Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 4, 2:35=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote:
But we still don't have proof that DBTs are reliable for audio, we just assume they are because they work so well for other kinds of bias-control= led testing. To the contrary, we have proof that nothing *except* DBTs are reliable for audio. bob |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:24:35 -0800, bob wrote
(in article ): On Mar 4, 2:35=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote: But we still don't have proof that DBTs are reliable for audio, we just assume they are because they work so well for other kinds of bias-control= led testing. To the contrary, we have proof that nothing *except* DBTs are reliable for audio. bob Really, how do we prove that? With DBTs? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another perspective | Car Audio | |||
fm tuners (another perspective) | High End Audio | |||
A Different Perspective on current events | Pro Audio | |||
'Billion' in perspective. | Marketplace |