Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have read more than one article where the recommended maximum length
of loudspeaker wire is presented as a function of the wire gauge and the impedance of the speakers, e.g. in the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge I have also heard that output power and damping factor should be considered as well - a high power amplifier needs a thicker cable. Are there any studies made about the wire length contra output power and damping factor? /August |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"August Karlstrom" wrote in message
I have read more than one article where the recommended maximum length of loudspeaker wire is presented as a function of the wire gauge and the impedance of the speakers, e.g. in the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge I chased the footnotes for this paper, and found that it was heavily based on this paper: http://procosound.com/download/white...r%20Cables.pdf Proco Sound is a well-known supplier to the professional audio and in particular the live sound industry. In general the acccuracy requirements for live sound are somewhat relaxed as compared to high-accuracy home or mastering/mixing room audio. The Wikipedia article wire length recommendations seem to be based on maintaining a damping factor of about 20 which again is somewhat relaxed as compared to the requirements for high performance audio. I would recomment using a criteria of maintaining the damping factor between 50 and 100. I have also heard that output power and damping factor should be considered as well - a high power amplifier needs a thicker cable. Generally speaking, sizing wire for a good damping factor will result in adequate capacitor for the kinds of power amps generally used for home audio. Are there any studies made about the wire length contra output power and damping factor? Yes. The Greiner JAES paper is a classic and covers other issues. If the speakers being used have unusually variable and low impecance curves then the resistance and inductance of the speaker cable become more signficant. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-10-15 21:41, Arny Krueger wrote:
In general the acccuracy requirements for live sound are somewhat relaxed as compared to high-accuracy home or mastering/mixing room audio. The Wikipedia article wire length recommendations seem to be based on maintaining a damping factor of about 20 which again is somewhat relaxed as compared to the requirements for high performance audio. I would recomment using a criteria of maintaining the damping factor between 50 and 100. That's interesting. I read the article with the impression that they were talking about home audio. The Wikipedia article probably needs to be updated then. If we would make a similar table applicable to high performance audio, what would it look like? I have also heard that output power and damping factor should be considered as well - a high power amplifier needs a thicker cable. Generally speaking, sizing wire for a good damping factor will result in adequate capacitor for the kinds of power amps generally used for home audio. Sorry, I'm not sure what that means in a practical sense. To take a concrete example, let's say I have two 2x1.5 mm^2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC cables, each of length four meter. Is there a high performance system in which these cables would be insufficient? Are there any studies made about the wire length contra output power and damping factor? Yes. The Greiner JAES paper is a classic and covers other issues. If the speakers being used have unusually variable and low impecance curves then the resistance and inductance of the speaker cable become more signficant. OK, thanks for the reference Arny. /August |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"August Karlstrom" wrote in message
... I have read more than one article where the recommended maximum length of loudspeaker wire is presented as a function of the wire gauge and the impedance of the speakers, e.g. in the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. I have also heard that output power and damping factor should be considered as well - a high power amplifier needs a thicker cable. **Again, it depends on the speakers and the length of the cable. Are there any studies made about the wire length contra output power and damping factor? **It's just maths. There's no real mystery here. The problem with the term 'damping factor' is that it relates to (usually) an 8 Ohm impedance. Hardly any loudspeakers present an 8 Ohm impedance. A far better term for amplifier manufacturers to use is output impedance vs. frequency. IOW: The output impedance should always be specified from 20Hz ~ 20kHz. Many SET and Class D amplifier manufacturers carefully avoid citing this data for some very good, albeit cynical, reasons. The output impedance of such amplifiers can easily reach several Ohms at 20kHz. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote:
"August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. Thanks for the input. /August |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:54:25 -0700, August Karlstrom wrote
(in article ): On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. Thanks for the input. /August All wire sounds exactly the same. Copper zip cord, 14 Gauge or bigger should be sufficient for any 4-meter run for any domestic amplifier or speaker setup. If you have a really big amp (say 700 watts/channel or more), you might want to increase that size to something like the bulk cable used in industrial-sized extension cords (12 -10 Gauge). Forget everything else, it doesn't matter. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Audio Empire wrote: On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:54:25 -0700, August Karlstrom wrote (in article ): On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. Thanks for the input. /August All wire sounds exactly the same. Copper zip cord, 14 Gauge or bigger should be sufficient for any 4-meter run for any domestic amplifier or speaker setup. If you have a really big amp (say 700 watts/channel or more), you might want to increase that size to something like the bulk cable used in industrial-sized extension cords (12 -10 Gauge). Forget everything else, it doesn't matter. Why is the wire size used to feed the speakers so much more important than the wire used *in* the speaker -- for crossovers and more importantly, for the voice coil? Clearly, the *length* of the latter two far exceeds the former. Isaac |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:12:18 -0700, isw wrote
(in article ): In article , Audio Empire wrote: On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 06:54:25 -0700, August Karlstrom wrote (in article ): On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. Thanks for the input. /August All wire sounds exactly the same. Copper zip cord, 14 Gauge or bigger should be sufficient for any 4-meter run for any domestic amplifier or speaker setup. If you have a really big amp (say 700 watts/channel or more), you might want to increase that size to something like the bulk cable used in industrial-sized extension cords (12 -10 Gauge). Forget everything else, it doesn't matter. Why is the wire size used to feed the speakers so much more important than the wire used *in* the speaker -- for crossovers and more importantly, for the voice coil? Clearly, the *length* of the latter two far exceeds the former. Isaac It isn't. In any case, "more than sufficient for the task" is just being pretentious. |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-10-17 23:53, Audio Empire wrote:
All wire sounds exactly the same. Copper zip cord, 14 Gauge or bigger should be sufficient for any 4-meter run for any domestic amplifier or speaker setup. OK, so you mean that the resistance in a four meter wire of gauge 15 or more may be too high. Do you base this claim on some resistance percentage similar to the Wikipedia article where 5% is mentioned? According to the Wikipedia article I could even use a wire as thin as 20 AWG for a four meter run. On the other hand Arny Krueger suspects that the 5% value is a recommendation for live sound rather than for critical listening in a domestic environment. So what is the maximum resistance percentage for critical listening? /August |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 07:47:42 -0700, August Karlstrom wrote
(in article ): On 2010-10-17 23:53, Audio Empire wrote: All wire sounds exactly the same. Copper zip cord, 14 Gauge or bigger should be sufficient for any 4-meter run for any domestic amplifier or speaker setup. OK, so you mean that the resistance in a four meter wire of gauge 15 or more may be too high. Do you base this claim on some resistance percentage similar to the Wikipedia article where 5% is mentioned? I base it on the fact that 14-Ga Zip cord is less than 0.006 Ohm/foot. A meter is a hair over three feet (3.37 inches over to be exact). You figure it out. According to the Wikipedia article I could even use a wire as thin as 20 AWG for a four meter run. On the other hand Arny Krueger suspects that the 5% value is a recommendation for live sound rather than for critical listening in a domestic environment. So what is the maximum resistance percentage for critical listening? Just buy 14-Ga zip cord and forget about it. Your are counting angels on the heads of pins here. |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"August Karlstrom" wrote in message
On 2010-10-17 23:53, Audio Empire wrote: All wire sounds exactly the same. Copper zip cord, 14 Gauge or bigger should be sufficient for any 4-meter run for any domestic amplifier or speaker setup. OK, so you mean that the resistance in a four meter wire of gauge 15 or more may be too high. Do you base this claim on some resistance percentage similar to the Wikipedia article where 5% is mentioned? According to the Wikipedia article I could even use a wire as thin as 20 AWG for a four meter run. On the other hand Arny Krueger suspects that the 5% value is a recommendation for live sound rather than for critical listening in a domestic environment. So what is the maximum resistance percentage for critical listening? The maximum resistance percentage for critical listening is between 1 and 2% of the lowest impedance of the speaker. That ensures that the effect of the wire is less than from 0.1 to 0.2 dB, and thus inaudible in all cases. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"August Karlstrom" wrote in message
... On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? **Without knowing the impedance curve (20Hz ~ 20kHz) of your speakers, I cannot say. In all probability, yes, it would be OK. Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. **There are three characteristics of speaker cable that are of interest. They a * Resistance. The lower the better. * Inductance. The lower the better. * Capacitance. Largely unimportant, when using a competently designed amplifier. That leaves resistance (R) and inductance (L). The significance of the two paramaters depends on the impedance of the speaker and the length of the cable. 4 Metres is a modest cable run and SHOULD present few problems in any system. Resistance is governed by the amount of conductive material in the cable. Indutance is much more complicated. Standard 'zip' type speaker cables (basically any parallel pair of conductors) exhibits pretty much the highest possible inductance. The wider the spacing of the cable conductors (see: Naim speaker cable), the higher the inductance and less desirable the cable. As the conductor spacing is made smaller, the inductance falls. Some manufacturers use multiple conductors, closely bound together to reduce inductance still further. Others (Goertz, et al) use flat conductors, in intimate proximity to reduce inductance to extremely low levels. For my part, I suggest the use of RG213/U coax cable, which exhibits quite low resistance and very low inductance, at reasonable cost. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:08:37 -0700, Trevor Wilson wrote
(in article ): "August Karlstrom" wrote in message ... On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? **Without knowing the impedance curve (20Hz ~ 20kHz) of your speakers, I cannot say. In all probability, yes, it would be OK. Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. **There are three characteristics of speaker cable that are of interest. They a * Resistance. The lower the better. * Inductance. The lower the better. * Capacitance. Largely unimportant, when using a competently designed amplifier. I practice, none of these things have the slightest effect on the sound. Resistence/foot is less than a 0.006 Ohm for 14 Ga. zip. That leaves resistance (R) and inductance (L). The significance of the two paramaters depends on the impedance of the speaker and the length of the cable. 4 Metres is a modest cable run and SHOULD present few problems in any system. Capacitance is around 12pf/foot or about 144pf for 4 meters of 14 Ga zip cord. It has been found that capacitive loads of up to 20,000 pf (.02 mfd) have no audible or visible effect on audio signals. That means that 4 meters of 14 Ga zip cord would need 100 times more capacitance/foot to have any effect whatsoever on a an audio signal passing through it. Inductance is likewise negligible. One can run 80 ft of 14 Ga zip as speaker cable for 8 Ohm speakers before it is recommended that one increase the wire size to 12 Ga. IOW, as long as the zip cord is 14 Ga or larger and your runs are less than 80ft, don't sweat it. just buy what you like and cheap hardware store zip cord is FINE. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Audio Empire wrote:
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:08:37 -0700, Trevor Wilson wrote (in article ): "August Karlstrom" wrote in message ... On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? **Without knowing the impedance curve (20Hz ~ 20kHz) of your speakers, I cannot say. In all probability, yes, it would be OK. Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. **There are three characteristics of speaker cable that are of interest. They a * Resistance. The lower the better. * Inductance. The lower the better. * Capacitance. Largely unimportant, when using a competently designed amplifier. I practice, none of these things have the slightest effect on the sound. Resistence/foot is less than a 0.006 Ohm for 14 Ga. zip. **Incorrect. Both resistance and inductance can affect sound quality, depending on the length of the cable and the impedance of the speaker. Capacitance, as I have already stated many times, is irrelevant with any properly designed amplifier. That leaves resistance (R) and inductance (L). The significance of the two paramaters depends on the impedance of the speaker and the length of the cable. 4 Metres is a modest cable run and SHOULD present few problems in any system. Capacitance is around 12pf/foot or about 144pf for 4 meters of 14 Ga zip cord. It has been found that capacitive loads of up to 20,000 pf (.02 mfd) have no audible or visible effect on audio signals. That means that 4 meters of 14 Ga zip cord would need 100 times more capacitance/foot to have any effect whatsoever on a an audio signal passing through it. **As I carefully pointed out, capacitance is irrelevant. Inductance is likewise negligible. **No. Inductance is not negligible. It *may* be irrelevant, depending on the length of the cable and the speakers used, however. One can run 80 ft of 14 Ga zip as speaker cable for 8 Ohm speakers before it is recommended that one increase the wire size to 12 Ga. **Just a reminder: There is no such thing as an "8 Ohm speaker". All speakers, with the possible exception of Maggies, exhibit varying impedances. SOME speakers, like ESLs, which may present a relatively high impedance over most of the audible range, can often present very low impedances at high frequencies. Here is one such example: http://www.rageaudio.com.au/index.php?p=1_12 Click on 'Accustat'. With a 25 Metre length of standard 'zip' type speaker cable, a serious and very audible problem at HF can be expected. Low resistance and low inductance cables are absolutely essential with such speakers and such long cable runs. IOW, as long as the zip cord is 14 Ga or larger and your runs are less than 80ft, don't sweat it. just buy what you like and cheap hardware store zip cord is FINE. **I have no issue with cheap, but misleading people by suggesting that they can connect very long cables to speakers and expecting no problems is just wrong. -- Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Trevor Wilson wrote:
"August Karlstrom" wrote in message ... On 2010-10-17 03:17, Trevor Wilson wrote: "August wrote in message http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge **Like all such cliams, the Wiki article over-simplifies things. They ignore the very real effects of inductance, when using long cable runs and speakers which exhibit a falling impedance at HF (like ESLs). In those cases, the inductive effects of cable can become quite significant. To take my example again, let's say I need a pair of cables, each four meters long. Is there a system in which a 2x1.5 mm2 (approx.15 AWG) OFC wire would be insufficient? **Without knowing the impedance curve (20Hz ~ 20kHz) of your speakers, I cannot say. In all probability, yes, it would be OK. 4m of zip cable will do on any home-use speakres, Kappa 9 included. Several people in this newsgroup believe that all wire sounds the same provided it is of the "correct type". What I'm trying to find out here is what the correct type is. I am not so interested in general claims that cannot be used in practice to make decisions. **There are three characteristics of speaker cable that are of interest. They a * Resistance. The lower the better. * Inductance. The lower the better. At 4m cable length inductance is unimportant. * Capacitance. Largely unimportant, when using a competently designed amplifier. That leaves resistance (R) and inductance (L). The significance of the two paramaters depends on the impedance of the speaker and the length of the cable. 4 Metres is a modest cable run and SHOULD present few problems in any system. I would say no problems in any home system. Resistance is governed by the amount of conductive material in the cable. Indutance is much more complicated. Standard 'zip' type speaker cables (basically any parallel pair of conductors) exhibits pretty much the highest possible inductance. The wider the spacing of the cable conductors (see: Naim speaker cable), the higher the inductance and less desirable the cable. As the conductor spacing is made smaller, the inductance falls. Some manufacturers use multiple conductors, closely bound together to reduce inductance still further. Others (Goertz, et al) use flat conductors, in intimate proximity to reduce inductance to extremely low levels. For my part, I suggest the use of RG213/U coax cable, which exhibits quite low resistance and very low inductance, at reasonable cost. It's an overkill unless you use 20m cable together with extremely low (broken by design?) impedance (1.5ohm) speakers. rgds \SK -- "Never underestimate the power of human stupidity" -- L. Lang -- http://www.tajga.org -- (some photos from my travels) |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-10-15 20:38, August Karlstrom wrote:
I have read more than one article where the recommended maximum length of loudspeaker wire is presented as a function of the wire gauge and the impedance of the speakers, e.g. in the Wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speaker_wire#Wire_gauge I have also heard that output power and damping factor should be considered as well - a high power amplifier needs a thicker cable. Are there any studies made about the wire length contra output power and damping factor? Here is my calculation of the minimum cross-sectional area of speaker wire. Please tell me if you spot any errors. *** The resistance R of a wire can be computed as R = rho * l / A where l is the length of the conductor in meters, A is the cross-sectional area in square meters and rho is the electrical resistivity in ohm meters. Now, if we want the resistance of a wire of a specified length to be no more than a percentage p of the lowest impedance of the speaker R_L we have the relation rho * l / A = p * R_L which is equivalent to A = rho * l / (p * R_L) For copper wire the resistivity is 1.68Eˆ’8 ohm meters. If we choose p to be one percent, which according to Arny Krueger ensures that the effect of the wire is less than 0.1 dB and thus inaudible, we have the relation A = 1.68Eˆ’10 * l / R_L (1) Example: Let's say we need two runs of four meter speaker wire. The lowest impedance of our speaker is 8 Ω. Which cross-sectional area should a copper wire have for maximum performance? By applying formula (1) we have that the total area should be at least 8.4Eˆ’07 m^2 so a 2x0.50 mm^2 wire should be enough. /August |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-10-19 17:23, August Karlstrom wrote:
Here is my calculation of the minimum cross-sectional area of speaker wire. Please tell me if you spot any errors. *** Unfortunately, some strange characters seem to have creped into the text. Here is a corrected version: *** The resistance R of a wire can be computed as R = rho * l / A where l is the length of the conductor in meters, A is the cross-sectional area in square meters and rho is the electrical resistivity in ohm meters. Now, if we want the resistance of a wire of a specified length to be no more than a percentage p of the lowest impedance of the speaker R_L we have the relation rho * l / A = p * R_L which is equivalent to A = rho * l / (p * R_L) For copper wire the resistivity is 1.68E-8 ohm meters. If we choose p to be one percent, which according to Arny Krueger ensures that the effect of the wire is less than 0.1 dB and thus inaudible, we have the relation A = 1.68E-10 * l / R_L (1) Example: Let's say we need two runs of four meter speaker wire. The lowest impedance of our speaker is 8 ohm. Which cross-sectional area should a copper wire have for maximum performance? By applying formula (1) we have that the total area should be at least 8.4E-07 m^2 so a 2x0.50 mm^2 wire should be enough. /August |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2010-10-19 18:41, August Karlstrom wrote:
On 2010-10-19 17:23, August Karlstrom wrote: Here is my calculation of the minimum cross-sectional area of speaker wire. Please tell me if you spot any errors. Well, I spotted an error myself. In equation (1) the constant should of course be 1.68E-06 rather than 1.68E-10. The rest of the calculation should be correct however. Sorry about that. Here is the corrected version: *** The resistance R of a wire can be computed as R = rho * l / A where l is the length of the conductor in meters, A is the cross-sectional area in square meters and rho is the electrical resistivity in ohm meters. Now, if we want the resistance of a wire of a specified length to be no more than a percentage p of the lowest impedance of the speaker R_L we have the relation rho * l / A = p * R_L which is equivalent to A = rho * l / (p * R_L) For copper wire the resistivity is 1.68E-8 ohm meters. If we choose p to be one percent, which according to Arny Krueger ensures that the effect of the wire is less than 0.1 dB and thus inaudible, we have the relation A = 1.68E-06 * l / R_L (1) Example: Let's say we need two runs of four meter speaker wire. The lowest impedance of our speaker is 8 ohm. Which cross-sectional area should a copper wire have for maximum performance? By applying formula (1) we have that the total area should be at least 8.4E-07 m2 so a 2x0.50 mm2 wire should be enough. /August |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
.mid Vs .wav maximum | Pro Audio | |||
Maximum SPL from a 12?? | Car Audio | |||
Maximum Length for Toslink and Firewire Cables | Pro Audio | |||
Maximum Length for Toslink and Firewire Cables | Pro Audio | |||
Solid core copper 18 guage thermostat wire - problems as a speaker wire? | High End Audio |