"Lorin David Schultz" wrote in message
news:fY17d.170$MV5.61@clgrps13...
Yeah yeah yeah, the USA this and the government that and war to boot.
Whatever. Take it OUTSIDE!!!

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

Now would all you hand-wringers and flag wavers please get the **** OVER
yourselves?

Thank you.



What's wrong with your carbeurator?

jb

"Lorin David Schultz" wrote in message
news:fY17d.170$MV5.61@clgrps13...
Yeah yeah yeah, the USA this and the government that and war to boot.
Whatever. Take it OUTSIDE!!!

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

Now would all you hand-wringers and flag wavers please get the **** OVER
yourselves?

Thank you.



What's wrong with your carbeurator?

jb

In article ,
"reddred" wrote:

"Lorin David Schultz" wrote in message
news:fY17d.170$MV5.61@clgrps13...
Yeah yeah yeah, the USA this and the government that and war to boot.
Whatever. Take it OUTSIDE!!!

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

Now would all you hand-wringers and flag wavers please get the **** OVER
yourselves?

Thank you.



What's wrong with your carbeurator?

jb

right out of college I worked a a mechanic in a Harly dealer
he owner had a Jaguar xke and I had to rebuild the carbs on that monster
syncing them was a nightmare

In article ,
"reddred" wrote:

"Lorin David Schultz" wrote in message
news:fY17d.170$MV5.61@clgrps13...
Yeah yeah yeah, the USA this and the government that and war to boot.
Whatever. Take it OUTSIDE!!!

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

Now would all you hand-wringers and flag wavers please get the **** OVER
yourselves?

Thank you.



What's wrong with your carbeurator?

jb

right out of college I worked a a mechanic in a Harly dealer
he owner had a Jaguar xke and I had to rebuild the carbs on that monster
syncing them was a nightmare

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:30:09 GMT, George
wrote:

What's wrong with your carbeurator?

right out of college I worked a a mechanic in a Harly dealer
he owner had a Jaguar xke and I had to rebuild the carbs on that monster
syncing them was a nightmare

My last scooter was a 1977 Gold Wing. North Korean terrorists
broke into my garage and spilled the mercury from my quad vacuum
gauge. That's why I stepped down from this election.

Thanks to all my supporters,

Chris Hornbeck

On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:30:09 GMT, George
wrote:

What's wrong with your carbeurator?

right out of college I worked a a mechanic in a Harly dealer
he owner had a Jaguar xke and I had to rebuild the carbs on that monster
syncing them was a nightmare

My last scooter was a 1977 Gold Wing. North Korean terrorists
broke into my garage and spilled the mercury from my quad vacuum
gauge. That's why I stepped down from this election.

Thanks to all my supporters,

Chris Hornbeck

"Chris Hornbeck" wrote in message

That's why I stepped down from this election.

Thanks to all my supporters,

Can we still write you in?

Glenn D.

"Chris Hornbeck" wrote in message

That's why I stepped down from this election.

Thanks to all my supporters,

Can we still write you in?

Glenn D.

Ty Ford wrote:


They'll start tellin' folk you're a communist,
bed wetter, pinko, faggot.

Bull. Show me where one of "them" called you any of these things.

Ty Ford wrote:


They'll start tellin' folk you're a communist,
bed wetter, pinko, faggot.

Bull. Show me where one of "them" called you any of these things.

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:56:34 -0600, "Glenn Dowdy"
wrote:

That's why I stepped down from this election.
Thanks to all my supporters,

Can we still write you in?

Sorry; I've decided that all of you Great Unwashed are
unworthy of me. Better luck next election, assuming I
allow one.

Politics is so boring.

Chris Hornbeck

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:56:34 -0600, "Glenn Dowdy"
wrote:

That's why I stepped down from this election.
Thanks to all my supporters,

Can we still write you in?

Sorry; I've decided that all of you Great Unwashed are
unworthy of me. Better luck next election, assuming I
allow one.

Politics is so boring.

Chris Hornbeck

Lorin, stress is very bad for your health. Getting ****ed can actually
knock years off your life.

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

Yeah yeah yeah, the USA this and the government that and war to boot.
Whatever. Take it OUTSIDE!!!

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

Now would all you hand-wringers and flag wavers please get the **** OVER
yourselves?

Thank you.

Lorin, stress is very bad for your health. Getting ****ed can actually
knock years off your life.

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

Yeah yeah yeah, the USA this and the government that and war to boot.
Whatever. Take it OUTSIDE!!!

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

Now would all you hand-wringers and flag wavers please get the **** OVER
yourselves?

Thank you.

"reddred" wrote

What's wrong with your carbeurator?


LOL!

"reddred" wrote

What's wrong with your carbeurator?


LOL!

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...

Lorin, stress is very bad for your health. Getting ****ed can actually
knock years off your life.


Are you kidding? Stressing is what I do for a living! g

Because I'm now over Thirty-ten and have ZERO savings, I'm focussing on
unhealthy stress, heavy smoking and a diet of fat, sugar and
miscellaneous ook. There you have my retirement plan: die early. If I
live past 65, I'm screwed!

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...

Lorin, stress is very bad for your health. Getting ****ed can actually
knock years off your life.


Are you kidding? Stressing is what I do for a living! g

Because I'm now over Thirty-ten and have ZERO savings, I'm focussing on
unhealthy stress, heavy smoking and a diet of fat, sugar and
miscellaneous ook. There you have my retirement plan: die early. If I
live past 65, I'm screwed!

--
"It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!"
- Lorin David Schultz
in the control room
making even bad news sound good

(Remove spamblock to reply)

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

I didn't even know you had a carburetor. Is it one of the glass moels?

--
ha

Lorin David Schultz wrote:

I care as much about your domestic politics as you do about my
carburetor problems, and neither has any place in a pro audio newsgroup.

I didn't even know you had a carburetor. Is it one of the glass moels?

--
ha

"Lorin David Schultz" wrote:

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...

Lorin, stress is very bad for your health. Getting ****ed can actually
knock years off your life.


Are you kidding? Stressing is what I do for a living! g

Because I'm now over Thirty-ten and have ZERO savings, I'm focussing on
unhealthy stress, heavy smoking and a diet of fat, sugar and
miscellaneous ook. There you have my retirement plan: die early. If I
live past 65, I'm screwed!

Doesn't work! I do all of the above and I'm 67. You don't die early; ya just
wish ya had.

Harvey Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio
http://www.ITRstudio.com/

"Lorin David Schultz" wrote:

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...

Lorin, stress is very bad for your health. Getting ****ed can actually
knock years off your life.


Are you kidding? Stressing is what I do for a living! g

Because I'm now over Thirty-ten and have ZERO savings, I'm focussing on
unhealthy stress, heavy smoking and a diet of fat, sugar and
miscellaneous ook. There you have my retirement plan: die early. If I
live past 65, I'm screwed!

Doesn't work! I do all of the above and I'm 67. You don't die early; ya just
wish ya had.

Harvey Gerst
Indian Trail Recording Studio
http://www.ITRstudio.com/

Harvey Gerst wrote:

Doesn't work! I do all of the above and I'm 67. You don't die early; ya just
wish ya had.

You going to AES? Plenty of junk food in SF.

--
ha

Harvey Gerst wrote:

Doesn't work! I do all of the above and I'm 67. You don't die early; ya just
wish ya had.

You going to AES? Plenty of junk food in SF.

--
ha

Harvey Gerst wrote:

Doesn't work! I do all of the above and I'm 67. You don't die early; ya
just
wish ya had.

You going to AES? Plenty of junk food in SF.

--
ha



Ya gotta watch SF, it's the only place in the world the oranges suck back.


--Wayne

-"sounded good to me"-

Harvey Gerst wrote:

Doesn't work! I do all of the above and I'm 67. You don't die early; ya
just
wish ya had.

You going to AES? Plenty of junk food in SF.

--
ha



Ya gotta watch SF, it's the only place in the world the oranges suck back.


--Wayne

-"sounded good to me"-

On Sep 27, 2004, Ty Ford commented:

Not a bad idea Marc. Who would do the moderating?

BTW, My newsreader says your email is invalid.
--------------------------------snip----------------------------------

That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group. There are ways to do it in a semi-automated
way, but it has to be guided with some human involvement. The moderators
would be included in the Charter, and voted on in the newsgroup voting
process (which is a total pain in the ass, but that's the way it works on the
Net). For more info, you can read the "Moderated Newsgroup FAQ" which is
he

http://www.swcp.com/~dmckeon/mod-faq.html


My email address has been " for almost ten years now, since
I've owned the domain name. I added an extra "m" to try to thwart the
spambots that grab email addresses and flood mailboxes with unwanted crap.
Google says I've left about 780 messages here during that time, so I'm not
exactly a stranger.

--MFW
[remove the extra M above for email]

On Sep 27, 2004, Ty Ford commented:

Not a bad idea Marc. Who would do the moderating?

BTW, My newsreader says your email is invalid.
--------------------------------snip----------------------------------

That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group. There are ways to do it in a semi-automated
way, but it has to be guided with some human involvement. The moderators
would be included in the Charter, and voted on in the newsgroup voting
process (which is a total pain in the ass, but that's the way it works on the
Net). For more info, you can read the "Moderated Newsgroup FAQ" which is
he

http://www.swcp.com/~dmckeon/mod-faq.html


My email address has been " for almost ten years now, since
I've owned the domain name. I added an extra "m" to try to thwart the
spambots that grab email addresses and flood mailboxes with unwanted crap.
Google says I've left about 780 messages here during that time, so I'm not
exactly a stranger.

--MFW
[remove the extra M above for email]

Marc Wielage wrote:


That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group.

L.O.L.

There are ways to do it in a semi-automated

It takes people about 2 minutes to get around ANYTHING you want to
program a "bot" to do. Waste of time. Though it can be a bit amusing.

Marc Wielage wrote:


That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group.

L.O.L.

There are ways to do it in a semi-automated

It takes people about 2 minutes to get around ANYTHING you want to
program a "bot" to do. Waste of time. Though it can be a bit amusing.

Pete Dimsman wrote:
Marc Wielage wrote:


That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group.

L.O.L.

It works pretty well. Check out comp.risks as the best possible example
of moderation, with Peter Neumann selecting everything that gets into the
digest. comp.dcom.telecom is another example with somewhat more sloppy
moderation. (Again it's a single moderator handling everything, but he had
a brain aneurism five or six years ago and has not really been the same
since).

A weirder example is rec.audio.high-end, which used to be moderated by my
friend Tom Kreuger. He burned out on the process and turned it over to
a whole team of people, some of whom are good and some of whom are not, and
there isn't as consistent a policy as a result.

There are also some moderated mailing lists which have two tiers of membership.
Long-time members get to post directly, while folks who have not been on for
so long have to have all posts approved by the moderator. This actually works
very well to reduce moderator burnout.

There are ways to do it in a semi-automated

It takes people about 2 minutes to get around ANYTHING you want to
program a "bot" to do. Waste of time. Though it can be a bit amusing.

That's the point of moderation: there is a human being in the loop.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Pete Dimsman wrote:
Marc Wielage wrote:


That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group.

L.O.L.

It works pretty well. Check out comp.risks as the best possible example
of moderation, with Peter Neumann selecting everything that gets into the
digest. comp.dcom.telecom is another example with somewhat more sloppy
moderation. (Again it's a single moderator handling everything, but he had
a brain aneurism five or six years ago and has not really been the same
since).

A weirder example is rec.audio.high-end, which used to be moderated by my
friend Tom Kreuger. He burned out on the process and turned it over to
a whole team of people, some of whom are good and some of whom are not, and
there isn't as consistent a policy as a result.

There are also some moderated mailing lists which have two tiers of membership.
Long-time members get to post directly, while folks who have not been on for
so long have to have all posts approved by the moderator. This actually works
very well to reduce moderator burnout.

There are ways to do it in a semi-automated

It takes people about 2 minutes to get around ANYTHING you want to
program a "bot" to do. Waste of time. Though it can be a bit amusing.

That's the point of moderation: there is a human being in the loop.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

That's the point of moderation: there is a human being in the loop.
--scott


And with many moderators if you don't suck up to them , YOUR FIRED
george

That's the point of moderation: there is a human being in the loop.
--scott


And with many moderators if you don't suck up to them , YOUR FIRED
george

Scott Dorsey wrote:

That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group.

It works pretty well. Check out comp.risks as the best possible example
of moderation, with Peter Neumann selecting everything that gets into the
digest.

It can work well, but it depends on your goal. It can be great for a
business or a scientific (technical) oriented group where the goal is
JUST a transfer of information. Not a lot of fun but it does serve a
purpose.

Moderated groups for recreational purposes, tend to fail, in my opinion.
Yes they still have people posting, but, depending on the moderators,
and the guidelines are so subjective, can be so stifling that you lose
most of the posters. Some of those posters are good to lose, they are
just trouble makers, but you also lose some of the most fun and
entertaining people.

R.a.p. is a little of both. Yes it is a technical site to help people
learn the ins and outs of recording and production techniques, but it is
also a group of people that like to bs about other stuff too. This irks
some people to the nth degree. Others welcome it. How are the moderators
going to reconcile these opposing views?

Scott Dorsey wrote:

That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve each
and every message in the group.

It works pretty well. Check out comp.risks as the best possible example
of moderation, with Peter Neumann selecting everything that gets into the
digest.

It can work well, but it depends on your goal. It can be great for a
business or a scientific (technical) oriented group where the goal is
JUST a transfer of information. Not a lot of fun but it does serve a
purpose.

Moderated groups for recreational purposes, tend to fail, in my opinion.
Yes they still have people posting, but, depending on the moderators,
and the guidelines are so subjective, can be so stifling that you lose
most of the posters. Some of those posters are good to lose, they are
just trouble makers, but you also lose some of the most fun and
entertaining people.

R.a.p. is a little of both. Yes it is a technical site to help people
learn the ins and outs of recording and production techniques, but it is
also a group of people that like to bs about other stuff too. This irks
some people to the nth degree. Others welcome it. How are the moderators
going to reconcile these opposing views?

On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:47:20 -0400, Pete Dimsman wrote
(in article ):



Scott Dorsey wrote:

That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve
each
and every message in the group.

It works pretty well. Check out comp.risks as the best possible example
of moderation, with Peter Neumann selecting everything that gets into the
digest.

It can work well, but it depends on your goal. It can be great for a
business or a scientific (technical) oriented group where the goal is
JUST a transfer of information. Not a lot of fun but it does serve a
purpose.

Moderated groups for recreational purposes, tend to fail, in my opinion.
Yes they still have people posting, but, depending on the moderators,
and the guidelines are so subjective, can be so stifling that you lose
most of the posters. Some of those posters are good to lose, they are
just trouble makers, but you also lose some of the most fun and
entertaining people.

R.a.p. is a little of both. Yes it is a technical site to help people
learn the ins and outs of recording and production techniques, but it is
also a group of people that like to bs about other stuff too. This irks
some people to the nth degree. Others welcome it. How are the moderators
going to reconcile these opposing views?

If everyone played by the rules, there would be no problems. Problem is, they
don't.

Ty


-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:47:20 -0400, Pete Dimsman wrote
(in article ):



Scott Dorsey wrote:

That would be the moderators. Volunteers would have to manually approve
each
and every message in the group.

It works pretty well. Check out comp.risks as the best possible example
of moderation, with Peter Neumann selecting everything that gets into the
digest.

It can work well, but it depends on your goal. It can be great for a
business or a scientific (technical) oriented group where the goal is
JUST a transfer of information. Not a lot of fun but it does serve a
purpose.

Moderated groups for recreational purposes, tend to fail, in my opinion.
Yes they still have people posting, but, depending on the moderators,
and the guidelines are so subjective, can be so stifling that you lose
most of the posters. Some of those posters are good to lose, they are
just trouble makers, but you also lose some of the most fun and
entertaining people.

R.a.p. is a little of both. Yes it is a technical site to help people
learn the ins and outs of recording and production techniques, but it is
also a group of people that like to bs about other stuff too. This irks
some people to the nth degree. Others welcome it. How are the moderators
going to reconcile these opposing views?

If everyone played by the rules, there would be no problems. Problem is, they
don't.

Ty


-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

oing to reconcile these opposing views?

If everyone played by the rules, there would be no problems. Problem is, they
don't.

Ty


-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com


Do you "play by the Rules" in EVERY aspect of your life?
give it a ****ing break, your being a ****y anal rententive jerk
G

oing to reconcile these opposing views?

If everyone played by the rules, there would be no problems. Problem is, they
don't.

Ty


-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com


Do you "play by the Rules" in EVERY aspect of your life?
give it a ****ing break, your being a ****y anal rententive jerk
G