Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Scott Dorsey Scott Dorsey is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 16,853
Default Sampling rates

geoff wrote:
On 1/01/2016 5:06 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:

But.... these days you can buy very good digital gear and very good analogue
gear (and let me say that the ATR-100 can be set up to sound so much more
accurate than any of the previous generations of tape machines


I wonder how the difference between the ATR-100 and (say) the latest
Zoom is ? Without even thinking about the $ difference (per channel).


Much of the difference is that you can set the ATR-100 up so that it isn't
transparent at all, if that's what you want.

The issue with the Zoom recorders are the mike preamps and gain controls
more than converters. The recording part is the easy part.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DAT = .WAV @ changing sampling rates Felix Dollinger Pro Audio 6 April 28th 07 01:09 AM
Sampling rates and scaling Mogens V. Pro Audio 11 March 14th 07 06:54 AM
Demand for even higher sampling rates John L Rice Pro Audio 10 April 2nd 05 11:50 PM
Lavry article on sampling rates, online Steven Sullivan High End Audio 1 April 9th 04 07:19 PM
Why 24/96 sampling isn't necessarily better-sounding than 24/44 sampling Arny Krueger Pro Audio 90 November 20th 03 12:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:10 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"