Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While researching ignitors on gas arc tube lamps I read about how the magnetic field collapses when the circuit is basically opened as the AC input signal falls to zero and it causes a spike in the secondary as high as 2500-3000 Volt range for 150w to 400w lamps. I know the spike in a ballast is designed for the lamp to start. I should say the lamp is designed to take advantage of the spike.
SO: A spike must happen to a tube push pull amp as well though perhaps not that high in voltage, I don't know. I got to thinkin'. The Power Transformer, if opened while standby is closed, could do some real damage to the amp, right? If a spike like that is released across the rectifier and filter caps, the inductor, and the power tubes...I don't have testing experience in this so here is the question. Q1 What happens to the amp as this spike works its way through a basic amp; e.g. http://drtube.com/schematics/marshall/2204u.gif Part1: Assume a proper speaker is connected. Part2: Assume without a speaker connected. Slightly different note: I've noticed that when I open the standby preparing the amp to be shut down after playing for a while that I can hear my guitar chord at lower volume and fades within a few moments through the speakers. This is a different discharging scenario since the standby is open no spike from the PT can pass.. Q2 What is contributing to the discharging of the amp, providing enough energy to the amp for the signal to still be heard for a few seconds? The heaters are still hot so is the amp dissipating the coils and caps stored energy only? Or is there stored energy in the hot tubes as well? Provided there is an input signal. X |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please note the interpolations:
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 5:04:33 AM UTC-4, Xtrchessreal wrote: While researching ignitors on gas arc tube lamps I read about how the magnetic field collapses when the circuit is basically opened as the AC input signal falls to zero and it causes a spike in the secondary as high as 2500-3000 Volt range for 150w to 400w lamps. I know the spike in a ballast is designed for the lamp to start. I should say the lamp is designed to take advantage of the spike. SO: A spike must happen to a tube push pull amp as well though perhaps not that high in voltage, I don't know. This is the fallacy of 'leaping to conclusions' - reasoning from the specific to the general. My cat is grey, therefore all cats are grey. The ballast in a gas-discharge lamp is wound and designed to deliver that spike at the collapse of the field. Note that a lamp ballast is essentially a massive choke with no secondary winding(s). A power-transformer with multiple secondary windings, the 'hottest' of which is perhaps 4:1 (but relatively low current) is not wound to deliver such a spike. What *does* happen is that the current through the filaments is a bit high until the filament heats and resistance increases. But this is hardly what would be defined as a damaging spike. This does not include the potential of an external spike. But, nothing generated within the 'system' will do as you suggest. Once that is understood, your first question is moot. I got to thinkin'. The Power Transformer, if opened while standby is closed, could do some real damage to the amp, right? If a spike like that is released across the rectifier and filter caps, the inductor, and the power tubes...I don't have testing experience in this so here is the question. Q1 What happens to the amp as this spike works its way through a basic amp; e.g. http://drtube.com/schematics/marshall/2204u.gif Part1: Assume a proper speaker is connected. Part2: Assume without a speaker connected. Slightly different note: I've noticed that when I open the standby preparing the amp to be shut down after playing for a while that I can hear my guitar chord at lower volume and fades within a few moments through the speakers. This is a different discharging scenario since the standby is open no spike from the PT can pass. Q2 What is contributing to the discharging of the amp, providing enough energy to the amp for the signal to still be heard for a few seconds? The heaters are still hot so is the amp dissipating the coils and caps stored energy only? Or is there stored energy in the hot tubes as well? Provided there is an input signal. The capacitors within the amp discharging through the residual conduction in of the tubes. When the filament shuts off, there is still some minimal conduction from the residual heat. A few seconds - perhaps a bit more depending on the design of the amp itself and the amount of capacitance in use. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 5:12:34 AM UTC-6, Peter Wieck wrote:
Please note the interpolations: On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 5:04:33 AM UTC-4, Xtrchessreal wrote: While researching ignitors on gas arc tube lamps I read about how the magnetic field collapses when the circuit is basically opened as the AC input signal falls to zero and it causes a spike in the secondary as high as 2500-3000 Volt range for 150w to 400w lamps. I know the spike in a ballast is designed for the lamp to start. I should say the lamp is designed to take advantage of the spike. SO: A spike must happen to a tube push pull amp as well though perhaps not that high in voltage, I don't know. This is the fallacy of 'leaping to conclusions' - reasoning from the specific to the general. My cat is grey, therefore all cats are grey. The ballast in a gas-discharge lamp is wound and designed to deliver that spike at the collapse of the field. Note that a lamp ballast is essentially a massive choke with no secondary winding(s). A power-transformer with multiple secondary windings, the 'hottest' of which is perhaps 4:1 (but relatively low current) is not wound to deliver such a spike. What *does* happen is that the current through the filaments is a bit high until the filament heats and resistance increases. But this is hardly what would be defined as a damaging spike. This does not include the potential of an external spike. But, nothing generated within the 'system' will do as you suggest. Once that is understood, your first question is moot. I got to thinkin'. The Power Transformer, if opened while standby is closed, could do some real damage to the amp, right? If a spike like that is released across the rectifier and filter caps, the inductor, and the power tubes...I don't have testing experience in this so here is the question. Q1 What happens to the amp as this spike works its way through a basic amp; e.g. http://drtube.com/schematics/marshall/2204u.gif Part1: Assume a proper speaker is connected. Part2: Assume without a speaker connected. Slightly different note: I've noticed that when I open the standby preparing the amp to be shut down after playing for a while that I can hear my guitar chord at lower volume and fades within a few moments through the speakers. This is a different discharging scenario since the standby is open no spike from the PT can pass. Q2 What is contributing to the discharging of the amp, providing enough energy to the amp for the signal to still be heard for a few seconds? The heaters are still hot so is the amp dissipating the coils and caps stored energy only? Or is there stored energy in the hot tubes as well? Provided there is an input signal. The capacitors within the amp discharging through the residual conduction in of the tubes. When the filament shuts off, there is still some minimal conduction from the residual heat. A few seconds - perhaps a bit more depending on the design of the amp itself and the amount of capacitance in use. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA I agree with you. I went back to study the circuit of the Constant Wattage Autotransformer Ballast I was working with: http://cr4.globalspec.com/PostImages...797CED15AB.bmp The Cap across the primary and secondary only charges/discharges at higher open circuit voltage and the starter closes during arc lamp ignition, once at operating voltage the cap stops charging and discharging because the operating voltage is lower and the starter stays open. At that point the Ballast is just an Inductor. The spike I was thinking about is only on the secondary at arc lamp startup. After operation for several hours and then switched off the starter is still at a lower voltage, the arc tube is still hot, the Cap is still not charged and stays open, no spike should occur at that point either. The PT on an amp would not deliver any different peak voltage than normal. I was confused because of the diagram, looks similar to a PT but the Cap in series with secondary is very different. Thanks for your input ![]() X |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to worry. I have chased down more than a few rabbit-holes in my time!
It just makes SO much sense that it should be this way, why isn't it??? Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/26/17 02:04, Xtrchessreal wrote:
While researching ignitors on gas arc tube lamps I read about how the magnetic field collapses when the circuit is basically opened as the AC input signal falls to zero and it causes a spike in the secondary as high as 2500-3000 Volt range for 150w to 400w lamps. I know the spike in a ballast is designed for the lamp to start. I should say the lamp is designed to take advantage of the spike. SO: A spike must happen to a tube push pull amp as well though perhaps not that high in voltage, I don't know. the best way to describe this is: if you create a 5th harmonic while opening or closing the circuit to a transformer, the current "rotates backwards" with respect to phase rotation. Additionally, if you were to close (or open) a transformer primary circuit at the peak voltage, you would theoretically have zero (real) current if the load were purely inductive. And, if you opened or closed the circuit at zero crossing, you would have maximum (reactive) current. This being due to reactive current 90 degrees lagging voltage. I saw people discuss 'inrush current' once before, who then mercilously FLAMED me, just for suggesting that experiments be done to show what the peak amperage REALLY is (claims of 1000 amps, and so forth, pure bull****). And that name 'inrush current' offers a poor description of what is REALLY happening. If you close the switch at "just the right point", or open the switch at "just the right point", you might get unlucky and max out the current. Zero crossing is considered one of the worst points, but 5th harmonic (36 degrees) would be _THE_ worst. I did some real calculations (which I don't think I ever posted, because I was sick of the ASSHOLES that only wanted to make their own dicks look bigger than mine) and determined that the biggest surge current would be due to creating a 5th harmonic waveform. So if you were to close (or open) the switch at the magic 36 degree point in the sine wave, assuming no hysteresis on the core, and certain conditions for toroidal transformers, you'd max out current, at an even higher level (as a spike, not continuous) than you might expect based on the resistance of the windings and impedence of the load, etc.. This is because phase rotation of the 5th harmonic OPPOSES the phase rotation of the 1st harmonic. It's worse than a direct short, as you're literally OPPOSING the current flow. This is known to burn up motors and wiring etc. in power circuits with sufficient 5th harmonic in the power circuit. 5th harmonic is bad. VERY bad. https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tex...ase-sequences/ Now the term 'inrush current' is (unfortunately) in use in the electrical power generation industry. It's misleading as to what it actually means. There's no "inrush" really. They just call it that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inrush_current -- misleading name The wikipedia article also explains some of the issues with toroidal transformers, which are moderately interesting - I'd just use a series slow-blow fuse of an appropriate size, which would have a small series resistance in the circuit, and would mitigate a lot of the problem. Also, any 'spike' is basically in the primary of the transformer and (as I understand it) does NOT induce problems in the secondary circuit(s). In any case, energizing or de-energizing a transformer can cause issues with the primary windings and the mains power you plug into. but the secondary(s) shouldn't see any effects. Not in any significance, anyway. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 26, 2017 at 5:04:33 AM UTC-4, Xtrchessreal wrote:
While researching ignitors on gas arc tube lamps I read about how the magnetic field collapses when the circuit is basically opened as the AC input signal falls to zero and it causes a spike in the secondary as high as 2500-3000 Volt range for 150w to 400w lamps. I know the spike in a ballast is designed for the lamp to start. I should say the lamp is designed to take advantage of the spike. SO: A spike must happen to a tube push pull amp as well though perhaps not that high in voltage, I don't know. I got to thinkin'. The Power Transformer, if opened while standby is closed, could do some real damage to the amp, right? If a spike like that is released across the rectifier and filter caps, the inductor, and the power tubes...I don't have testing experience in this so here is the question. Q1 What happens to the amp as this spike works its way through a basic amp; e.g. http://drtube.com/schematics/marshall/2204u.gif Part1: Assume a proper speaker is connected. Part2: Assume without a speaker connected. Slightly different note: I've noticed that when I open the standby preparing the amp to be shut down after playing for a while that I can hear my guitar chord at lower volume and fades within a few moments through the speakers. This is a different discharging scenario since the standby is open no spike from the PT can pass. Q2 What is contributing to the discharging of the amp, providing enough energy to the amp for the signal to still be heard for a few seconds? The heaters are still hot so is the amp dissipating the coils and caps stored energy only? Or is there stored energy in the hot tubes as well? Provided there is an input signal. X Not to worry, do the following. Connect a 1000 PIV SI diode such as a 1N4007 so that its anode side is connected to the common lead (ground), the cathode lead to the load side of the B+. Any energy stored in the LCL filter network will be safely dissipated when the standby is set to OFF. Wish I could show you on a schematic. What make & Model is the amp? It might be in Aspens book. Cheers to all, John L Stewart |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In common power supplies the only example where there might be a problem would be that using choke input. The choke likes to keep the current flowing, so a switch between the rectifiers & the choke input could cause insulation failure. But a switch on the primary side as it normally would be is OK, the choke still has a way to dump stored energy thru the PS transformer wdgs & rectifer.
But choke input is now uncommon, most PS are cap input. In my case I installed the fix I spoke of in a regulated PS with DC standby I built many years ago so that it can be run either in choke or cap input. The max volts or current can then be used to advantage. Cheers to all, John L Stewart |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 11:37:24 AM UTC-6, wrote:
In common power supplies the only example where there might be a problem would be that using choke input. The choke likes to keep the current flowing, so a switch between the rectifiers & the choke input could cause insulation failure. But a switch on the primary side as it normally would be is OK, the choke still has a way to dump stored energy thru the PS transformer wdgs & rectifer. But choke input is now uncommon, most PS are cap input. In my case I installed the fix I spoke of in a regulated PS with DC standby I built many years ago so that it can be run either in choke or cap input. The max volts or current can then be used to advantage. Cheers to all, John L Stewart its a 2204 Marshall circuit that I built, I added an LED between the input filter and the standby, when switch closes and B+ hits the amp rail LED ON, such that when switch is later opened the Caps discharge through the LED to ground over a period of several minutes, for safety when opening the amp e.g. to bias new tubes or repairs, tweaks... X |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/23/17 00:05, Xtrchessreal wrote:
On Friday, August 4, 2017 at 11:37:24 AM UTC-6, wrote: In common power supplies the only example where there might be a problem would be that using choke input. The choke likes to keep the current flowing, so a switch between the rectifiers & the choke input could cause insulation failure. But a switch on the primary side as it normally would be is OK, the choke still has a way to dump stored energy thru the PS transformer wdgs & rectifer. But choke input is now uncommon, most PS are cap input. In my case I installed the fix I spoke of in a regulated PS with DC standby I built many years ago so that it can be run either in choke or cap input. The max volts or current can then be used to advantage. Cheers to all, John L Stewart its a 2204 Marshall circuit that I built, I added an LED between the input filter and the standby, when switch closes and B+ hits the amp rail LED ON, such that when switch is later opened the Caps discharge through the LED to ground over a period of several minutes, for safety when opening the amp e.g. to bias new tubes or repairs, tweaks... X LEDs typically use up to 10ma, which is actually a LOT for a 400V power supply (that'd need a 5W resistor in series with the LED). A more interesting modification would do the following in standby: a) short out the speaker leads on the output transformer (or use a very very very low resistance) to prevent unusual oscillations, etc. b) power the system with 50-100V and leave the fixed bias ON for the output tubes but if your system doesn't have fixed bias, then it probably won't work right... The reason why you want to apply at least SOME voltage in standby mode is to prevent cathode damage. It's my understanding that tubes without positive plate voltage have a tendency to form bizarre 'charge clouds' around the cathode, damaging the coating among other things. I read about things like this in an article on extending tube life, from the 1960's. I don't have a link handy, though... So, in any case, you might consider at least doing 'b' but maybe activate a relay to cause 'a' so you don't go into motorboating type of oscillations in the power stage [with a big fat series resistor dropping the voltage down like that]. Shorting the O.P.T. is generally bad, but doing so while voltage is between 50V and 100V won't "cook" anything, and would prevent oscillations. [merely opening the speaker leads won't prevent oscillations - in fact it might make them WORSE] You could also use a relay to make sure that the short is removed BEFORE normal voltage is restored, a "break before make" condition using a relay with multiple SPDT switches in it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
don't try to collapse closely while you're serving up to a mushy committee | Car Audio | |||
Precipitous Collapse of the US dollar | Car Audio | |||
Loud Music Can Cause Lung Collapse | Pro Audio | |||
recording multitrack audio on the field (i mean "on the field" !) who did that ? | Pro Audio |