Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/25/2021 9:34 AM, Don Pearce wrote:
Nobody has yet designed a VST transformer effect? About time, I reckon. Maybe someone has, though I'm not aware of it. But there are many preamp models that include a model of the transformer used in the hardware version. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
#42
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/05/2021 1:34 am, Don Pearce wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2021 09:19:31 -0400, Mike Rivers wrote: On 5/25/2021 4:30 AM, Don Pearce wrote: Well, anyone who is still messing with transformers gets what he deserves. Active electronics provide common mode rejection every bit as good these days, and without the distortion and frequency response penalties inherent in the non-linear magnetic properties of iron. If the only reason to "mess" with transformers was to provide an accurate balanced connection, then, sure, get rid of them. The THAT chips make for better common mode rejection than any transformer. However, today's recordists have either been brainwashed or have decided on their own that their recordings should include some of the "vintage" sound of 50 year old equipment, to which transformers are a significant contributor. And for that, there's nothing like a transformer. Nobody has yet designed a VST transformer effect? About time, I reckon. d Well the is/was 'Magneto' for tape emuluation. geoff |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Universal audio preamp comparison | Pro Audio | |||
A Comparison | Audio Opinions | |||
Car Amp Comparison | Car Audio | |||
here are some preamp comparison results | Pro Audio | |||
comparison | Car Audio |