Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article znr1111842747k@trad, Mike Rivers wrote:
But I heard that Apple is considering making a two-button mouse. So there may be hope for the Mac accessory-shy. MacAlly has made 3-button mice for Apples for years, from old ADB ones on up to modern USB ones. And on the modern USB Macs you can pretty much just plug any USB mouse in and have it work. I have a MacAlly on the OS X box at work. Makes using X a whole lot easier, for one thing. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
S O'Neill wrote:
Alexander P. Barkey wrote: Just the fact that every program you load cannot be completely removed from memory what means that every program you start brings you closer to reboot your pc is a fact that cannot be tolerated when you do work on it. Not true Yes, true. It's known, u can read it in every pc magazine : Microsoft Windows cannot unload all DLLs it loaded by starting a program. So you open up a program and close it. There will be trash in your memory that sits there until you reboot. Google it... Hell, yes. A DLL is *supposed* to be unloaded after the last process that uses it is unloaded. And that doesn't always happen. I've seen this firsthand: debugging ONE DLL that's only used by ONE program, I've had to reboot in order to see my changes after I'd modified the DLL. This is the reason why "reboot" is the first thing any tech support tells you to do. Well, that and it kills a lot of TS time. Excel is notorious for memory leaks. Even after it's unloaded, though, windoze isn't smart enough to reclaim that memory. Therefore, weekly "maintenance reboots" are sometimes prescribed. This is a result of bad application (or middleware) coding. Macs are starting to see similar weirdnesses now (thanks to their very complex OS environment and the interaction of multiple vendors' components using multiple APIs.) Bottom line: Big, complicated general purpose operating systems are suboptimal for realtime processing. |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you just trying to take up extra space at Google? Some reason you
can't trim quotes? Is that harder than working a DAW? Did it ever occur to you that I don't give a damn about you and your dialup connection or the fact that you have to wait an extra tenth of a second to see my posts, every one of which you seem intent upon reading and replying to w/ some asinine BS. I have better things to do than trim and top-quote every message I post....if you don't like it, place me on your killfilter, or just get a life and stop playing netnanny. -- Jonny Durango "Patrick was a saint. I ain't." http://www.jdurango.com "hank alrich" wrote in message .. . x-no archive: yes Jonny Durango wrote: Look, my basic argument is that in my humble, subjective, biased opinion Are you just trying to take up extra space at Google? Some reason you can't trim quotes? Is that harder than working a DAW? -- ha |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
S O'Neill wrote:
Hell, yes. A DLL is *supposed* to be unloaded after the last process that uses it is unloaded. And that doesn't always happen. I've seen this firsthand: debugging ONE DLL that's only used by ONE program, I've had to reboot in order to see my changes after I'd modified the DLL. Hmm, here's an interesting article on that subject: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q96312/ According to that article, the problem comes about because Windows doesn't keep track of how many times an application has called LoadLibrary(), so that if the app fails to make a corresponding FreeLibrary() call for every LoadLibrary() call it has made (possibly due to crashing), then Windows doesn't know the library isn't in use and won't unload it. It's probably that way for API compatibility reasons (some software that intentionally leaves a library open for some reason), but it's still dumb. - Logan |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jonny Durango" wrote:
Did it ever occur to you that I don't give a damn about you and your dialup connection or the fact that you have to wait an extra tenth of a second to see my posts, every one of which you seem intent upon reading and replying to w/ some asinine BS. I have better things to do than trim and top-quote every message I post....if you don't like it, place me on your killfilter, or just get a life and stop playing netnanny. I'm gonna assume that you were just in a bad mood when you wrote that and not plonk you yet, because up until now I had the impression that you are NOT an asshole. It's common courtesy to trim irrelevant parts of previous posts. If you don't wanna, that's your prerogative, but be aware that it IS considered rude by others, and many people WILL simply disregard your posts in the future. If you're okay with that, never mind. Otherwise, maybe take a minute to tidy up before clicking "send." -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Logan Shaw wrote:
S O'Neill wrote: Hell, yes. A DLL is *supposed* to be unloaded after the last process that uses it is unloaded. And that doesn't always happen. I've seen this firsthand: debugging ONE DLL that's only used by ONE program, I've had to reboot in order to see my changes after I'd modified the DLL. Hmm, here's an interesting article on that subject: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q96312/ According to that article, the problem comes about because Windows doesn't keep track of how many times an application has called LoadLibrary(), so that if the app fails to make a corresponding FreeLibrary() call for every LoadLibrary() call it has made (possibly due to crashing), then Windows doesn't know the library isn't in use and won't unload it. It was loaded statically, so I guess it was Windows that didn't call Free...; I wasn't using LoadLibrary for this one. Therefore it was called once on startup and may not get called after a crash or exiting via a debugger; this must happen pretty often. But where doesn't it unload from? It's loaded into the process' address space. When the process terminates, everything in that space should go buh-bye. Do you mean its image is left in RAM, or mapped, to be linked into some unsuspecting new process that loads it? And what if it's still there after a bug that may have left it unstable? And why is the compiler able to overwrite a such a file when it's ostensibly "in use"? Ah, well, whatever. I don't have that problem anymore. It's probably that way for API compatibility reasons (some software that intentionally leaves a library open for some reason), but it's still dumb. - Logan |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Lorin,
"Lorin David Schultz" wrote: wrote: Despite many of my musical friends taunting me about staying with a PC for audio production, I have stuck with them for several years. I am, however, exhausted with my Dell 2.4 GHz Inspiron laptop with XP pro snip I have a Sony Vaio laptop with a 2.4GHz P4 and only 512MB RAM that's working tickety-boo with my Mbox. Is "tickety-boo" good? Thanks, Andy |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry Hank, I'm partially to blame for not trimming past posts, too.
I'll beginneth noweth... Cheers, Trevor de Clercq hank alrich wrote: Are you just trying to take up extra space at Google? Some reason you can't trim quotes? Is that harder than working a DAW? -- ha |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lorin,
Forgive me, I mis-spoke in the heat of the exchange. When I said ProTools has been "bug free" I really meant "has not been buggy". They may seem like the same statement, but they are not. Obviously, ProTools has bugs. Most (if not all) are well documented in the ReadMe files with each software release as well as the Answerbase section on the Digi website. "Being buggy" implies that solid, know-working functionality will just randomly not work for some random unknown reason. ProTools, in my not limited but of course not unlimited experience has not "been buggy". The distinction I'm trying to draw is that saying a piece of software "is buggy" implies a slanderous and problematic nature of the software more than some other piece of software. ProTools I find is far more stable than most pieces of software I use. Therefore, it may still have bugs, but it is relatively not a buggy application at all. Should I call ProTools buggy? If so, then every piece of software I've used has been "buggy". And at that point, there is no real way to truly differentiate the software that actually IS buggy and the software that actually is stable. I should have tempered my original statement, but my position remains essentially the same. Cheers, Trevor de Clercq Lorin David Schultz wrote: "Trevor de Clercq" wrote: I've run ProTools on Macs for 5 years now and can say it's been bug free. Either you have been REALLY lucky, or you have a VERY limited definition of "bug." Our experience with Pro Tools on the Mac is no better or worse than the same stuff with Windows (different, but not better or worse), but I wouldn't call it "bug free." We've had the occasional "the Mac crashes when I do this / then don't do that" with Digi tech support. |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Speaking of the subject, I'm starting to get disgusted with my laptop. It's getting slower and slower to boot, it seems to be getting slower and slower to start applications, and a couple of times in the past month it's left me a message that a serious error has occurred ("If this is the first time you see this message, restart your computer. . .. .") and leaves a cryptic message about a memory dump. It doesn't even tell me where that memory dump is even if it would actually help me to look at it. The computer (running XP Home) is on just about all the time. It could be that the disk drive is getting a bit ill. I do de-frag now and then, I run Zone Alarm, I check for viruses with AVG (never found one) and for ad/spyware with AdAware, which never turns up anything more serious than a "data miner." Much of the time, this computer is streaming audio from a radio station on the net, via Winamp. I'm wondering if this is leaving some garbage behind that a little housekeeping could remove. All those tempted to recommend "a clean install of Windows" need not apply. Other suggestions are welcome and might even get tried if they're not too destructive. On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? I've done that on desktop computers by just connecting the new drive to a spare IDE port on the computer and using the utility that comes with the new drive (MaxBlast is one) to copy everything from the old drive to the new drive. Do laptops have a "second IDE port?" -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
Speaking of the subject, I'm starting to get disgusted with my laptop. It's getting slower and slower to boot, it seems to be getting slower and slower to start applications, and a couple of times in the past month it's left me a message that a serious error has occurred ("If this is the first time you see this message, restart your computer. . . .") and leaves a cryptic message about a memory dump. It doesn't even tell me where that memory dump is even if it would actually help me to look at it. The computer (running XP Home) is on just about all the time. It could be that the disk drive is getting a bit ill. I do de-frag now and then, I run Zone Alarm, I check for viruses with AVG (never found one) and for ad/spyware with AdAware, which never turns up anything more serious than a "data miner." Much of the time, this computer is streaming audio from a radio station on the net, via Winamp. I'm wondering if this is leaving some garbage behind that a little housekeeping could remove. All those tempted to recommend "a clean install of Windows" need not apply. Other suggestions are welcome and might even get tried if they're not too destructive. On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? I've done that on desktop computers by just connecting the new drive to a spare IDE port on the computer and using the utility that comes with the new drive (MaxBlast is one) to copy everything from the old drive to the new drive. Do laptops have a "second IDE port?" I archive everything to a ext usb hd when I reinstal a OS get a clean fast puter but everything is right there on the Iomega if I need it G |
#53
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? Norton "Ghost". |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rivers" wrote:
[...] Other suggestions are welcome and might even get tried if they're not too destructive. You've probably already done this rather rudimentary task, but just in case you haven't: In My Computer, Right-click on the C: drive. Select properties. The window that appears includes a button for "Disk Cleanup." It often gets rid of some clutter. The other tabs include some other housekeeping options, including defrag. Also check the startup folder in your start menu. Some software (like MS Office) places "helper" apps there. They speed up starting the app when you use it, but they slow down starting the computer. They also use up system resources even when you're not using the app they "help." They're not necessary and can be removed from the start menu. The one and only exception I ever found to that rule was an app that installed with the driver for a Contour Shuttle controller. The controller wouldn't work without the "helper" app. I've never heard of another case like that though, ever. The last place to look is the startup tab of the system configuration utility. Select "Run" from the Start Menu and type "msconfig" Then select the "Startup" tab. Many of the items that appear there are also just "helper" apps that are actually more disruptive than helpful. Uncheck anything you don't absolutely need. How do you know what you don't need? I just Googled any listings I didn't recognize and was able to find explanations for all but one of the items on my list. The one I couldn't find I left alone. -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1112110295k@trad Speaking of the subject, I'm starting to get disgusted with my laptop. It's getting slower and slower to boot, it seems to be getting slower and slower to start applications, and a couple of times in the past month it's left me a message that a serious error has occurred ("If this is the first time you see this message, restart your computer. .. . .") and leaves a cryptic message about a memory dump. It doesn't even tell me where that memory dump is even if it would actually help me to look at it. Computers, especially laptops tend to get slow as the disk fills up. The computer (running XP Home) is on just about all the time. It could be that the disk drive is getting a bit ill. This also happens. I do de-frag now and then, I run Zone Alarm, I check for viruses with AVG (never found one) and for ad/spyware with AdAware, which never turns up anything more serious than a "data miner." Lucky you. Much of the time, this computer is streaming audio from a radio station on the net, via Winamp. I'm wondering if this is leaving some garbage behind that a little housekeeping could remove. The "Disk Clean Up" facility does a pretty good job on those. All those tempted to recommend "a clean install of Windows" need not apply. Other suggestions are welcome and might even get tried if they're not too destructive. Registy clean-up programs are a last-ditch possibility. On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? The program of choice is Ghost 2003. It will do something like an image copy of a drive. Generally you don't want a precise image copy, because the drive's size is changing. The tricky part, is as you note below, hooking two hard drives to a laptop. The method I use to get two laptop drives on one comptuer involves a desktop computer and a couple of $8 adaptors that hook laptop drives to standard IDE cables and ports. Ghost will also clone drives using another computer as a TCP/IP host. Ghost also supports acessing hard drives on USB/IDE converters. I see them around $22 including shipping on eBay, about $40 elsewhere. I've done that on desktop computers by just connecting the new drive to a spare IDE port on the computer and using the utility that comes with the new drive (MaxBlast is one) to copy everything from the old drive to the new drive. Do laptops have a "second IDE port?" No second IDE port that I know of. Unless you seriously dissasemble the laptop, only one is at all acessible. |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? Norton "Ghost". How does it work? And is it really practical? With a bit over 10 GB on the existing drive, that's at least 15 CDs. And then what do I do with the CDs when I install the new drive? Is (or can be) CD #1 bootable, and will it take off and start loading the virgin drive? Hmmm. I've only used it on desktops with a second drive to hold the image while I replaced the boot drive. It makes an image of the partition, and it's smart enough to copy that image back onto a different-sized target partition (or not, if it's too small). If it was bootable, it shall remain bootable. At a former employer they used to capture clean windoze installations with it so they could quickly return a used machine to service for someone else. Or, if I can "Ghost" to the new drive that I would install, how do I connect that drive? I'm sure a firewire or USB box for the new drive would do, but I don't know from experience. |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? Norton "Ghost". How does it work? And is it really practical? With a bit over 10 GB on the existing drive, that's at least 15 CDs. Ghost can compress the image file, and ought to be able to fit a 10 gB system partition onto a single DVD. what do I do with the CDs when I install the new drive? Is (or can be) CD #1 bootable, and will it take off and start loading the virgin drive? Yes, but it's far easier to make a Ghost boot floppy and then restore an image from the optical drive (or a network drive.) Or, if I can "Ghost" to the new drive that I would install, how do I connect that drive? That's a hardware thing. Probably USB. One more good reason for external SATA ports on laptops (coming soon!) |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#63
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
writes: On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? Norton "Ghost". How does it work? And is it really practical? With a bit over 10 GB on the existing drive, that's at least 15 CDs. And then what do I do with the CDs when I install the new drive? Is (or can be) CD #1 bootable, and will it take off and start loading the virgin drive? Or, if I can "Ghost" to the new drive that I would install, how do I connect that drive? I just bought a Wiebetech Firewire DriveDock, which attaches to a bare ATA drive, providing the drives power supply and a Firewire connection. Works a treat, allowing easy use of HD's as if they were reels of tape. I like this thing. Does your 'puter have an FW interface? If not, Wiebetech also has DriveDocks that do USB, FW800, and some fancy ones that do all of those. -- ha |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ghost or Drive Image are great programs. I used to restore Ghost
images from a CD all the time when I was using Win2k or Win98se. It was great to back up and running in 10 minutes However with XP there is more data so I'm not sure it will all fit on a single CD. However I think Ghost also has a way to stripe the image across more than one CD if it's too big to fit on one. You just need to have Ghost.exe on a floppy drive, then copy the image from the CDs back onto your C: drive. But if you are making a drive image of an installation that is already screwed up, this isn't going to help you. You need to make an image of a good installation so that you can restore it. So you might really do need to do a fresh install if you can't figure out the problem. I always keep the OS on a separate partition from the programs so it's less of a problem to fix a bad installation. If you are using XP, it should allow you to "repair" the installation rather than a complete install from scratch, which would allow you to keep all your application settings intact. Al On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:39:35 -0800, S O'Neill wrote: Mike Rivers wrote: In article writes: On another sour note, is there a good way yet to "clone" a replacement laptop disk drive, in the even that it looks like this is the culprit? Norton "Ghost". How does it work? And is it really practical? With a bit over 10 GB on the existing drive, that's at least 15 CDs. And then what do I do with the CDs when I install the new drive? Is (or can be) CD #1 bootable, and will it take off and start loading the virgin drive? Hmmm. I've only used it on desktops with a second drive to hold the image while I replaced the boot drive. It makes an image of the partition, and it's smart enough to copy that image back onto a different-sized target partition (or not, if it's too small). If it was bootable, it shall remain bootable. At a former employer they used to capture clean windoze installations with it so they could quickly return a used machine to service for someone else. Or, if I can "Ghost" to the new drive that I would install, how do I connect that drive? I'm sure a firewire or USB box for the new drive would do, but I don't know from experience. |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Started receiving my replacement parts today. Refurbished RAM and HD.
Much cheaper than replacing the whole computer. Had to send the chassis with the processor and m-board to Memphis. For now it's my only option. Guess I'll install the OS when the chassis returns and see what happens. I'm currently driving a 2000 Volvo that I bought used and kicks butt. Hope the refurbs work as well. Got a good offer to buy a used G4 today. Hmmmm...... Andy Peake |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy" wrote:
Is "tickety-boo" good? Oh man, I hope so, 'cause if it isn't, I'm gonna have to go fifteen rounds in the Mboxing ring. "Good" is relative. "Tickety-boo" is better than "Jim Dandy," but not as good as "a treat." Does that help any? If so, I've haven't tried hard enough to be weird. -- "It CAN'T be too loud... some of the red lights aren't even on yet!" - Lorin David Schultz in the control room making even bad news sound good (Remove spamblock to reply) |
#71
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#72
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#73
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rivers" wrote in message
news:znr1112127295k@trad In article lch2e.131428$gJ3.107731@clgrps13 writes: You've probably already done this rather rudimentary task, but just in case you haven't: In My Computer, Right-click on the C: drive. Select properties. The window that appears includes a button for "Disk Cleanup." It often gets rid of some clutter. I looked at that once (might have been on an earlier version of Windoze) and it was into deleting WAV and JPG files, most of which I wanted to keep. The wavs and jpgs were no doubt temporary internet files. They are parts of web pages that you browsed. |
#74
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"playon" wrote in message
Mike, a side note... I have heard the Maxblast utility which comes pre-installed on the Maxtor drives is a major problem for formatting the disk properly for a DAW. There was a lot of discussion about this a few years ago, maybe they solved the problem with a newer version, but you might want to look into it. I haven't found that the software that comes with Maxtor, Seagate, or WD drives in their consumer-pack versions are much use for installing or migrating drives. OTOH, the Disk Management function of XP is flexible, effective, and fast for formatting. While Ghost isn't cheap, it sure gets the job done. IME the current Release 9 of Ghost offers little or nothing over the older 2003 version for this sort of thing. It might be possible to pick up some highly discounted offers on Ghost 2003 since it is no longer the latest-greatest. Ironically, In fact Ghost 9 includes 2003 as its sole utility for migrating disk images. http://www.softwaresurplus.com/Guara...st+9&ovtac=PPC http://qualityinks.com/title1.php?title_id=nortonghost |
#76
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
In article writes: it's far easier to make a Ghost boot floppy and then restore an image from the optical drive (or a network drive.) Now, that's a possibility - make the Ghost image to a drive on another computer networked to the laptop, and then restore from that, assuming the Ghost boot floppy has enough smarts to talk to a networked computer without a setup. You need DOS drivers for the network card (usually emulating an NE2000), and you'll have to re-remember how to tweak autoexec.bat and config.sys files. Drop me a line and I can send you some working configs. |
#77
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#78
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#79
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Mar 2005 06:53:47 -0500, (Mike Rivers)
wrote: In article writes: Ghost can compress the image file, and ought to be able to fit a 10 gB system partition onto a single DVD. No DVD writer (or USB or Firewire case for a laptop drive either) here. It doesn't make sense to have to buy something like that for a one-time use. You can find a LOT of uses for an external optical or hard drive. Wonderful for backups, extra storage, portability, etc etc. And they aren't that expensive. Al |
#80
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ghost 2003, auction ends in a couple of hours, bid is at $4.50!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...595765 4&rd=1 On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:45:48 -0500, "Arny Krueger" wrote: "playon" wrote in message Mike, a side note... I have heard the Maxblast utility which comes pre-installed on the Maxtor drives is a major problem for formatting the disk properly for a DAW. There was a lot of discussion about this a few years ago, maybe they solved the problem with a newer version, but you might want to look into it. I haven't found that the software that comes with Maxtor, Seagate, or WD drives in their consumer-pack versions are much use for installing or migrating drives. OTOH, the Disk Management function of XP is flexible, effective, and fast for formatting. While Ghost isn't cheap, it sure gets the job done. IME the current Release 9 of Ghost offers little or nothing over the older 2003 version for this sort of thing. It might be possible to pick up some highly discounted offers on Ghost 2003 since it is no longer the latest-greatest. Ironically, In fact Ghost 9 includes 2003 as its sole utility for migrating disk images. http://www.softwaresurplus.com/Guara...st+9&ovtac=PPC http://qualityinks.com/title1.php?title_id=nortonghost |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amp noise from laptop | Tech | |||
Cheap laptop for MIDI work? | Pro Audio | |||
Live Recording: Laptop or Alesis HD24? | Pro Audio | |||
Using a raid hardrive archiving system with a laptop...? | Pro Audio | |||
laptop to stereo? | Pro Audio |