Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new
world of ridicule for our favorite mutt? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 093f8c92-5416-4fcf-9f79-9cafad950b76
@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com, says... If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new world of ridicule for our favorite mutt? It would indeed. However, it's pretty clear to me that he was joking around during his back-and-forth with Shhhh. After all, he was the one mocking Scottie in that earlier thread I referenced. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 25, 1:20*pm, hophead wrote:
In article 093f8c92-5416-4fcf-9f79-9cafad950b76 @s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com, says... If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new world of ridicule for our favorite mutt? It would indeed. However, it's pretty clear to me that he was joking around during his back-and-forth with Shhhh. After all, he was the one mocking Scottie in that earlier thread I referenced. I agree that it's highly unlikely he's Scott's dad. But who would joke about such a terrible thing? |
#4
![]()
Posted to alt.sports.football.pro.sd-chargers,rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boon" wrote in message ... If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new world of ridicule for our favorite mutt? |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd just like to say how flattered I am that there's a thread in my honor in
a group I've never previously been to or heard of. I've been usenet stalked by a great many people over the years, but you guys have taken it to a new and altogether more impressive level. Please accept my most heartfelt standing ovation. "Boon" wrote in message ... If this guy really is Scott's dad, doesn't that open up a whole new world of ridicule for our favorite mutt? |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 26, 3:43*pm, "badlands420" wrote:
I'd just like to say how flattered I am that there's a thread in my honor in a group I've never previously been to or heard of. You think it's an honor to be ridiculed? Do tell. I've been usenet stalked by a great many people over the years, Then maybe it's time to get off the computer and join the real world. but you guys have taken it to a new and altogether more impressive level. Please accept my most heartfelt standing ovation. I don't know...is this supposed to make us feel bad or something? Is your life is so meaningless that any type of acknowledgement is better than being completely ignored? That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside and look at some trees. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is your life is so meaningless that any type of acknowledgement is better than being completely ignored? Being lectured about not having a life by someone who chooses to spend his time waging newsgroup vendettas with ScottW is quite ironic indeed. That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside and look at some trees. I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since, apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS), but, as Scott is currently not present there and none of us can stand his ass anyway, how do you suppose retribution is being exacted? This is a serious question. I'd appreciate a serious answer if you can manage one. |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() boopsie screeches in outrage. That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside and look at some trees. I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since, apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS) This is soooo disappointing. You were doing quite well at spotting troll-bait before. You even made a joke when I suggested you were naive. Now this? Tsk, tsk. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() boopsie screeches in outrage. Don't flatter yourself. You were doing quite well at spotting troll-bait before. The troll bait in question was so obtuse and unoriginal that Helen Keller couldn't have missed it. Again, don't flatter yourself. |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 27, 12:14*am, "badlands420" wrote:
Is your life is so meaningless that any type of acknowledgement is better than being completely ignored? Being lectured about not having a life by someone who chooses to spend his time waging newsgroup vendettas with ScottW is quite ironic indeed. It's not "ironic" at all. Yet another idiot who has no idea what the word means. That's right...you're still alive, but just barely. Time to go outside and look at some trees. I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since, apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS), but, as Scott is currently not present there and none of us can stand his ass anyway, how do you suppose retribution is being exacted? This is a serious question. I'd appreciate a serious answer if you can manage one. If that was an accurate rendition of reality, I could probably manage a serious answer. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If that was an accurate rendition of reality, I could probably manage a serious answer. Wow, I think I just heard the sound of your balls shriveling up into nothingness. Let me know if they drop again, Mary. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 27, 12:14*am, "badlands420" wrote:
I'm curious. You used terms like "revenge" and "getting even" when explaining your Keystone Kopsian group foray into the Chargers NG (since, apparently, you regard usenet as SERIOUS ****ING BUSINESS), but, as Scott is currently not present there and none of us can stand his ass anyway, how do you suppose retribution is being exacted? This is a serious question. I'd appreciate a serious answer if you can manage one. 1. Usenet is not "serious business". I'm here mainly for the laughs. 2. Perhaps one reason ScottW (or "2pid" as I prefer to call him) is not here is because he cannot handle being made to look stupid on yet another newsgroup. Since none of you can seemingly stand his pathetic, imbecilic ass you should thank us for helping remove him. 3. The fact that he's off cowering somewhere instead of posting his inane drivel is indeed satisfying. He craves attention and demands serious consideration of his moronic 'differing POVs'. Personally, though, I prefer it when he posts because I enjoy tormenting the idiotic simp. He'll be back on Sunday offering up more of his ill- informed views. I personally doubt that he's ever played a down. If nothing else, 2pid values his own opinions quite highly. LoL. 4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about. Were those responses serious enough for you? |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Shhhh! said: 4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about. Were those responses serious enough for you? Bratzi needs to find out whether boopsie knows how to solder. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() 1. Usenet is not "serious business". I'm here mainly for the laughs. Sorry, I assumed you guys were familiar with common troll humor. It appears I was mistaken. 2. Perhaps one reason ScottW (or "2pid" as I prefer to call him) is not here is because he cannot handle being made to look stupid on yet another newsgroup. Since none of you can seemingly stand his pathetic, imbecilic ass you should thank us for helping remove him. My newsgroup experience is not adversely affected by the presence of people I can't stand. Additionally, as I've stated before, I can't imagine ever taking Scott seriously enough to stalk him. That's more a reflection on you than him. 3. The fact that he's off cowering somewhere instead of posting his inane drivel is indeed satisfying. If Scott is important enough to you that you find satisfaction in anything he does or doesn't do, I wouldn't admit that publicly. He craves attention and demands serious consideration of his moronic 'differing POVs'. I don't suppose you've ever heard of a killfile? Personally, though, I prefer it when he posts because I enjoy tormenting the idiotic simp. So how is it satisfying to troll a group in which he's not present? Please help me understand this. He'll be back on Sunday offering up more of his ill- informed views. I personally doubt that he's ever played a down. If nothing else, 2pid values his own opinions quite highly. LoL. If he's able to generate this level of obsession from you all, he has no reason to think otherwise. 4. In case you hadn't noticed, some of us are even talking football on the SD group, which is supposedly what that group is about. Well, every thread there tends to be on topic, which is a hell of a lot more than I can say for this ********. Were those responses serious enough for you? I would prefer a simple answer to the question I asked. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd like to thank Zorro, Goat****er, and FailOut Boy for making me the new
pwner of this newsgroup (term used loosely). Y'all are entirely too kind. |