Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter
2011. Come and get 'em. NAMM: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf CES: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:33:14 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote:
I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. Thanks! NAMM: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ namm_winter2011_report.pdf I thought you invented the Fairlight CMI re-release to see if people were paying attention. But it's real! Wow. It's interesting that they are keeping the user interface the same as the original too. And now I read on to find TASCAM have released a software version of their 1984 portastudio 4-track for the iPad. I wonder if it simulates occasionally chewing the tape? It seems creative limitations are in fashion! CES: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "philicorda" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:33:14 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote: I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. Thanks! NAMM: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/ namm_winter2011_report.pdf I thought you invented the Fairlight CMI re-release to see if people were paying attention. But it's real! Wow. It's interesting that they are keeping the user interface the same as the original too. And now I read on to find TASCAM have released a software version of their 1984 portastudio 4-track for the iPad. I wonder if it simulates occasionally chewing the tape? .....and does it have dbx noise reduction ?! Poly |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message ... I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. NAMM: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf Excellent! And thank you. Almost makes me feel like I'm there..... (but my 3rd encounter of the day with the snowshovel reminds me that I'm not) Poly |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 25, 9:33*am, Mike Rivers wrote:
I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. NAMM:http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre..._winter2011_re... CES:http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com- useful and interesting audio stuff You've been a busy man! Thanks for this - I particularly like the stomach Steinway but I don't think the natives here will give up their traditional ones. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well done as usual Mike. Thanks to your posts maybe I don't need to go to
NAMM anymore? Neil R "Danny T" wrote in message ... On Jan 25, 9:33 am, Mike Rivers wrote: I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. NAMM:http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre..._winter2011_re... CES:http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com- useful and interesting audio stuff You've been a busy man! Thanks for this - I particularly like the stomach Steinway but I don't think the natives here will give up their traditional ones. |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/25/2011 11:58 AM, polymod wrote:
And now I read on to find TASCAM have released a software version of their 1984 portastudio 4-track for the iPad. I wonder if it simulates occasionally chewing the tape? ....and does it have dbx noise reduction ?! Artifacts? You want artifacts? I expect you can get it to export an MP3 file. g I don't think the UA Studer A-800 plug-in has a flutter adjustment, but I remember seeing somebody's tape simulator that did. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rivers wrote:
On 1/25/2011 11:58 AM, polymod wrote: And now I read on to find TASCAM have released a software version of their 1984 portastudio 4-track for the iPad. I wonder if it simulates occasionally chewing the tape? ....and does it have dbx noise reduction ?! Artifacts? You want artifacts? I expect you can get it to export an MP3 file. g I don't think the UA Studer A-800 plug-in has a flutter adjustment, but I remember seeing somebody's tape simulator that did. Enter the number of layers of splicing tape wrapped around the capstan: [0] --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/25/2011 12:38 PM, Neil Rutman wrote:
Well done as usual Mike. Thanks to your posts maybe I don't need to go to NAMM anymore? NAMM wouldn't like me very much if I promoted that reaction from everyone. For a few years when I was writing fairly regularly for magazines, I didn't do formal show reports since mostly I was looking for things to write about or review. But now that business has pretty much dried up (the magazines that still cover the shows do it with their own editorial staff, not outside writers like me) I go with the idea of looking for stuff to review or write about. I have to maintain a good enough reputation so that companies will send me stuff to play with even though I don't have a corporation behind me. And then, what I write doesn't, at least not yet, have circulation in the tens of thousands like the magazines. And I haven't figured out how to make it pay, either. I don't want to take ads for stuff that I might be writing about. Maybe some unrelated place with lots of money like Target or Apple will decide that it's a good idea to have reports like this and more detailed product reviews than most magazines publish, and will give me a generous grant. Some time I'd like to stay some place nicer than the Travelodge and eat some place other than Denny's when I go to these shows. g -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:38:27 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote
(in article ): On 1/25/2011 12:38 PM, Neil Rutman wrote: Well done as usual Mike. Thanks to your posts maybe I don't need to go to NAMM anymore? NAMM wouldn't like me very much if I promoted that reaction from everyone. For a few years when I was writing fairly regularly for magazines, I didn't do formal show reports since mostly I was looking for things to write about or review. But now that business has pretty much dried up (the magazines that still cover the shows do it with their own editorial staff, not outside writers like me) I go with the idea of looking for stuff to review or write about. I have to maintain a good enough reputation so that companies will send me stuff to play with even though I don't have a corporation behind me. And then, what I write doesn't, at least not yet, have circulation in the tens of thousands like the magazines. And I haven't figured out how to make it pay, either. I don't want to take ads for stuff that I might be writing about. Maybe some unrelated place with lots of money like Target or Apple will decide that it's a good idea to have reports like this and more detailed product reviews than most magazines publish, and will give me a generous grant. Some time I'd like to stay some place nicer than the Travelodge and eat some place other than Denny's when I go to these shows. g Wow! A little bitter? Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:33:14 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote
(in article ): I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. NAMM: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf CES: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf Thanks for spending your pension on travel for us, Mike. Was that a government job? I forget. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty Ford wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:38:27 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote (in article ): On 1/25/2011 12:38 PM, Neil Rutman wrote: Well done as usual Mike. Thanks to your posts maybe I don't need to go to NAMM anymore? NAMM wouldn't like me very much if I promoted that reaction from everyone. For a few years when I was writing fairly regularly for magazines, I didn't do formal show reports since mostly I was looking for things to write about or review. But now that business has pretty much dried up (the magazines that still cover the shows do it with their own editorial staff, not outside writers like me) I go with the idea of looking for stuff to review or write about. I have to maintain a good enough reputation so that companies will send me stuff to play with even though I don't have a corporation behind me. And then, what I write doesn't, at least not yet, have circulation in the tens of thousands like the magazines. And I haven't figured out how to make it pay, either. I don't want to take ads for stuff that I might be writing about. Maybe some unrelated place with lots of money like Target or Apple will decide that it's a good idea to have reports like this and more detailed product reviews than most magazines publish, and will give me a generous grant. Some time I'd like to stay some place nicer than the Travelodge and eat some place other than Denny's when I go to these shows. g Wow! A little bitter? Ty Ford I think not. Mike's a fine writer and a great reviewer, and IMO, it pretty much sucks if there's not a viable market for his writing. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty Ford wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:33:14 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote (in article ): I've posted my consolidated NAMM and CES reports for Winter 2011. Come and get 'em. NAMM: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf CES: http://mikeriversaudio.files.wordpre...011_report.pdf Thanks for spending your pension on travel for us, Mike. Was that a government job? I forget. He retired from an engineering job with the FAA. When you land safely, thank him. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/26/2011 5:04 PM, Ty Ford wrote:
Thanks for spending your pension on travel for us, Mike. Was that a government job? I forget. Ty, you don't need to read them if theyt bore you. But I really would like to find an alternate to magazines to pick up a little spending money. If you have any good suggestions, let me know. Otherwise, I'll just continue to show my brilliance and great insight, and hope that maybe someone notices, appreciates it, and maybe, just maybe, asks me to cover a show for a web site that pays for content. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio" - John Watkinson Drop by http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com now and then |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:23:53 -0500, hank alrich wrote
(in article ): Ty Ford wrote: On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:38:27 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote (in article ): On 1/25/2011 12:38 PM, Neil Rutman wrote: Well done as usual Mike. Thanks to your posts maybe I don't need to go to NAMM anymore? NAMM wouldn't like me very much if I promoted that reaction from everyone. For a few years when I was writing fairly regularly for magazines, I didn't do formal show reports since mostly I was looking for things to write about or review. But now that business has pretty much dried up (the magazines that still cover the shows do it with their own editorial staff, not outside writers like me) I go with the idea of looking for stuff to review or write about. I have to maintain a good enough reputation so that companies will send me stuff to play with even though I don't have a corporation behind me. And then, what I write doesn't, at least not yet, have circulation in the tens of thousands like the magazines. And I haven't figured out how to make it pay, either. I don't want to take ads for stuff that I might be writing about. Maybe some unrelated place with lots of money like Target or Apple will decide that it's a good idea to have reports like this and more detailed product reviews than most magazines publish, and will give me a generous grant. Some time I'd like to stay some place nicer than the Travelodge and eat some place other than Denny's when I go to these shows. g Wow! A little bitter? Ty Ford I think not. Mike's a fine writer and a great reviewer, and IMO, it pretty much sucks if there's not a viable market for his writing. I've known Mike a lot longer than I've know you, Hank. Ty --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:56:22 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote
(in article ): On 1/26/2011 5:04 PM, Ty Ford wrote: Thanks for spending your pension on travel for us, Mike. Was that a government job? I forget. Ty, you don't need to read them if theyt bore you. But I really would like to find an alternate to magazines to pick up a little spending money. If you have any good suggestions, let me know. Otherwise, I'll just continue to show my brilliance and great insight, and hope that maybe someone notices, appreciates it, and maybe, just maybe, asks me to cover a show for a web site that pays for content. Wasn't it me who introduced you to RW and PAR? Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/28/2011 12:36 PM, Ty Ford wrote:
Wasn't it me who introduced you to RW and PAR? I'm not sure you introduced me, but we did talk about other magazines when I was writing for Recording. I bought lunch. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rivers" wrote in message ... On 1/28/2011 12:36 PM, Ty Ford wrote: Wasn't it me who introduced you to RW and PAR? I'm not sure you introduced me, but we did talk about other magazines when I was writing for Recording. I bought lunch. at Denny's? ![]() Poly |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:05:16 -0500, Mike Rivers wrote
(in article ): On 1/28/2011 12:36 PM, Ty Ford wrote: Wasn't it me who introduced you to RW and PAR? I'm not sure you introduced me, but we did talk about other magazines when I was writing for Recording. I bought lunch. pretty sure it was me. Ty --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/31/2011 12:12 PM, Ty Ford wrote:
Wasn't it me who introduced you to RW and PAR? pretty sure it was me. Well, then, thanks. Actually. my first published article was a NAMM show report in Radio World. Greg Lukens was talking with the editor shortly after the show and mentioned my report to him. It was probably on the MIDILink Network. Can't even remember what year. I was bugging John Gatski for a couple of years before he invited me to write my first article for PAR - the 2006 Summer NAMM show in Austin. -- "Today's production equipment is IT based and cannot be operated without a passing knowledge of computing, although it seems that it can be operated without a passing knowledge of audio." - John Watkinson http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com - useful and interesting audio stuff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
June Audio review + Show Reports Now Onlne | High End Audio | |||
May Equip. Reviews + FSI & Munich Show Reports + More! | High End Audio | |||
NAMM Show | Pro Audio | |||
.NYC & Munich Audiophile Show Reports. | High End Audio | |||
CES and Home Entertainment Show - Seeking High-End Audio Reports | High End Audio |