Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry Lavo wrote:
"Arny Krueger" wrote in message ... "Scott" wrote in message snip (Or) how silly or not silly the writers at Stereophile or TAS look? The adulation of die-hard LP adherents some 27 years more or less after being totally and utterly obsoleced by the audio CD was clearly stoked by these writers. Advertisers paid these jounals hard, cold cash for advertisements based on their ability to encourge possibly otherwise sensible people to spend and spend on meaningless "upgrades" again and again. snip You are aware that at the time CD's were released that The Abso!ute Sound still was being published with no manufacturer's advertising, are you not? And five years later it was still accepting ads only from dealers, not manufacturers. If you are not aware, then stop slandering the audiophile press. Early CD's on early CD equipment were often unlistenable to many audiophiles. I have in my possession some of the promo copies of the first CD releases...The King and I, among others. On my 1989 Phillips CD player it was literally unlistenable and sounded like it was being played back through a kazoo (and I only exagerate slightly). Most didn't sound that bad, but digital glare was much in evidence. Digital glare, Harry, or just naive digital mastering? There was a learning curve involved in the latter, you know. -- -S We have it in our power to begin the world over again - Thomas Paine |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another perspective | Car Audio | |||
fm tuners (another perspective) | High End Audio | |||
A Different Perspective on current events | Pro Audio | |||
'Billion' in perspective. | Marketplace |