Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 19:49:26 -0700, bob wrote
(in article ): On Nov 2, 7:22=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote: Forty years ago, vinyl was THE source of listener-owned music media. Today it has to compete with a myriad of other viable music sources. That's a sign of musical source diversity. Let's not oversell this. The moment vinyl faced serious competition it started losing market share. In the 80s, it was losing out not only to CD, but also to cassettes, for heaven's sake. It was dead. It's now back from the dead. That's something, but a 2% market share is nothing to crow about. It is certainly true that the compact cassette ate deeply into LP sales starting in the mid-seventies, which just went to show that most buyers valued convenience over performance (no matter what one thinks of LP as a music source, I think most knowledgeable audio/music enthusiasts would have to agree that decent vinyl performance is far better than was Philips cassette performance - even WITH Dolby B and HX Pro). I always found commercially available cassettes to sound lousy. Even on a Nakamichi 1000, they had much more wow and flutter than an LP, they were noisier than an LP and always sounded compressed. In short, they were lousy. snip All of them. Project. Music Hall, and Rega all make fine performing "high-end" turntables. There's no market for any other kind. I wouldn't call them "fine performing." But certain know-nothing reviewers have anointed them "high-end," and that's been enough. They have low wow/flutter, the arms are low mass/low friction and dynamically balanced, and they do a decent job of playing a record. Of course they don't elicit the last word in resolution from one's vinyl but they are better than any $89 direct-drive table from the 1980s. snip But there are scores of new ones that have taken their place. The absolute bottom tier is gone, that's true. There are no more cheap mass-market tables from the likes of Pioneer, Yamaha, Panasonic etc., Not those brands in particular, but the low end is still well- represented. Last time I was in Best Buy (a while ago), the only thing they carried was a sub-$100 Sony. It's still made, and has plenty of competition. Yes, it seems that cheap tables from Numark, Ion, and Sony are still available, but I must say that I've never seen one in a store. Numark tables show up from time-to-time in Music stores as "DJ equipment" however. Let's not forget that the only thing that kept vinyl alive in the 90s AT ALL was the DJ market. (And they were not using the hamster-powered belt drives of today's entry-level audiophile market.) The SL1200 is out of production, but several copycats are still out there. That was then, this is now. I never had a DD table that satisfied me, and I had a number of DD tables that were highly touted at the time. I don't remember their model numbers but I had the big, expensive Panasonic SP-10 as well as the top-of-the-line JVC QL-70 (among others) and I didn't like either. I believe that looking back, my favorite turntable, and the one I should have kept, was the Empire 598 "Troubadour". It was built like a tank, belt drive, with a sprung sub-chassis, had a nice big torque-y motor and an excellent mid-mass arm. My friends and I called it the "great gold idol". it was very imposing looking. With the Nakaoka heavy, lead-filled record mat fitted, it gave the most satisfying sound I think I ever heard from LP (although my later Mapleknoll Athena was close, it's requirement for a noisy aquarium pump and the concomitant difficulty in keeping the air properly proportioned between the SLT arm and the 'table's platter, made it a pain in the arse) What's really missing today is the p-mount, which brought acceptable and non-destructive reproduction to the masses. The indictment of the p-mount concept was that arguably, the highest quality P-mount cartridge ever sold (to my knowledge - who knows what was sold in Japan and never made available in the rest of the world) was the original Sumiko Bluepoint. There was no P-mount Koetsu, or Dynavector or even a P-mount Shure V-15 available. I'm not saying that this kind of standardization wasn't a good idea, it certainly was. But unfortunately, it looks as if it were too little, too late and only mass-market manufacturers embraced it. I don't remember one high-quality arm maker who had a P-mount arm. If I'm wrong here and disremember, please enlighten me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|