"Sander deWaal" wrote in message
...
"Bruce J. Richman" said:

Those that *are* psychotic will probably deny it. :-)

Psychiatrist to patient:
"You're obviously in your denial phase."
Patient:
"No I'm not!"

:-)

--

Procrastinator to those who criticize him for it: "Just you wait."

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Ruud Broens wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
groups.com...
:
: dave weil wrote:
:
: On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:59:44 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
: wrote:
:
: "Ruud Broens" wrote in message
:
:
: Well Bruce, it's time to have it out:
: either you subscribe to the notion, that flaming justifies endless
: follow-up flaming - in which case, you don't have a leg to stand
: on,
: when accusing others of flaming -
: or you state that there is no such justification - in which case,
: you
: better 'shape up your act, hm ? -
:
: Agreed.
:
: Tired of the flame-****
: time for .audio.opinion as intended
:
: Agreed.
:
: I guess you don't mind the flame-**** then, huh Arnold?
:
: Arnold has always been happy to increase the flames on RAO. Apparently
: our new self-appointed hypocritical "historian", Rudy, forgot to
: consider posts

Hypocritical, eh ? Let's see, that's not professional psychol. jargon,
so, did you look it up, yet, in your dict. ? Better do that, Brucie
Ruuudie


It looks like I struck a nerve. :--)

Are you ready to amuse us some more with your Google fables with the
selective
amnesia you manage to use in your searches.

Any proof that he's trying to distort the record?


Look up the phrase "truth in reporting" in YOUR dictionary, Rudy. The
one
with the inscription "Approved by Krueger, Lionel and Torresists".

Look in a mirror and ask yourself if you are part of the problem or part of
the solution?

And then lecture us about increasing the audio content on RAO. We can all
see
how hard you're trying to do that.


What do you suppose your own % of posts about audio are vs. your other
comments?

Ruud Broens wrote:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
.................................................. .............................
: .......................................
: Well Bruce, it's time to have it out:
: either you subscribe to the notion, that flaming justifies
endless
: follow-up
: flaming - in which case, you don't have a leg to stand on, when
: accusing
: others of flaming -
: or you state that there is no such justification - in which case,
you
: better
: 'shape up your act, hm ? -
:
:
: Well, Rudy, since you've elected to distort history by producing a
post
: out of context, WITHOUT BOTHERING TO POST SEVERAL ATTACKS
: THAT PRECEDED IT BY STEWART PINKERTON,
your logic is both self-serving and flawed.

Brucy, baby, you *really* don't want to take _me_ on re logic :-)
trust me:-))


Rudy, baby, I already have, and those reading my reeponse to your
tranparent attack thread, will easily see that your "logic" has been
destroyed, if it ever existed at all.



: Do you really want to align yourself with McKelvy, who has a
documented
: Google record of les and false statements about my professional
: activies and training for almost 7 years, or with Krueger, who has
: recently claimed that he is entttled to attack others since he's
been
: attacked in the past?
:
: Let's consider the following posts by Pinkerton, whcih you somehow,
in
: your rush to hypocritical jusdgment, somehow "overlooked":


Rudy, BAby, are you trying to imitate your friend, Krueger, by
deliberately deleting evidence presented in a post that puts you in a
negative light.

Is that more of that famous "truth in reporting" for which you're so
well known? LOL !!!



----- : Most RAO participants, I feel, would agree.

You want to see some put up ? Fine.
Let's see, if we can raise hands of 'most RAO participants'
when it come to agreeing with Bruce J. Richman that :

IT IS HYPOCRITICAL TO EXPOSE INCESSANT FLAMING


Rudy is now trying to misquote me, just as he attributed a smear of
Lionel's to me. But Rudy's record for telling the truth about what
Google shows is pretty terrible, as I've already clearly indicated.
He's been sold some propaganda by Krueger and will do anything to try
and spread it.

LOL !!!!

I'm all for votes, Rudy !!! Let's start with a poll among RAO's
active posters to see how many think that Krueger has smeared and
flamed more specific different people, for a longer period of time,
than any other RAO poster. Since you like to use past Google threads,
they can look at a thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
Experience" to get a better idea of the truth you'd like to hide and/or
ignore.

Then we can ask people to vote on whether you're deliberatly deceptive
posting of a response to Pinkerton came before or after he attacked me.
People can easily compare the dates on the post I reproduced to find
out the truth.

Sorry, as my friend, Dave Weil would say to the thoroughly discredited
Krueger, you lose, again.

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

:--)

Is it a "double-nose" guy, Bruce ?
Parkinson ?
Ooops sorry. :-(

Ruud Broens wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

And since this is an audio NG - or should be, here's one of my
favorite
"psychology songs" - Melanie Safka (AKA Melanie):

Psychotherapy
by Safka Melanie

Album :


Oh mine eyes have seen the glory of the theories of Freud,
He has taught me all the evils that my ego must avoid.
Repression of the impulses resuling paranoid
As the id goes marching on.
Glory glory psychotherapy, glory glory sexuality,
Glory glory now we can be free as the id goes marching on

There was a man who thought his friends to him were all superior
And this complex he imagined made life drearier and drearier
Till his analyst assured him that he really was inferior
As the id goes marching on.
Glory glory psychotherapy, glory glory sexuality,
Glory glory now we can be free as the id goes marching on

Do you drown your superego in a flood of alcohol - or something else
-
And go running after women till you're just about to fall.
You may think you're having fun but you're not having fun at all
As the id goes marching on.
Glory glory psychotherapy, glory glory sexuality,
Glory glory now we can be free as the id goes marching on

Oh sad is the masochism, the vagaries of sex
Have turned half the population into total nervous wrecks.
But your analyst will cure you, long as you can pay the cheques
As the id goes marching on.
Glory glory psychotherapy, glory glory sexuality,
Glory glory now we can be free as the id goes marching on

Is your body plagued by aches and pains that you can't understand
Compound fractures ingrown toenails, floating kidneys, trembling
hands,
There's a secret to your trouble: you're in love with your old man
As the id goes marching on.
Glory glory psychotherapy, glory glory sexuality,
Glory glory now we can be free as the id goes marching on

Freud's mystic world of meaning needn't have us mystified
It's really very simple what the psyche tries to hide:
A thing is a phallic symbol if it's longer than it's wide
As the id goes marching on.
Glory glory psychotherapy, glory glory sexuality,
Glory glory now we can be free as the id goes marching on.

Copyright =A92002-2004 LyricsBox.com

..=2E............................................. ..........................=
..=2E......
......
Well, Doc, like the poetry and songs a lot more
than the prose u produce :-)
Rudy

That's understandable, Rudy. After all, she's not here responding to a
series of false statements you've made.

I've also written some modest ballads about a few of RAO's more
notorious characters, but since you've clearly chosen sides, you
wouldn't appreciate them .

Jim Sanders, who occasionally posts here under the name, "Seabiscuit"
also wrote a nice litle number called "This Old Kroo" (sung to the tune
of "This Old House", but you would not appreciae either the humor or
the honesty in the lyrics.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
ups.com...

As for Lionel, his language problems in
English would probably penalize him sevwrely were he to be evaluated
with an English language IQ test

And I thought, the brit's were the masters of irony :-) My mistake
Rudy

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message
...
:
: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
: ups.com...
:
: As for Lionel, his language problems in
: English would probably penalize him sevwrely were he to be evaluated
: with an English language IQ test
:
: And I thought, the brit's were the masters of irony :-) My mistake
: Rudy
:
But we gotta give it to ya, Doc:

you rre ly know how to put a sewer into a sentence , lad (think: Scottish
accent
Rudy
comic

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

: I'm all for votes, Rudy !!! Let's start with a poll among RAO's
: active posters to see how many think that Krueger has smeared and
: flamed more specific different people, for a longer period of time,
: than any other RAO poster. Since you like to use past Google threads,
: they can look at a thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
: Experience" to get a better idea of the truth you'd like to hide and/or
: ignore.

Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a change


: Then we can ask people to vote on whether you're deliberatly deceptive
: posting of a response to Pinkerton came before or after he attacked me.
: People can easily compare the dates on the post I reproduced to find
: out the truth.
:
: Sorry, as my friend, Dave Weil would say to the thoroughly discredited
: Krueger, you lose, again.
:

Ruud Broens wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

: I'm all for votes, Rudy !!! Let's start with a poll among RAO's
: active posters to see how many think that Krueger has smeared and
: flamed more specific different people, for a longer period of time,
: than any other RAO poster. Since you like to use past Google
threads,
: they can look at a thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
: Experience" to get a better idea of the truth you'd like to hide
and/or
: ignore.

Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a change




Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy .
Are you sure he's not coaching you?

The Krueger post I referred to had about 1787 entries, which has to be
some kind of record for an RAO post. Of course, you'd like pretend it
doesn't exist as would Krueger, I'm sure.

Let's try one with your name in it.

Thanks for pfoviding another high audio content post.





: Then we can ask people to vote on whether you're deliberatly
deceptive
: posting of a response to Pinkerton came before or after he attacked
me.
: People can easily compare the dates on the post I reproduced to
find
: out the truth.
:
: Sorry, as my friend, Dave Weil would say to the thoroughly
discredited
: Krueger, you lose, again.
:

Lionel wrote:

Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :
Lionel wrote:

Bruce J. Richman a =E9crit :


It wasn't worth the time or effort, since you ended it with a

series of

idiotic lies. If you want a rational discussion, you'll have to
at
least "pretend" to be rational and civilized.

Sorry Bruce, I was believing that you could be a psychologist ! :-)



You were believing that you could post a series of delusional lies
and
get a response to them. You were wrong, as you usually are. Admit
it,
Lionel, you have no interest in rational discussions. You're just
on
RAO to insult other people. You've demonstrated this over and over
again.

In other words, you can't prevent yourself from closing your
semi-rational posts with a series of idiotic insults. Thanks for
confirming my hypothesis.

Your group of "supporters" seems to be shrinking. Have you noticed
that?

"Timmmmmmmme is on my side....." :-D

Lockjaw or tetanus or tardive dyskinesia? Probably the last if you've
been taking certain meds

Mick actually sang "T-i-ime is on my side, yes it is" when I saw him
and the boys during the Steel Wheels Tour in 1990.

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
: oups.com...
:
: : I'm all for votes, Rudy !!! Let's start with a poll among RAO's
: : active posters to see how many think that Krueger has smeared and
: : flamed more specific different people, for a longer period of time,
: : than any other RAO poster. Since you like to use past Google
: threads,
: : they can look at a thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
: : Experience" to get a better idea of the truth you'd like to hide
: and/or
: : ignore.
:
: Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a change
:
:
:
:
: Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy .
: Are you sure he's not coaching you?
: "Bruce J. Richman"

hehe, we can always relay on good ol' doc to change the subject:-)
but, he, he's now, more than ever, also changing the thread title on
a regular basis. That's new !! Hmm,

Rudy
r'alley

"Ruud Broens" wrote in message


hehe, we can always relay on good ol' doc to change the subject:-)
but, he, he's now, more than ever, also changing the thread title on
a regular basis. That's new !! Hmm,

Given how bitterly Brucie has complained about changing the subject line,
this is a very hypocritical thing for him to do. He seems to have become
completely ungrounded.

Ruud Broens wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
: oups.com...
:
: : I'm all for votes, Rudy !!! Let's start with a poll among
RAO's
: : active posters to see how many think that Krueger has smeared
and
: : flamed more specific different people, for a longer period of
time,
: : than any other RAO poster. Since you like to use past Google
: threads,
: : they can look at a thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
: : Experience" to get a better idea of the truth you'd like to
hide
: and/or
: : ignore.
:
: Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a
change
:
:
:
:
: Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy .
: Are you sure he's not coaching you?
: "Bruce J. Richman"

hehe, we can always relay on good ol' doc to change the subject:-)
but, he, he's now, more than ever, also changing the thread title on
a regular basis. That's new !! Hmm,

Rudy
r'alley

ROFLMAO !!! We can always depend on Rudy to try and copy Krueger's
de3ceptive posting habits, including deleting important information
from posts and changing thread titles.

What was that about increasing the audio content on RAO, Rudy?
ROFLMAO !!!!

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: :
: : Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a
: change
: :
: :
: :
: :
: : Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy .
: : Are you sure he's not coaching you?
: : "Bruce J. Richman"
:
: hehe, we can always relay on good ol' doc to change the subject:-)
: but, he, he's now, more than ever, also changing the thread title on
: a regular basis. That's new !! Hmm,
:
: Rudy
: r'alley
:
: ROFLMAO !!! We can always depend on Rudy to try and copy Krueger's
: de3ceptive posting habits, including deleting important information
: from posts and changing thread titles.
:
: What was that about increasing the audio content on RAO, Rudy?
: ROFLMAO !!!!

It's deviced that way, doc :-) Little 'lettin' of steam' postings for your
comfort !
at your service,
Rudy

Ruud Broens wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: :
: : Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a
: change
: :
: :
: :
: :
: : Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy
.
: : Are you sure he's not coaching you?
: : "Bruce J. Richman"
:
: hehe, we can always relay on good ol' doc to change the
subject:-)
: but, he, he's now, more than ever, also changing the thread title
on
: a regular basis. That's new !! Hmm,
:
: Rudy
: r'alley
:
: ROFLMAO !!! We can always depend on Rudy to try and copy Krueger's
: deceptive posting habits, including deleting important information
: from posts and changing thread titles.
:
: What was that about increasing the audio content on RAO, Rudy?
: ROFLMAO !!!!

It's deviced that way, doc :-) Little 'lettin' of steam' postings
for your
comfort !
at your service,
Rudy

ER, Rudy........... i don't think anything was "deviced that way".
(Did you have this statement checked by either Krueger ot Tor to see if
it was typographically correct?) Usually those "letting off steam" do
it for their OWN comfort. :-)

Any intention of discussing audio, as you self-righteously proclaimed
before joining RAO's most widely despised and hated poster? It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :
Lionel wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

Lionel wrote:


Bruce J. Richman a écrit :



It wasn't worth the time or effort, since you ended it with a

series of


idiotic lies. If you want a rational discussion, you'll have to

at

least "pretend" to be rational and civilized.

Sorry Bruce, I was believing that you could be a psychologist ! :-)



You were believing that you could post a series of delusional lies

and

get a response to them. You were wrong, as you usually are. Admit

it,

Lionel, you have no interest in rational discussions. You're just

on

RAO to insult other people. You've demonstrated this over and over
again.

In other words, you can't prevent yourself from closing your
semi-rational posts with a series of idiotic insults. Thanks for
confirming my hypothesis.

Your group of "supporters" seems to be shrinking. Have you noticed
that?

"Timmmmmmmme is on my side....." :-D


Lockjaw or tetanus or tardive dyskinesia? Probably the last if you've
been taking certain meds

Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.

Mick actually sang "T-i-ime is on my side, yes it is" when I saw him
and the boys during the Steel Wheels Tour in 1990.



I've seen them 2 times long time ago.
They were in France in 2003 but I haven't anymore interest for this kind
of "American shows in large stadiums... For that I prefer to go to the
circus now.
"Timmmmmmmmmmmmmmme was on my side..." :-(

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...
:
: Ruud Broens wrote:
: "Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
: oups.com...
: :
: : Ruud Broens wrote:
: : :
: Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a
: : change
: : :
: : :
: : :
: : :
: : : Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy
: .
: : : Are you sure he's not coaching you?
: : : "Bruce J. Richman"
: :
: : hehe, we can always relay on good ol' doc to change the
: subject:-)
: : but, he, he's now, more than ever, also changing the thread title
: on
: : a regular basis. That's new !! Hmm,
: :
: : Rudy
: : r'alley
: :
: : ROFLMAO !!! We can always depend on Rudy to try and copy Krueger's
: : deceptive posting habits, including deleting important information
: : from posts and changing thread titles.
: :
: : What was that about increasing the audio content on RAO, Rudy?
: : ROFLMAO !!!!
:
: It's deviced that way, doc :-) Little 'lettin' of steam' postings
: for your
: comfort !
: at your service,
: Rudy
:
: ER, Rudy........... i don't think anything was "deviced that way".
: (Did you have this statement checked by either Krueger ot Tor to see if
: it was typographically correct?) Usually those "letting off steam" do
: it for their OWN comfort. :-)

You're right, doc! 'Deviced' may have technical connotations, and, really,
it's more of an artform, should have said : crafted :-)

:
: Any intention of discussing audio, as you self-righteously proclaimed
: before joining RAO's most widely despised and hated poster? It might
: interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
: from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
: the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
: RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

you don't *really* want to do the Google thing on that , eh:
...intention of discussing audio... ?:-)
Rudy

In article .com,
"Bruce J. Richman" writes:

It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more. If he was to apologise, he would be allowed to post in RAHE
again.

--
David Bath, RAHE Co-Moderator

Paul Dormer wrote:

"Lionel" emitted :

Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.

Australian wine is good at the moment.


Much better than the French whine spilled daily on RAO, for sure.
Better aroma, better taste and much better ability to be part of a
pleasant experience.

Cheers ! May the wind be always at your back


The Verified Dr. Richman




S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
-----------------------------------
It's Grim down south..

In article ,
Paul Dormer wrote:

"Lionel" emitted :

Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.

Australian wine is good at the moment.

I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
shop and asks for "vin anglais".

Stephen

"David E. Bath" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"Bruce J. Richman" writes:

It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more. If he was to apologise, he would be allowed to post in RAHE
again.

--
David Bath, RAHE Co-Moderator

do you mean that if I were to call you
an anal retentive ****wad, you won't let
me play on your playground?

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

Ruud Broens wrote:
"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
oups.com...

: I'm all for votes, Rudy !!! Let's start with a poll among RAO's
: active posters to see how many think that Krueger has smeared and
: flamed more specific different people, for a longer period of time,
: than any other RAO poster. Since you like to use past Google
threads,
: they can look at a thread entitled "Have You Had A Bad Krueger
: Experience" to get a better idea of the truth you'd like to hide
and/or
: ignore.

Nahh, let's do a Have You Had a Bad Richman Experience, for a change




Your fellow history revisionist, Krueger, tried that once, Rudy .
Are you sure he's not coaching you?

The Krueger post I referred to had about 1787 entries, which has to be
some kind of record for an RAO post.

How many different authors? According to the Google record that particular
thread had 69 authors. I wonder how many of them were negative?
How many were sockpuppets?
A cursory look shows that it's about 12 people, most of them the usual
suspects. There also seems to be a typical strayng from the title to a
variety of other topics and an ignored piece of advice from Ken Kantor for
the anti-Krueger people to wise up and shut up. Hmmmm, wher have I heard
that advice before?

IIRC the 1787 number is not the record but I'll have to check more later, I
seem to recall one thread with approx. 3000 responses, but most likely all
from the same bunch.




Of course, you'd like pretend it
doesn't exist as would Krueger, I'm sure.

Let's try one with your name in it.

Thanks for pfoviding another high audio content post.





: Then we can ask people to vote on whether you're deliberatly
deceptive
: posting of a response to Pinkerton came before or after he attacked
me.
: People can easily compare the dates on the post I reproduced to
find
: out the truth.
:
: Sorry, as my friend, Dave Weil would say to the thoroughly
discredited
: Krueger, you lose, again.
:

"MINe 109" wrote in message
...
: In article ,
: Paul Dormer wrote:
:
: "Lionel" emitted :
:
: Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.
:
: Australian wine is good at the moment.
:
: I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
: shop and asks for "vin anglais".
:
: Stephen


Chef was great !!
Wouldn't mind a sequel :-))
Rudy

In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:

MINe 109 said:

Australian wine is good at the moment.

I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
shop and asks for "vin anglais".

And they gave him .... what? A pint of Guiness, or Devon cream?

A good sneering.

Stephen

Paul Dormer a écrit :
"Lionel" emitted :


Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.


Australian wine is good at the moment.


Australian wine is the new "Beaujolais" (gag).

If you are allergic to French products, let's taste some Portugese or
some Chilian wines they are clean and well done... Non Coca Cola products.

Lionel wrote:
Paul Dormer a =E9crit :
"Lionel" emitted :


Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.


Australian wine is good at the moment.


Australian wine is the new "Beaujolais" (gag).


Do you mean "Beaujolais _Nouveau_", Lionel, that stuff made popular by
Georges deBeouf? I have had some good "Beaujolais-Villages".

And yes, there are some excellent, under-valued (in the US market, at
least)wines from both Portugal and Chile. And some South African wines
are quite good, and under-valued (in the US), as well.





If you are allergic to French products, let's taste some Portugese or

some Chilian wines they are clean and well done... Non Coca Cola
products.

Lionel wrote:
Paul Dormer a =E9crit :
"Lionel" emitted :


Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.


Australian wine is good at the moment.


Australian wine is the new "Beaujolais" (gag).


Do you mean "Beaujolais _Nouveau_", Lionel, that stuff made popular by
Georges deBeouf? I have had some good "Beaujolais-Villages".

And yes, there are some excellent, under-valued (in the US market, at
least)wines from both Portugal and Chile. And some South African wines
are quite good, and under-valued (in the US), as well.





If you are allergic to French products, let's taste some Portugese or

some Chilian wines they are clean and well done... Non Coca Cola
products.

a écrit :
Lionel wrote:

Paul Dormer a écrit :

"Lionel" emitted :



Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.


Australian wine is good at the moment.


Australian wine is the new "Beaujolais" (gag).



Do you mean "Beaujolais _Nouveau_", Lionel, that stuff made popular by
Georges deBeouf? I have had some good "Beaujolais-Villages".

Georges Duboeuf. Since the en of '70s Le Beaujolais Village is most of
the time a fairly good to good product. Anyway they are well elaborated
, clean grappes and clean vinification. The limitation in l/ha grant you
a quite interesting evolution from a millesime to an other one.


And yes, there are some excellent, under-valued (in the US market, at
least)wines from both Portugal and Chile. And some South African wines
are quite good, and under-valued (in the US), as well.

I never went in Chile :-( but in Portugal wineyard is very clean,
thankfully for our french product Portugese haven't a good marketing. :-)
I cannot comment since I don't know anything about South-African ones.
The only thing I can say is that South-Africa is in a good latitude.


If you are allergic to French products, let's taste some Portugese or


some Chilian wines they are clean and well done... Non Coca Cola

products.

Bruce J. Richman a écrit :

The Verified Dr. Richman

Since you are daily showing a total lack of interest for the *details*,
I recommend you to shut up about wines.

No psychologist jargon here. :-|

MINe 109 a écrit :
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:


MINe 109 said:


Australian wine is good at the moment.

I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
shop and asks for "vin anglais".

And they gave him .... what? A pint of Guiness, or Devon cream?


A good sneering.

The easiest way to chose a wine is to do like "George M. Middius" the
most expensive is the best...
This save (lol) you a lot of time in painful (lol) and boring (lol)
repeated tastings. ;-)
"Winnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne is on my side"

Lionel wrote:
MINe 109 a =E9crit :
In article ,
George M. Middius wrote:


MINe 109 said:


Australian wine is good at the moment.

I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French
wine
shop and asks for "vin anglais".

And they gave him .... what? A pint of Guiness, or Devon cream?


A good sneering.

The easiest way to chose a wine is to do like "George M. Middius" the

most expensive is the best...


Yes, and so often a "George M. Middius" type is found to be happily
drinking the Bose Acoustimess of wine and congratulating himself on his
"good taste". :-0






This save (lol) you a lot of time in painful (lol) and boring (lol)
repeated tastings. ;-)
"Winnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne is on my side"

Clyde Slick wrote:


"David E. Bath" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"Bruce J. Richman" writes:

It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more. If he was to apologise, he would be allowed to post in RAHE
again.

--
David Bath, RAHE Co-Moderator

do you mean that if I were to call you
an anal retentive ****wad, you won't let
me play on your playground?



I think what Dr. Bath is saying is that Krueger said some inappropriate things
about the moderating team. While it's hard to believe, these things might even
involve some false statements !!!

Now, why do you suppose that happened? Could it be that RAO's model of
truthfulness and "intrapersonal" (Krooglish) skill development somehow told a
bucketful of lies about the RAHE moderators? Having lots of posts rejected
because they crap all over other RAHE posters can tend to push a person to
extreme instability. Being the standard bearer for audio truth, justice and
the scientific way is getting tougher and tougher. ::-(





Bruce J. Richman

Lionel wrote:


Since you are daily showing a total lack of interest for the *details*,
I recommend you to shut up about wines.

No psychologist jargon here. :-|


Just another French whine, and rather bitter. Evidently processed from sour
grapes.





Bruce J. Richman

Lionel wrote:

MINe 109 said:


Australian wine is good at the moment.

I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
shop and asks for "vin anglais".

And they gave him .... what? A pint of Guiness, or Devon cream?


A good sneering.

The easiest way to chose a wine is to do like "George M. Middius" the
most expensive is the best...
This save (lol) you a lot of time in painful (lol) and boring (lol)
repeated tastings. ;-)
"Winnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne is on my side"








More lockjaw, tetanus or tardive dyskinesia? Or perhaps involuntary tremors
produced from an overdose of Haldol?









Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
: Lionel wrote:
:
: MINe 109 said:
:
:
: Australian wine is good at the moment.
:
: I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
: shop and asks for "vin anglais".
:
: And they gave him .... what? A pint of Guiness, or Devon cream?
:
:
: A good sneering.
:
: The easiest way to chose a wine is to do like "George M. Middius" the
: most expensive is the best...
: This save (lol) you a lot of time in painful (lol) and boring (lol)
: repeated tastings. ;-)
: "Winnnnnnnnnnnnnnnne is on my side"
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
: More lockjaw, tetanus or tardive dyskinesia? Or perhaps involuntary tremors
: produced from an overdose of Haldol?
:
:
: Bruce J. Richman
:
More revealing projections from Bruce J. Richman ?
Rudy

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"David E. Bath" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"Bruce J. Richman" writes:

It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more. If he was to apologise, he would be allowed to post in RAHE
again.

--
David Bath, RAHE Co-Moderator

do you mean that if I were to call you
an anal retentive ****wad, you won't let
me play on your playground?



I think what Dr. Bath is saying is that Krueger said some inappropriate
things
about the moderating team. While it's hard to believe, these things might
even
involve some false statements !!!

Now, why do you suppose that happened? Could it be that RAO's model of
truthfulness and "intrapersonal" (Krooglish) skill development somehow
told a
bucketful of lies about the RAHE moderators? Having lots of posts
rejected
because they crap all over other RAHE posters can tend to push a person to
extreme instability. Being the standard bearer for audio truth, justice
and
the scientific way is getting tougher and tougher. ::-(





Bruce J. Richman

"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"David E. Bath" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"Bruce J. Richman" writes:

It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more. If he was to apologise, he would be allowed to post in RAHE
again.

--
David Bath, RAHE Co-Moderator

do you mean that if I were to call you
an anal retentive ****wad, you won't let
me play on your playground?



I think what Dr. Bath is saying is that Krueger said some inappropriate
things
about the moderating team. While it's hard to believe, these things might
even
involve some false statements !!!

Now, why do you suppose that happened? Could it be that RAO's model of
truthfulness and "intrapersonal" (Krooglish) skill development somehow
told a
bucketful of lies about the RAHE moderators? Having lots of posts
rejected
because they crap all over other RAHE posters can tend to push a person to
extreme instability. Being the standard bearer for audio truth, justice
and
the scientific way is getting tougher and tougher. ::-(



Mr. Bath said he was banned for comments about the moderators.
I assume they were critical. Let's hope that the moderators
don't consider themselves immune to criticism.
Now, if it were for repeated fallacious and defamatory comments,
that is another story.
I don't know what Arny said, so I withhold my judgement.

In article ,
Paul Dormer wrote:

"MINe 109" emitted :

Only between 15 and 25 cl of French wine everyday.

Australian wine is good at the moment.

I love the "Chef" episode in which Lenny Henry goes to a French wine
shop and asks for "vin anglais".

Lenny Henry? ;-(

I like "Chef"! Maybe he's not good in other stuff. His American movie
was terrible.

Stephen

"George M. Middius" wrote in message
...


Clyde Slick said:

Mr. Bath said he was banned for comments about the moderators.
I assume they were critical. Let's hope that the moderators
don't consider themselves immune to criticism.
Now, if it were for repeated fallacious and defamatory comments,
that is another story.
I don't know what Arny said, so I withhold my judgement.

Do you really think Krooger made a well-founded criticism? After all the
ridiculous accusations he's made against JA, Wheeler, Bamborough, etc.? It
was probably just a gratuitous personal slur, the kind we know all too
well on RAO.


You are probably right, but Bath is a pompous ass.

Art Said:


"Bruce J. Richman" wrote in message
...
Clyde Slick wrote:


"David E. Bath" wrote in message
...
In article .com,
"Bruce J. Richman" writes:

It might
interest you to know that your new friend, Krueger, has been banned
from rec.audio.high-end, a moderated Usenet newsgroup, precisely for
the kind of behavior you support and encourage. AFAIK, he's the only
RAO poster that holds that dubious "honor".

He was banned for his comments on RAO about the moderators, nothing
more. If he was to apologise, he would be allowed to post in RAHE
again.

--
David Bath, RAHE Co-Moderator

do you mean that if I were to call you
an anal retentive ****wad, you won't let
me play on your playground?



I think what Dr. Bath is saying is that Krueger said some inappropriate
things
about the moderating team. While it's hard to believe, these things might
even
involve some false statements !!!

Now, why do you suppose that happened? Could it be that RAO's model of
truthfulness and "intrapersonal" (Krooglish) skill development somehow
told a
bucketful of lies about the RAHE moderators? Having lots of posts
rejected
because they crap all over other RAHE posters can tend to push a person to
extreme instability. Being the standard bearer for audio truth, justice
and
the scientific way is getting tougher and tougher. ::-(



Mr. Bath said he was banned for comments about the moderators.
I assume they were critical. Let's hope that the moderators
don't consider themselves immune to criticism.
Now, if it were for repeated fallacious and defamatory comments,
that is another story.
I don't know what Arny said, so I withhold my judgement.


While I don't know what specific comments Dr.Bath was referring to, there are
certain things that I *do* know, from several years of my own, personal
expererince posting on RAHE. The moderators on RAHE, David Bath and for quite
a while, Armand Dreyer are actually university profesors who do this on a
volunterr basis. A lot of latitude is given to posters as far as what they can
say there as long as they confine their attacks to the message and not take
personal pot shots at the messenger. If you go there, you'll see plenty of
people like Pinkerton and few other objectives, regularly taking shots at what
the subjectivists there have to say (Pinkerton likes to call other peoples'
posts "absolute rubbish" - and that is allowed.

All that said, I can tell you from personal experience with the moderators and
*my* posts that prior to Krueger's being banned from RAHE his personal attacks
there against me many times crossed the line into the same kind o vitriol, only
slightly attenuated, that you see on RAO. Do you really think he can change?
Don't be silly. The actual facts are as follows. On more than one occasion
Krueger managed to post some pretty nasty stuff directed at me on RAHE. When I
responded, the moderators stepped in and told me to tone it down, in effect,
which I did. On at least one occasion, I was told by one of the moderators,
and I recall it being Dr.. Bath, that they had also rejected posts of Krueger's
which were much worse than anything I wrote that was also rejected. This is
the type of atmosphere and disregard for civil discourse that Krueger brought
to RAHE.

I suspect, although it's just a theory, that Krueger's rationalizations for why
he was bvanned from RAHE represented a distortion of what really happened. I'm
sure that whatever Dr. Bath is referring to, it was in all probability some
sort of false statements that Krueger made about the moderating team. That is
the kind of person most of us know Krueger to be, and it doesn't matter what NG
is involved.




Bruce J. Richman