me privately to insist they have no connection with Wieck; they don't want to share the fate of dealers on RAT who identified too closely with the Magnequest Scum. but more importantly, you raise questions about your own stature and intent. Nah, the sort of people impressed with stature don't matter to me, and the ones who do matter to me are very bright indeed, far too intelligent to mistake my intent. The greater danger is that they will say, Gee, Andre, after whom sovereign governments sent assassins for his moral stand, is slipping when his only "enemy" is some little janitor from some little PA town. (Life can get quite boring when all your enemies are dead or living in disgrace without their pensions...) In any event, when an intellectual's dignity becomes more important than his message, he has already lost the battle, the war, and all utility to society. I learned that from another janitor, one Ron Bales, a footsoldier in the Magnequest Mob, and when I later went around systematically dealing with the immoral fellow-travellers of the scumbag Mike LaFevre, I let Ron off; he later became a most useful member of AGA. After all, to quote the prophet Lujack: Eagles don't hunt flies. I've heard that (do tell more about Lujack -- a television character?) but it is false logic. A more appropriate saying in the circumstances is: All that is required for evil to triumph is for good people to remain silent. I have always taken the view that in any assault on free speech, fundamental liberty is challenged. Strong reaction follows inevitably. I do hope, D Peter, that I have not wasted my time being reasonable; a few witty put-downs are so much quicker to write. It would be awful if I misunderstood you and you were indeed standing up for Worthless Wiecky's right to be a slimy stalker, character assassin and blackmailer, a thug on free speech. But, if I read you right, thanks for trying to be helpful. Andre Jute Visit Andre Jute at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andre Jute wrote:
On Sep 20, 7:56 am, D Peter Maus wrote: Andre Jute wrote: Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors. {stipulated, snipped for good taste} All right, you agree Wieck is slime and the accusations are proven against him; you so stipulate. A pity I toocannot draw a curtain over the distasteful slime of Peter Wieck's crime. You know, Andre, for someone with the notable acclaim you seem to rest on, for the worldwide respect you claim to command, I never rest on my laurels, D Peter, and I make no claims. You can read whatever I put on my netsite and draw your own conclusion. your rather heated pursuit of Mr Wieck in these fora should be beneath you. Why should putting down a bully who assaults free speech and tries to blackmail his victim into silence be beneath any intellectual? Surely an attack on free speech is the first order of business for any intellectual. The blackmail: Worthless Wiecky, without any provocation from me, hounds my posts for two years with hundreds of messages and then offers to desist if I will say what he wants me to say in the manner he wants me to say it. Do I need to explain how that is a fascist assault on free speech? He is an individual with a hobbycraft interest, who posts you USENet for his activities. You, on the other hand, would appear, by your website, to play at a much higher level. With considerable worldwide recognition and support. Sure, that's what's problem here. Worthless Wiecky is a stalker. The talentless little man thinks that by denigrating me, by "controlling" me, his talentless, worthless person will appear to be greater than my achievements. It's the dreams of stalkers everywhe to live in the skin of the beloved, and when the beloved finds them boring, to assassinate him. In short, Wieck's assaults on free speech are driven by a diseased envy. By your pursuit of Mr Wieck, you have given him far more recognition and credibility than he would have otherwise have assumed, Raise your eyes, D Peter, to the horison and beyond. Search engines will find Worthless Wiecky for a long time and undercut his dignity, which is important to him because it all he has. People in the communities where he was once appreciated (among other reasons for his large-scale bribery, literally buying loyalty with weekly presents), will first close around him, and then start wondering about the fire indicated by the smoke. A couple of smart traders have already written to me privately to insist they have no connection with Wieck; they don't want to share the fate of dealers on RAT who identified too closely with the Magnequest Scum. but more importantly, you raise questions about your own stature and intent. Nah, the sort of people impressed with stature don't matter to me, and the ones who do matter to me are very bright indeed, far too intelligent to mistake my intent. The greater danger is that they will say, Gee, Andre, after whom sovereign governments sent assassins for his moral stand, is slipping when his only "enemy" is some little janitor from some little PA town. (Life can get quite boring when all your enemies are dead or living in disgrace without their pensions...) In any event, when an intellectual's dignity becomes more important than his message, he has already lost the battle, the war, and all utility to society. I learned that from another janitor, one Ron Bales, a footsoldier in the Magnequest Mob, and when I later went around systematically dealing with the immoral fellow-travellers of the scumbag Mike LaFevre, I let Ron off; he later became a most useful member of AGA. After all, to quote the prophet Lujack: Eagles don't hunt flies. I've heard that (do tell more about Lujack -- a television character?) but it is false logic. A more appropriate saying in the circumstances is: All that is required for evil to triumph is for good people to remain silent. I have always taken the view that in any assault on free speech, fundamental liberty is challenged. Strong reaction follows inevitably. I do hope, D Peter, that I have not wasted my time being reasonable; a few witty put-downs are so much quicker to write. It would be awful if I misunderstood you and you were indeed standing up for Worthless Wiecky's right to be a slimy stalker, character assassin and blackmailer, a thug on free speech. But, if I read you right, thanks for trying to be helpful. Andre Jute Visit Andre Jute at http://members.lycos.co.uk/fiultra/ ROFLMMFAO! |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Krooborg shows why it hates and fears everything with a hint of sophistication. Nousiane[sic] and I often wear nametags with our Middiot[sic]-borne[sic] borg-names at local audio club meetings. Sometimes a post like this one brings you up short as you wonder how a creature like Arnii Krooborg can be allowed to run free in the world.... "Audio club meetings", Arnii? I suppose you're the champion nose-picker in the entire Detroit metro area. |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Sep, 17:57, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote in message ups.com I'm thinking that Jute the uncouth has alienated so many people that Peter should advertise at Kutztown that he's AKA "Worthless Wiecky" Nousiane and I often wear nametags with our Middiot-borne borg-names at local audio club meetings. Gets a lot of laughs! Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors. snip equally repulsive weirdness Kroo****, being your favorite. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who keeps crooks out of Kutztown? | Marketplace | |||
Peter Wieck, Kutztown Space 338, Thief, Stalker, Liar | Audio Opinions | |||
OT - Kutztown Vintage Radio Swap Meet (Sept. 22/23) Kutztown, PA | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Is Quantec germany a bunch of crooks????????????? | Pro Audio |