[Iarnrod]

On Jul 6, 7:30*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:35*am, Iarnrod wrote:



On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.

Yes I do. You do not. He already has been 100% more transparent than
any previous president in US history be cause he released his BC
proving he is a natural born citizen and became the only presidential
candidate ever to document his eligibility.

as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue,

You're lying of course. Chester Arthur. Huge scandal. There was
question about whether FDR was actually born on Campobello. Of course
other candidates also faced scrutiny -- Romney, Goldwater, and of
course Panama Jack McCain.

nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

They weren't asked for in this case either except by you nutbags.
There was never any question that Obama was born in Hawaii. Yet Obama
proved it and still you nutbags pretend he still must show you his
papers! Too ****in' funny!

How come you only question the black guy?

Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

[Iarnrod]

On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that's a lie because he of course is 100 more transparent than any
previous president.

[Iarnrod]

On Jul 6, 9:04*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 6, 10:36*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"



wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:30*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 6, 8:35*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us.. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.

Why not explain your particular definition, 2pid. And use your own
account. You're making Clyde look dumb.

as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue, nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

LOL! Obama did not "present a problem". A certain group tried to
create one and the dip****s of that group fell in line.

Say, did you know the republicans have a "candidate's university" in
Washington? They teach republican candidates how to run campaigns at
it. One of the classes they give is called "How to File an Indictment
10 Days Before an Election". No ****.

He was asked to prove he was a US citizen. He "transparently" provided
incontrovertible proof of his US citizenship.

You seem to 'think' there is some hidden data on hisbirth
certificate. What do you suppose that is? Why is it important?

You're full of speculation and **** and not much else.

my issue has nothing to do with his citizenship.
It has to do with his lack of transparency.

That's a lie because he is patently more transparent than any previous
president in history.

He has
refused to release the document,

That is of course a lie.

Whaddaya think this is: http://static.politifact.com.s3.amaz...hCertObama.jpg

He released it. Case is closed.

acting like'
he has something he wants hidden,

He is doing no such thing. He released it.

If he wants to be
transparent, and live up to his self promoting hype,
he should release it.

He did.

I don't know what is on it, i don;t know what he is intentionally
hiding, if anything,

Nothing. He released what Hawaii gave him. Case closed. Your argument
is with Hawaii state law which protects all such documents. Even
yours.

but i want him to stop
hiding the document while he hypocritically claims to be transparent.

No, you want the black man out of the White House.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:30*am, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Jul 6, 8:35*am, Iarnrod wrote:

On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.

Yes I do. You do not. He already has been 100% more transparent than
any previous president in US history be cause he released his BC
proving he is a natural born citizen and became the only presidential
candidate ever to document his eligibility.

as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue,

You're lying of course. Chester Arthur. Huge scandal. There was
question about whether FDR was actually born on Campobello. Of course
other candidates also faced scrutiny -- Romney, Goldwater, and of
course Panama Jack McCain.


are you saying that bc's were requested and withheld? I did't
know that was true, if it is true.

nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

They weren't asked for in this case either except by you nutbags.
There was never any question that Obama was born in Hawaii. Yet Obama
proved it and still you nutbags pretend he still must show you his
papers! Too ****in' funny!


I want him to shoe it for other reasons, unrelated to his place of
birth.

How come you only question the black guy?

I just questioned McCain, is he black?

Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

[Iarnrod]

On Jul 6, 9:09*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 6, 11:37*am, Jenn wrote:



In article
,
*Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 6, 8:35 am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 5, 11:16 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 5, 7:51 pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us.. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.
as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue, nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

What problems did he present?

originally, there was the question of where he was born, since
successfully resolved.

No, there never was a question of where he was born. It has always
been well known he was born in Hawaii. Kooker rightard lies made up to
cause trouble don't create actual questions.

that is why a bc became an issue for him
when it wasn't an issue for anyone else.

No, that's a lie. It became an "issue" among birfers but not among the
sane.


In reality, Mc Cain would have had a bigger problem than Obama.
\I believe that Mc Cain IS NOT a natural born *citizen, and that Obama
is.
See, Mc Cain was supposedly born in a hopsital in the Panama City,
Republic of Panama, not
in the *US territory of the Canal Zone. Yes, he was the son of an
active US servicemn and
his parents were residents of the Canal Zone, but he was actually born
abroad, in the repblic of
Panama.

[Iarnrod]

On Jul 6, 9:10*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 6, 11:40*am, Boon wrote:



On Jul 6, 9:36*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 6, 8:30*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 6, 8:35*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.

Why not explain your particular definition, 2pid. And use your own
account. You're making Clyde look dumb.

as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue, nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

LOL! Obama did not "present a problem". A certain group tried to
create one and the dip****s of that group fell in line.

Say, did you know the republicans have a "candidate's university" in
Washington? They teach republican candidates how to run campaigns at
it. One of the classes they give is called "How to File an Indictment
10 Days Before an Election". No ****.

He was asked to prove he was a US citizen. He "transparently" provided
incontrovertible proof of his US citizenship.

You seem to 'think' there is some hidden data on hisbirth
certificate. What do you suppose that is? Why is it important?

You're full of speculation and **** and not much else.

Besides, the Supreme Court dismissed the birther argument three times.
The third time they didn't even formally look at it because it was so
lacking in hard evidence.

And if hisbirthcertificatehad said "Muslim," so what? It was a well-
known fact that Obama's father was a Muslim, albeit a non-practicing
one. Add that to the fact that Obama has made countless statements
about his administration being tolerant and welcoming toward Islam,
both in and out of the US, and you've run out of conspiracies.

that's how i feel, So what if it said that.?

It cannot. Religion is not part of a birth certificate.

[Jenn[_2_]]

In article
,
Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:30*am, Clyde Slick wrote:



On Jul 6, 8:35*am, Iarnrod wrote:

On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to
Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon,
I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us.
He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd
see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.

Yes I do. You do not. He already has been 100% more transparent than
any previous president in US history be cause he released his BC
proving he is a natural born citizen and became the only presidential
candidate ever to document his eligibility.

as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue,

You're lying of course. Chester Arthur. Huge scandal. There was
question about whether FDR was actually born on Campobello. Of course
other candidates also faced scrutiny -- Romney, Goldwater, and of
course Panama Jack McCain.


are you saying that bc's were requested and withheld? I did't
know that was true, if it is true.

nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

They weren't asked for in this case either except by you nutbags.
There was never any question that Obama was born in Hawaii. Yet Obama
proved it and still you nutbags pretend he still must show you his
papers! Too ****in' funny!


I want him to shoe it for other reasons, unrelated to his place of
birth.

How come you only question the black guy?

I just questioned McCain, is he black?

Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

And there's no reason to suspect that Obama was born outside the US.
But the nutters do anyway.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 7, 10:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:

Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

What "reason" can you give for "suspecting otherwise" with Obama?

I mean other than right wing blogs, of course.

[Clyde Slick]

On Jul 8, 2:51*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

What "reason" can you give for "suspecting otherwise" with Obama?


distrust over his lack of transparency, after promising transparency.
He must be hiding something to
break such a sacred campaign promise.

I mean other than right wing blogs, of course.

I don't read any political blogs.

[Iarnrod]

On Jul 8, 4:17*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Jul 8, 2:51*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

What "reason" can you give for "suspecting otherwise" with Obama?

distrust over his lack of transparency,

But you have failed to show a lack of transparency while I have shown
he has more transparency than any previous president. EPIC FAIL. What
is the real reason?

after promising transparency.
He must be hiding something to
break such a sacred campaign promise.

He is not doing any such thing. Try again, dearie.

I mean other than right wing blogs, of course.

I don't read any political blogs.

Sounds like you barely read at all.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 7, 9:26*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jul 7, 8:31*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 6:32*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 7, 2:26*pm, ScottW wrote:

If Arizona wins in court, and they (Obama administration) carry
through with their threat to refuse to allow ICE to cooperate with Az.
state and local law enforcement, continuing to impede enforcement in
spite of the findings of the courts, will that be a crime IYO?

No. It will be a 'victory' for state's rights and they have no claim
to federal help.

the Feds can't win a suit against Arizona for enforcing it's state
law,

(Unless it's found to be unconstitutional)

and Arizona can't win a suit against the Feds for the Feds NOT enforicng
its law

If Arizona wins it's on its own.

Exactly. A state that goes against the federal government usually sees
a reduction in federal funding. It happened a decade ago when Kentucky
refused to enforce its marijuana laws since it improved the local
economies in the Eastern counties. The feds swooped down and said,
"Start busting thse pot farmers or we'll withhold all federal
funding."

The real question is whether or not Arizona can withstand such
penalties. Kentucky couldn't.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 7, 10:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 6, 7:30*am, Clyde Slick wrote:





On Jul 6, 8:35*am, Iarnrod wrote:

On Jul 5, 11:16*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 5, 7:51*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
You haven't yet gotten to the whole "how did he travel to Pakistan in
1981" bull****, or the British dual citizenship crapola. C'mon, I've
been looking forward to fresh birther meat for a few weeks.

Clyde is NOT a birther, he's a conspiracy theorist.

You simply wouldn't believe the information he's hiding from us. He's
a pro-Communist Al Queda frontman who used to do assassinations for
the CIA. It says so right on hisbirthcertificate, right next to
where his political affiliation is listed as "Socialist". You'd see,
if he'd only release it...

I never said any such thing. I said he was not transparent.

And that is of course a lie since he was transparent on this, much
more so than any previous candidate for president ever.

you still don't get what transparency means.

Yes I do. You do not. He already has been 100% more transparent than
any previous president in US history be cause he released his BC
proving he is a natural born citizen and became the only presidential
candidate ever to document his eligibility.

as far as bc's, other presidents did not present problems
for which bc's were even an issue,

You're lying of course. Chester Arthur. Huge scandal. There was
question about whether FDR was actually born on Campobello. Of course
other candidates also faced scrutiny -- Romney, Goldwater, and of
course Panama Jack McCain.

nor were they asked for, as in this
case.

They weren't asked for in this case either except by you nutbags.
There was never any question that Obama was born in Hawaii. Yet Obama
proved it and still you nutbags pretend he still must show you his
papers! Too ****in' funny!

How come you only question the black guy?

Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

Exactly. Racism motivates the majority of anti-Obama sentiment in this
country. Racists have just gotten better at disguising their hate over
the years.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 8, 7:26*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jul 8, 4:17*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 8, 2:51*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

What "reason" can you give for "suspecting otherwise" with Obama?

distrust over his lack of transparency,

But you have failed to show a lack of transparency while I have shown
he has more transparency than any previous president. EPIC FAIL. What
is the real reason?

after promising transparency.
He must be hiding something to
break such a sacred campaign promise.

He is not doing any such thing. Try again, dearie.

I mean other than right wing blogs, of course.

I don't read any political blogs.

Sounds like you barely read at all.

Point to "Granny".

It's amusing to watch Clyde drive down the road of stupidity.

[Boon[_2_]]

On Jul 8, 1:22*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Jul 8, 7:26*am, Iarnrod wrote:





On Jul 8, 4:17*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 8, 2:51*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

What "reason" can you give for "suspecting otherwise" with Obama?

distrust over his lack of transparency,

But you have failed to show a lack of transparency while I have shown
he has more transparency than any previous president. EPIC FAIL. What
is the real reason?

after promising transparency.
He must be hiding something to
break such a sacred campaign promise.

He is not doing any such thing. Try again, dearie.

I mean other than right wing blogs, of course.

I don't read any political blogs.

Sounds like you barely read at all.

Point to "Granny".

It's amusing to watch Clyde drive down the road of stupidity.

Until Scott shows up and runs him off the road, of course.

[Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On Jul 8, 9:12*pm, Boon wrote:
On Jul 8, 1:22*pm, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"





wrote:
On Jul 8, 7:26*am, Iarnrod wrote:

On Jul 8, 4:17*am, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 8, 2:51*am, "Shhhh!!!! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Jul 7, 10:22*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:

On Jul 7, 11:15*pm, Iarnrod wrote:
Bush never proved he was born in the US. You just took his word for
it, kook.

no reason to suspect otherwise.

What "reason" can you give for "suspecting otherwise" with Obama?

distrust over his lack of transparency,

But you have failed to show a lack of transparency while I have shown
he has more transparency than any previous president. EPIC FAIL. What
is the real reason?

after promising transparency.
He must be hiding something to
break such a sacred campaign promise.

He is not doing any such thing. Try again, dearie.

I mean other than right wing blogs, of course.

I don't read any political blogs.

Sounds like you barely read at all.

Point to "Granny".

It's amusing to watch Clyde drive down the road of stupidity.

Until Scott shows up and runs him off the road, of course.

Oh, you have to stay in the lanes?