Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Patrick Turner wrote: On Jul 30, 2:28*pm, John Byrns wrote: I have one of these J.W.Miller TRF tuners. *To maintain constant bandwidth from the bottom to the top of the MW broadcast band the circuit Q of the coils must increase in proportion to the frequency, this can be accomplished by arranging the circuit so that series resistance, either part of the coil, or external, dominates the in circuit Q of the coil. *Then when coupled into band-pass pairs the product of the coupling factor k, and the Q, or kQ, must be kept constant across the MW band. *Since the Q is increasing with frequency the coupling coefficient k must be inversely proportional to frequency. *This is done by keeping the mutual coupling reactance constant across the band. *Unfortunately ordinary capacitors and inductors have reactance which varies with frequency. * This problem is solved by using a normal capacitor in series with an inverse capacitor who's reactance varies proportionally to frequency, the two "capacitors" approximating a constant capacitive reactance across the MW band. * The inverse capacitor is simulated by using the so called "negative mutual coupling coil", the center tapped coil that you describe which acts as the inverse capacitor in the mutual coupling circuit. I like the Miller tuner more than I like the other WE sets. But what you said in your concluding paragraph has an abundance of information which leaves the obscurity around the subject described at least highly persistant. I found the Q got higher at the low end of the BC band so in one radio I used two input coils and two gangs on one set so that each coil tuned each side of a centre F at the low end, and both together at the top end where whatever the Q was, it wasn't enough to cut sidebands much for the wanted 10kHz of AF BW. The two coils had their own copper can and were bits of ferrite rod and solid wire. The first had a loosely coupled input primary winding from a bittowire antenna, with the tuned winding coupling to the second tuned LC via a carbon comp R = 39k. Seemed to work just fine. But fluorescent lamps ruined reception and I changed to one hand made coil on a single ferrite rod. Audio HF remained OK and hum ****ed off, so I is 'appy wiff wotteye got now. I think you need to use Litz wire instead of solid wire to wind the coils, like the crystal set guys do, to get the required Q at the high end of the band. Then add a small series resistor to each coil to reduce the Q at the low end of the band; this series resistance has little effect at the high end of the band when variable capacitor tuning is used. Then you need to do some reading on filter theory to find out the proper way to couple the two coils. This approach will provide a flatter response, with less finicky alignment and lower losses than your ad hoc approach. -- Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://fmamradios.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Electron Tubes/ Vacuum Tubes/ radiotron/ RCA, GE, Tung-Sol , Vintage | Vacuum Tubes | |||
box of vacuum tubes for sale... | Vacuum Tubes | |||
F.S. : RCA 6L6/5881 vacuum tubes | Marketplace | |||
Vacuum tubes in vacuum | Vacuum Tubes |