Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio Empire Audio Empire is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,193
Default Active vs. passive pre-amp

On Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:09:55 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):

"Audio Empire" wrote in message

On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 10:36:51 -0700, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):


"Dave Cook" wrote in message


I also tried measure the Vrms output from the amp with
a voltmeter, But mine does not seem to be accurate over
1kHz or so.

Most general use voltmeters are that way. Their major
purpose in life is measuring 50 or 60 Hz power.

Just use a 400 Hz test tone!


It's better than acoustic.


Far better. There really is no such thing as 0.1 dB accuracy or resolution
with acoustic measurements. Have someone else walk round the room, or simply
wait for the air currents and temperatures to redistribute themselves, and
you will measure a different number.

Acoustic measurements with pure continuous tones haven't been used by
professionals for decades. The first refinement was to start using swept
tones, and the second refinement was using spectrum analyzers to measure
artificially generated noise.


Besides, absolute accuracy is
not important here, anyway. What's important is RELATIVE
accuracy. I.E. that the meter read EXACTLY the same for
all of the units under test with the same 400 Hz TONE,
and that the scale can be sufficiently expanded to get
the outputs as close one another as possible.


Agreed. Matching is of the essence, not absolute frequency response.

Most cheap digital voltmeters are already a dB or more down at 1 KHz. But
they can generally be used for comparisons up to about 10 KHz or more. The
frequency response of DVMs is not always specified. I have two DVMs - a
Fluke and a Protek, that are flat within a few tenths of a dB up to 20 KHz.
The rest are not really audio instruments, but I could and have used them
for level matching.

Good frequency response is actually a distraction when you are metering the
power line and batteries, which is what most people use DVMs for.



Yep. But like you say, good frequency response or accuracy are not important
here, but repeatability is. Still, in all, I consider my E-Bay purchase of an
HP-400E to be about the best $15 I ever spent on audio (and my Behringer
cable-tester box with the built-in 400 Hz and 1KHz oscillator was the best
$30 I ever spent on an audio device - BTW, If you don't have one, American
Musical Supply is selling these puppies fro $21! )

 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Active vs Passive monitors muzician21 Pro Audio 39 June 1st 09 01:16 PM
Passive or active bi-amping (aka active operation) Jerry High End Audio 56 August 29th 06 12:28 AM
passive or active crossovers smoove Car Audio 7 June 10th 05 07:21 AM
active or passive sub? simon Audio Opinions 1 May 6th 05 06:38 PM
subwoofer-passive or active and more... s.pl Tech 5 October 17th 04 11:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"