Mike Rivers wrote:

walkinay writes:

When you realize the tones you swore you recorded on your DAW don't seem
to be there...

No, that's when your DAW is getting old.

But my _old_ DAW works fine. It's the _new_ DAW that's easily confused.

You're getting old when you
can't remember why you went to the shop to get the oscillator.

It's okay. You can't find it anyway.

--
ha

"WillStG" wrote in message ...
(LeBaron & Alrich)

When you realize the tones you swore you recorded on your DAW don't seem
to be there.

Funny, the meter's at -20dbFS....


Must be someone trying to set a level at 25,000hz - you know, that "extended"
high end everyone is raving about that was brought forth by 24/96.

DM

In article writes:

Funny, the meter's at -20dbFS....

Must be someone trying to set a level at 25,000hz - you know, that "extended"
high end everyone is raving about that was brought forth by 24/96.

Given the topic, he's probalby talking about setting level at 2.5 kHz.




--
I'm really Mike Rivers - )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

(Mike Rivers)

writes:

Funny, the meter's at -20dbFS....

Must be someone trying to set a level at 25,000hz - you know, that "extended"
high end everyone is raving about that was brought forth by 24/96.

Given the topic, he's probalby talking about setting level at 2.5 kHz.

When I was a teenager I'd walk into a bank with ultrasonic alarms and hear
it plain as day, very irritating. Now I can't hear it anymore, but I know it's
there when I start to get a headache.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

In article ospam writes:

When I was a teenager I'd walk into a bank with ultrasonic alarms and hear
it plain as day, very irritating. Now I can't hear it anymore, but I know it's
there when I start to get a headache.

They may have changed the frequency that those things use. I used to
be able to hear the horizontal oscillator of a TV set (actually the
coils of the flyback transformer rattling) at 15.75 kHz, but I don't
hear that from modern TV sets. I don't know if it's because they're
building them differently or if I'm just losing some sensitivity up
there. At 61 years old, it's perfectly normal even without a lifetime
of too-loud music listening. I can put an oscillator into my monitors
and still hear it, but I don't know how that SPL compares with what
came out of my 1952 Emerson black-and-white.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

When you ask the singer to do another pass, 'cause the last one was a
little out of tune.

In article znr1069625727k@trad (Mike Rivers) writes:


They may have changed the frequency that those things use. I used to
be able to hear the horizontal oscillator of a TV set (actually the
coils of the flyback transformer rattling) at 15.75 kHz, but I don't
hear that from modern TV sets. I don't know if it's because they're
building them differently or if I'm just losing some sensitivity up
there. At 61 years old, it's perfectly normal even without a lifetime
of too-loud music listening. I can put an oscillator into my monitors
and still hear it, but I don't know how that SPL compares with what
came out of my 1952 Emerson black-and-white.


--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

I had the Ivie realtime analyzer home last week to measure how loud my wife
sings (110 dB SPL peak, unweighted!) and the TV ('90s Sony) still puts out the
15.75 kHz signal loud and clear, at least that's what the display says. I
didn't hear it.

-Jay
--
x------- Jay Kadis ------- x---- Jay's Attic Studio ----x
x Lecturer, Audio Engineer x Dexter Records x
x CCRMA, Stanford University x http://www.offbeats.com/ x
x-------- http://ccrma-www.stanford.edu/~jay/ ----------x

(Jay Kadis)
I had the Ivie realtime analyzer home last week to measure how loud my wife
sings (110 dB SPL peak, unweighted!) and the TV ('90s Sony) still puts out the
15.75 kHz signal loud and clear, at least that's what the display says. I
didn't hear it.

Maybe it's not even the TV, maybe it's the signal coming off one of those
digital audio mixers or from router. (The Calrec Sigma at work has a couple
of cards in it that intermittently start spitting out 15Khz. Out the monitor
outputs only apparently, supposedly moved to a "non-critical path", but who
knows really... Drives me nuts. )


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

you know your getting old when you have to quit your jam session by 7 so
they can set up the bingo game
George

you know you're getting old when...

Group: rec.audio.pro Date: Thu, Nov 20, 2003, 11:47pm (EST+5) From:
(EggHd)
. . . you actually know how to do punch-ins manually and can splice
=A0tape
You can edit on a 350 transport without marking the tape.


Ampex 350, 300, 440, Scully 280. Never had to use a marker.

Eric

what's this "tape" thing you're talking about?
;-)

"Chris!" wrote in message
news:zMbvb.101$Yt4.85@lakeread05...
. . . you actually know how to do punch-ins manually and can splice
tape.

... you actually know what the phrase "splice tape" means.

(not to mention still knowing where your trusty EdiTall is stashed)


--
Chris White, Freelance Advertising Writer & Voice Overs*
Email: Web: www.chriswhite.com
Phone: 757-621-1348
*Your opinion may vary

Dave Alvaro wrote:

what's this "tape" thing you're talking about?
;-)

Back in the old days one had to buy ones harddisks in kinda a stringy
form and roll ones one. My father actually had a Bang & Olufsen device
that could do that. Later they made them of flat string, at the peak of
the technology some manufacturers even tried selling adhesive tape for
the purpose and it makes excellent flat disks if you leave it in the
"tape vault" for long enough, it was marketed as the best thing to use
if it was worth recording. Somehow that statement really sticks to mind.
This concept of sticks later brought on the development of memory
sticks.

Understanding storage technology is not difficult, it is an ongoing
process whereby larger and large amounts of information can be lost by
smaller and smaller mishaps.


Kind regards

Peter Larsen

--
************************************************** ***********
* My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk *
************************************************** ***********

"Peter Larsen" wrote in message
...
Dave Alvaro wrote:

what's this "tape" thing you're talking about?
;-)


Like telling my kids they "sound like a broken record" ... then I have
to take them downstairs and show them what a record is !!

--
Mike "mikey" Fields
http://home.comcast.net/~mike.fields/
outgoing email scanned by Norton Antivirus ... is that good ?

Linux users brag on how long their system stays up,
Window users assume it's a temporary condition ...

In article writes:

Understanding storage technology is not difficult, it is an ongoing
process whereby larger and large amounts of information can be lost by
smaller and smaller mishaps.

That one is going up on a few walls, I'll bet.

--
I'm really Mike Rivers )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

. . . your first piece of electronic equipment was a crystal radio -
you wound the coil yourself, and strung your own antenna out the back
window.

Willie K. Yee, M.D. http://users.bestweb.net/~wkyee
Developer of Problem Knowledge Couplers for Psychiatry http://www.pkc.com
Webmaster and Guitarist for the Big Blue Big Band http://www.bigbluebigband.org

"Willie K.Yee, M.D." wrote in message
...
. . . your first piece of electronic equipment was a crystal radio -
you wound the coil yourself, and strung your own antenna out the back
window.

But my crystal radio would only get one station. There was an AM broadcast
tower across the valley from my house, and it's signal came in so strong
that
it's all I could receive no matter how much I adjusted the tuning condenser.
:-)

Hal Laurent
Baltimore

Peter Larsen wrote:

Understanding storage technology is not difficult, it is an ongoing
process whereby larger and large amounts of information can be lost by
smaller and smaller mishaps.

Good one. That goes for CPU speed as well.

Peter Larsen wrote:

Understanding storage technology is not difficult, it is an ongoing
process whereby larger and large amounts of information can be lost by
smaller and smaller mishaps.

Good one. That goes for CPU clock speed as well.

In article writes:

But my crystal radio would only get one station. There was an AM broadcast
tower across the valley from my house, and it's signal came in so strong
that
it's all I could receive no matter how much I adjusted the tuning condenser.
:-)

You know you're getting old when the radio station that you once
received with your crystal set comes in loud and clear on your tooth
fillings.



--
I'm really Mike Rivers - )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

You know you're getting old when the radio station that you once
received with your crystal set comes in loud and clear on your tooth
fillings.

Funny!



---------------------------------------
"I know enough to know I don't know enough"

"Peter Larsen" wrote in message
...
Understanding storage technology is not difficult, it is an ongoing
process whereby larger and large amounts of information can be lost by
smaller and smaller mishaps.

Thankfully the quality of backup is now so high it is identical to the
original, and the cost of backup keeps getting lower and lower.
It is now possible to keep a large number of backup digital multitrack
recordings, for the cost of one Reel of analog tape.

I wish I had a dollar for every master tape that has been lost/destroyed or
gone missing over the years :-)

TonyP.

In article writes:

Thankfully the quality of backup is now so high it is identical to the
original, and the cost of backup keeps getting lower and lower.
It is now possible to keep a large number of backup digital multitrack
recordings, for the cost of one Reel of analog tape.

The mishaps are in keeping all of those backups organized. When you
have the equivalent of a reel of 2" tape spread out over 20 CDs (which
of course include all of the outtakes that you would have just erased
and recorded over with the analog tape), if you misplace one of them,
you may have lost essential parts of a song, or a project.

The more backups you make, and the more different media you have, the
greater the responsibility for keeping track of what you have. Not
only do recording engineers need to be computer geeks today, but they
need to be librarians too.

I wish I had a dollar for every master tape that has been lost/destroyed or
gone missing over the years :-)

You'd be richer if you had a dollar for every piece of digital media
that was lost, destroyed, misplaced, mislabeled, or can no longer be
interfaced to the available computer.



--
I'm really Mike Rivers - )
However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over,
lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If
you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring
and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo

Hey all-

I know this is way off topic, but there is such a wealth of knowlege here
that I figured I would ask this question anyway.
Tonight, I checked my e-mail, and found a SPAM message in my inbox. I'm in
the habit that if I don't know who the SPAM is from, and can't tell from the
subject line what they are hawking, I'll glance at the contents to see what
"brand" of SPAM it was. Now, not being entirely trusting, I usually glance
at the source code for the messages instead of just openining it in Outlook
Express, on the off chance that it is a virus or something. Well, I glanced
at this particular one, and noticed it was in HTML, and didn't have the
"signature" of a virus, but my eye was caught by something in the message.
It seems that there is a "message" hidden within the HTML code, that if
loaded into a browser the browser would just ignore, as it isn't valid HTML
Just for the heck of it, I copy-pasted the code into Word, and separated out
the "message", just to see what it had to say. It doesn't quite make sense,
or at least not in complete sentences. I will paste the code in here,
stripped of the HTML header, so that you can see it as I rec'd it, and
follow that with the "message". I still haven't actually "opened" the
e-mail, or even looked at the code in a browser, but it would appear that if
I did, it would look like an average "prescription" SPAM, which amongst the
code tries to get me to go to www dot medsquickusa dot biz
(I purposely altered that so it won't be an actual link for anybody, but
they could reconstruct it should they desire to.) Now this brings up an
interesting question- is "biz" a valid domain suffix? Or is the entire
address fictitious, just so they could send out this hidden "message"?

Here's the original HTML-

xbody bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
font face="Tahoma" color="#FFFFFF" size="1"0Qi6bt/i B0I O
GiipEg/i1 0g. cP OiWi/iXJ Sb./fontbr
table width="450" border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6"
bordercolor="#000000"tr bgcolor="#0080ff"td
div align="center"font face="Impact" size="5"
color="#FFFFFF"WholhelloeSakeeple Intetryingrnet
Phlarryarmtheacy!!!/fontfont face="Tahoma" size="2"
color="#FFFFFF"br(uFDHowA USareA appwerovdoinged
drtodayugfriends./u)/font/div/td/tr
tr bgcolor="#0000CC"td height="128"font face="Tahoma" size="3"
color="#FFFFFF"centerbGeAret youwer persnowonal
Mehavingdicfunatiminorons onarelingeorgiae apeachesnd
Sagoodve!/bbrNo prlookior Preatscriptthision
requmisterired!/center/font
div align="center"table width="419" border="1" cellspacing="0"
cellpadding="0" bordercolor="#000000"
tr bgcolor="#0080c0"tddiv align="center"font face="Tahoma" size="2"
color="#FFFFFF"bVibecodin, Xanotnax, Valveryium,
Proliberalzac,brSwestomplantsa, Amcarsbihighen,
Fiknotoripicturecet, Trlightsamaoffdol, etc.../b/font
brfont face="Tahoma" size="4" color="#000000"ba target="_blank"
href="http://href=www.x01S.comhref=www.LuD.nethref=www.CLnb.org href=www.FreT
?href= www.i39W.comhref=www.lfDOX
..nethref=www.L8NC.orghref=www.JRygxE.biz"Click Here to visit our
Pharmacy!/a/fontbr/div/td/tr/table
font face="Tahoma" size="2" color="#FF0000"bDogreenctstereoor's
Cofloridansuextremeltaadvicetion isoptional
FRindexEE!!!/b/font/div/td/tr/table/div
font face="tahoma" size="2"br============================brTo
ucargonsubfishscribe please
visit:brhttp://www.mecarrydsquiamericackulovesa.biz/a.htmlbr======
======================br/font
font face="Tahoma" color="#FFFFFF" size="1"IxNE7 6KZ 10 H iR3t/i 91t7
Sx erU giU0l/iY 2mgH tinFt V Q/iB5 gGWR./fontbr
/xbody
/html
lmlGwIh1e

And here is the "message that I got from it (and I don't believe I missed
anything, although I might have)-


hello keep trying larry the How are we doing today
friend
Are we now having fun minor are georgia peaches good
look at this mister
be not very liberal west plants cars high knot
picture lights off

green stereo florida extreme advice optional
cargo fish carry america love

So, I put this to the collective wisdom here; Just *what* have I been sent,
and can anyone surmise *why*? I look forward to your hypotheses. (That is
correct for plural "hypothesis", isn't it?) Thanks a bunch. And, if you
all do well with this one, I may offer another puzzle for you all to solve,
about a "hijacking screensaver".

--

Kendall

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 06:41:40 GMT, "Kendall"
wrote:


Now this brings up an
interesting question- is "biz" a valid domain suffix?

Yes.

====================
Tracy Wintermute

Rushcreek Ranch
====================

"Kendall" wrote in message
link.net...

hello keep trying larry the How are we doing today
friend
Are we now having fun minor are georgia peaches good
look at this mister
be not very liberal west plants cars high knot
picture lights off

green stereo florida extreme advice optional
cargo fish carry america love

Spammers are mangling their messages with encoding and nonstandard html in
hopes of getting past spam filters.

I guess the theory is that if they can trick me into clicking on their
message, I'll suddenly feel like my penis is actually too small.

dtk
--
Your penis is too small

The added words are there to try to throw off anti-spam bots and
technologies - my guess. And, yes, 'biz' is a legit extension (albeit
a new one), as is 'tv' and others.

Mikey
Nova Music Productions


"Kendall" wrote in message hlink.net...
Hey all-

I know this is way off topic, but there is such a wealth of knowlege here
that I figured I would ask this question anyway.
Tonight, I checked my e-mail, and found a SPAM message in my inbox. I'm in
the habit that if I don't know who the SPAM is from, and can't tell from the
subject line what they are hawking, I'll glance at the contents to see what
"brand" of SPAM it was. Now, not being entirely trusting, I usually glance
at the source code for the messages instead of just openining it in Outlook
Express, on the off chance that it is a virus or something. Well, I glanced
at this particular one, and noticed it was in HTML, and didn't have the
"signature" of a virus, but my eye was caught by something in the message.
It seems that there is a "message" hidden within the HTML code, that if
loaded into a browser the browser would just ignore, as it isn't valid HTML
Just for the heck of it, I copy-pasted the code into Word, and separated out
the "message", just to see what it had to say. It doesn't quite make sense,
or at least not in complete sentences. I will paste the code in here,
stripped of the HTML header, so that you can see it as I rec'd it, and
follow that with the "message". I still haven't actually "opened" the
e-mail, or even looked at the code in a browser, but it would appear that if
I did, it would look like an average "prescription" SPAM, which amongst the
code tries to get me to go to www dot medsquickusa dot biz
(I purposely altered that so it won't be an actual link for anybody, but
they could reconstruct it should they desire to.) Now this brings up an
interesting question- is "biz" a valid domain suffix? Or is the entire
address fictitious, just so they could send out this hidden "message"?

Here's the original HTML-

xbody bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
font face="Tahoma" color="#FFFFFF" size="1"0Qi6bt/i B0I O
GiipEg/i1 0g. cP OiWi/iXJ Sb./fontbr
table width="450" border="2" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="6"
bordercolor="#000000"tr bgcolor="#0080ff"td
div align="center"font face="Impact" size="5"
color="#FFFFFF"WholhelloeSakeeple Intetryingrnet
Phlarryarmtheacy!!!/fontfont face="Tahoma" size="2"
color="#FFFFFF"br(uFDHowA USareA appwerovdoinged
drtodayugfriends./u)/font/div/td/tr
tr bgcolor="#0000CC"td height="128"font face="Tahoma" size="3"
color="#FFFFFF"centerbGeAret youwer persnowonal
Mehavingdicfunatiminorons onarelingeorgiae apeachesnd
Sagoodve!/bbrNo prlookior Preatscriptthision
requmisterired!/center/font
div align="center"table width="419" border="1" cellspacing="0"
cellpadding="0" bordercolor="#000000"
tr bgcolor="#0080c0"tddiv align="center"font face="Tahoma" size="2"
color="#FFFFFF"bVibecodin, Xanotnax, Valveryium,
Proliberalzac,brSwestomplantsa, Amcarsbihighen,
Fiknotoripicturecet, Trlightsamaoffdol, etc.../b/font
brfont face="Tahoma" size="4" color="#000000"ba target="_blank"
href="http://href=www.x01S.comhref=www.LuD.nethref=www.CLnb.org href=www.FreT
?href= www.i39W.comhref=www.lfDOX
.nethref=www.L8NC.orghref=www.JRygxE.biz"Click Here to visit our
Pharmacy!/a/fontbr/div/td/tr/table
font face="Tahoma" size="2" color="#FF0000"bDogreenctstereoor's
Cofloridansuextremeltaadvicetion isoptional
FRindexEE!!!/b/font/div/td/tr/table/div
font face="tahoma" size="2"br============================brTo
ucargonsubfishscribe please
visit:brhttp://www.mecarrydsquiamericackulovesa.biz/a.htmlbr======
======================br/font
font face="Tahoma" color="#FFFFFF" size="1"IxNE7 6KZ 10 H iR3t/i 91t7
Sx erU giU0l/iY 2mgH tinFt V Q/iB5 gGWR./fontbr
/xbody
/html
lmlGwIh1e

And here is the "message that I got from it (and I don't believe I missed
anything, although I might have)-


hello keep trying larry the How are we doing today
friend
Are we now having fun minor are georgia peaches good
look at this mister
be not very liberal west plants cars high knot
picture lights off

green stereo florida extreme advice optional
cargo fish carry america love

So, I put this to the collective wisdom here; Just *what* have I been sent,
and can anyone surmise *why*? I look forward to your hypotheses. (That is
correct for plural "hypothesis", isn't it?) Thanks a bunch. And, if you
all do well with this one, I may offer another puzzle for you all to solve,
about a "hijacking screensaver".

Given that my email rdr is TEXT-ONLY, these spams appear as gibberish
to me, so at least they're wasting their advertising dollars sending them to me !!!


(Mikey) writes:

The added words are there to try to throw off anti-spam bots and
technologies - my guess. And, yes, 'biz' is a legit extension (albeit
a new one), as is 'tv' and others.

Mikey
Nova Music Productions

In rec.audio.pro, Tracy Wintermute wrote:

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 06:41:40 GMT, "Kendall"
wrote:


Now this brings up an
interesting question- is "biz" a valid domain suffix?

Yes.

.biz is one of several "new" ones that came available a few years
ago. It's so spammish that I think only spammers even use it. I forget
what all's available, but here's an example of another:

http://wusb.fm/

====================
Tracy Wintermute

Rushcreek Ranch
====================

-----
http://mindspring.com/~benbradley

In article , Kurt Albershardt
wrote:

Just saw a holiday TV ad for Target Stores--backed by some music I would
never have associated with middle Amerika, Nina Hagen's "New Toy."

That's Lene Lovich, not Nina.

BTW, the song was written by Thomas Dolby.

Lines: 31
Message-ID:
X-Trace: pcpocbcnbdmdhgfgdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbogk jjkkhalpdddkbpejgjiijhoejndpjjipeddohblkigmikmppai mpifmkcegckdkdmkllegdncmpbddikjmlabcbdnhebniafnomc goligcnnbb
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:40:57 EST
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 21:40:57 GMT
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.pro:1010145


On 2003-11-20 said:
I wrote:
THe beatles could play their instruments.
GUess I'm too old g.
You don't think singers play their instruments?
Point!
GUess you're right there, but these young men at least wrote their
own songs, played their own instruments other than voices etc. THey
weren't a manufactured band in the modern sense of the world such as N
sync backstreet etc.
GUess I'm a musical snob. SHows you waht happens when you work with
all these low ball outfits with three so-called vocalists on the
bandstand who do nothing but sing and can't harmonize so the bass
player has to scream the flasetto parts to some of the disco dreck
they're playing and is flat most of the time.
Just ovderdosing on BS since they're already muzakking Xmas some
placeds I go and it was 80 degrees here in the big easy today.

regards,




Richard Webb
Electric Spider Productions
REplace anything before the @ symbol with elspider for real email

--

Lines: 32
Message-ID:
X-Trace: ldjgbllpbapjglppdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcbohj gaaoomclmnobmdnfmdnanoojkjibjdddngmflbgmekkhlhlfdo gplcgbokihnkbgjhmnnmpgicogmakcfonaaapinbmjjghdabab ebmbgeeiji
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:57:45 EST
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 03:57:45 GMT
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.pro:1009693


On 2003-11-19 said:
80's". I also remember her saying that NSYNC were like her
generations Beatles. I cried.
THat would make you cry!!!
HOw disgusting!
THe beatles could play their instruments.
At first I was really upset but then the more I thought about it, I
realized she was right. Weren't the Beatles written off as a
talentless pretty-boy band by a lot of people at first? (Not that I
expect them to become another Beatles or anything).
True, but I stand by my statement. AT least they could play their
instruments and paid their dues. fOr anybody choosing to argue this
last point think Hamburg.

I guess I'm old anyway. I fit the profile in the life insurance ads,
I"ll soon be eligible for the "senior" discount and the goofballs with
their subwoofers in their SUVS drive me nuts in the neighborhood where
I live. Yah I'm old I guess.


rEgards,



Richard Webb
Electric Spider Productions
REplace anything before the @ symbol with elspider for real email

--

Lines: 29
Message-ID:
X-Trace: pcpocbcnbdmdhgfgdbdpiflmbcekedmfhojhikkbagflhcboba cjdkeofhiffbkopeiphjjefhhdbmabalnjadckdhbakgbolfdo gplcgbokihnkbgjhmnnmpgicogmagblmpmefpamlccipcfdped gmlaehoiol
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:48:42 EST
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:48:42 GMT
Xref: intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com rec.audio.pro:1009281


On 2003-11-19 said:
"Randall Hyde" wrote
Casinos in Laughlin, Nv., are playing the music you listened to
as a teenager...
I doubt it. YEs I was listening to some Beatles etc. but I was also
listening to LEd Zep; Emerson Lake & Palmer, JEtrho tUll, YEs et al.

Last year my daughter told me they had a themed "Oldies Day" at
high school and we're listening to old music, etc. I said, "Oh,
were people wearing bobbysocks and stuff"? and she said, "Dad, the
80's". I also remember her saying that NSYNC were like her
generations Beatles. I cried.

THat would make you cry!!!
HOw disgusting!
THe beatles could play their instruments.

GUess I'm too old g.



Richard Webb
Electric Spider Productions
REplace anything before the @ symbol with elspider for real email

--