Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 7:38:40 AM UTC-8, Arny Krueger wrote:
"Audio_Empire" wrote in message ... However a better picture of the HK990's performance can be gleaned from this Stereophile test: http://tinyurl.com/c6s6kha You can probably get a set of Stereophile measurements for the Krell i300 from there as well. I didn't bother to look. Google says that there is no online Stereophile test of the Krell i300. The fact that you claimed that it probably exists suggests that you are actully so disinterested in this discussion that you can't be bothered to do even one small google search to support it. Why should I bother to respond further? That's up to you, I really don't care. I did state, up front that I didn't bother to look. Then you take me to task for not looking. What is that supposed to prove? If it's supposed to show that I'm really not that interested in the minutiae about these two amps when my sole purpose for mentioning them was to contrast how they had the same power rating using two different design philosophies, then you are being a champion of the incredibly obvious, here. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Brief History of CD DBTs | High End Audio | |||
Rx for DBTs in hobby magazines ... LOt"S ;-) | Audio Opinions | |||
A laundry-list of why DBTs are used | Audio Opinions | |||
Good old DBTs | Audio Opinions | |||
Power Conditioners - DBTs? | High End Audio |