Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Steven Sullivan Steven Sullivan is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,268
Default LP vs CD - Again. Another Perspective

Scott wrote:
On Feb 4, 6:47?pm, bob wrote:
On Feb 4, 2:11=A0pm, Audio Empire wrote:



Many of these "classic" analog recordings from the 'golden era' of stereo
(before recording got so complicated with multt-miking and multi-track an=

d
ruined the sound) HAVE be digitized but with varying success. For instanc=

e,
many of the RCA Red Seal Shaded Dogs have been digitized several times by
BMG/RCA with varying success. Certainly, the most ambitious project was w=

hen
RCA/BMG released more than 100 titles as hybrid SACDs. None sound as good=

?as
the LPs released by Classics records


And is that because of better mastering, or the euphonic distortions
that the vinyl offers? The former maybe, the latter definitely.

and, in fact, the SACDs don't even sound
as good as the JVC XRCD releases of the same titles,


Not surprising. There quite a bit of evidence that the 2-channel
layers are often treated as an afterthought.

and XRCD is Red Book,
not SACD or DVD-A or Blu-Ray or any other high-resolution digital release
format.


Which, as we know, wouldn't make an audible difference anyway.



So, what it comes down to is what I said before. These LP titles have
a reputation for being good sounding LPs and it's what the dyed-in-the-wo=

ol
vinyl-phile wants. So that's what gets remastered (perhaps at 45 RPM) and
pressed on heavy 180 or 200 gram virgin vinyl sometimes as single -sided
records. =A0


I guess another way of asking the question I've been raising is, why
are there so many died-in-the-wool vinylphiles today?


You've pretty much answered the question for yourself. " And is that
because of better mastering, and the euphonic distortions.


that could be an 'or' rather than an 'and'


Why would that make a difference? The results are what they are
regardless of why. Better sound is better sound regardless of how you
get there.



If the judgement of 'better sound' is significantly influenced by knowledge of,
and bias for or against, the format being listened to, is it really better *sound*?



--
-S
We have it in our power to begin the world over again - Thomas Paine

Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another perspective Edward M. Kennedy[_2_] Car Audio 0 December 25th 07 08:53 PM
fm tuners (another perspective) michael High End Audio 9 March 22nd 05 12:59 AM
A Different Perspective on current events paul Pro Audio 2 July 4th 04 01:26 AM
'Billion' in perspective. Ron Marketplace 5 September 13th 03 03:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"