Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DaveC writes:
Your drawing is wrong; signal goes to the inverting (-) inputs and the Vcc/2 reference goes to the non-inverting (+) inputs. JF Thanks guys. Fixed: http://i44.tinypic.com/r1k8qa.jpg All else looks good? You still have the signal go to the non-inverting input. The way the schematic is, U1-U3 will throw their output hard to a rail or oscillate with positive feedback from R13-R15. Are cap values reasonable? I added C8 & C9 out of habit of seeing in other designs. Values for these? I worry that the RC time constant would have the reference be not at the 1/2 way point while C8 charges on powerup. I don't see a C9. Might do something not so good to the subwoofer. |
#2
![]()
Posted to alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.design,sci.electronics.repair,rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You still have the signal go to the non-inverting input.
The current version of the drawing has signal going to the inverting input Are cap values reasonable? I added C8 & C9 out of habit of seeing in other designs. Values for these? I worry that the RC time constant would have the reference be not at the 1/2 way point while C8 charges on powerup. Suggestions? I don't see a C9. That means you're not looking at the right version of the drawing. Copy & paste this into a browser: http://i44.tinypic.com/r1k8qa.jpg Might do something not so good to the subwoofer. [M. Moroney] Suggestions? Thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|