Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. and to what point is this abuse of equipment warrented? should I trow my cabinets off tall building to prove that they will be destroyed? this is the PRO LIVE SOUND newsgroup we do not drive ANY amps into heavy clipping, for any reason what-so-ever George |
#42
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George's Pro Sound Company wrote:
"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker clipping does not damage speakers and distortion does not damage speakers, its overheating and over excursion that damages speakers distortion is one method of achieving overheating, but you can overheat with a spotlessly clean signal as well Really?, I'll make sure I don't do business with you. Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. I'll say no more. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5" |
#43
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jamie" t wrote in message news ![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker clipping does not damage speakers and distortion does not damage speakers, its overheating and over excursion that damages speakers distortion is one method of achieving overheating, but you can overheat with a spotlessly clean signal as well Really?, I'll make sure I don't do business with you. Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. I'll say no more. you don't have to you already stated it was the HEAT that killed the speaker the distortion was just a means to generate the heat put a 100% distored signal from a 1 watt amp into a 600 watt woofer and you will not live long enough to see it burn out. its NOT the distortion, it's the HEAT Distortion is simply one way to obtain heat, so is a blow torch and so is a clean signal with too many watts behind it it's not the jumping off the bridge that kills you, it's the impact with the ground do you understand? George |
#44
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: this is the PRO LIVE SOUND newsgroup No, it isn't. You are cross posting to these groups: news:rec.audio.tech news:alt.audio.pro.live-sound news:sci.electronics.repair -- http://improve-usenet.org/index.html aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white listed, or I will not see your messages. If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm There are two kinds of people on this earth: The crazy, and the insane. The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy. |
#45
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. and to what point is this abuse of equipment warrented? should I trow my cabinets off tall building to prove that they will be destroyed? this is the PRO LIVE SOUND newsgroup we do not drive ANY amps into heavy clipping, for any reason what-so-ever George Err, then why are you crossposting to other groups? However doesn't 'your' group get read by equipment hirers etc? And to suggest no pro equipment ever gets abused by pros is pie in the sky... -- *To be intoxicated is to feel sophisticated, but not be able to say it. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#46
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
George's Pro Sound Company wrote: Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. I'll say no more. you don't have to you already stated it was the HEAT that killed the speaker the distortion was just a means to generate the heat put a 100% distored signal from a 1 watt amp into a 600 watt woofer and you will not live long enough to see it burn out. its NOT the distortion, it's the HEAT Distortion is simply one way to obtain heat, so is a blow torch and so is a clean signal with too many watts behind it So a 1 watt power amp and 600 watt speakers is your formula to prevent speaker damage under all conditions? You must have very large arms. -- *A 'jiffy' is an actual unit of time for 1/100th of a second. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#47
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. BTW have driben amps to clipping on the bench hundreds of times in the last 40+ years. Your problem is you are trying to talk down to somebody who knows a lot more than you. Go learn enough to argue then come back.. |
#48
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
liquidator wrote:
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. BTW have driben amps to clipping on the bench hundreds of times in the last 40+ years. Your problem is you are trying to talk down to somebody who knows a lot more than you. Go learn enough to argue then come back.. Any one have some hip boots ? my normal boots aren't tall enough! http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5" |
#49
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jamie" t wrote in message news ![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker clipping does not damage speakers and distortion does not damage speakers, its overheating and over excursion that damages speakers distortion is one method of achieving overheating, but you can overheat with a spotlessly clean signal as well Really?, I'll make sure I don't do business with you. Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. Ahnothetr person with minimal knowledge. George doesn't always word things the best way, but he knows a lot. Speakers are rated for average power, over time. Look at the area under a square wave- it is a lot larger than the area under a sine wave. What that means is more power for a longer time. What is happening is the AMOUNT of power is being increased to a speaker for a longer TIME. Plain and simple- that is more power. It is the amout of power over time that kills the speaker...it can only shed heat so fast, put power in faster than that it will burn up. Simple..just use a bigger amp...and drive it to peak, you can blow the speaker quickly. Use a smaller amp, and drive it to its full power for longer, and the speaker will blow, assuming the amp is big enough to put out that much average power. Either way- it is power that is the culprit. The amount of energy being put into the speaker...put it in faster than the speaker can sink it, you will have thermal failure. It is not DC as people who skimmed one book and didn't understand it want to insist. Make the amp small enough, the speaker can handle any waveform. Make the amp big enough and the speaker will fail instantly with any input at all...then there are a million scenarios in between. I disagreee with George, I use big amps and don't blow speaker, conversely people are blowing their 100 watt speakers with "50 watt" amplifiers. Take a look at an EV speaker rating...xxx watss with pink noise for xxx hours. Change the signal, the speaker's rating changes. Incraes the time, the speaker's rating changes. Square waves or severe clipping is more power for a longer time. That is all it is. Not DC, not any big mystery, it's a measurable phenomenon. I do agree with George that sizing amps and sopeakers reduces chance for failure. But many touring companies use big amps for horns also, larger amps tend to hold their resale better, from a business standpoint make more sense to me. Here's a semi pro example- Loot at the price difference between a Behringer 2500 and a 1500. Not much...but come resale time you will do a lot better with the 2500.. Business is business, I buy bigger amps. your mileage may vary. |
#50
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jamie" t wrote in message ... liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. BTW have driben amps to clipping on the bench hundreds of times in the last 40+ years. Your problem is you are trying to talk down to somebody who knows a lot more than you. Go learn enough to argue then come back.. Any one have some hip boots ? my normal boots aren't tall enough! Jeez- another idiot to killfiter- where are you pointing out what I said was wrong? No where- simply because you don't know enough. |
#51
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. and to what point is this abuse of equipment warrented? should I trow my cabinets off tall building to prove that they will be destroyed? this is the PRO LIVE SOUND newsgroup we do not drive ANY amps into heavy clipping, for any reason what-so-ever George Err, then why are you crossposting to other groups? However doesn't 'your' group get read by equipment hirers etc? And to suggest no pro equipment ever gets abused by pros is pie in the sky... Hey, even Pros get abused by other Pros... Dave we've gooten off on the wrong foot, but what happens is Eeyore starts these damn crossposts. He has been asked a number of times to stop. He's a nice fellow but he keeps staring into space and mumbling "crossposting is good". What it does is throw groups of people together who don't know each other...it ALWAYS wstarts fights .PERIOD. I wish Graham (Eeyore) would stops as he's been asked to- but he's convinced he's right, and no amount of logic is gonna change that.. |
#52
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
liquidator wrote: Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. BTW have driben amps to clipping on the bench hundreds of times in the last 40+ years. Your problem is you are trying to talk down to somebody who knows a lot more than you. Pot, kettle. HTH. -- *I'm not your type. I'm not inflatable. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#53
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
liquidator wrote:
"Jamie" t wrote in message ... liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. BTW have driben amps to clipping on the bench hundreds of times in the last 40+ years. Your problem is you are trying to talk down to somebody who knows a lot more than you. Go learn enough to argue then come back.. Any one have some hip boots ? my normal boots aren't tall enough! Jeez- another idiot to killfiter- where are you pointing out what I said was wrong? No where- simply because you don't know enough. Boy!, you're way out of your league.. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5" |
#54
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
liquidator wrote:
"Jamie" t wrote in message news ![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker clipping does not damage speakers and distortion does not damage speakers, its overheating and over excursion that damages speakers distortion is one method of achieving overheating, but you can overheat with a spotlessly clean signal as well Really?, I'll make sure I don't do business with you. Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. Ahnothetr person with minimal knowledge. George doesn't always word things the best way, but he knows a lot. Speakers are rated for average power, over time. Look at the area under a square wave- it is a lot larger than the area under a sine wave. What that means is more power for a longer time. What is happening is the AMOUNT of power is being increased to a speaker for a longer TIME. Plain and simple- that is more power. It is the amout of power over time that kills the speaker...it can only shed heat so fast, put power in faster than that it will burn up. Simple..just use a bigger amp...and drive it to peak, you can blow the speaker quickly. Use a smaller amp, and drive it to its full power for longer, and the speaker will blow, assuming the amp is big enough to put out that much average power. Either way- it is power that is the culprit. The amount of energy being put into the speaker...put it in faster than the speaker can sink it, you will have thermal failure. It is not DC as people who skimmed one book and didn't understand it want to insist. Make the amp small enough, the speaker can handle any waveform. Make the amp big enough and the speaker will fail instantly with any input at all...then there are a million scenarios in between. I disagreee with George, I use big amps and don't blow speaker, conversely people are blowing their 100 watt speakers with "50 watt" amplifiers. Take a look at an EV speaker rating...xxx watss with pink noise for xxx hours. Change the signal, the speaker's rating changes. Incraes the time, the speaker's rating changes. Square waves or severe clipping is more power for a longer time. That is all it is. Not DC, not any big mystery, it's a measurable phenomenon. I do agree with George that sizing amps and sopeakers reduces chance for failure. But many touring companies use big amps for horns also, larger amps tend to hold their resale better, from a business standpoint make more sense to me. Here's a semi pro example- Loot at the price difference between a Behringer 2500 and a 1500. Not much...but come resale time you will do a lot better with the 2500.. Business is business, I buy bigger amps. your mileage may vary. What ever you do think you know as fact, must of come at a great expense of destroying a lot of electronics. http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5" |
#55
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
liquidator wrote: It is not DC as people who skimmed one book and didn't understand it want to insist. Drive an amp hard enough and that's what you effectively get, as far as the speaker is concerned. Try taking your head out of your arse and use that scope. -- *Time is the best teacher; unfortunately it kills all its students. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#56
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jamie" t wrote in message ... liquidator wrote: "Jamie" t wrote in message ... liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. BTW have driben amps to clipping on the bench hundreds of times in the last 40+ years. Your problem is you are trying to talk down to somebody who knows a lot more than you. Go learn enough to argue then come back.. Any one have some hip boots ? my normal boots aren't tall enough! Jeez- another idiot to killfiter- where are you pointing out what I said was wrong? No where- simply because you don't know enough. Boy!, you're way out of your league.. You are right of course, I outgrew Little League decades ago. Later, Junior. |
#57
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jamie" t wrote in message ... liquidator wrote: "Jamie" t wrote in message news ![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker clipping does not damage speakers and distortion does not damage speakers, its overheating and over excursion that damages speakers distortion is one method of achieving overheating, but you can overheat with a spotlessly clean signal as well Really?, I'll make sure I don't do business with you. Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. Ahnothetr person with minimal knowledge. George doesn't always word things the best way, but he knows a lot. Speakers are rated for average power, over time. Look at the area under a square wave- it is a lot larger than the area under a sine wave. What that means is more power for a longer time. What is happening is the AMOUNT of power is being increased to a speaker for a longer TIME. Plain and simple- that is more power. It is the amout of power over time that kills the speaker...it can only shed heat so fast, put power in faster than that it will burn up. Simple..just use a bigger amp...and drive it to peak, you can blow the speaker quickly. Use a smaller amp, and drive it to its full power for longer, and the speaker will blow, assuming the amp is big enough to put out that much average power. Either way- it is power that is the culprit. The amount of energy being put into the speaker...put it in faster than the speaker can sink it, you will have thermal failure. It is not DC as people who skimmed one book and didn't understand it want to insist. Make the amp small enough, the speaker can handle any waveform. Make the amp big enough and the speaker will fail instantly with any input at all...then there are a million scenarios in between. I disagreee with George, I use big amps and don't blow speaker, conversely people are blowing their 100 watt speakers with "50 watt" amplifiers. Take a look at an EV speaker rating...xxx watss with pink noise for xxx hours. Change the signal, the speaker's rating changes. Incraes the time, the speaker's rating changes. Square waves or severe clipping is more power for a longer time. That is all it is. Not DC, not any big mystery, it's a measurable phenomenon. I do agree with George that sizing amps and sopeakers reduces chance for failure. But many touring companies use big amps for horns also, larger amps tend to hold their resale better, from a business standpoint make more sense to me. Here's a semi pro example- Loot at the price difference between a Behringer 2500 and a 1500. Not much...but come resale time you will do a lot better with the 2500.. Business is business, I buy bigger amps. your mileage may vary. What ever you do think you know as fact, must of come at a great expense of destroying a lot of electronics. Again showing your gross ignorance. As a working pro I'm sure I paid more in taxes than you earned. Welcome to the killfiles as the only total loss I've seen today. Dont' bother replying, but your juvenile need to will make you do it anyway. |
#58
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "Ron Johnson" wrote in message Eeyore wrote: This is a well established technique for preventing voice coils burning out under conditions of 'overdrive'. here is a novel thought DON"T OVERDRIVE THEM simple and effective Easily said - but not so easy to do when setting up this sort of equipment. Let alone when that equipment is being used by all sorts. it's what I do the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a amp larger than the speakers rateing Doesn't stop the amp having greater than the HF driver's rating ! Strangely that's not always so. The best solution would be a decent limiter on the amp input - but these cost if it's not going to sound horrid when it operates. A bulb is a very cheap solution to help protect the speakers. No lamps in my meyers. setting up a system that both sounds good and stays within the limits of the equipment used is NOT hard, it simply requires one know what they are doing. These days always having 'someone who knows what they're doing' is rare. And even less likely with a small band starting out. So you need to make equipment as idiot proof as possible. a amp equal to the speaker rms rateing will never burn out the speaker unless the amp is clipped hard and long it will never exceed the excursion of the speaker unless someone fires a gun a inch from a mic at foolish gains set your system up properly and you have no need for these foolish lamps. Either the amp cannot produce enough wally to damage the speakers or it can - so the gunshot thing is rubbish. But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Or ensure the amp you have is fitted with DC 'crowbar' protection such as I design in.. Or output relays but these can oxidise their contacts degrading the sound, and if they don't have enough clearance will arc-over on a DC fault. create cheap MI gear that is used improperly and you need to limit the abuse idiots can administer, to save on the warrentte costs I have never heard a speaker with lamps(I've owned plenty) sound as good as a speaker with out lamps Correctly designed the lamp should have little effect on the sound as its cold resistance will be very low. Only when it starts to 'protect' will the resistance increase. again no lamps in my meyers, I do have alimiter but it is set well above any threshold I pass music at. why buy a 1000 watt amp then limit it to 300 watts, why not just buy a 300 watt amp? Why are you using a limiter at all, then? I think you summed it up pretty well there Dave. Graham |
#59
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() William Sommerwerck wrote: the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... Exceed X max (not difficult with ported cabs) and you can do a lot of damage to the LF driver too. Graham |
#60
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: a amp "can" put out several times it's rated power for a instant, enough to throw a cone. been there already UTTER and complete rubbish. If you're referring to the difference between an rms and peak voltage or power, that's already taken into account in the speaker's rating. Yes, you can get a bit more out of an amp on toneburst but rarely much over 1-2dB at the very most. Certainly not for long enough to do any damage. You're straying into tech territory here George that you don't understand. Stick to rigging and mixing. Graham |
#61
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker Generally. But not exclusively by far. Exceeding X max can trash an LF or HF driver without as much as even a discoloured voice coil. And there are many easy ways to do it. Graham |
#62
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() William Sommerwerck wrote: in practice, audible distortion is a warning that you should turn down the volume. Couldn't agree more. The distortion I was talking about was the sort that comes from pushing it into its excursion limits. (X max) Precisely. I have a lovely pair of Altec diaphragms in my "rogue's gallery" that demonstrates this perfectly. The voice coils meaure 100% OK and look OK. Graham |
#63
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: bottoming(or farting) a woofer is truely a horid sound That's technically exceeding X max (Thiele and Small parameters). Easy to do with ported cabs and no suitable high order HPF. Mine (my client's) is 24dB/octave @ 35Hz. Graham |
#64
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Meat Plow" wrote in message ... On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:03:47 -0500, "George's Pro Sound Company" wrote: "Meat Plow" wrote in message ... On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:25:13 +0000, Eeyore wrote: Meat Plow wrote: "George's Pro Sound Company"wrote: "Meat Plow" wrote in message Eeyore wrote: This is a well established technique for preventing voice coils burning out under conditions of 'overdrive'. There is a stage monitor I'm having problems with that uses this method. The HF sounds very distorted and almost cuts in and out. I looked closely inside and found some damaged push-on terminals. Ah, I thought, probably a poor contact causing the probelm, replaced them, checked driver DC resistances etc, reassembled thinking I'd probably fixed it. But no, the low level HF and distortion continued. I'd checked the DC resistance of the protection bulb but later it occurred to me that it might have 'very nearly' burnt out and have a weak spot that wouldn't show up on a DVM but passing signal would heat it and cause this trouble. I'll be able to find out soon enough but I wondered if anyone else had ever encountered this ? In the meantime I brought the HF driver home to check it's not voice coil rub. Been using some Wharfedale stage gear for a year or so. The mains are all protected by lamps. I've replaced two in a year but not experienced a distorted HF. You'll find problems in the xover or drive I would assume rather than the lamp. or maybe it's time to upgrade from that MI grade junk your using George Who, me? From what I've heard they're well considered and in the IAG group now. http://www.internationalaudiogroup.com/ The Chang brothers don't believe in messing about AIUI. http://www.internationalaudiogroup.c...ve_summary.php Graham We've been using the Warfe pro-audio stuff for a year and have had few problems. One 2500 watt power amp we used for our 18" subs got sent back because it was too sensitive and would fault when pushed hard at 4 ohms. The replacement did not exhibit this behavior under the exact conditions. I've replaced a couple lamp protectors elsewhere. I wouldn't call Wharfedale junk. It's usable, sounds good and reliable and a lot less expensive than other name brands. I consider W home stereo grade gear, not suitable for Pro Live Sound, below behringer Glad to hear it. I don't suppose you're a musician who uses Wharfe gear or repairs pro audio gear for a living, but rather just another consumer or retailer who has an opinion. As far as the Behringer gear goes I have no experience with it so other than seeing a lot of negative comments about it from those who do use or repair it i have no opinion. Behringer is like any company...some usable for semi pro, some absolute garbage. Thee odd thing is most negative comments about Behringer do NOT come from users as you say. Almost all negative posts about Behringer are from users of other brands. It's no worse than any other cheap stuff, better sometimes. I don't us it, but plenty of weekend warrriors do. If Behringer was a s bad as people try to say, they would be out of business. Conclusion- many aof the negative posts are bull. I don't use Behringer, or Mackie, or any of that kinda stuff. But I am not gonna insist everybody drive the same brand of car I do. |
#65
![]()
Posted to alt.audio.pro.live-sound,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: I've replaced a couple lamp protectors elsewhere. I wouldn't call Wharfedale junk. It's usable, sounds good and reliable and a lot less expensive than other name brands. I consider W home stereo grade gear, not suitable for Pro Live Sound, below behringer Actually George, granted most of their range is typical MI stuff, some of the Wharfedale pro stuff is pretty nice, consider the TwinX series, birch ply cabinets and good coaxial drivers, surprisingly good sounding though more expensive than most MI grade boxes, still not vastly overpriced. what I got out of this thread we were talking about crappy mdf boxes MDF has better acoustic damping (i.e. less resonance - hence better quality sound) than straight ply. with poorly designed passive crossovers aimed at the bottom feeder market also it must be some European quirk as I have never seen a warfedale boxin live sound service at any gig anywhere in the USA Probably not promoted in the USA into the Pro market. Possibly comparable to the better Yorkville stuff which we never see here in Europe. Seriously, some of it's very acceptable. Ron, was it you who mentioned the cheap Chinese NEXO 'knock-offs' ? Show George those. Graham |
#66
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote What gets you up so early on a Sunday? (I'm on the west coast, and have been up since 2AM.) went out had a couple of dogfish 90 minutes and that set me down early(8pm) some days your just not tired at 4 am As in... http://www.dogfish.com/brewings/Seas...le/3/index.htm Same brewery but this IPA http://www.dogfish.com/brewings/Year...A/11/index.htm Are you familiar with the origin of the name 'IPA' ? Graham |
#67
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Tony wrote: I like to protect gear from whatever might come, so I like lamps and polyswiches. I would be almost as happy with a frequency-selective limiter that could independently account for the thermal and displacement limits of the tweeter, mid and woofer (with appropriately different time constants - an even greater challenge), but the reality is that a lamp in the tweeter circuit handles 80% of abuse, so it's cheap insurance. That's how I see it too. We don't get many lamps blown but it does happen, even in the EV QRx's (almost once a year on average). But an interesting twist is that with the simple 2nd order HPFs I have been trying (with a very high Fc, eg 8 kHz, to flatten CD horn response and match sensitivities), a lamp or polyswitch in the INPUT to the crossover has the nice benefit of also seeing more MF, and so potentially account for both thermal and displacement limitations. Admittedly the time constants cannot be independent as would really be required, but it's still better than having the lamp in the crossover output circuit, and a LOT safer for the amp, which becomes UNLOADED when the protection operates, instead of shorted. Indeed it should ALWAYS be on the input side. Which is how ours are arranged. It just disconnects the HPF. Graham |
#68
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message But no speaker is designed to handle DC for long - which is what you can get from a grossly overloaded amp. To be certain that DC couldn't wreck the speakers would require a *much* smaller amp than would otherwise make sense. Or, of course, use an amp which can't pass DC. Jeez...a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. That's why I use 'clip eliminator circuits'. Did my first 18 years ago in the 1200B. Used a transconductance amp in a feedback loop (inactive until clip sensed so no effect on normal signal). Graham |
#69
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: put a 100% distored signal from a 1 watt amp into a 600 watt woofer and you will not live long enough to see it burn out. Uh ? A 100% distorted signal would be a square wave of 2W rating. That's not going to bother ANY 600W rated voice coil. Graham |
#70
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: George's Pro Sound Company wrote: this is the PRO LIVE SOUND newsgroup No, it isn't. You are cross posting to these groups: news:rec.audio.tech news:alt.audio.pro.live-sound news:sci.electronics.repair More correctly I was, since the original question was relevant to all. George should have trimmed the groups for pro-sound comments only. Graham |
#71
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: George's Pro Sound Company wrote: this is the PRO LIVE SOUND newsgroup No, it isn't. You are cross posting to these groups: news:rec.audio.tech news:alt.audio.pro.live-sound news:sci.electronics.repair In practice, I think you'll find the subject matter is still of interest in all of these. Graham |
#72
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote: And to suggest no pro equipment ever gets abused by pros is pie in the sky... Many a JBL D150 went to meet its maker in the 70s. In flames quite often. Graham |
#73
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() liquidator wrote: "Jamie" t wrote in message Any one have some hip boots ? my normal boots aren't tall enough! Jeez- another idiot to killfiter- where are you pointing out what I said was wrong? Jamie is notorious (with me at least) for having some very odd ideas sometimes in the electronics groups. I think he's a little bit out of touch with current practice in this area. Graham |
#74
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() liquidator wrote: Dave we've gooten off on the wrong foot, but what happens is Eeyore starts these damn crossposts. He has been asked a number of times to stop. He's a nice fellow but he keeps staring into space and mumbling "crossposting is good". What it does is throw groups of people together who don't know each other...it ALWAYS wstarts fights .PERIOD. I wish Graham (Eeyore) would stops as he's been asked to- but he's convinced he's right, and no amount of logic is gonna change that.. According to the currently accepted rules of netquette, a post that is relevant to several groups SHOULD be cross-posted. Most certainly not multiposted. Explain how it is off-charter in rec.audio.tech or sci.electronics.repair where a lot of audio is discussed daily. It was a repair question after all ! And technical. Graham |
#75
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jamie wrote: Boy!, you're way out of your league.. Typical Jamie response. Liquidator knows his stuff 99+ odd % of the time. Graham |
#76
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Meat Plow wrote: "George's Pro Sound Company" wrote: "Meat Plow" wrote in message I wouldn't call Wharfedale junk. It's usable, sounds good and reliable and a lot less expensive than other name brands. I consider W home stereo grade gear, not suitable for Pro Live Sound, below behringer Glad to hear it. I don't suppose you're a musician who uses Wharfe gear or repairs pro audio gear for a living, but rather just another consumer or retailer who has an opinion. He's a US (NY state AIUI) audio hire company operator. As far as the Behringer gear goes I have no experience with it so other than seeing a lot of negative comments about it from those who do use or repair it I have no opinion. Seen and heard of more Behringer gear die prematurely than any other brand that one ought presumably to be able to take seriously. Ron (UK) tried 2 of their big amps. Both went U/S just outside warranty. OTOH, the venue I help out still has 2 of my Studiomaster D series amps working day in, day out and both are 10+ yrs old. Only maintence needed, blowing out the heatsinks and replacing a couple of scratchy gain pots. And you can replace those pots in 15 mins compared to the over one HOUR it takes for a QSC RMX ! Graham |
#77
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() liquidator wrote: Thee odd thing is most negative comments about Behringer do NOT come from users as you say. I've experienced their stuff fail on one of my clients. He will NOT buy Behringer any more. He has a BUSINESS to run that requires RELIABILITY. Graham |
#78
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jamie" t wrote in message ... liquidator wrote: "Jamie" t wrote in message news ![]() George's Pro Sound Company wrote: "William Sommerwerck" wrote in message ... the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to use a[n] amp larger than the speaker[']s rateing [sic] Actually, the easiest way to overdrive a speaker is to play it at a level where it produces audible distortion. But as most listeners have no idea what distortion sounds like... OTOH distortion does not destroy speakers, speakers are as happy to play distortion as clean signal only when you exceed the heat dissipating ability of the motor do you burn out a speaker clipping does not damage speakers and distortion does not damage speakers, its overheating and over excursion that damages speakers distortion is one method of achieving overheating, but you can overheat with a spotlessly clean signal as well Really?, I'll make sure I don't do business with you. Btw, distortion due to amplifier saturation, even though the amp is far belong the rating of the speaker can and does over heat the speaker coil and thus, can terminate the life of a speaker even rated higher than said amp. Ahnothetr person with minimal knowledge. George doesn't always word things the best way, but he knows a lot. Speakers are rated for average power, over time. Look at the area under a square wave- it is a lot larger than the area under a sine wave. What that means is more power for a longer time. What is happening is the AMOUNT of power is being increased to a speaker for a longer TIME. Plain and simple- that is more power. It is the amout of power over time that kills the speaker...it can only shed heat so fast, put power in faster than that it will burn up. Simple..just use a bigger amp...and drive it to peak, you can blow the speaker quickly. Use a smaller amp, and drive it to its full power for longer, and the speaker will blow, assuming the amp is big enough to put out that much average power. Either way- it is power that is the culprit. The amount of energy being put into the speaker...put it in faster than the speaker can sink it, you will have thermal failure. It is not DC as people who skimmed one book and didn't understand it want to insist. Make the amp small enough, the speaker can handle any waveform. Make the amp big enough and the speaker will fail instantly with any input at all...then there are a million scenarios in between. I disagreee with George, I use big amps and don't blow speaker, conversely people are blowing their 100 watt speakers with "50 watt" amplifiers. Take a look at an EV speaker rating...xxx watss with pink noise for xxx hours. Change the signal, the speaker's rating changes. Incraes the time, the speaker's rating changes. Square waves or severe clipping is more power for a longer time. That is all it is. Not DC, not any big mystery, it's a measurable phenomenon. I do agree with George that sizing amps and sopeakers reduces chance for failure. But many touring companies use big amps for horns also, larger amps tend to hold their resale better, from a business standpoint make more sense to me. Here's a semi pro example- Loot at the price difference between a Behringer 2500 and a 1500. Not much...but come resale time you will do a lot better with the 2500.. Business is business, I buy bigger amps. your mileage may vary. What ever you do think you know as fact, must of come at a great expense of destroying a lot of electronics. I take it you do not earn the money to pay your mortgage, put kids through school, pay your employees , buy cars and all the rest useing speakers and amplifiers for pro live sound work if you did you would not be makeing such a jackass out of yourself right now George |
#79
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() liquidator wrote: "Dave Plowman (News)" wrote Suggest you try driving a DC coupled amp into heavy clipping and see the results to speakers which can nominally handle its output. You would have flunked electronics 101. Clipping and DC are not the same thing. That argument was selltled years ago- only those with minimal knowledge advance it today. In the early days of DC coupled outputs, some amps still had a degree of internal AC coupling or bypassing in the drive circuitry. They could indeed 'drift' DC under prolonged overdrive. Graham |
#80
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tech,alt.audio.pro.live-sound,sci.electronics.repair
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Meat Plow" wrote in message ... On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 05:03:47 -0500, "George's Pro Sound Company" wrote: "Meat Plow" wrote in message ... On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 04:25:13 +0000, Eeyore wrote: Meat Plow wrote: "George's Pro Sound Company"wrote: "Meat Plow" wrote in message Eeyore wrote: This is a well established technique for preventing voice coils burning out under conditions of 'overdrive'. There is a stage monitor I'm having problems with that uses this method. The HF sounds very distorted and almost cuts in and out. I looked closely inside and found some damaged push-on terminals. Ah, I thought, probably a poor contact causing the probelm, replaced them, checked driver DC resistances etc, reassembled thinking I'd probably fixed it. But no, the low level HF and distortion continued. I'd checked the DC resistance of the protection bulb but later it occurred to me that it might have 'very nearly' burnt out and have a weak spot that wouldn't show up on a DVM but passing signal would heat it and cause this trouble. I'll be able to find out soon enough but I wondered if anyone else had ever encountered this ? In the meantime I brought the HF driver home to check it's not voice coil rub. Been using some Wharfedale stage gear for a year or so. The mains are all protected by lamps. I've replaced two in a year but not experienced a distorted HF. You'll find problems in the xover or drive I would assume rather than the lamp. or maybe it's time to upgrade from that MI grade junk your using George Who, me? From what I've heard they're well considered and in the IAG group now. http://www.internationalaudiogroup.com/ The Chang brothers don't believe in messing about AIUI. http://www.internationalaudiogroup.c...ve_summary.php Graham We've been using the Warfe pro-audio stuff for a year and have had few problems. One 2500 watt power amp we used for our 18" subs got sent back because it was too sensitive and would fault when pushed hard at 4 ohms. The replacement did not exhibit this behavior under the exact conditions. I've replaced a couple lamp protectors elsewhere. I wouldn't call Wharfedale junk. It's usable, sounds good and reliable and a lot less expensive than other name brands. I consider W home stereo grade gear, not suitable for Pro Live Sound, below behringer Glad to hear it. I don't suppose you're a musician who uses Wharfe gear or repairs pro audio gear for a living, but rather just another consumer or retailer who has an opinion. As far as the Behringer gear goes I have no experience with it so other than seeing a lot of negative comments about it from those who do use or repair it i have no opinion. my opionons are formed by the gear I choose to own or not own, I IN FACT put my money where my mouth is I OWN a sr company with a 1/4 million dollars of inventory and events that have run into the 100,000 attendence range be at it over 20 years I feature mostly Meyer Sound Labs gear for the serious rig and behringer for the disposable low end crap George |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tweeter protection | Tech | |||
Tweeter protection. | Car Audio | |||
Tweeter midrange protection devices/calculation | Tech | |||
Ranger speaker overload! | Car Audio | |||
speaker protection | Car Audio |