Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stereo imaging is another topic. For live recorded music, your stereo im=
pression is less that of the spread of the musicians, and more the specific= delay and reverberation caused by the room's shape and audio impression. F= or music that is recorded in the studio, generally every instrument is mic'= d separately and the stereo spread is whatever the engineer(s) decide.... T= he best stereo recordings I have heard were recorded out of doors,=20 with the microphones separated by a large distance, thus eliminating much o= f the reverb and delay except that which comes off the ground. The worst ar= e generally those which have the mics on the same mount, but pointed in dif= ferent directions. I'm afraid you have all this backward (and no, it's not a subjective matter= ). A good place to start learning about the subject is the stereo miking de= mo created in the Caltech Music Lab, which has long been recognized as auth= oritative by well-known experts, and has been adopted by NPR Microphone Wor= kshops. As a service to the audio field, I've made it available on my label= at shop.PerformanceRecordings.com . -James Boyk Founder/Director, Caltech Music Lab 1979-2004 CV www.PerformanceRecordings.com/cv.html |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, August 18, 2013 5:53:03 AM UTC-7, wrote:
Stereo imaging is another topic. For live recorded music, your stereo impression is less that of the spread of the musicians, and more the specific delay and reverberation caused by the room's shape and audio impression. For music that is recorded in the studio, generally every instrument is mic'd separately and the stereo spread is whatever the engineer(s) decide.... The best stereo recordings I have heard were recorded out of doors, with the microphones separated by a large distance, thus eliminating much of the reverb and delay except that which comes off the ground. The worst are generally those which have the mics on the same mount, but pointed in different directions. This is counter to my experience. Frankly, recording music out-of-doors is fraught with difficulties. First of all, there is wind noise. It doesn't take much of a breeze to ruin a recording, and while wind "socks" help, they aren't 100% effective by any stretch of the imagination. Secondly, without any enclosure for the musicians, the amount of acoustical energy reaching the mikes is hugely attenuated. Thirdly, there is no reverb, so the music sounds dry and lifeless. and is definitely NOT something that I would want to listen to. Also, the idea that Blumlein-style microphone technique ("The worst are generally those which have the mics on the same mount, but pointed in different directions.") is somehow the worst type of microphone setup is as wrong as one can be. So called "purist" microphone placement (A-B, X-Y, M-S, ORTF, etc,) yields by FAR the best stereo sound stage and the best imaging (for speaker reproduction). I'm afraid you have all this backward (and no, it's not a subjective matter). That is quite correct. A good place to start learning about the subject is the stereo miking demo created in the Caltech Music Lab, which has long been recognized as authoritative by well-known experts, and has been adopted by NPR Microphone Workshops. As a service to the audio field, I've made it available on my label at shop.PerformanceRecordings.com . -James Boyk Thanks, I;ll take a look at it. Audio_Empire |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Industry rags | Pro Audio | |||
"Are Modern Recording Practices Damaging Music?" | Pro Audio | |||
Do we need science in subjective audio "reviewing"? | High End Audio | |||
Do we need science in subjective audio "reviewing"? | High End Audio | |||
Testing audio latency of modern operating systems | Pro Audio |