Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/29/2011 7:31 PM, timewarp2008 wrote:
On May 29, 6:40 pm, "Bill wrote: vdubreeze wrote: Bill, the reason no one here can further work with you on this is simply that you have 75% of your "facts" wrong, so it's a dead end. The pizza guy is lying to your friend, or he is being misunderstood. Your friend is giving you way wrong information regarding the way BMI works, or maybe he is giving you a good explanation and you're not accepting the info properly. Whatever the reason, until you stop insisting that 2 + 2 = 5 and that the moon is made of green cheese not only will you get no help here but no one will take you seriously. Perhaps so. Here is a URL of some interesting music copyright legal cases. They neither reinforce my perspective nor yours, You should read the article more carefully. It clearly reinforces the perspectivse of vdubreeze, and everyone else who has stated that you have your facts wrong. There are numerous statements in the article that directly contradict your hallucinations and bizarre fake copyright information. For instance, the duration of copyrights, the role of BMI, and whether purchase of the sheet music entitles you to perform a copyrighted work for the customers at a commercial establishment. For starters. You should read and understand this article. It would be a good first step at correcting your gross misunderstanding of copyrights and performance rights. But somehow I suspect that you'll just keep kicking and screaming, because you obviously prefer whining to understanding and resolving the issues about which you whine. I await Mr. Graham quoting Dickens per; Mr. Bumble: "If the law supposes that, then the law is a ass, a idiot! [...]" == It seems that international law does complicate matters in that the US government has been served notice of violation of the Berne Convention because of the *Fairness in Music Licensing Act of 1998* allowing some "businesses" to play the radio without the need for a license. [Yes, over simplified.] == The law always lags cultural and technological advancements. Value of and compensation for intellectual property in arts and entertainment is one heck of a complex mess. == ....enough said, for now. Later... Ron Capik -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NY CD Blues | Pro Audio | |||
NY CD Blues | Tech | |||
HHB CD-R blues | Pro Audio | |||
Next-day blues | Pro Audio | |||
BLUES ON PBS | High End Audio |