Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 28, 3:50=A0am, "C. Leeds" wrote:
On 3/27/2011 10:43 AM, Audio Empire wrote: the hyperbole is a journalistic "device" and the universal WE doesn't mean ANYTHING except as an opening line. =A0It's n= ot meant to be taken literally... Please explain how, as a journalist, you use this "device" of hyperbole. Please explain how a reader is to distinguish your hyperbole from other statements you expect us to accept as factual. Did you employ this hyperbolic "device" when you worked as an equipment reviewer? I hope he did. Hyperbole is a pretty common device in critical review of any and all things subjective. It's on the readers to understand this commonly used device. If one wishes to be boring as a reviewer hyperbole should be avoided at all costs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
FS: Vintage Audio Tubes and other Vintage Electronic Parts | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Semi OT - vintage amplifier for vintage system? | Vacuum Tubes |