Tommy B wrote:

"It's a lot of hard work"
I'm going to start using that as my mantra.


"And I'm doing it".

Pete Dimsman wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.


One would hope.


I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.


Pitiful.

Pete Dimsman wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.


One would hope.


I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.


Pitiful.

Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

One would hope.

The other night, somebody knocked over my Kerry/Edwards signs. This
morning they were gone! Yup, somebody removed them. I noticed some other
(Kerry/Edwards) signs around the neighborhood have also gone missing.
All the Bush signs seem to still be in place.

Pathetic Bush supporters... (..)

Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

One would hope.

The other night, somebody knocked over my Kerry/Edwards signs. This
morning they were gone! Yup, somebody removed them. I noticed some other
(Kerry/Edwards) signs around the neighborhood have also gone missing.
All the Bush signs seem to still be in place.

Pathetic Bush supporters... (..)

Well, if we make a big enough crater it would limit their "Big Sky" horizon.
Then again, I guess we could always use another Great Lake. If you don't
mind the mutated fish.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Blind Joni wrote:
Will, these are folks guided by their religion who blow themselves up.
We'll
never be able to stop a determined suicide bomber. What makes you think
that
they'll recognize the "inevitability of defeat"? You could go in right
now
and kill every other Muslim, pop nukes over Mecca and Medina, totally
quit
using oil and we'd still have folks fighting us.

So what is your idea of a solution?

I say we nuke Montana. A pre-emptive strike is the only solution.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Well, if we make a big enough crater it would limit their "Big Sky" horizon.
Then again, I guess we could always use another Great Lake. If you don't
mind the mutated fish.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Blind Joni wrote:
Will, these are folks guided by their religion who blow themselves up.
We'll
never be able to stop a determined suicide bomber. What makes you think
that
they'll recognize the "inevitability of defeat"? You could go in right
now
and kill every other Muslim, pop nukes over Mecca and Medina, totally
quit
using oil and we'd still have folks fighting us.

So what is your idea of a solution?

I say we nuke Montana. A pre-emptive strike is the only solution.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Personally, when Bush absolutely wanted to make a rebuttal, he actually
looked like he'd been caught ****ing on his shoes. Sorry, but the "deer in
headlights" analogy is so worn! g

Register. Vote.

And hope that somehow your vote actually counts.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...


Don Cooper wrote:


Thank God NY is blue.

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

Personally, when Bush absolutely wanted to make a rebuttal, he actually
looked like he'd been caught ****ing on his shoes. Sorry, but the "deer in
headlights" analogy is so worn! g

Register. Vote.

And hope that somehow your vote actually counts.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...


Don Cooper wrote:


Thank God NY is blue.

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g

Thanks Bush.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Tommy B" wrote in message
news
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

"It's a lot of hard work"
I'm going to start using that as my mantra.
Tom


"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...


Don Cooper wrote:


Thank God NY is blue.

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g

Thanks Bush.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Tommy B" wrote in message
news
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

"It's a lot of hard work"
I'm going to start using that as my mantra.
Tom


"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...


Don Cooper wrote:


Thank God NY is blue.

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

Pete Dimsman wrote:
Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

Actually, I thought he was much more articulate than usual in this debate.
Neither Kerry nor Bush can hold a candle to Reagan at thinking on their
feet and coming up with quick answers, though, and it really showed. What
I would like to see is for the both of them to debate Tony Blair. That
would be a real death match.

What disturbed me was the huge amount of breath noise on Bush's voice, which
definitely did not make him sound like he was in good control. Was he miked
this way deliberately? You could hear him take a deep breath in before every
question. I heard the debate on the radio so I couldn't see how he was
miked, but I am surprise it wasn't corrected in a run-through.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Pete Dimsman wrote:
Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

Actually, I thought he was much more articulate than usual in this debate.
Neither Kerry nor Bush can hold a candle to Reagan at thinking on their
feet and coming up with quick answers, though, and it really showed. What
I would like to see is for the both of them to debate Tony Blair. That
would be a real death match.

What disturbed me was the huge amount of breath noise on Bush's voice, which
definitely did not make him sound like he was in good control. Was he miked
this way deliberately? You could hear him take a deep breath in before every
question. I heard the debate on the radio so I couldn't see how he was
miked, but I am surprise it wasn't corrected in a run-through.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

And you wouldn't think that Karl Rove had all that much time on his hands.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...


Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

One would hope.

The other night, somebody knocked over my Kerry/Edwards signs. This
morning they were gone! Yup, somebody removed them. I noticed some other
(Kerry/Edwards) signs around the neighborhood have also gone missing.
All the Bush signs seem to still be in place.

Pathetic Bush supporters... (..)

And you wouldn't think that Karl Rove had all that much time on his hands.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...


Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

One would hope.

The other night, somebody knocked over my Kerry/Edwards signs. This
morning they were gone! Yup, somebody removed them. I noticed some other
(Kerry/Edwards) signs around the neighborhood have also gone missing.
All the Bush signs seem to still be in place.

Pathetic Bush supporters... (..)

Interesting. Since you heard it on the radio, how did you view the results?
In the JFK/Nixon debate, JFK came out strong on TV, but interestingly
enough, those that listened on the radio thought that Nixon handily won the
debate.

Was there that kind of disparity in what you heard compared to what the
pundits have been saying?

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Pete Dimsman wrote:
Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

Actually, I thought he was much more articulate than usual in this debate.
Neither Kerry nor Bush can hold a candle to Reagan at thinking on their
feet and coming up with quick answers, though, and it really showed. What
I would like to see is for the both of them to debate Tony Blair. That
would be a real death match.

What disturbed me was the huge amount of breath noise on Bush's voice,
which
definitely did not make him sound like he was in good control. Was he
miked
this way deliberately? You could hear him take a deep breath in before
every
question. I heard the debate on the radio so I couldn't see how he was
miked, but I am surprise it wasn't corrected in a run-through.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Interesting. Since you heard it on the radio, how did you view the results?
In the JFK/Nixon debate, JFK came out strong on TV, but interestingly
enough, those that listened on the radio thought that Nixon handily won the
debate.

Was there that kind of disparity in what you heard compared to what the
pundits have been saying?

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Pete Dimsman wrote:
Don Cooper wrote:

After tonights debate, I am more hopeful that more states are going to
be blue.

I cannot believe how pathetic Bush is.
It's like you just want to cheer for the guy when he can actually
complete a sentence.

Actually, I thought he was much more articulate than usual in this debate.
Neither Kerry nor Bush can hold a candle to Reagan at thinking on their
feet and coming up with quick answers, though, and it really showed. What
I would like to see is for the both of them to debate Tony Blair. That
would be a real death match.

What disturbed me was the huge amount of breath noise on Bush's voice,
which
definitely did not make him sound like he was in good control. Was he
miked
this way deliberately? You could hear him take a deep breath in before
every
question. I heard the debate on the radio so I couldn't see how he was
miked, but I am surprise it wasn't corrected in a run-through.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

The stock market is rallying. Seems investors must like the idea of a
Kerry presidency. Or maybe they just like the idea of kicking Bush out.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g

Thanks Bush.

The stock market is rallying. Seems investors must like the idea of a
Kerry presidency. Or maybe they just like the idea of kicking Bush out.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g

Thanks Bush.

Perhaps they thought Bush won the debate? Rudy seems to think it went that
way.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...
The stock market is rallying. Seems investors must like the idea of a
Kerry presidency. Or maybe they just like the idea of kicking Bush out.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of
fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her
ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger!
g

Thanks Bush.

Perhaps they thought Bush won the debate? Rudy seems to think it went that
way.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...
The stock market is rallying. Seems investors must like the idea of a
Kerry presidency. Or maybe they just like the idea of kicking Bush out.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of
fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her
ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger!
g

Thanks Bush.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
Interesting. Since you heard it on the radio, how did you view the results?
In the JFK/Nixon debate, JFK came out strong on TV, but interestingly
enough, those that listened on the radio thought that Nixon handily won the
debate.

I don't know. As I said, I thought Bush was a lot more articulate than he
normally is, but I was disappointed that neither one of them really talked
much about social issues outside of the 9/11 and terrorism things. I would
not give either one of them much credit for explaining why their policies
in general are better than the other guy's.

Sure, we have economic problems, and sure we have a war going on, but what
do they _really_ think about what the war on drugs is doing to our foreign
relations? What do they really think about broadcast ownership rules or
education reform?

Was there that kind of disparity in what you heard compared to what the
pundits have been saying?

I don't have a TV set, and I didn't get the Post this morning, so I don't
know what the pundits are saying yet.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

Roger W. Norman wrote:
Interesting. Since you heard it on the radio, how did you view the results?
In the JFK/Nixon debate, JFK came out strong on TV, but interestingly
enough, those that listened on the radio thought that Nixon handily won the
debate.

I don't know. As I said, I thought Bush was a lot more articulate than he
normally is, but I was disappointed that neither one of them really talked
much about social issues outside of the 9/11 and terrorism things. I would
not give either one of them much credit for explaining why their policies
in general are better than the other guy's.

Sure, we have economic problems, and sure we have a war going on, but what
do they _really_ think about what the war on drugs is doing to our foreign
relations? What do they really think about broadcast ownership rules or
education reform?

Was there that kind of disparity in what you heard compared to what the
pundits have been saying?

I don't have a TV set, and I didn't get the Post this morning, so I don't
know what the pundits are saying yet.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Roger W. Norman wrote:

Sure, we have economic problems, and sure we have a war going on, but what
do they _really_ think about what the war on drugs is doing to our foreign
relations? What do they really think about broadcast ownership rules or
education reform?

Domestic issues are to be the focus of the later debates.

Glenn D.

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Roger W. Norman wrote:

Sure, we have economic problems, and sure we have a war going on, but what
do they _really_ think about what the war on drugs is doing to our foreign
relations? What do they really think about broadcast ownership rules or
education reform?

Domestic issues are to be the focus of the later debates.

Glenn D.

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g


Maybe you should be the President!

: )

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g


Maybe you should be the President!

: )

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

Perhaps they thought Bush won the debate? Rudy seems to think it went that
way.


Rudy thinks what they tell him to think.

"Roger W. Norman" wrote:

Perhaps they thought Bush won the debate? Rudy seems to think it went that
way.


Rudy thinks what they tell him to think.

Pete Dimsman wrote:

The other night, somebody knocked over my Kerry/Edwards signs. This
morning they were gone! Yup, somebody removed them. I noticed some other
(Kerry/Edwards) signs around the neighborhood have also gone missing.
All the Bush signs seem to still be in place.

Pathetic Bush supporters... (..)


In 2000, there was someone from Ohio taking Hilary Clinton signs from
lawns in my area. When asked what he was doing, he said cleaning up the
trash.

Pete Dimsman wrote:

The other night, somebody knocked over my Kerry/Edwards signs. This
morning they were gone! Yup, somebody removed them. I noticed some other
(Kerry/Edwards) signs around the neighborhood have also gone missing.
All the Bush signs seem to still be in place.

Pathetic Bush supporters... (..)


In 2000, there was someone from Ohio taking Hilary Clinton signs from
lawns in my area. When asked what he was doing, he said cleaning up the
trash.

Rudy seemed to think a painting at the Brooklyn Museum was sacriligous,
cause it was made out of cowpoop, and portrayed the Madonna.
He was not particularly well reguarded before 9/11, which made him an
instant hero.
Tom



"Roger W. Norman" wrote in message
...
Perhaps they thought Bush won the debate? Rudy seems to think it went
that
way.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...
The stock market is rallying. Seems investors must like the idea of a
Kerry presidency. Or maybe they just like the idea of kicking Bush out.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of
fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing
her
ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But
she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her
finger!
g

Thanks Bush.

Rudy seemed to think a painting at the Brooklyn Museum was sacriligous,
cause it was made out of cowpoop, and portrayed the Madonna.
He was not particularly well reguarded before 9/11, which made him an
instant hero.
Tom



"Roger W. Norman" wrote in message
...
Perhaps they thought Bush won the debate? Rudy seems to think it went
that
way.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Pete Dimsman" wrote in message
...
The stock market is rallying. Seems investors must like the idea of a
Kerry presidency. Or maybe they just like the idea of kicking Bush out.

Roger W. Norman wrote:
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of
fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing
her
ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But
she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her
finger!
g

Thanks Bush.

On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:37:02 -0400, "Roger W. Norman"
wrote:

Personally, when Bush absolutely wanted to make a rebuttal, he actually
looked like he'd been caught ****ing on his shoes. Sorry, but the "deer in
headlights" analogy is so worn! g

He looked more like he'd been sucking on a lemon.

Al

On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:37:02 -0400, "Roger W. Norman"
wrote:

Personally, when Bush absolutely wanted to make a rebuttal, he actually
looked like he'd been caught ****ing on his shoes. Sorry, but the "deer in
headlights" analogy is so worn! g

He looked more like he'd been sucking on a lemon.

Al

On 1 Oct 2004 13:47:09 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

As I said, I thought Bush was a lot more articulate than he
normally is,

But then that's not setting the bar very high, is it?

Al

On 1 Oct 2004 13:47:09 -0400, (Scott Dorsey) wrote:

As I said, I thought Bush was a lot more articulate than he
normally is,

But then that's not setting the bar very high, is it?

Al

Tommy B wrote:

Rudy seemed to think a painting at the Brooklyn Museum was sacriligous,
cause it was made out of cowpoop, and portrayed the Madonna.
He was not particularly well reguarded before 9/11, which made him an
instant hero.


Exactly, and he was wonderful for that next month. Now, he's just
cashing in on it.

Tommy B wrote:

Rudy seemed to think a painting at the Brooklyn Museum was sacriligous,
cause it was made out of cowpoop, and portrayed the Madonna.
He was not particularly well reguarded before 9/11, which made him an
instant hero.


Exactly, and he was wonderful for that next month. Now, he's just
cashing in on it.

"Roger W. Norman"
The problem with that statement is that it's not only a statement of fact,
but it's an excuse. I know because I've used it around here trying to
complete all this remodelling work and even my wife started laughing her ass
off last night when Bush first said "It's a lot of hard work". But she
wasn't laughing at Bush, she was laughing at me and pointing her finger! g

Thanks Bush.

Can't blame the President for everything Roger.


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits