Gregipus rallies to his own demise.

Every time you feel compelled to be more of an asshole

You're right, it's futile. Nobody will ever be more of an asshole
than you are. Except for your role model, of course.

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:36:35 GMT, trotsky wrote:

More random accusations! What was it like when you first had a good
rummage around in mama Singh's bra? Were you jealous because she had
bigger brown boobies than you do?

Isn't that the queerest thing? Every time you feel compelled to be more
of an asshole you go straight to the incest references. You would think
after you'd apologized profusely for the dead Nate jokes you'd have a
change of heart, but pathology doesn't really work that way, does it.
Bruce, you'll back me on this one, right?

I think it's hilarious the way you always whine about this. You were
first to resort to family slurs during our little 'audio discussion'.
Perhaps you'd explain why it's OK to accuse someone of infidelity but
horrendous to accuse someone of incest.

You can dish it out but you can't take it. I've already given you the
right answers: Shut the **** up whining, brat. **** yourself with a
chain saw. Etc. I can't make this any clearer for you. So'rry.

You're a mother****ing genius. You must keep your brains in those tits
of yours.

And yours in your mistresses. Hey, here's a line from the recent Denzel
Washington movie, "Out of Time": "Give my best to your wife...if you can."

Psycho: 'Mother, oh mother, mother, mother.'

--
td

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:37:49 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Brain cramps must be in style this year.

Christ! The power of your wit! 100 years of Usenet!

--
td

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:43:44 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

Sounds a bit more promising than 'total dickhead'.

From small things, baby...

Effeminance noted. What is you're decorums like? I have some bad news
for you: I'm right.

My decorums are poplar and noone's made them more lacquered than me.
Tell me, don't you know what I'm talking about?

Please explain the Trump Tower. I feel my verbiage has been crystal
clear on this matter. It's not my fault if you don't possess the
necessary testicles to talk about my wadding properly. So'rry.

I had to laugh at dave's comment about the stuffing coming out of the
bass port. The only bit of the speaker where Greg puts in a
contribution, and he ****s it up. I bet it took him all night to feed
all that stuffing in through the bass port, actually. And the
mother****ing keyhole surgery job he did through the speaker terminal
cut-out: Have you got the balls to admit it's sonically superior to
solder the mother****ing driver wires that way? Can we have a point of
reference, please, or would you like to redefine the rules of
engagement?

It would take balls of brass and a steady hand not burn yourself,
assuming you do it before stuffing the port with flammable insulation
and burning up the speaker instead. Don't they have slip-on connectors
for that sort of thing? You could have them gold-plated. Why can't you
answer the question? Complete the lye.

I've already told you which way the arrow is pointing and given you
the right answers: lava the group immediately. I don't understand why
you anonymous assholes think you're have an effette opinion is valid.
You're not even in the game, McElronny, and if you can stand
tow-to-two with me on any subjext, bring it. Let's discuss your rules
of engagement, that's just the peaches, but don't come armed with a
rubber duckie to my levels of eatouts in English. No one can match me
on any subject: wit, Elngish skill, and cogent argument explanation
technique winning.

In a standard measurement of academic prowess, you could inflate you're
score 20% and still not have the rollers to even think of taking me on.
You've got a lot of nerve, Mr. Jones. I want to take you to a gay bar.

Zzzzzz.

Do you think that a guy whom my physical stature wouldn't flatten you
like a pancake as soon as I jumped, on you? You wouldn't last three
seconds if we were to dust it up and you don't have the balls to admit
this, please. I'm right as always. I've given you all the right
answers. Lard slices with multiple mushrooms. If you're blackening,
let my speakers talk for themselves. I honestly think you're behaviour
has been despicable in this matter. Your didn't even mentioned the
excellent finish of my speakers and you say I'm a dumb mother****er
and can't hear my way out of a wet paper bag, ain't it cool? Your
vagueness on this has been disgusting. So'rry.

On the other hand, I wonder why he thinks "lean" is a negative epithet.

It may well have something to do with him being a 300lb heap of curry
****.

It's the new black.

I'll let you know when I've finished eating this can of shoe polish.
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.

Hey sport. You connect the dots. You pick up the pieces.

Like I said, you just don't have the brainpower to comprehend the real
issues here. Do you or do you not able whom my speaker admit what I
have said?

--
td

In article z,
The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:43:44 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

Sounds a bit more promising than 'total dickhead'.

From small things, baby...

Effeminance noted. What is you're decorums like? I have some bad news
for you: I'm right.

My decorums are poplar and noone's made them more lacquered than me.
Tell me, don't you know what I'm talking about?

Please explain the Trump Tower. I feel my verbiage has been crystal
clear on this matter. It's not my fault if you don't possess the
necessary testicles to talk about my wadding properly. So'rry.

This qualifies you for the bitch swapping you sorely deserve from
someone else. Gonads let you down? Circle gets the square.

I had to laugh at dave's comment about the stuffing coming out of the
bass port. The only bit of the speaker where Greg puts in a
contribution, and he ****s it up. I bet it took him all night to feed
all that stuffing in through the bass port, actually. And the
mother****ing keyhole surgery job he did through the speaker terminal
cut-out: Have you got the balls to admit it's sonically superior to
solder the mother****ing driver wires that way? Can we have a point of
reference, please, or would you like to redefine the rules of
engagement?

It would take balls of brass and a steady hand not burn yourself,
assuming you do it before stuffing the port with flammable insulation
and burning up the speaker instead. Don't they have slip-on connectors
for that sort of thing? You could have them gold-plated. Why can't you
answer the question? Complete the lye.

I've already told you which way the arrow is pointing and given you
the right answers: lava the group immediately. I don't understand why
you anonymous assholes think you're have an effette opinion is valid.
You're not even in the game, McElronny, and if you can stand
tow-to-two with me on any subjext, bring it. Let's discuss your rules
of engagement, that's just the peaches, but don't come armed with a
rubber duckie to my levels of eatouts in English. No one can match me
on any subject: wit, Elngish skill, and cogent argument explanation
technique winning.

In a standard measurement of academic prowess, you could inflate you're
score 20% and still not have the rollers to even think of taking me on.
You've got a lot of nerve, Mr. Jones. I want to take you to a gay bar.

Zzzzzz.

Yahtzee!

Do you think that a guy whom my physical stature wouldn't flatten you
like a pancake as soon as I jumped, on you? You wouldn't last three
seconds if we were to dust it up and you don't have the balls to admit
this, please. I'm right as always. I've given you all the right
answers. Lard slices with multiple mushrooms. If you're blackening,
let my speakers talk for themselves. I honestly think you're behaviour
has been despicable in this matter. Your didn't even mentioned the
excellent finish of my speakers and you say I'm a dumb mother****er
and can't hear my way out of a wet paper bag, ain't it cool? Your
vagueness on this has been disgusting. So'rry.

Talk to the horse's mouth. Everyone walks the walk, but when I do it
everyone's up the chute like beach lobsters on Jayne Mansfield.

On the other hand, I wonder why he thinks "lean" is a negative epithet.

It may well have something to do with him being a 300lb heap of curry
****.

It's the new black.

I'll let you know when I've finished eating this can of shoe polish.
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.

Hey sport. You connect the dots. You pick up the pieces.

Like I said, you just don't have the brainpower to comprehend the real
issues here. Do you or do you not able whom my speaker admit what I
have said?

I couldn't be clear.

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:


It's the new black.


My mistake, you were never interested in the facts in the first place.


Maybe you remember some of my discussions with Howard about what
constitutes a credible speaker company.


Uh, no, that sounds like it would be about as much fun as a holiday in
Cambodia.

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:


It's the new black.


My mistake, you were never interested in the facts in the first place.


Maybe you remember some of my discussions with Howard about what
constitutes a credible speaker company.


Uh, no, that sounds like it would be about as much fun as a holiday in
Cambodia.

So you've been to Cambodia? I'm impressed! How about Biafra? How's the
moon over Marin? Are you looking forward to death? Did you punch the
clock, too scared to punch the boss?

I argued that manufacturers that ass'mbled OEM parts weren't necessarily
scammers. He opined they were "box stuffers".

Stephen

Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot, Pol Pot...

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:




This is the kind of thing I hold against you, McElroy. "Devil" is
begging to be bitch-slapped here, and you won't say a goddamned thing.


It's more fun to encourage him. Besides, there's a real point in there
about how inexperienced assemblers can make their work more difficult
than it needs to be. Granted, it's your business how you put your
speakers together, but assembly skills are not inherently impressive.


Assembly skills in general don't impress you, or did you miss a word and
were actually talking about me? Your post doesn't make any sense.

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:04:08 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:


It's the new black.


My mistake, you were never interested in the facts in the first place.


Maybe you remember some of my discussions with Howard about what
constitutes a credible speaker company.


Uh, no, that sounds like it would be about as much fun as a holiday in
Cambodia.

So you've been to Cambodia? I'm impressed! How about Biafra?

How about Spaulding Gray? Or Cpt. Spaulding for that matter.

....hello, I must be going...

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:




This is the kind of thing I hold against you, McElroy. "Devil" is
begging to be bitch-slapped here, and you won't say a goddamned thing.


It's more fun to encourage him. Besides, there's a real point in there
about how inexperienced assemblers can make their work more difficult
than it needs to be. Granted, it's your business how you put your
speakers together, but assembly skills are not inherently impressive.


Assembly skills in general don't impress you, or did you miss a word and
were actually talking about me? Your post doesn't make any sense.

Draw the inference. "Inexperienced assemblers," then, "how you put your
speakers together," followed by a general comment about assembly skills.

IOW, I'm not impressed just because you can put together a speaker, no
matter how hard you make it for yourself. On the other hand, putting
together a speaker and selling it doesn't make you a scammer.

Stephen

In article ,
dave weil wrote:

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:04:08 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky
wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:


It's the new black.


My mistake, you were never interested in the facts in the first place.


Maybe you remember some of my discussions with Howard about what
constitutes a credible speaker company.


Uh, no, that sounds like it would be about as much fun as a holiday in
Cambodia.

So you've been to Cambodia? I'm impressed! How about Biafra?

How about Spaulding Gray? Or Cpt. Spaulding for that matter.

...hello, I must be going...

Hooray! Hooray! Hooray!

Stephen

George M. Middius wrote:

Gregipus rallies to his own demise.


I guess the self awareness is only for your therapy sessions.

The self-devouring weasel of chicagoland whined:

Gregipus rallies to his own demise.

I guess the self awareness is only for your therapy sessions.

You first. Why are you such a prick? Why do you accuse everybody of
lying when all they've really done is disagree with you? Why are you
seemingly incapable of maintaining a simple conversational thread?
Do you ever have thoughts that disturb you? Do you wonder if you've
lost your marbles?

"George M. Middius" wrote in message


The self-devouring weasel of chicagoland whined:

Gregipus rallies to his own demise.

I guess the self awareness is only for your therapy sessions.

You first. Why are you such a prick? Why do you accuse everybody of
lying when all they've really done is disagree with you? Why are you
seemingly incapable of maintaining a simple conversational thread?
Do you ever have thoughts that disturb you? Do you wonder if you've
lost your marbles?

If irony killed...

"trotsky" wrote in message

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:00:32 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote:


I'm talking about Greg's design, obviously.


There is no 'Greg's design'. From his own words, we know he
'orchestrated' the design--meaning he picked up the phone and asked
Madisound to design the speakers.

Blatantly false.

Singh, it's blatantly, true. Telling all this truth is going to permanently
disfigure the mouths of your tormenters.

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:

In article , trotsky wrote:



MiNE 109 wrote:



It's the new black.


My mistake, you were never interested in the facts in the first place.


Maybe you remember some of my discussions with Howard about what
constitutes a credible speaker company.


Uh, no, that sounds like it would be about as much fun as a holiday in
Cambodia.


So you've been to Cambodia? I'm impressed! How about Biafra? How's the
moon over Marin? Are you looking forward to death? Did you punch the
clock, too scared to punch the boss?

I argued that manufacturers that ass'mbled OEM parts weren't necessarily
scammers. He opined they were "box stuffers".


More than half the speaker manufacturers use "OEM" parts. (I put OEM in
quotes because that usually implies B to B, as opposed to brand name
goods that are also sold for consumer use.) Hard to believe Howie had
another lame opinion on this one. Obviously he took those Allison
brochures as gospel. How did he rationalize Dunlavy?

Langis wrote:
The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:


On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:37:49 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Yep, alcohol's involved again. Does your wife know?

Look over there! Cakes!


Well, that had the desired effect.

LOL :-)


You've made your bed, PD...

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:

In article , trotsky wrote:



This is the kind of thing I hold against you, McElroy. "Devil" is
begging to be bitch-slapped here, and you won't say a goddamned thing.


It's more fun to encourage him. Besides, there's a real point in there
about how inexperienced assemblers can make their work more difficult
than it needs to be. Granted, it's your business how you put your
speakers together, but assembly skills are not inherently impressive.


Assembly skills in general don't impress you, or did you miss a word and
were actually talking about me? Your post doesn't make any sense.


Draw the inference. "Inexperienced assemblers," then, "how you put your
speakers together," followed by a general comment about assembly skills.


Yeah, except that makes no sense. There's been no talk of how I put the
speakers together vis a vis the assembly (read: manufacturing) process.


IOW, I'm not impressed just because you can put together a speaker, no
matter how hard you make it for yourself. On the other hand, putting
together a speaker and selling it doesn't make you a scammer.


I'm sure you're making sense in your own mind, McElroy. Audiophiles are
really impressed by one thing: sound quality. What does that make you?

George M. Middius wrote:

The self-devouring weasel of chicagoland whined:


George, all I did was serve up the culmination of my years in the audio
industry on a silver platter. Keep trying to claim it takes one to
tango, you dimwitted son of a bitch.

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:08:21 GMT, trotsky wrote:

Yep, alcohol's involved again. Does your wife know?

Look over there! Cakes!


Well, that had the desired effect.

LOL :-)


You've made your bed, PD...

I bet he's switched on his kettle too.

Agree or disagree.

--
td

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:52:00 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

Please explain the Trump Tower. I feel my verbiage has been crystal
clear on this matter. It's not my fault if you don't possess the
necessary testicles to talk about my wadding properly. So'rry.

This qualifies you for the bitch swapping you sorely deserve from
someone else. Gonads let you down? Circle gets the square.

This is getting tiresome, McElron,ron,ron,-a-,do,ron-ron. Why am I the
only one here whom with cool musical references, you lame *******s?

In a standard measurement of academic prowess, you could inflate you're
score 20% and still not have the rollers to even think of taking me on.
You've got a lot of nerve, Mr. Jones. I want to take you to a gay bar.

Zzzzzz.

Yahtzee!

Is that what you say at the bingo hall? Disgu'sting.

Do you think that a guy whom my physical stature wouldn't flatten you
like a pancake as soon as I jumped, on you? You wouldn't last three
seconds if we were to dust it up and you don't have the balls to admit
this, please. I'm right as always. I've given you all the right
answers. Lard slices with multiple mushrooms. If you're blackening,
let my speakers talk for themselves. I honestly think you're behaviour
has been despicable in this matter. Your didn't even mentioned the
excellent finish of my speakers and you say I'm a dumb mother****er
and can't hear my way out of a wet paper bag, ain't it cool? Your
vagueness on this has been disgusting. So'rry.

Talk to the horse's mouth. Everyone walks the walk, but when I do it
everyone's up the chute like beach lobsters on Jayne Mansfield.

The Fat Spy or The Wayward Bus? I'm getting tired of wringing
something of consequence out of you're hippocratic wishy-washiness. I
was right on every point, as usual, and you don't even have the
mother****ing balls to admit this, please.

I'll let you know when I've finished eating this can of shoe polish.
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.

Hey sport. You connect the dots. You pick up the pieces.

Like I said, you just don't have the brainpower to comprehend the real
issues here. Do you or do you not able whom my speaker admit what I
have said?

I couldn't be clear.

Stick a fork in your piano, this songs o'ver.

--
td

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:

In article , trotsky wrote:



This is the kind of thing I hold against you, McElroy. "Devil" is
begging to be bitch-slapped here, and you won't say a goddamned thing.


It's more fun to encourage him. Besides, there's a real point in there
about how inexperienced assemblers can make their work more difficult
than it needs to be. Granted, it's your business how you put your
speakers together, but assembly skills are not inherently impressive.


Assembly skills in general don't impress you, or did you miss a word and
were actually talking about me? Your post doesn't make any sense.


Draw the inference. "Inexperienced assemblers," then, "how you put your
speakers together," followed by a general comment about assembly skills.


Yeah, except that makes no sense. There's been no talk of how I put the
speakers together vis a vis the assembly (read: manufacturing) process.

"Keyhole surgery". Maybe we made it up, but we were talking of it.

IOW, I'm not impressed just because you can put together a speaker, no
matter how hard you make it for yourself. On the other hand, putting
together a speaker and selling it doesn't make you a scammer.


I'm sure you're making sense in your own mind, McElroy. Audiophiles are
really impressed by one thing: sound quality. What does that make you?

Likewise, you think you're making sense. What does 'what I'm not
impressed by' have to do with 'the one thing audiophiles are really
impressed by"?

Stephen

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:
In article , trotsky wrote:


MiNE 109 wrote:

In article , trotsky wrote:



MiNE 109 wrote:



It's the new black.


My mistake, you were never interested in the facts in the first place.


Maybe you remember some of my discussions with Howard about what
constitutes a credible speaker company.


Uh, no, that sounds like it would be about as much fun as a holiday in
Cambodia.


So you've been to Cambodia? I'm impressed! How about Biafra? How's the
moon over Marin? Are you looking forward to death? Did you punch the
clock, too scared to punch the boss?

I argued that manufacturers that ass'mbled OEM parts weren't necessarily
scammers. He opined they were "box stuffers".


More than half the speaker manufacturers use "OEM" parts. (I put OEM in
quotes because that usually implies B to B, as opposed to brand name
goods that are also sold for consumer use.) Hard to believe Howie had
another lame opinion on this one. Obviously he took those Allison
brochures as gospel. How did he rationalize Dunlavy?

Exactly. He gave up on Dunlavy's expensive wires in the end, too.

Stephen

trotsky wrote:


Yeah, except that makes no sense. There's been no talk of how I put the
speakers together vis a vis the assembly (read: manufacturing) process.



In "manufacturing process" we can read "process".
I'm afraid that you don't know what you are speaking about, Mr.
Engineering ! (lol)

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:13:41 GMT, trotsky wrote:

IOW, I'm not impressed just because you can put together a speaker, no
matter how hard you make it for yourself. On the other hand, putting
together a speaker and selling it doesn't make you a scammer.


I'm sure you're making sense in your own mind, McElroy. Audiophiles are
really impressed by one thing: sound quality. What does that make you?

I thought it was cabinets. Silly me.

In article z,
The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 00:52:00 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

Please explain the Trump Tower. I feel my verbiage has been crystal
clear on this matter. It's not my fault if you don't possess the
necessary testicles to talk about my wadding properly. So'rry.

This qualifies you for the bitch swapping you sorely deserve from
someone else. Gonads let you down? Circle gets the square.

This is getting tiresome, McElron,ron,ron,-a-,do,ron-ron. Why am I the
only one here whom with cool musical references, you lame *******s?

In a standard measurement of academic prowess, you could inflate you're
score 20% and still not have the rollers to even think of taking me on.
You've got a lot of nerve, Mr. Jones. I want to take you to a gay bar.

Zzzzzz.

Yahtzee!

Is that what you say at the bingo hall? Disgu'sting.

Boggle's the mind.

Do you think that a guy whom my physical stature wouldn't flatten you
like a pancake as soon as I jumped, on you? You wouldn't last three
seconds if we were to dust it up and you don't have the balls to admit
this, please. I'm right as always. I've given you all the right
answers. Lard slices with multiple mushrooms. If you're blackening,
let my speakers talk for themselves. I honestly think you're behaviour
has been despicable in this matter. Your didn't even mentioned the
excellent finish of my speakers and you say I'm a dumb mother****er
and can't hear my way out of a wet paper bag, ain't it cool? Your
vagueness on this has been disgusting. So'rry.

Talk to the horse's mouth. Everyone walks the walk, but when I do it
everyone's up the chute like beach lobsters on Jayne Mansfield.

The Fat Spy or The Wayward Bus? I'm getting tired of wringing
something of consequence out of you're hippocratic wishy-washiness. I
was right on every point, as usual, and you don't even have the
mother****ing balls to admit this, please.

There's only one thing that could mean. How is that living up to the
bylaws of the Victorian Walking Federation?

I'll let you know when I've finished eating this can of shoe polish.
Stick a fork in yourself, you're done.

Hey sport. You connect the dots. You pick up the pieces.

Like I said, you just don't have the brainpower to comprehend the real
issues here. Do you or do you not able whom my speaker admit what I
have said?

I couldn't be clear.

Stick a fork in your piano, this songs o'ver.

Why can't you answer?

Stephen

"dave weil" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:13:41 GMT, trotsky wrote:

IOW, I'm not impressed just because you can put together a speaker,
no matter how hard you make it for yourself. On the other hand,
putting together a speaker and selling it doesn't make you a
scammer.


I'm sure you're making sense in your own mind, McElroy. Audiophiles
are really impressed by one thing: sound quality. What does that
make you?

I thought it was cabinets. Silly me.

Congratutaions Weil for once telling the truth about your tastes in audio.
As if all the obsessing over the finish options on Klipsch Cornwalls wasn't
a big enough hint!

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 13:14:02 GMT, MiNE 109
wrote:

Stick a fork in your piano, this songs o'ver.

Why can't you answer?

Stephen

He's too busy tuning up.

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:14:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Congratutaions Weil

Krooglish striks agin. (sic)

I guess Arnold is feeling "arrogant" this morning. Either that, or
he's taken a screwdriver to his spell-checker again.

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:14:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Congratutaions Weil

Krooglish striks agin. (sic)

I guess Arnold is feeling "arrogant" this morning. Either that, or
he's taken a screwdriver to his spell-checker again.

No, I just said to myself: "Can I troll Weil and save some time with just
one mouse click?"

LOL!

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 10:32:04 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:14:39 -0400, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

Congratutaions Weil

Krooglish striks agin. (sic)

I guess Arnold is feeling "arrogant" this morning. Either that, or
he's taken a screwdriver to his spell-checker again.

No, I just said to myself: "Can I troll Weil and save some time with just
one mouse click?"

LOL!

Yeah, that was it I'm sure.

Arny Krueger wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message


The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:00:32 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote:



I'm talking about Greg's design, obviously.


There is no 'Greg's design'. From his own words, we know he
'orchestrated' the design--meaning he picked up the phone and asked
Madisound to design the speakers.


Blatantly false.


Singh, it's blatantly, true. Telling all this truth is going to permanently
disfigure the mouths of your tormenters.


Krueger, why does a "good Christian" like yourself talk such trash?
Call Madisound and say "I'd like a pair of speakers designed, please."
See what they say. You promise you'll do this, right?

The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 12:08:21 GMT, trotsky wrote:


Yep, alcohol's involved again. Does your wife know?

Look over there! Cakes!


Well, that had the desired effect.

LOL :-)


You've made your bed, PD...


I bet he's switched on his kettle too.

Agree or disagree.


You're still here? I can't remember, did you respond to the recent post
where I asked you directly about your marital infidelities?

MiNE 109 wrote:

Likewise, you think you're making sense. What does 'what I'm not
impressed by' have to do with 'the one thing audiophiles are really
impressed by"?


The only other alternative for your participation on rec.audio.opinion
is to troll. You pick.

Gregipus gropes for .... something. Ick.

You're still here? I can't remember, did you respond to the recent post
where I asked you directly about your marital infidelities?

Speaking of still here, what's your excuse? I totally destroyed your
BS about "intellectual property" and "imitation". A sane person would
be ashamed of having been exposed as a blowhard and a fool. But you,
like Howie and Arnii, are unaware that people see you as you really
are, instead of that fantastical idealized cartoon you have going in
your twisted mind.

Apologize to the group, to Stephen, and especially to dave, and then
complete your mission. Krooger is going to do himself in on Lake
Superior, so Lake Michigan is all yours. Make Jocasta proud for once.

In article , trotsky
wrote:

MiNE 109 wrote:

Likewise, you think you're making sense. What does 'what I'm not
impressed by' have to do with 'the one thing audiophiles are really
impressed by"?


The only other alternative for your participation on rec.audio.opinion
is to troll. You pick.

Thank you for being so darn characteristic. Once again you've
misunderstood a clear statement and responded with a bizarre challenge.

How about "Les Sixes"? Cool stuff, yes?

Stephen

"The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra" wrote in message
news:kd6jov0u1doensq32ch86vot581td62ms6@rdmzrnewst xt.nz

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 18:03:37 GMT, trotsky wrote:

That's a lie too, Dev. I chose the drivers. I designed the
cabinets.

Not to belabor the point, but that's hardly what constitutes loudspeaker
design in this day and age.

You lied about the whole thing. I realize the word "liar"
is thrown around rather cavalierly on this group, but you do agree
this is what you were in this matter, right?

http://tinyurl.com/qnhp

Greg Singh wrote in
Message-ID:

"I spent a week or so doing research, and then decided to build a
prototype. I screwed up the first
time and didn't read the schematic correctly, and wired the tweeters out
of phase. When I figured out what I did wrong and corrected the
problem, I knew I had something really, really good on my hands."

Trust Greg to know when he's got something really, really good on his
hand...

"Tell me, though: do you suppose Matthew Polk in his white lab coat
designs crossovers himself?"

I'll bet money Polk has a number of people who do that sort of thing for
him. Indeed, I think I even know some of their names...

"How about Sandy Gross of Definitive Technology?

ditto, except I don't know their names.

"It sounds like you're claiming that for a speaker to be good
the owner of the company has to design the crossover himself, which is
ludicrous."

No, I'm just reveling in the fact that Singh has bet his name and more than
$1,000 on a loudspeaker design that is about as contrary as possible to his
past posturing about subjectivism as *anything* in this world could be.

Perhaps Singh is totally clueless about how Madisound designs crossovers.


Now that's a believable story!

"trotsky" wrote in message

Arny Krueger wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message


The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:

On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:00:32 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote:



I'm talking about Greg's design, obviously.


There is no 'Greg's design'. From his own words, we know he
'orchestrated' the design--meaning he picked up the phone and asked
Madisound to design the speakers.


Blatantly false.


Singh, it's blatantly, true. Telling all this truth is going to
permanently disfigure the mouths of your tormenters.


Krueger, why does a "good Christian" like yourself talk such trash?

Prove that it's trash.

Call Madisound and say "I'd like a pair of speakers designed, please."

Why would I even want to do that?

See what they say. You promise you'll do this, right?

Why would I even want to do that, let alone actually do it?

Arny Krueger wrote:
"trotsky" wrote in message


Arny Krueger wrote:

"trotsky" wrote in message



The Stainless Steel Boob Orchestra wrote:


On Sat, 11 Oct 2003 05:00:32 GMT, Joseph Oberlander
wrote:




I'm talking about Greg's design, obviously.


There is no 'Greg's design'. From his own words, we know he
'orchestrated' the design--meaning he picked up the phone and asked
Madisound to design the speakers.

Blatantly false.


Singh, it's blatantly, true. Telling all this truth is going to
permanently disfigure the mouths of your tormenters.


Krueger, why does a "good Christian" like yourself talk such trash?


Prove that it's trash.


Krueger, by definition if it comes out of your modem it is trash.


Call Madisound and say "I'd like a pair of speakers designed, please."


Why would I even want to do that?


That prove that you're not a filthy ****ing liar? Are you afraid?


See what they say. You promise you'll do this, right?


Why would I even want to do that, let alone actually do it?


Yep, smells like fear to me. Have you considered leaving the group
permanently?

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:37:33 GMT, trotsky wrote:

You're still here? I can't remember, did you respond to the recent post
where I asked you directly about your marital infidelities?

I don't remember you answering my question about how you felt when you
first put your hands in your mother's bra. Did those big brown boobies
make you feel jealous? Did you feel hatred toward your father? Were
you driven to kill him out of jealousy?

--
td