[None]

Dum**** Retard vomited in message
...
Hey Trevor: Read a few of 'None's replies here.
Compare what's contained in them to what's
contained in mine. Are mine laced with name-
calling and filthy language?...

So you're a hypocritical dum**** retard, too. You dropped an F-bomb in a
different newsgroup just yesterday. Dumb ****.

I came here to do just that: Learn something.

No, you have repeatedly refused to learn. Ask a question, get a technically
accurate answer, and you gibber about how you're unable to accept the facts,
or even understand them. FCKWAFA! KFJS. SJIBISEA. Dumb ****.

[None]

Mental Defective wrote in
message ...

Trevor wrote ...

You forgot to tell him that he's responding to a "bot". It's always
hilarious when you fall face-first into that stinking pile of dog****.

[[email protected]]

John Williamson wrote: "No, it happens no matter what the designer
wants to happen. It's the laws of physics that dictate what happens to
speaker impedance as frequency and drive power change. "


Are you saying there's no way for designers
to change the impedance curve of a given
speaker or headphone driver, which in turn
affects freq. response?

So then how do some models of Beats by
Dre phones have a reputation for being all
'boom'and little else, vs the relatively transparent
HD-600? Is that all random? Left to chance?

[None]

THECK-MAAAAAAAH! jabbered in message
...

Are you saying there's no way for designers
to change the impedance curve of a given
speaker or headphone driver, which in turn
affects freq. response?

So then how do some models of Beats by
Dre phones have a reputation for being all
'boom'and little else, vs the relatively transparent
HD-600? Is that all random? Left to chance?

You forgot to read the post you're replying to. Especially, the part where
Williamson advised,

"You keep showing your ignorance by saying things like 'gut instinct' when
writing about scientifically verifiable and explicable facts.

"Do all of us a favour and take an evening class in basic electronics, ask
the teacher about anything you don't understand after it's been explained,
then you will be able to do the calculations and, just possibly not need to
ask dumb questions in here. It's not rocket science, it's barely horse and
buggy complexity if you stick to rules."

So, instead of taking the advice, you continue to show ignorance and ask
stupid questions. If you're too stupid to understand basic electronics or
elementary math, you will continue to be an ignorant dumb ****. If
Williamson were to give you an accurate, factual response to your latest
stupid question, you would not understand it. Dumb ****.

FCKWAFA!

[Scott Dorsey]

wrote:
Are you saying there's no way for designers
to change the impedance curve of a given
speaker or headphone driver, which in turn
affects freq. response?

Other way around. You design for the frequency response, and you get
the impedance curve that you get.

Because what you -care- about is the frequency response. You don't really
care so much about the impedance plot, just as long as it doesn't dip too low.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

[geoff]

On 8/08/2018 2:43 AM, wrote:
John Williamson wrote: "No, it happens no matter what the designer
wants to happen. It's the laws of physics that dictate what happens to
speaker impedance as frequency and drive power change. "


Are you saying there's no way for designers
to change the impedance curve of a given
speaker or headphone driver, which in turn
affects freq. response?

So then how do some models of Beats by
Dre phones have a reputation for being all
'boom'and little else, vs the relatively transparent
HD-600? Is that all random? Left to chance?



Beats headphones are designed for exaggerated bass in order to appeal
appeal to people who are impressed by exaggerated bass, and peer or
marketing pressure.

geoff

[[email protected]]

geoff wrote: "Beats headphones are designed for exaggerated bass in order to appeal
appeal to people who are impressed by exaggerated bass, and peer or
marketing pressure.

geoff "

So since I got it backwards - thinking freq. response is
altered by changing impedance curve - how IS freq.
response arrived at in a transducer?

[geoff]

On 8/08/2018 1:04 PM, wrote:
geoff wrote: "Beats headphones are designed for exaggerated bass in order to appeal
appeal to people who are impressed by exaggerated bass, and peer or
marketing pressure.

geoff "

So since I got it backwards - thinking freq. response is
altered by changing impedance curve - how IS freq.
response arrived at in a transducer?


Diaphragm mass/compliance/shape/material, voice-coil electrical and
mechanical factors, ear-cup materials and dimensions, 'grille' material,
and listeners head and ear size and shape. Plus a few other things I'm sure.

geoff