Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Jerry Jerry is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 115
Default Tone controls - should we or shouldn't we - what do the HiFi purists say

I personally know a few people who I'd call "purists". These folks believe
the ultimate goal of high fidelity is to reproduce sound exactly as if we
were present at a live concert.

For these folks there is only one setting on their amps ... FLAT! That is,
12 o'clock for bass, treble and mid (if you have one).

Now my AR1500 receiver even has a button for "tone flat". What it does is
completely bypass the tone control circuits and deliver the signal directly
to the power amp. NEVER USED IT!

I admit that I am a "diddler". I adjust to suit my tastes ... all of the
time!

From my perspective, failing to do this leaves the resulting sound at the
discretion of some sound engineer whose ultimate goal is to sell CD's.
Further, this engineer, when mixing, has no idea how my system sounds ...
in MY room. Consequently, there is zero chance that the resulting sound
will be "conditioned" for my room/system.

Some folks will say:

"You want the audio system (a flat responding, low-distortion audio system)
to reproduce recordings, including both the positive and negative features.
That is, you do not want to make a performing soloist jump out in front of
the orchestra and not sound the way they would at a live performance. You do
not want to add clarity (by boosting the mid/treble range to a louder level)
when no such clarity would exist in that strength at a live performance."

From my perspective, if I can't hear a jazz solo, I've missed the
"creativity" that I enjoy so much. Further, if I can't hear that
creativity, then I might as well be listening to classical music where it's
played the same way ... every time.

One last issue that I discovered tonight. I was wondering whether my
tweeters were working, so I hooked up an audio oscillator to my amp and went
from 2000Hz up to 10,000 Hz. Everything was fine up to 8000 Hz (my
tweeters seem to be working). Between 8,000 and 9,000Hz, I could still hear
sound, but at reduced levels. After 9,000 ... nothing!

So I plugged in my Koss headphones and performed the same test. Exactly the
same results! Once I got to 9,000Hz, however, I turn up the amp volume to
see if I could hear the sound any better. No question that with a "boost" I
could hear 9,000 Hz clearly. Then did the same at 10,000K, but this time I
required an even larger boost to hear any sound. Finally, somewhere between
11,000 and 12,000Hz there was nothing I could do to hear any sound

Returning to the tone control issue. Now I know positively that my hearing
is not what it once was (and I suspect I am NOT alone in this). Is it so
terribly wrong for me to boost treble so that I can hear recordings as I
would years ago??

Regards,
Jerry

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Passive Bi-amping and tone controls - do they achieve anything Jerry High End Audio 2 September 17th 06 03:38 PM
Tone Controls, EQ's Etc. Mark D Audio Opinions 179 November 7th 05 03:38 PM
Issues bypassing tone controls. Did I screw up? Bryan McGivney Vacuum Tubes 4 February 13th 04 06:58 PM
DIY Amp - Tone controls update (semi-long). JamesG Vacuum Tubes 1 September 17th 03 07:12 PM
Is it true you can't bypass the Behringer UB802's tone controls ? Jones_r Pro Audio 11 August 16th 03 12:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"