Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
Peter Larsen[_3_] Peter Larsen[_3_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,295
Default Shoeps CMC641 suboptimal? It happens.

Carey Carlan wrote:

With the capsules at extreme angles and 18" apart I get a surprising


distance makes sense, but I always keep omni's parallel so as to get the
same image of the rearmost center in both, otherwise the room sound to me
tends to split into a Y.

amount of stereo field. For that matter, as close as I was to such a
big group, that's probably as much spread as I could want.


Omni's vs. subcardioid vs. cardioid is very much about how much audience
and/or room noise is acceptable but also about depth clarity, some of the
time omni pairs work better for large ensembles than for small ensembles.

Kind regards

Peter Larsen



Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T.H.E. vs Shoeps arrangeit Pro Audio 78 October 3rd 12 09:11 PM
Who had the cmc641 for sale? Ty Ford Pro Audio 2 March 25th 09 10:55 PM
CMC641 as male and female VO mic Ty Ford Pro Audio 7 June 12th 07 02:46 AM
Cut 1 filter for Schoeps CMC641 Bryan Beasleigh Pro Audio 2 February 27th 04 02:03 AM
wtb: Schoeps CMC641 xybor Pro Audio 10 July 29th 03 07:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"