Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A common configuration for an output transformer secondary (a la Dynaco)
is C-4-8-16. The four ohm tap is roughly the mid-point of secondary. If you connect one 4 ohm load from C-4 and then another 4 ohm load from 4-16, what would the overall load look like to the output stage? Would it make a difference if you ground the 4 ohm tap instead of C? This could be an interesting way to bi-wire a speaker. What do RATs think? - Paul |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 16, 6:19*pm, "Paul D. Spiegel" wrote:
A common configuration for an output transformer secondary (a la Dynaco) is C-4-8-16. *The four ohm tap is roughly the mid-point of secondary. If you connect one 4 ohm load from C-4 and then another 4 ohm load from 4-16, what would the overall load look like to the output stage? *Would it make a difference if you ground the 4 ohm tap instead of C? Let me assume you have a pair of full range speakers, each 4 ohms. The use of a full range 4 ohm speaker across C-4 gives the amp a 4 ohm load. If anotherfull range 4 ohm speaker is connected across 4-16, then you have 2 x 4 ohm speakers in parallel and the load is 2 ohms. Maybe your Dynaco will smoke a bit. But suppose you have ONE 4 ohm speaker but there is a 4 ohm bass and a 4 ohm treble with separate inputs. You could connect the bass C-4, and the treble 4-16, and because the bandwidth of each speaker does not include the bandwidth of the other, then the amp has a 4 ohm load and is loaded identically to if you had one full range speaker C-4. When connecting any speaker to C-4, only 1/2 of the secondary winding is used to produce speaker current so secondary winding resistance losses are high compared to using say 16 ohms across C-16 when losses are at the minimum. By using bass C-4 and treble 4-16, the losses will be reduced slightly because treble energy is produced by a winding which is otherwise not used to make power. Because the treble power above 1 kHz is maybe only 20% of the bass power below 1kHz the use of all the windings does not reduce winding losses very much, maybe -10% only - and you will not hear the slightest improvement to the sound. Patrick Turner. This could be an interesting way to bi-wire a speaker. What do RATs think? *- Paul |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul D. Spiegel wrote:
A common configuration for an output transformer secondary (a la Dynaco) is C-4-8-16. The four ohm tap is roughly the mid-point of secondary. If you connect one 4 ohm load from C-4 and then another 4 ohm load from 4-16, what would the overall load look like to the output stage? Would it make a difference if you ground the 4 ohm tap instead of C? This could be an interesting way to bi-wire a speaker. What do RATs think? Essentially you'd be connecting one amp to two speakers in parallel. To retain the design load on the output stage, you would need to use two 8ohm speakers. Considering this group is not quite yet pro.test-tone.tubes, remarks about using speakers with different frequency ranges are spurious. Here's a maths exercise. Let's say you have one speaker that's 4ohms up to 2kHz and infinite impedance beyond, and another speaker that's infinite impedance below 2kHz and 4ohms beyond. Connect these as you suggest. What is the resulting impedance for a 1kHz tone? For a 3kHz tone? For a signal that combines 1kHz and 3kHz equally? For music? Answers on postcard marked "red herring". Where's your feedback connected? Assuming you have global feedback, it would be best connected to a point common to both speakers. You can't do that with a centre tap transformer whilst still utilizing all the windings. If the two secondaries were separate, you could. Ian |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.tubes
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/15/10 23:19, Paul D. Spiegel so witilly quipped:
A common configuration for an output transformer secondary (a la Dynaco) is C-4-8-16. The four ohm tap is roughly the mid-point of secondary. If you connect one 4 ohm load from C-4 and then another 4 ohm load from 4-16, what would the overall load look like to the output stage? Would it make a difference if you ground the 4 ohm tap instead of C? This could be an interesting way to bi-wire a speaker. What do RATs think? transformers and beam-power pentodes are expensive. I suggest NOT doing that. Your total load will be twice that of a 4 ohm load on the 4 ohm tap because you're loading it TWICE instead of once. The end result at full power would be pink plates and possible burnt windings. The magic blue smoke won't go back in, by the way. You'll have to get "a new one" (whatever blows up first). You could wire ONE of the speakers on 4-16 but I see no reason why you would want to. Instead, wire the speakers in series and use the 8 ohm tap, or (if whoofer/tweeter) use series crossover cap/coil and phase invert the tweeter. Or keep on hand a stock of tubes, transformers, filter chokes, and solder. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
McCain Taps Palin | Audio Opinions | |||
what the heck! DC on secondary?? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Ground your secondary winding | Vacuum Tubes | |||
PT HV secondary | Vacuum Tubes | |||
ElectroPrint TM3KB (w/UL taps) output xforms for sale | Marketplace |