Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neumann TLM 103 or AKG 414?
i do home recording on a yamaha AW16G (for now). i want i decent mic mostly for vox, but also acoustic instruments. each of these is in my budget. i've read the specs, but can someone who knows these mics make a recommendation (without jumping off into over-my-headsville). i've been recording for several years, but still have much to learn. my best (most expensive mics) are EV RE20 and AKG C3000 (the older black one). i like the AKG for acoustic guitar and upright bass, but some folks have commented that it gives a harsh tone. i have a rode NT1-A that i like pretty well. i have several different stereo preamps, but all in the $200-300 range (presonus, beringer, ART). i appreciate the input. |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:55:04 -0700 (PDT), mcnews
wrote: Neumann TLM 103 or AKG 414? i do home recording on a yamaha AW16G (for now). i want i decent mic mostly for vox, but also acoustic instruments. each of these is in my budget. i've read the specs, but can someone who knows these mics make a recommendation (without jumping off into over-my-headsville). i've been recording for several years, but still have much to learn. my best (most expensive mics) are EV RE20 and AKG C3000 (the older black one). i like the AKG for acoustic guitar and upright bass, but some folks have commented that it gives a harsh tone. i have a rode NT1-A that i like pretty well. i have several different stereo preamps, but all in the $200-300 range (presonus, beringer, ART). i appreciate the input. For most home situations I would say forget the mic. Whatever you are using right now are either good or can be corrected once recorded. Spend your money on acoustic treatment for the room. The rewards will be tenfold greater. d |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 16, 2:08*pm, (Don Pearce) wrote:
For most home situations I would say forget the mic. Whatever you are using right now are either good or can be corrected once recorded. Spend your money on acoustic treatment for the room. The rewards will be tenfold greater. I partly agree with Don. Budget for a TLM 103 or a 414. Then go buy a Neumann TLM 102 (which I like better than either the 103 or 414) and use the money you save for room treatment. And, eventually, a better preamp, at least at the Real Nice Preamp level. Peace, Paul |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcnews wrote:
Neumann TLM 103 or AKG 414? i do home recording on a yamaha AW16G (for now). i want i decent mic mostly for vox, but also acoustic instruments. each of these is in my budget. i've read the specs, but can someone who knows these mics make a recommendation (without jumping off into over-my-headsville). i've been recording for several years, but still have much to learn. my best (most expensive mics) are EV RE20 and AKG C3000 (the older black one). i like the AKG for acoustic guitar and upright bass, but some folks have commented that it gives a harsh tone. i have a rode NT1-A that i like pretty well. i have several different stereo preamps, but all in the $200-300 range (presonus, beringer, ART). i appreciate the input. Those are two very different mics, one multi-pattern generally intended for studio use, and the other single pattern intended for stage vocals. Given that and no other considerations I'd say get the AKG. However... Note that the RE20 is quite an excellent vocal mic. I'd say sell the C3000 and buy a Josephson C42 for instruments. Spend the difference on a better preamp, specifically the FMR RNP, which is two channels for under $500. Work with the RE20 and the C42 and the RNP until you know you're getting the most from them and then add to yoru kit if you feel the need. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mcnews wrote:
Neumann TLM 103 or AKG 414? They are both good mikes but they sound different. i do home recording on a yamaha AW16G (for now). i want i decent mic mostly for vox, but also acoustic instruments. each of these is in my budget. i've read the specs, but can someone who knows these mics make a recommendation (without jumping off into over-my-headsville). i've been recording for several years, but still have much to learn. my best (most expensive mics) are EV RE20 and AKG C3000 (the older black one). i like the AKG for acoustic guitar and upright bass, but some folks have commented that it gives a harsh tone. i have a rode NT1-A that i like pretty well. i have several different stereo preamps, but all in the $200-300 range (presonus, beringer, ART). i appreciate the input. Go find a legitimate dealer that will let you audition the mikes on your own voice so you can make a decision. Also, be aware that the various mikes in the AKG 414 series sound totally different... I never liked the common B/ULS, but the original 414TL is much more to my taste. Then again, the TL II is a third mike entirely (which I like less than any of the others). I don't think you'll go wrong with any of them, and I think you can find a good deal on any of them used also. But I think you need to give a listen to them. I'll say that it's hard to beat the RE-20 that you already have for versatility... the RE-20 works pretty well on any vocal. It's seldom the best mike on a given voice for a given style, but it's never a bad one. The older C3000 is not as harsh as the C3000B, but it's still harsher than I like. If you like it, you might find the 414 B/ULS is like a cleaner version of that kind of sound. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PStamler" wrote in message ... On Sep 16, 2:08 pm, (Don Pearce) wrote: For most home situations I would say forget the mic. Whatever you are using right now are either good or can be corrected once recorded. Spend your money on acoustic treatment for the room. The rewards will be tenfold greater. I partly agree with Don. Budget for a TLM 103 or a 414. Then go buy a Neumann TLM 102 (which I like better than either the 103 or 414) and use the money you save for room treatment. And, eventually, a better preamp, at least at the Real Nice Preamp level. i like this advice. my recording environment is a low ceiling cinder block on two sides basement with hanging airducts and lead water pipes. tips? |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:29:28 -0400, "mcnewsxp"
wrote: "PStamler" wrote in message ... On Sep 16, 2:08 pm, (Don Pearce) wrote: For most home situations I would say forget the mic. Whatever you are using right now are either good or can be corrected once recorded. Spend your money on acoustic treatment for the room. The rewards will be tenfold greater. I partly agree with Don. Budget for a TLM 103 or a 414. Then go buy a Neumann TLM 102 (which I like better than either the 103 or 414) and use the money you save for room treatment. And, eventually, a better preamp, at least at the Real Nice Preamp level. i like this advice. my recording environment is a low ceiling cinder block on two sides basement with hanging airducts and lead water pipes. tips? Don't lick the water pipes. Visit Ethan's site on http://www.realtraps.com/ for some really good info on treating rooms. Even if you don't buy what he sells, you will find out how to do it for yourself. d |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:55:04 -0400, mcnews wrote
(in article ): Neumann TLM 103 or AKG 414? i do home recording on a yamaha AW16G (for now). i want i decent mic mostly for vox, but also acoustic instruments. each of these is in my budget. i've read the specs, but can someone who knows these mics make a recommendation (without jumping off into over-my-headsville). i've been recording for several years, but still have much to learn. my best (most expensive mics) are EV RE20 and AKG C3000 (the older black one). i like the AKG for acoustic guitar and upright bass, but some folks have commented that it gives a harsh tone. i have a rode NT1-A that i like pretty well. i have several different stereo preamps, but all in the $200-300 range (presonus, beringer, ART). i appreciate the input. Both the 103 and whichever version of the 414 are finicky about what preamp they like. The 414 is multi-pattern, the 103 is cardioid only. Other patterns are handy. Both like a good room. I DO like the TLM 102. It's a very good mic and very neutral, as in not as bright as the other two, and less expensive. Cardioid only. If you like the NT1-a you may also like the Marshall MCA SP-1. You simply can't go wrong for $50. http://www.pssl.com/MXL-SP1-Condense...hone-With-Clip Really. Regards, Ty Ford --Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services Acting and Voiceover Demos http://www.tyford.com Guitar player?:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWaPRHMGhGA |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 17, 7:29*am, "mcnewsxp" wrote:
"PStamler" wrote in message ... On Sep 16, 2:08 pm, (Don Pearce) wrote: For most home situations I would say forget the mic. Whatever you are using right now are either good or can be corrected once recorded. Spend your money on acoustic treatment for the room. The rewards will be tenfold greater. I partly agree with Don. Budget for a TLM 103 or a 414. Then go buy a Neumann TLM 102 (which I like better than either the 103 or 414) and use the money you save for room treatment. And, eventually, a better preamp, at least at the Real Nice Preamp level. i like this advice. *my recording environment is a low ceiling cinder block on two sides basement with hanging airducts and lead water pipes. *tips? Go to a public library and check out one of F. Alton Everest's books on the design of small studios. Don't go for the Master Handbook of Acoustics; it's too big a mouthful to start with. Instead, get one of the smaller introductory ones. If your library doesn't have his books, they can get them via interlibrary loan. Peace, Paul |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "PStamler" wrote in message ... On Sep 17, 7:29 am, "mcnewsxp" wrote: "PStamler" wrote in message ... On Sep 16, 2:08 pm, (Don Pearce) wrote: For most home situations I would say forget the mic. Whatever you are using right now are either good or can be corrected once recorded. Spend your money on acoustic treatment for the room. The rewards will be tenfold greater. I partly agree with Don. Budget for a TLM 103 or a 414. Then go buy a Neumann TLM 102 (which I like better than either the 103 or 414) and use the money you save for room treatment. And, eventually, a better preamp, at least at the Real Nice Preamp level. i like this advice. my recording environment is a low ceiling cinder block on two sides basement with hanging airducts and lead water pipes. tips? Go to a public library and check out one of F. Alton Everest's books on the design of small studios. Don't go for the Master Handbook of Acoustics; it's too big a mouthful to start with. Instead, get one of the smaller introductory ones. If your library doesn't have his books, they can get them via interlibrary loan. this? http://www.amazon.com/Sound-Studio-C...4817609&sr=8-2 |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ty Ford wrote:
If you like the NT1-a you may also like the Marshall MCA SP-1. You simply can't go wrong for $50. What Ty said. Leaves plenty money for an RNP. Make all your mics sound better. -- shut up and play your guitar * http://hankalrich.com/ http://armadillomusicproductions.com/who'slistening.html http://www.sonicbids.com/HankandShai...withDougHarman |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Neuman U-67's | Pro Audio | |||
FS Neuman m149 $2600 | Pro Audio | |||
FS Neuman m149 $2600 | Pro Audio | |||
Neuman U67 power supply voltage selection | Pro Audio |