Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#201
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#202
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#205
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
one can notundo the past
but we can make a better tomorrow by putting some one with both brains and conscience in the White House We can make the future better by stopping this war, TODAY How will voting for Kerry do this? |
#206
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
one can notundo the past
but we can make a better tomorrow by putting some one with both brains and conscience in the White House We can make the future better by stopping this war, TODAY How will voting for Kerry do this? |
#207
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WillStG wrote: Bob Cain WillStG wrote: Bob Cain has now actually recomended surrender and giving the terrorists whatever they demand. Remind me to never let this guy speak for me. He puts the strangest words in my mouth. Ok, surrender and *negotiate* with the terrorists, because they will still be reasonable at this point you said. Hmmm, I can't find the word terrorist in what you quoted of mine. Where, was that again? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#208
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WillStG wrote: Bob Cain WillStG wrote: Bob Cain has now actually recomended surrender and giving the terrorists whatever they demand. Remind me to never let this guy speak for me. He puts the strangest words in my mouth. Ok, surrender and *negotiate* with the terrorists, because they will still be reasonable at this point you said. Hmmm, I can't find the word terrorist in what you quoted of mine. Where, was that again? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#209
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WillStG wrote: George then why is the Bush administration calling forr Russia to negotiate and appease these animals? are we agaisnt terrorists or only against terrorist that attack us, or happen tto live someplace near terrorists that attack us According to Colin Powell today, we spoke to the political opposition in Czechnia 3 years ago, and have not since. And your point is? And that answers George's question how? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#210
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WillStG wrote: George then why is the Bush administration calling forr Russia to negotiate and appease these animals? are we agaisnt terrorists or only against terrorist that attack us, or happen tto live someplace near terrorists that attack us According to Colin Powell today, we spoke to the political opposition in Czechnia 3 years ago, and have not since. And your point is? And that answers George's question how? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#211
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WillStG wrote: Once upon a time, a Democrat said - Will, he was simply puting Nikita Kruschev on notice. Does not-so-subtle sublety totally escape you? I was a senior in high school then and I understood what he was saying and to whom. Nikita called his bluff and then he called Nikita's. Scary **** that was. It's even scarier out now but no one seems to be nearly as scared. Odd, that. _No-one_ is bluffing this time round. "Nikita's Bluff" sounds like it should be the name of a band or at least a song. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#212
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() WillStG wrote: Once upon a time, a Democrat said - Will, he was simply puting Nikita Kruschev on notice. Does not-so-subtle sublety totally escape you? I was a senior in high school then and I understood what he was saying and to whom. Nikita called his bluff and then he called Nikita's. Scary **** that was. It's even scarier out now but no one seems to be nearly as scared. Odd, that. _No-one_ is bluffing this time round. "Nikita's Bluff" sounds like it should be the name of a band or at least a song. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#213
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() George wrote: GW BUSH is a janus faced scumbag What's a janus faced scumbag? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#214
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() George wrote: GW BUSH is a janus faced scumbag What's a janus faced scumbag? Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#215
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:31:01 -0700, Bob Cain
wrote: Hmmm, I can't find the word terrorist in what you quoted of mine. Where, was that again? It's in the same part where we all throw up our hands and surrender to the forces of evil. Almost nothing interesting can be digested into a newsgroup posting. A'course they said that about movin' pitchers. Folks who claim to have a privileged viewpoint are about a century out of date. But in human experience a century isn't so much. Chris Hornbeck |
#216
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:31:01 -0700, Bob Cain
wrote: Hmmm, I can't find the word terrorist in what you quoted of mine. Where, was that again? It's in the same part where we all throw up our hands and surrender to the forces of evil. Almost nothing interesting can be digested into a newsgroup posting. A'course they said that about movin' pitchers. Folks who claim to have a privileged viewpoint are about a century out of date. But in human experience a century isn't so much. Chris Hornbeck |
#217
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:44:09 -0700, Bob Cain
wrote: Nikita called his bluff and then he called Nikita's. Scary **** that was. It's even scarier out now but no one seems to be nearly as scared. Odd, that. _No-one_ is bluffing this time round. Nobody ever questioned whether the Russkies could *actually* launch their liquid fueled rockets. Well, at least nobody who knew. Well, at least noboby who could talk about it. Or at least anybody who *would* talk about it. Thank God it wasn't political. Chris Hornbeck |
#218
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:44:09 -0700, Bob Cain
wrote: Nikita called his bluff and then he called Nikita's. Scary **** that was. It's even scarier out now but no one seems to be nearly as scared. Odd, that. _No-one_ is bluffing this time round. Nobody ever questioned whether the Russkies could *actually* launch their liquid fueled rockets. Well, at least nobody who knew. Well, at least noboby who could talk about it. Or at least anybody who *would* talk about it. Thank God it wasn't political. Chris Hornbeck |
#219
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 04:27:37 GMT, Chris Hornbeck
wrote: On 08 Sep 2004 03:30:39 GMT, ospam (WillStG) wrote: - John F. Kennedy Presidential Inaugural Address, 1961 ... and you Roger Norman, are no John F. Kennedy. But both are veterans, and you could have some ordinary respect. Not a chance... Will talks big, but you won't see him signing up for anything. |
#220
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 04:27:37 GMT, Chris Hornbeck
wrote: On 08 Sep 2004 03:30:39 GMT, ospam (WillStG) wrote: - John F. Kennedy Presidential Inaugural Address, 1961 ... and you Roger Norman, are no John F. Kennedy. But both are veterans, and you could have some ordinary respect. Not a chance... Will talks big, but you won't see him signing up for anything. |
#221
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Hornbeck wrote: Nobody ever questioned whether the Russkies could *actually* launch their liquid fueled rockets. Well, at least nobody who knew. Well, at least noboby who could talk about it. Or at least anybody who *would* talk about it. Thank God it wasn't political. Sting had it right back in the 80's. True now more than ever. And they do love their children too. The cold war had players that were relatively rational. Kept us from killing each other. With OR without Reagan. (..) We are both now dealing with crazy *******s that would just as soon everyone was dead. Much more serious than the cold war i.m.o. Problem is, Bush ain't helping. Unfortunately, just the opposite. http://protest.bmgbiz.net/FailedOBL.jpg |
#222
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Hornbeck wrote: Nobody ever questioned whether the Russkies could *actually* launch their liquid fueled rockets. Well, at least nobody who knew. Well, at least noboby who could talk about it. Or at least anybody who *would* talk about it. Thank God it wasn't political. Sting had it right back in the 80's. True now more than ever. And they do love their children too. The cold war had players that were relatively rational. Kept us from killing each other. With OR without Reagan. (..) We are both now dealing with crazy *******s that would just as soon everyone was dead. Much more serious than the cold war i.m.o. Problem is, Bush ain't helping. Unfortunately, just the opposite. http://protest.bmgbiz.net/FailedOBL.jpg |
#223
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:31:02 -0700, playon wrote:
Not a chance... These are difficult times and we could all practice some tolerance. We Americans are at a crossroads. What will we become next? It's nut-cuttin' time kids. Will's right, and George's right, and Ty's right and....... So ,what's next? Does America survive this? Chris Hornbeck |
#224
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 23:31:02 -0700, playon wrote:
Not a chance... These are difficult times and we could all practice some tolerance. We Americans are at a crossroads. What will we become next? It's nut-cuttin' time kids. Will's right, and George's right, and Ty's right and....... So ,what's next? Does America survive this? Chris Hornbeck |
#225
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Hornbeck wrote: So ,what's next? Does America survive this? The 90's seem like such a wonderful dream now, don't they? b.t.w., you better off than you were 4 years ago? (yeah, right (..)) |
#226
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Hornbeck wrote: So ,what's next? Does America survive this? The 90's seem like such a wonderful dream now, don't they? b.t.w., you better off than you were 4 years ago? (yeah, right (..)) |
#228
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
ospam (WillStG) wrote: George then why is the Bush administration calling forr Russia to negotiate and appease these animals? are we agaisnt terrorists or only against terrorist that attack us, or happen tto live someplace near terrorists that attack us According to Colin Powell today, we spoke to the political opposition in Czechnia 3 years ago, and have not since. that is not what the Russian news agencys are reporting George |
#229
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Romeo Rondeau" wrote: one can notundo the past but we can make a better tomorrow by putting some one with both brains and conscience in the White House We can make the future better by stopping this war, TODAY How will voting for Kerry do this? That is a unknown but voteing for Bush will not bring peace or security this has been proven by his "work" over his term so vote for hope or vote for more of the same George |
#230
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Romeo Rondeau" wrote: one can notundo the past but we can make a better tomorrow by putting some one with both brains and conscience in the White House We can make the future better by stopping this war, TODAY How will voting for Kerry do this? That is a unknown but voteing for Bush will not bring peace or security this has been proven by his "work" over his term so vote for hope or vote for more of the same George |
#231
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan West wrote in message ...
We no longer have the luxury of choice as to whether we deal with the world or not. Really? America has chosen *not* to deal with the dozens of violent socio-political upheavals that have plagued African nations for the past couple decades. It would seem America has the luxury [sic] of picking and choosing our global dealings. |
#232
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan West wrote in message ...
We no longer have the luxury of choice as to whether we deal with the world or not. Really? America has chosen *not* to deal with the dozens of violent socio-political upheavals that have plagued African nations for the past couple decades. It would seem America has the luxury [sic] of picking and choosing our global dealings. |
#233
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, the WTC truck bomb was 1993, so the answer is "no".
|
#234
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, the WTC truck bomb was 1993, so the answer is "no".
|
#235
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nathan West" wrote in message
... Dave Martin wrote: Umm.... You don't think it takes courage to be a suicide bomber? No I don't. I think it takes a misguided fanatical approach to archaic principles. It is similar to asking if you think it takes courage to blow your own brains out...what do you need?...1 or 2 ms decision time and then your done. That's not courage. Nope - days, weeks or months of planning typically go into suicide bombings. Besides, you really should talk with someone who has unsuccessfully tried to commit suicide; those decisions are not made and acted upon in milliseconds. |
#236
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nathan West" wrote in message
... Dave Martin wrote: Umm.... You don't think it takes courage to be a suicide bomber? No I don't. I think it takes a misguided fanatical approach to archaic principles. It is similar to asking if you think it takes courage to blow your own brains out...what do you need?...1 or 2 ms decision time and then your done. That's not courage. Nope - days, weeks or months of planning typically go into suicide bombings. Besides, you really should talk with someone who has unsuccessfully tried to commit suicide; those decisions are not made and acted upon in milliseconds. |
#237
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nathan West" wrote in message
... Do you have any sense of why we are in the Middle East right now? We are in the Middle east, in countries that had potential or were on going in trying to wreck the US economy, the US way of life and/or destroy US citizen's. Hey - France and Japan have the potential to do all of those things, and China seems to be doing it now. Should we invade them, too? |
#238
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nathan West" wrote in message
... Do you have any sense of why we are in the Middle East right now? We are in the Middle east, in countries that had potential or were on going in trying to wreck the US economy, the US way of life and/or destroy US citizen's. Hey - France and Japan have the potential to do all of those things, and China seems to be doing it now. Should we invade them, too? |
#239
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#240
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Richman's ethical lapses | Audio Opinions |