Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcp6453 wrote:
Here are the mixers we're considering and a comment about each one. I realize that the comparisons are not apples to apples. A key consideration is aux outs. Mackie 1640i (Firewire and 6 aux outs, but costs almost as much as a Presonus) Presonus StudioLive 16.4.2 (Amazing features but not best reliability so far) Allen & Heath MixWizard3 16:2 (6 aux outs, 100mm faders) Behringer UFX1604 (Looks fantastic but unknown shipping date; also cheap) Any thoughts? Ergonomics and layout clarity wins. That - in my opinion - leaves you with the A&H. In this context the Behringer principle of one more button than the competition weighs against them, buttons are expensive, so they have to cut the cost of something else - perhaps the faders, perhaps the capacitors, perhaps all physical switches "less good". For a basement toy - sorry Behringer, but some of your cheaper mixers come across as such - that may not matter, but for a hard working desk it quite possibly does matter. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/11/2011 3:59 PM, Peter Larsen wrote:
mcp6453 wrote: Here are the mixers we're considering and a comment about each one. I realize that the comparisons are not apples to apples. A key consideration is aux outs. Mackie 1640i (Firewire and 6 aux outs, but costs almost as much as a Presonus) Presonus StudioLive 16.4.2 (Amazing features but not best reliability so far) Allen & Heath MixWizard3 16:2 (6 aux outs, 100mm faders) Behringer UFX1604 (Looks fantastic but unknown shipping date; also cheap) Any thoughts? Ergonomics and layout clarity wins. That - in my opinion - leaves you with the A&H. In this context the Behringer principle of one more button than the competition weighs against them, buttons are expensive, so they have to cut the cost of something else - perhaps the faders, perhaps the capacitors, perhaps all physical switches "less good". For a basement toy - sorry Behringer, but some of your cheaper mixers come across as such - that may not matter, but for a hard working desk it quite possibly does matter. Thanks for the input. I've never touch an A&H, but the reviews are usually pretty good. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcp6453 wrote:
Thanks for the input. I've never touch an A&H, but the reviews are usually pretty good. Take a look - and a listen - also at a Soundcraft Spirit M8, from the product info it could be nicer to work with than all of those you asked about. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/13/2011 3:21 AM, Peter Larsen wrote:
mcp6453 wrote: Thanks for the input. I've never touch an A&H, but the reviews are usually pretty good. Take a look - and a listen - also at a Soundcraft Spirit M8, from the product info it could be nicer to work with than all of those you asked about. The Spirit only has 4 aux sends, and two of them are pre-fader. The Mackie 1640i has 6 aux sends with all 6 switchable pre or post. The Mackie seems to be the winner at the moment, but I'm so turned off by the headroom problem on the 1402-VLZ Pro that I'm hesitant to purchase a Mackie. If I had room for it, I would dig out my Tascam M520. Problem solved. The darned thing is too big for my studio. (Does anybody know where I can get knobs for it? Some have been lost in moving. That is really annoying.) |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcp6453 wrote:
On 5/13/2011 3:21 AM, Peter Larsen wrote: mcp6453 wrote: Thanks for the input. I've never touch an A&H, but the reviews are usually pretty good. Take a look - and a listen - also at a Soundcraft Spirit M8, from the product info it could be nicer to work with than all of those you asked about. The Spirit only has 4 aux sends, and two of them are pre-fader. The Mackie 1640i has 6 aux sends with all 6 switchable pre or post. The Mackie seems to be the winner at the moment, but I'm so turned off by the headroom problem on the 1402-VLZ Pro that I'm hesitant to purchase a Mackie. If I had room for it, I would dig out my Tascam M520. Problem solved. The darned thing is too big for my studio. (Does anybody know where I can get knobs for it? Some have been lost in moving. That is really annoying.) http://www.teac.com/ |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcp6453 wrote:
On 5/13/2011 3:21 AM, Peter Larsen wrote: mcp6453 wrote: Thanks for the input. I've never touch an A&H, but the reviews are usually pretty good. Take a look - and a listen - also at a Soundcraft Spirit M8, from the product info it could be nicer to work with than all of those you asked about. The Spirit only has 4 aux sends, and two of them are pre-fader. The Mackie 1640i has 6 aux sends with all 6 switchable pre or post. The Mackie seems to be the winner at the moment, but I'm so turned off by the headroom problem on the 1402-VLZ Pro that I'm hesitant to purchase a Mackie. If I had room for it, I would dig out my Tascam M520. Problem solved. The darned thing is too big for my studio. (Does anybody know where I can get knobs for it? Some have been lost in moving. That is really annoying.) http://www.teac.com/ |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/20/2011 10:31 PM, mcp6453 wrote:
The Spirit only has 4 aux sends, and two of them are pre-fader. The Mackie 1640i has 6 aux sends with all 6 switchable pre or post. The Mackie seems to be the winner at the moment, but I'm so turned off by the headroom problem on the 1402-VLZ Pro that I'm hesitant to purchase a Mackie. First, there's no headroom problem with the VLZ if you use it correctly (like the manual says). But knowing that people don't read manuals and will forget about safe gain setting in the heat of the moment, the VLZ3 borrowed some tricks from the Onyx and they reduced the internal level of the mixer, making it up at the output since quieter parts are available now. If I had room for it, I would dig out my Tascam M520. Problem solved. The darned thing is too big for my studio. Do you know how big a 1640i is? It's pretty big, too. Not so wide, but deeeeeeep! -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Webcasting Mixer | Pro Audio | |||
FA:Altec 1567A tube mic preamp mixer, 352A mixer/comp etc. | Pro Audio | |||
WTB Soundtracs Mixer Solo Logic/Midi whole Mixer or some channels. | Pro Audio | |||
British Ram Mixer on Ebay...My Bloody Valentine Mixer? | Pro Audio | |||
FA: Custom Analog DAW Summing Mixer/8 into 2 stereo line mixer | Pro Audio |