Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , bob
wrote: On Oct 25, 1:35*pm, Stephen McElroy wrote: In article , bob wrote: I think I'd prefer to trust an editor who's actually measured said piece of crap: http://www.stereophile.com/content/a...music-player-m... ts Money quote: "The iPod's measured behavior is better than many CD players" There may be other issues related to using an iPod as a source component, but the DAC is not one of them. That's assuming the current iPod uses the same DAC as the 2003 No, it's assuming the later iPods don't use a DAC that's appreciably worse. I know of no evidence that this is the case, nor any particular reason to believe it might be. There was a controversy. This guy did some measurements: http://homepage.mac.com/marc.heijlig...son/measuremen ts/measurements.html The many online discussions are anecdotal, of course. and that it's possible to get that clean DAC output without it being degraded by, say, headphone amps chips. Well, that has nothing to do with the claim that the DAC itself is "a piece of crap," now, does it? Whether it's true or not I don't know (and neither do you, apparently), though it's certainly more plausible than blaming the DAC. If the DAC is fine but the iPod sounds awful, I suppose that's a comfort. Stephen |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|