I know. What I was saying is that one has to go into multi-disciplinary
studies to find all the information, so I'm not sure where to point you.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...


Roger W. Norman wrote:

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...

Roger, do you have any good sources on how much of a threat
that is and what we are possibly doing that could affect that?


Sources? How about the mass extinction of about 245 million years ago,
which has come down to being a eruption of methane sulfate during a
warming
period (way before humans were supposedly doing the warming) and,
although
it took a few thousand years because it wasn't enough to cause immediate
extinctions, we're talking about virtually all land based life and 70%
of
ocean born life.

Roger, I wasn't challenging you, I just want to look further
into this and to find out to what degree the global effects
civiliation is having on the planet influence that phenomenon.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

I know. What I was saying is that one has to go into multi-disciplinary
studies to find all the information, so I'm not sure where to point you.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...


Roger W. Norman wrote:

"Bob Cain" wrote in message
...

Roger, do you have any good sources on how much of a threat
that is and what we are possibly doing that could affect that?


Sources? How about the mass extinction of about 245 million years ago,
which has come down to being a eruption of methane sulfate during a
warming
period (way before humans were supposedly doing the warming) and,
although
it took a few thousand years because it wasn't enough to cause immediate
extinctions, we're talking about virtually all land based life and 70%
of
ocean born life.

Roger, I wasn't challenging you, I just want to look further
into this and to find out to what degree the global effects
civiliation is having on the planet influence that phenomenon.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

You can be really nasty some times, Ty! g

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Ty Ford" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:24:49 -0400, Raglan wrote
(in article ):

These threads are nearly always American-centric.

True, but would you deny that the policies & actions of the President
of
the USA have an effect on the rest of the world in this day & age?


Listen, guys, I'm a South African far far away and I find this sort of
OT discussion gives fascinating insight into the minds of Americans,
the Romans in this new age of empire, as it were. I prefer to read it
here because, as a long-time lurker in this group, I know many of you
from your on-topic postings and your lighter remarks. So I have a
sense of your non-political personalities, which gives far better
context than reading the rantings of unknowns in politics-only groups.

And as for those who try so hard to banish OT posts, why don't you
just not read them? Nobody's forcing you.

Raglan

Which is the equivalent of saying, "**** the leash and poop laws. I'm
going
to let my dog crap on the footpath, just walk around it."

There's a special place for you in pugatory Rag; cleaning up after
millions
of dog owners who don't give a crap about where their dogs crap.

Sincerely,

Ty Ford






-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other
audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

You can be really nasty some times, Ty! g

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Ty Ford" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:24:49 -0400, Raglan wrote
(in article ):

These threads are nearly always American-centric.

True, but would you deny that the policies & actions of the President
of
the USA have an effect on the rest of the world in this day & age?


Listen, guys, I'm a South African far far away and I find this sort of
OT discussion gives fascinating insight into the minds of Americans,
the Romans in this new age of empire, as it were. I prefer to read it
here because, as a long-time lurker in this group, I know many of you
from your on-topic postings and your lighter remarks. So I have a
sense of your non-political personalities, which gives far better
context than reading the rantings of unknowns in politics-only groups.

And as for those who try so hard to banish OT posts, why don't you
just not read them? Nobody's forcing you.

Raglan

Which is the equivalent of saying, "**** the leash and poop laws. I'm
going
to let my dog crap on the footpath, just walk around it."

There's a special place for you in pugatory Rag; cleaning up after
millions
of dog owners who don't give a crap about where their dogs crap.

Sincerely,

Ty Ford






-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other
audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:07:16 -0400, Ty Ford
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:04:12 -0400, George wrote
(in article ):

In article ,
playon wrote:

You could always take the intiative and start rec.audio.pro.uptight...

Al

Ha Ha ha
ty is using off-topic ranting to rant about off topic rants
does anyone else see the irony
no wonder he deserves the killfile
George

Bite me George, you legendary abuser of newsgroup rules. BTW, Play lacks the
cohones to put a real email address up, otherwise I would have responded to
him directly. And off list.

Anytime Ty, playonATcomcast.net all you have to do is read my headers
carefully to figure it out -- I don't post my email in order to avoid
spam, not because of any problems wiht my manhood.

However I'm not really interested in exchanging emails on the topic of
OT threads, our respective positions have already been hashed out on
this NG a few times....

Al


At least Roger has had the honesty to put his stuff on the line. You're too
busy ****ing in everyone else's well to start your own newsgroup where you
can do what you want.

Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:07:16 -0400, Ty Ford
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 21:04:12 -0400, George wrote
(in article ):

In article ,
playon wrote:

You could always take the intiative and start rec.audio.pro.uptight...

Al

Ha Ha ha
ty is using off-topic ranting to rant about off topic rants
does anyone else see the irony
no wonder he deserves the killfile
George

Bite me George, you legendary abuser of newsgroup rules. BTW, Play lacks the
cohones to put a real email address up, otherwise I would have responded to
him directly. And off list.

Anytime Ty, playonATcomcast.net all you have to do is read my headers
carefully to figure it out -- I don't post my email in order to avoid
spam, not because of any problems wiht my manhood.

However I'm not really interested in exchanging emails on the topic of
OT threads, our respective positions have already been hashed out on
this NG a few times....

Al


At least Roger has had the honesty to put his stuff on the line. You're too
busy ****ing in everyone else's well to start your own newsgroup where you
can do what you want.

Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:11:19 -0400, Ty Ford
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:24:49 -0400, Raglan wrote
(in article ):

These threads are nearly always American-centric.

True, but would you deny that the policies & actions of the President of
the USA have an effect on the rest of the world in this day & age?


Listen, guys, I'm a South African far far away and I find this sort of
OT discussion gives fascinating insight into the minds of Americans,
the Romans in this new age of empire, as it were. I prefer to read it
here because, as a long-time lurker in this group, I know many of you
from your on-topic postings and your lighter remarks. So I have a
sense of your non-political personalities, which gives far better
context than reading the rantings of unknowns in politics-only groups.

And as for those who try so hard to banish OT posts, why don't you
just not read them? Nobody's forcing you.

Raglan

Which is the equivalent of saying, "**** the leash and poop laws. I'm going
to let my dog crap on the footpath, just walk around it."

Bad analogy... they have software now that removes the poop before you
step in it... why don't you use it, is the real question?

Al

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:11:19 -0400, Ty Ford
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:24:49 -0400, Raglan wrote
(in article ):

These threads are nearly always American-centric.

True, but would you deny that the policies & actions of the President of
the USA have an effect on the rest of the world in this day & age?


Listen, guys, I'm a South African far far away and I find this sort of
OT discussion gives fascinating insight into the minds of Americans,
the Romans in this new age of empire, as it were. I prefer to read it
here because, as a long-time lurker in this group, I know many of you
from your on-topic postings and your lighter remarks. So I have a
sense of your non-political personalities, which gives far better
context than reading the rantings of unknowns in politics-only groups.

And as for those who try so hard to banish OT posts, why don't you
just not read them? Nobody's forcing you.

Raglan

Which is the equivalent of saying, "**** the leash and poop laws. I'm going
to let my dog crap on the footpath, just walk around it."

Bad analogy... they have software now that removes the poop before you
step in it... why don't you use it, is the real question?

Al

Well, you should have said constipation because laxative means that things
are going away, and obviously things haven't gone away yet. However, my
friend, if it's really constipation then ultimately what goes in has to come
out, and it will all be over however explosively! g

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we have 4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to read!
g

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Ty Ford" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:12:00 -0400, WillStG wrote
(in article ):

"Stu Venable"
They'll probably ask -- why not instead propose a
rec.audio.pro.moderated
newsgroup? With a moderated newsgroup, you'll have something RAP can't:
an
enforcement of the charter.

I would suport RAP becoming a moderated newsgroup, as long as the
moderator/s pledged to enforce the Charter in a Fair and Balanced
manner.

But considering the traffic here it would be an awfully big
commitment
to
take on, and there would be numbnuts playing hit and run, they'd get
banned
and
then use anonymous remailers...

But all this is OT political traffic taking up bandwidth is
probably
going
to recede after the election. After all, if Bush is reelected and Roger
moves
to Vietnam (as he has suggested he will), Internet access there is
likely so
slow that he will be writing fewer, and *much* shorter posts... g

I don't think so. I think this is actually a reaction to 9/11. People feel
jammed up about the event and somehow have come to the conclusion that a
newsgroup is a good place to dump their ****. They are wrong, btw, but
they
still have a lot of unprocessed **** and this newsgroup is the unfortunate
pot they've decided to dump in.

The political issues are just laxatives for the real deal. As has been
proven
before many times, "Ugly Americans" are everywhere.

Sincerely,

Ty Ford



-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other
audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

Well, you should have said constipation because laxative means that things
are going away, and obviously things haven't gone away yet. However, my
friend, if it's really constipation then ultimately what goes in has to come
out, and it will all be over however explosively! g

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we have 4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to read!
g

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"Ty Ford" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:12:00 -0400, WillStG wrote
(in article ):

"Stu Venable"
They'll probably ask -- why not instead propose a
rec.audio.pro.moderated
newsgroup? With a moderated newsgroup, you'll have something RAP can't:
an
enforcement of the charter.

I would suport RAP becoming a moderated newsgroup, as long as the
moderator/s pledged to enforce the Charter in a Fair and Balanced
manner.

But considering the traffic here it would be an awfully big
commitment
to
take on, and there would be numbnuts playing hit and run, they'd get
banned
and
then use anonymous remailers...

But all this is OT political traffic taking up bandwidth is
probably
going
to recede after the election. After all, if Bush is reelected and Roger
moves
to Vietnam (as he has suggested he will), Internet access there is
likely so
slow that he will be writing fewer, and *much* shorter posts... g

I don't think so. I think this is actually a reaction to 9/11. People feel
jammed up about the event and somehow have come to the conclusion that a
newsgroup is a good place to dump their ****. They are wrong, btw, but
they
still have a lot of unprocessed **** and this newsgroup is the unfortunate
pot they've decided to dump in.

The political issues are just laxatives for the real deal. As has been
proven
before many times, "Ugly Americans" are everywhere.

Sincerely,

Ty Ford



-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other
audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

"Roger W. Norman"

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we have 4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to read!

Stop making terroristic threats to influence the election Roger.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

"Roger W. Norman"

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we have 4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to read!

Stop making terroristic threats to influence the election Roger.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

http://tinyurl.com/6p6c3
Kerry Tells Bush to 'Get Real' on Assault Weapons

ST. LOUIS (Reuters) - Democratic candidate John Kerry (news - web sites)
on Friday said President Bush (news - web sites)'s failure to fight for
a renewal of a ban on assault weapons will make it easier for terrorists
to get the lethal weapons.


Citing the 9/11 commission and other reports, Kerry said that al Qaeda,
blamed for the attacks on America three years ago, had issued a manual
that urged followers to "come to America and buy assault weapons."

"Why is George Bush (news - web sites) making the job of terrorists
easier and making the job for America's police officers harder?" he
asked in a separate written statement.

playon wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:12:27 -0500, Pete Dimsman
wrote:



playon wrote:

Actually it's a non-issue, the whole assault rifle ban was a big, fake
bandaid from the start. The only difference between what they are
calling an "assault weapon" and the automatic weapons that are now
legal, is a silencer and (I think) a night scope... otherwise, it's
the same gun.


Al, read this article:

http://tinyurl.com/3hwvy


This part supports my point:


Even groups that back renewing the law acknowledge the gun industry
found loopholes and that dangerous weapons do remain on U.S. streets.
But they argue that without the ban, the problem will grow worse.


It may grow worse, but the point is, it has never been very difficult
for anyone to buy weapons of this type in America if they are
determined to have them.

http://tinyurl.com/6p6c3
Kerry Tells Bush to 'Get Real' on Assault Weapons

ST. LOUIS (Reuters) - Democratic candidate John Kerry (news - web sites)
on Friday said President Bush (news - web sites)'s failure to fight for
a renewal of a ban on assault weapons will make it easier for terrorists
to get the lethal weapons.


Citing the 9/11 commission and other reports, Kerry said that al Qaeda,
blamed for the attacks on America three years ago, had issued a manual
that urged followers to "come to America and buy assault weapons."

"Why is George Bush (news - web sites) making the job of terrorists
easier and making the job for America's police officers harder?" he
asked in a separate written statement.

playon wrote:
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:12:27 -0500, Pete Dimsman
wrote:



playon wrote:

Actually it's a non-issue, the whole assault rifle ban was a big, fake
bandaid from the start. The only difference between what they are
calling an "assault weapon" and the automatic weapons that are now
legal, is a silencer and (I think) a night scope... otherwise, it's
the same gun.


Al, read this article:

http://tinyurl.com/3hwvy


This part supports my point:


Even groups that back renewing the law acknowledge the gun industry
found loopholes and that dangerous weapons do remain on U.S. streets.
But they argue that without the ban, the problem will grow worse.


It may grow worse, but the point is, it has never been very difficult
for anyone to buy weapons of this type in America if they are
determined to have them.

g If you weren't such a Bu****e you might actually have some socially
redeeming values! g I take it back. I WOULD go out and have a drink with
you. Not that you'd want me to.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"WillStG" wrote in message
...
"Roger W. Norman"

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we have
4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to
read!

Stop making terroristic threats to influence the election Roger.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

g If you weren't such a Bu****e you might actually have some socially
redeeming values! g I take it back. I WOULD go out and have a drink with
you. Not that you'd want me to.

--


Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio

"WillStG" wrote in message
...
"Roger W. Norman"

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we have
4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to
read!

Stop making terroristic threats to influence the election Roger.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

--
Dave Martin
Java Jive Studio
Nashville, TN
www.javajivestudio.com

"Roger W. Norman" wrote in message
...
g If you weren't such a Bu****e you might actually have some socially
redeeming values! g I take it back. I WOULD go out and have a drink
with
you. Not that you'd want me to.

"WillStG" wrote in message
...
"Roger W. Norman"

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we
have
4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to
read!

Stop making terroristic threats to influence the election Roger.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

--
Dave Martin
Java Jive Studio
Nashville, TN
www.javajivestudio.com

"Roger W. Norman" wrote in message
...
g If you weren't such a Bu****e you might actually have some socially
redeeming values! g I take it back. I WOULD go out and have a drink
with
you. Not that you'd want me to.

"WillStG" wrote in message
...
"Roger W. Norman"

You better hope, for the sake of RAP, that Kerry wins because if we
have
4
more years of Bush, we have 4 more years of the **** you don't want to
read!

Stop making terroristic threats to influence the election Roger.

Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:39:26 -0400, playon wrote
(in article ):

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:11:19 -0400, Ty Ford
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:24:49 -0400, Raglan wrote
(in article ):

These threads are nearly always American-centric.

True, but would you deny that the policies & actions of the President of
the USA have an effect on the rest of the world in this day & age?


Listen, guys, I'm a South African far far away and I find this sort of
OT discussion gives fascinating insight into the minds of Americans,
the Romans in this new age of empire, as it were. I prefer to read it
here because, as a long-time lurker in this group, I know many of you
from your on-topic postings and your lighter remarks. So I have a
sense of your non-political personalities, which gives far better
context than reading the rantings of unknowns in politics-only groups.

And as for those who try so hard to banish OT posts, why don't you
just not read them? Nobody's forcing you.

Raglan

Which is the equivalent of saying, "**** the leash and poop laws. I'm going
to let my dog crap on the footpath, just walk around it."

Bad analogy... they have software now that removes the poop before you
step in it... why don't you use it, is the real question?

Al

No Al,

The real question is why do you think you're so high on the food chain that
you can break the rules. Would it be so ****ing difficult for you to lift a
finger on your mouse and click the right newsgroup instead of abusing this
one?

The burden is on you, since you are in violation of the rules here. The fact
that this has been brought to your attention many times before indicates an
amazing level of hubris.

You'd think all that attitude could be put to much better use, even if it
were only to go to a newsgroup that addressed your concerns. I guess you must
just enjoy pooping on the path and ****ing people off. That's sort of sad.

Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:39:26 -0400, playon wrote
(in article ):

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:11:19 -0400, Ty Ford
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 19:24:49 -0400, Raglan wrote
(in article ):

These threads are nearly always American-centric.

True, but would you deny that the policies & actions of the President of
the USA have an effect on the rest of the world in this day & age?


Listen, guys, I'm a South African far far away and I find this sort of
OT discussion gives fascinating insight into the minds of Americans,
the Romans in this new age of empire, as it were. I prefer to read it
here because, as a long-time lurker in this group, I know many of you
from your on-topic postings and your lighter remarks. So I have a
sense of your non-political personalities, which gives far better
context than reading the rantings of unknowns in politics-only groups.

And as for those who try so hard to banish OT posts, why don't you
just not read them? Nobody's forcing you.

Raglan

Which is the equivalent of saying, "**** the leash and poop laws. I'm going
to let my dog crap on the footpath, just walk around it."

Bad analogy... they have software now that removes the poop before you
step in it... why don't you use it, is the real question?

Al

No Al,

The real question is why do you think you're so high on the food chain that
you can break the rules. Would it be so ****ing difficult for you to lift a
finger on your mouse and click the right newsgroup instead of abusing this
one?

The burden is on you, since you are in violation of the rules here. The fact
that this has been brought to your attention many times before indicates an
amazing level of hubris.

You'd think all that attitude could be put to much better use, even if it
were only to go to a newsgroup that addressed your concerns. I guess you must
just enjoy pooping on the path and ****ing people off. That's sort of sad.

Ty Ford





-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Scott Fraser

Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Scott Fraser

Ty Ford wrote:


You'd think all that attitude could be put to much better use, even if it
were only to go to a newsgroup that addressed your concerns. I guess you must
just enjoy pooping on the path and ****ing people off. That's sort of sad.

I think that you've hit upon a fair analogy. Usenet is a shared, global
resource and therefore depends on the people using it to obey the
guidelines. To those people who respond to points like that with, 'Who
are you to tell me what to do? There's nothing you can do to stop me!',
it's difficult to know what to say.

This is an example of the ideology of 'modern people'. 'I'm alright jack
so **** you buddy!'. The idea of making a bit of a sacrifice by adhering
to the voluntary rules for the benefit of the common whole just doesn't
occur to them. Why should they, if they don't *have* to?

--
***My real address is m/ike at u/nmusic d/ot co dot u/k (removing /s)
np:
http://www.unmusic.co.uk
http://www.unmusic.co.uk/Top_50_Films.html - favorite films
http://www.unmusic.co.uk/amh-s.html - alt.music.home-studio

Ty Ford wrote:


You'd think all that attitude could be put to much better use, even if it
were only to go to a newsgroup that addressed your concerns. I guess you must
just enjoy pooping on the path and ****ing people off. That's sort of sad.

I think that you've hit upon a fair analogy. Usenet is a shared, global
resource and therefore depends on the people using it to obey the
guidelines. To those people who respond to points like that with, 'Who
are you to tell me what to do? There's nothing you can do to stop me!',
it's difficult to know what to say.

This is an example of the ideology of 'modern people'. 'I'm alright jack
so **** you buddy!'. The idea of making a bit of a sacrifice by adhering
to the voluntary rules for the benefit of the common whole just doesn't
occur to them. Why should they, if they don't *have* to?

--
***My real address is m/ike at u/nmusic d/ot co dot u/k (removing /s)
np:
http://www.unmusic.co.uk
http://www.unmusic.co.uk/Top_50_Films.html - favorite films
http://www.unmusic.co.uk/amh-s.html - alt.music.home-studio

(ScotFraser)

Dave Martin Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy
in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

(ScotFraser)

Dave Martin Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy
in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

"WillStG" wrote in message
...

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g

We wish...

--
Dave Martin
Java Jive Studio
Nashville, TN
www.javajivestudio.com

"WillStG" wrote in message
...

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g

We wish...

--
Dave Martin
Java Jive Studio
Nashville, TN
www.javajivestudio.com

WillStG wrote:

(ScotFraser)

Dave Martin Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy
in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g

Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

--
ha

WillStG wrote:

(ScotFraser)

Dave Martin Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good guy
in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g

Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

--
ha

(hank alrich)
Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

I do realize that you have been trying be an example of that for everyone
Hank. And your preoccupation with the penis side of people you disagree with
notwithstanding, don't think no one appreciates the effort.


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

(hank alrich)
Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

I do realize that you have been trying be an example of that for everyone
Hank. And your preoccupation with the penis side of people you disagree with
notwithstanding, don't think no one appreciates the effort.


Will Miho
NY Music & TV Audio Guy
Off the Morning Show! & sleepin' In... / Fox News
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away..." Tom Waits

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 16:38:47 -0400, hank alrich wrote
(in article ):

WillStG wrote:

(ScotFraser)

Dave Martin Roger, I've had dinner and hung out with Will - he's a good
guy
in addition
to being a fine and knowledgeable audio engineer.

And I've lunched with Will. I concur with Dave. Just be sure to keep off
political issues & you'll find Will an amiable fellow & a fun audio hang.

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g

Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

--
ha

I AM THEM.

TY

-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:57:08 -0400, killermike wrote
(in article ):

Ty Ford wrote:


You'd think all that attitude could be put to much better use, even if it
were only to go to a newsgroup that addressed your concerns. I guess you
must
just enjoy pooping on the path and ****ing people off. That's sort of sad.

I think that you've hit upon a fair analogy. Usenet is a shared, global
resource and therefore depends on the people using it to obey the
guidelines. To those people who respond to points like that with, 'Who
are you to tell me what to do? There's nothing you can do to stop me!',
it's difficult to know what to say.

This is an example of the ideology of 'modern people'. 'I'm alright jack
so **** you buddy!'. The idea of making a bit of a sacrifice by adhering
to the voluntary rules for the benefit of the common whole just doesn't
occur to them. Why should they, if they don't *have* to?



Apparently you have not yet read the RAP charter. It forbids OT posting.

Every society has rules. Those who break them knowingly have boundary issues,
or worse.

Regards,

Ty Ford


-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com

Shucks guys- I'm speechless... g

Fine. Now shut up.
g


Scott Fraser

Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

Got it. But what about coffee, single malt whiskies, BBQ, hot sauce, tofu, &
all the other important OT issues of importance?
Scott Fraser

Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

Got it. But what about coffee, single malt whiskies, BBQ, hot sauce, tofu, &
all the other important OT issues of importance?

Ty eats and drinks and probably fornicates, too. How do those not fit
into audio work? Must not we do those in order to remain alive and sane?
Crazy dead people could deliver regrettable audio.

--
ha

Ty Ford wrote:


Apparently you have not yet read the RAP charter. It forbids OT posting.

What's the date on that charter, Ty?

Perhaps its time for a constitutional reconvention in light
of all that has changed since then. There are lots of laws
on the books in lots of places that are just no longer
relevant and no longer enforced.


Bob
--

"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."

A. Einstein

On 12 Sep 2004 17:01:27 GMT, (ScotFraser) wrote:

Ain't it great? They're saying if we don't talk politics you're not an
asshole. g

Got it. But what about coffee, single malt whiskies, BBQ, hot sauce, tofu, &
all the other important OT issues of importance?
Scott Fraser

Ty doesn't care about those, he's very selective.

Ty Ford wrote:

I AM THEM.


Who is Number One?