Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"K. B." wrote in message ...
I'm more interested in the objective side of audio rather than the subjective side. It seems that (multichannel) DVD-Audio and SACD formats failed in the marketplace, Blu-ray w/PCM or Dolby TrueHD (maybe DTS-HD too) is the only widely available option for getting accurate multichannel audio to consumers. ~~~ Kirk Bayne alt.video.digital-tv Home Page http://avdtv.tripod.com/avdtv.htm I think that DVD-Audio and SACD failed because the manufacturers did not educate the public as to the advantages of these formats and the fact that you need to have decent quality equipment; all the way through your system to hear the sonic improvements that these formats can give you compared to regular CDs. I know that CD Japan and other sources apparently offer close to 1000 SACDs or maybe more. Also HDCD was an improvement over standard CD as well but for some reason Micro$oft purchased that company possibly to take it out of production it seems, I may be wrong here? I'm using a Cambridge Audio Universal Blu-ray player that does all of these formats and I can hear the difference compared to standard CDs, but I know that a dedicated SACD player from Sony would probably sound even better. I have heard that a $2000.00 player is in order to really experience the difference. Shaun |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: SPATIAL SOUND SP-1 SURROUND SOUND PROCESSOR | Marketplace | |||
FS: SPATIAL SOUND SP-1 SURROUND SOUND PROCESSOR | Marketplace | |||
DVD surround sound | Audio Opinions | |||
How to go Surround Sound?? | Car Audio | |||
FA: Rare Spatial Sound SP-1 Surround Sound Processor | Pro Audio |